Inspection Reports for Bickford of Portage

MI, 49024

Back to Facility Profile

Deficiencies per Year

8 6 4 2 0
2007
2016
2022
2023
2024
2025
Severe High Moderate Low Unclassified

Census Over Time

0 20 40 60 80 Jul '16 Sep '22 Jun '23 Aug '24 Apr '25
Census Capacity
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 1 Apr 23, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that Resident A's mental health was untreated at the facility.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident A exhibited aggressive and exit-seeking behaviors from admission on 03/10/2025, and the facility delayed communication with a licensed medical professional until 04/13/2025 for medical intervention. The facility failed to ensure Resident A's safety and protection by waiting an extended time to manage behaviors medically, establishing a violation.
Complaint Details
Complaint alleged Resident A's mental health was untreated. The complaint was substantiated based on findings that the facility delayed medical intervention and failed to manage Resident A's aggressive and exit-seeking behaviors appropriately.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Failure to ensure the safety and protection of Resident A by delaying communication with a medical provider for behavior management.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 71 Complaint receipt date: Apr 15, 2025 Investigation initiation date: Apr 15, 2025 Report due date: Jun 15, 2025 Medication quantity: 3 Safety checks frequency: 4
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Brandie McWethyAdministratorInterviewed regarding Resident A's care and behavior management
Kimberly HorstLicensing StaffAuthor of the Special Investigation Report
Andrea L. MooreManager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing SectionApproved the Special Investigation Report
Inspection Report Renewal Census: 21 Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 5 Apr 9, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Renewal Licensing Study to assess compliance with licensing rules and regulations for the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be in non-compliance with multiple rules including employee health screening, solid waste management, kitchen and dietary sanitation, food labeling, and safe storage of hazardous materials. Violations were established for each of these areas.
Deficiencies (5)
Description
Employee tuberculosis screening was completed the same day as occupational exposure instead of before exposure.
Garbage containers in common areas and spa rooms were not covered with tight-fitting lids, posing a risk of cross contamination.
Ice scoop was stored inside the ice machine with ice instead of in a separate sanitized container.
Multiple food items were found unlabeled without open dates in refrigerators and cabinets, making it unclear if they were safe for consumption.
Hazardous and toxic chemicals along with sharp items were stored unsecured in unlocked drawers and cabinets accessible to residents.
Report Facts
Number of staff interviewed and/or observed: 9 Number of residents interviewed and/or observed: 21 Capacity: 71 Date of on-site inspection: Apr 9, 2025
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 3 Dec 2, 2024
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to a complaint alleging that Resident A was violent towards staff and other residents and that the facility did not appropriately address these behaviors.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident A exhibited numerous aggressive and violent behaviors from September to November 2024, resulting in staff injury, resident injury, and self-injury. The facility had directives in the service plan to address these behaviors, but they were ineffective and lacked evidence of additional staff training or advanced directives. The facility also failed to update Resident A's service plan to reflect preventative measures for exit-seeking behaviors and did not document incidents in accordance with reporting guidelines.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident A was violent towards staff and other residents and that the facility did not appropriately address it. The allegation was substantiated. Another allegation that the facility did not have a working staff schedule was not substantiated.
Deficiencies (3)
Description
The facility did not maintain an organized program to provide protection, supervision, assistance, or supervised personal care for Resident A within the home.
Resident A’s service plan was not updated to reflect preventative measures to prevent exit-seeking behaviors.
Incidents pertaining to Resident A’s aggressive and violent behavior were documented but did not follow incident reporting guidelines and lacked outcomes, corrective actions, and evaluations.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 71 Safety checks per shift: 8 Complaint receipt date: Nov 19, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Brandie McWethyAdministratorInterviewed regarding Resident A's behaviors and facility practices
Krystyna BadoniAuthorized RepresentativeFacility representative named in the report
Julie VivianoLicensing StaffAuthor of the report and contact for corrective action plan
Employee AInterviewed regarding Resident A's combative behaviors and staff strategies
Employee BInterviewed with statements consistent with Administrator and Employee A
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 3 Dec 2, 2024
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to a complaint alleging that Resident A was observed with bruising on 10/30/2024.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident A incurred a fall on 10/17/2024 and later bruising was observed by hospice. Staff inconsistently used transfer methods, sometimes not using the prescribed Hoyer lift, potentially contributing to bruising. The facility failed to maintain an organized program to provide adequate protection and supervision, and Resident A's service plan was not updated to reflect current care needs. Incident reporting did not meet regulatory guidelines.
Complaint Details
Complaint received on 11/27/2024 alleging Resident A was observed with bruising on 10/30/2024. Violation was established based on investigation findings.
Deficiencies (3)
Description
Facility does not demonstrate an organized program to provide protection, supervision, assistance, and/or supervised personal care for Resident A to prevent falls and/or injury from falls.
Resident A’s service plan was not updated to reflect current provision of care or care levels.
Incident reporting pertaining to Resident A’s fall on 10/17/2024 did not follow incident reporting rule guidelines, lacking outcomes, corrective action taken, and evaluation.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 71 Complaint receipt date: Nov 27, 2024 Investigation initiation date: Dec 2, 2024 Report due date: Jan 27, 2025
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Brandie McWethyAdministratorInterviewed regarding Resident A's care and transfer methods
Julie VivianoLicensing StaffConducted investigation and authored report
Andrea L. MooreManager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing SectionApproved the investigation report
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 71 Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 1 Aug 21, 2024
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to a complaint received from Adult Protective Services alleging that caregivers provided care to residents positive for Covid-19 and also to residents without Covid-19, residents were not changed and showered, the facility had insufficient staff, and food was cold.
Findings
The investigation found no violation regarding caregivers providing care to both Covid-19 positive and negative residents, residents not being changed and showered, or food being cold. However, a violation was established for insufficient staffing, with multiple shifts not meeting required staffing levels, especially in assisted living and memory care units.
Complaint Details
Complaint received from Adult Protective Services on 08/19/2024 alleging Covid-19 outbreak management issues, inadequate resident care, insufficient staffing, and cold food. Investigation concluded violation established only for insufficient staffing; other allegations were not substantiated.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Facility has insufficient staff on multiple shifts, not meeting staffing guidelines.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 71 Staffing shortages: 12 Residents in assisted living: 40 Residents in memory care: 15
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Brandie McWethyAdministratorInterviewed regarding facility policies, staffing, and investigation findings
Kimberly HorstLicensing StaffAuthor of the Special Investigation Report
Inspection Report Renewal Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 0 Jun 17, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a renewal inspection to review licensing activity and compliance with public health code and administrative rules regulating home for the aged facilities.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable rules and statutes. Renewal of the license is recommended.
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 1 Jun 28, 2023
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to a complaint alleging that staff did not provide care in accordance with Resident A’s service plan.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility had a detailed service plan and plan of care for Resident A’s nephrostomy tube, which was signed by facility management and staff but not by Resident A or their authorized representative. Evidence showed that Resident A’s nephrostomy tube was found kinked and tubing underneath Resident A, violating the facility's plan of care. The facility communicated consistently with the authorized representative, physician, and home health company, and Resident A was discharged after exceeding the level of care the facility could provide.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility did not provide appropriate care for Resident A’s nephrostomy tube and that the home health company should have provided more visits. The complaint was substantiated with violation established.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Facility staff did not provide care in accordance with Resident A’s service plan, specifically related to nephrostomy tube care where tubing was found kinked and underneath Resident A.
Report Facts
Falls: 3 Capacity: 71
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Angela RaffertyAdministratorInterviewed regarding Resident A’s care and facility operations.
Julie VivianoLicensing StaffConducted the investigation and authored the report.
Inspection Report Renewal Census: 27 Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 2 Jun 1, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Renewal Licensing Study to evaluate compliance with licensing rules and to determine if the facility's license should be renewed.
Findings
The facility was found to be in non-compliance with rules related to kitchen and dietary practices, specifically the lack of labeling open dates on food items, and unsafe storage of hazardous and toxic materials accessible to residents in the memory care unit.
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Food items in refrigerators and cabinets were not labeled with appropriate open dates, making it unclear if they were safe for consumption.
Industrial chemicals and shampoos were stored in unlocked areas accessible to residents with impaired cognition, posing a risk of harm.
Report Facts
Number of residents interviewed and/or observed: 27 Number of staff interviewed and/or observed: 16 Facility capacity: 71
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 49 Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 0 Sep 16, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging the facility had insufficient staff, specifically that on 9/2 and 9/9 there was only one staff member for the first shift.
Findings
Interviews with staff and review of schedules revealed staffing levels were below desired levels, with frequent use of agency staff and insufficient caregivers on shifts. Call light response times averaged 12 minutes. Despite these findings, the violation was not established.
Complaint Details
Complaint received from Adult Protective Services on 09/13/2022 alleging insufficient staffing. Investigation included interviews with staff and administrator, schedule reviews, and call light response time analysis. Violation was not established.
Report Facts
Residents in assisted living: 35 Residents in memory care: 14 Capacity: 71 Average call light response time (minutes): 12 Percentage of shifts covered by agency staff: 75 Caregivers on 9/2 third shift: 3 Caregivers on 9/9 first shift: 3 Caregiver working until 8:30am on 9/9 first shift: 1 Caregivers on 9/9 third shift: 3
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kara TolliverFacility NurseInterviewed regarding staffing and resident care
Rick GarlickAdministratorNamed as facility administrator
Jeremiah JohnsonAuthorized RepresentativeNamed as authorized representative and participated in exit conference
Kim DavisInterim AdministratorInterviewed regarding staffing levels and use of agency staff
Inspection Report Original Licensing Census: 55 Capacity: 71 Deficiencies: 0 Jul 29, 2016
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to review and approve the addition of a 16-bed memory care unit attached to the existing facility and to update the facility's licensed bed capacity from 55 to 71.
Findings
The memory care unit was found to meet all safety and program requirements, including fire safety certification, occupancy approval, and compliance with Alzheimer's program standards. The unit includes secure access, emergency call systems, and life skills programming tailored to residents.
Report Facts
Licensed bed capacity: 71 Resident capacity before addition: 55 Memory care unit beds: 16
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Michele StreeterLicensing StaffConducted inspection and authored report
Betsy MontgomeryArea ManagerApproved the licensing study addendum
Janna RitterAdministratorFacility administrator named in report
Inspection Report Original Licensing Capacity: 55 Deficiencies: 0 Mar 2, 2007
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as an original licensing study to determine compliance with applicable licensing statutes and administrative rules for Portage Bickford Cottage.
Findings
The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with licensing requirements, with no rule or statutory violations noted. The report recommends issuance of a six-month temporary license with a maximum capacity of 55 residents.
Report Facts
Capacity: 55 Resident beds: 48 Resident beds: 7
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Patricia J. SjoLicensing StaffAuthor of the licensing study report and recommendation
Betsy MontgomeryArea ManagerApproved the licensing study report
Ismael VerduzcoAdministratorAdministrator of the facility
Judy SwartzellAuthorized RepresentativeApplicant and authorized representative for the facility

Loading inspection reports...