Inspection Reports for
Belmont Village Senior Living Aliso Viejo

The facility was found to be clean, safe, and sanitary with no deficiencies noted during the visit. All areas including physical plant, food service, medication administration, resident rooms, and safety equipment were inspected and found compliant.

Two allegations were investigated: 1) Staff are not trained properly on how to deal with dementia residents, which was found to be unfounded. 2) Staff are not ensuring residents take medication, which was found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found the allegation that staff were not properly trained to deal with dementia residents to be unfounded, as training records showed appropriate dementia training. The allegation that staff were not ensuring residents took medication was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence, with medication administration records and staff interviews supporting proper medication administration.

Two allegations were investigated: 1) Staff are not trained properly on how to deal with dementia residents, which was found to be unfounded. 2) Staff are not ensuring residents take medication, which was found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found the allegation that staff were not properly trained to deal with dementia residents to be unfounded, as training records showed appropriate dementia training and the staff involved was terminated. The allegation that staff were not ensuring residents took medication was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence, with medication administration records reviewed and staff and residents interviewed confirming proper medication administration.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated, meaning there was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The investigation found that the resident shared a room with their wife and had donated their queen bed to charity without informing the facility. The resident later obtained a bed from the facility. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated, meaning there was not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The investigation revealed that Resident 1 was seen by home health for dermatitis and was discharged from home health on 01/24/2024. The resident wears compression socks daily as directed and is independent and making own decisions. The resident shared a room with their wife and initially shared a queen bed, which was later donated to charity without informing the facility. The resident refused to use another bed until recently obtaining one from the facility. Based on record review and interviews, the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies cited. The kitchen, resident rooms, medication administration, staff files, and safety equipment were all observed to be in good order with no discrepancies.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies cited. The environment was clean and organized, resident rooms and bathrooms were properly furnished and operational, emergency systems were functional, and staff files and medication records showed no discrepancies.

The complaint alleged staff failed to provide care and supervision which resulted in a resident sustaining injuries during elopement. The allegation was found unsubstantiated after review of records, interviews, and evidence including surveillance video and medical reports.

The investigation found that although the resident sustained a traumatic fall resulting in death, the injuries were not due to neglect by facility staff. Evidence indicated the resident was likely unaware of the consequences of their actions and fell while attempting to leave the facility. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged staff failed to provide care and supervision resulting in resident injuries during elopement. The allegation was investigated and found unsubstantiated based on interviews and document review.

The investigation found that although the resident sustained a traumatic fall resulting in death, the injuries were not due to neglect by facility staff. Evidence indicated the resident likely fell while attempting to leave the facility and was unaware of the consequences of their actions. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

Two allegations were investigated: 1) Staff did not provide adequate food service, which was deemed unsubstantiated due to conflicting evidence; 2) Staff do not respond to resident's call assistance button in a timely manner, which was deemed unfounded based on interviews and observed response times.

The investigation found conflicting information regarding the food service allegation, with some residents corroborating and others denying it, resulting in the allegation being deemed unsubstantiated. The allegation regarding untimely response to call assistance buttons was found to be unfounded based on interviews and response time tests.

The complaint investigation involved two main allegations: 1) staff did not provide adequate food service, which was deemed unsubstantiated due to conflicting evidence; 2) staff did not respond to residents' call assistance buttons in a timely manner, which was deemed unfounded based on interviews and observed response times.

The investigation found conflicting information regarding the food service allegation, with some residents corroborating and others denying it, resulting in the allegation being deemed unsubstantiated. Regarding the call assistance allegation, most individuals denied the claim, and response times were observed to be within reasonable limits, leading to the allegation being deemed unfounded.

The visit reviewed the incident involving a resident who sustained rib fractures after a fall. Staff and physician communications were documented, and interviews with residents indicated no concerns about falls or staff responsiveness. The resident had not returned to the facility following urgent care.

The visit reviewed the incident involving a resident who sustained rib fractures after a fall. Staff and physician communications were confirmed, and residents reported no concerns about falls or staff responsiveness. The resident had not returned to the facility following urgent care.

Resident 1 fell and was initially assessed by facility LVN and hospice nurse. The resident was later diagnosed with a broken left hip after further assessment and mobile X-ray. During the visit, the resident was observed resting comfortably and pertinent documentation was reviewed.

Visit was triggered by an incident report regarding a resident fall; no substantiation status stated.

Resident 1 fell attempting to walk and was initially assessed by facility LVN and hospice nurse. The resident was later diagnosed with a broken left hip after further assessment and mobile X-ray. During the visit, the resident was observed resting comfortably and pertinent documentation was reviewed.

No deficiencies were noted during the visit. The facility completed an investigation of the incident, staff training records were reviewed and found current, and staff denied any abusive behavior towards residents.

The visit was triggered by a complaint (SOC 341) alleging inappropriate statements by Staff 1 to Resident 1. The facility investigated, found no injuries, and reinstated the staff member after training. Staff denied abuse and challenging behaviors were noted from the resident.

No deficiencies were noted during the visit. The facility conducted an investigation, temporarily removed the staff member from schedule, and initiated an eight-step training program for Dementia care. Staff interviewed denied any abuse or inappropriate behavior.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and well-maintained with no deficiencies noted. Residents appeared happy and well cared for, and all required safety and health measures were observed.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and well-maintained with no deficiencies noted. Residents appeared happy and well cared for, and the facility had appropriate emergency plans and COVID-19 mitigation measures in place.