Inspection Reports for Bickford of West Lansing
6429 Earlington Ln, Lansing, MI 48917, United States, MI, 48917
Back to Facility Profile
Inspection Report
Renewal
Census: 10
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 11
Apr 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Renewal Licensing Study to assess compliance with licensing requirements and to identify any violations that require corrective action.
Findings
The facility was found to be in non-compliance with multiple rules including lack of detailed medication administration plans, missing admission agreements, failure to conduct required tuberculosis screenings for residents and employees, incomplete staff training, medication administration documentation errors, inadequate ventilation in certain rooms, improper food labeling and disposal, and unsafe storage of hazardous materials. Many violations were repeat findings from previous inspections.
Deficiencies (11)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident B's service plan lacked detailed information on medication administration criteria for Lorazepam. |
| Facility did not have an admission agreement on file for Resident A. |
| Residents A, F, and G did not have tuberculosis screening within 12 months prior to admission. |
| Staff person 1 was not properly screened for tuberculosis within 10 days of hire; annual TB risk assessment not completed. |
| Care staff did not document application of skin prep wipes and dressing for Resident E and Resident B on specified dates. |
| Employees SP2, SP3, and SP4 did not complete required staff training. |
| Medication administration log for Resident B did not have staff initials for Risperidone doses on 03/04/2025 and 03/07/2025. |
| No continuous exhaust ventilation in beauty salon, soiled linen room, and janitor closets. |
| Common area refrigerators contained items not labeled with open and use-by dates. |
| Food items served and not eaten were not destroyed in memory care unit and common area refrigerators. |
| Laundry room unlocked allowing access to janitor closet and furnace room with hazardous and toxic materials accessible to cognitively impaired residents. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Residents interviewed/observed: 10
Staff interviewed/observed: 5
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Amy Price | Administrator | Named as facility administrator |
| Krystyna Badoni | Authorized Representative | Named as authorized representative of the licensee |
| Staff person 1 | Not properly screened for tuberculosis within 10 days of hire | |
| SP2 | Did not complete required staff training | |
| SP3 | Did not complete required staff training | |
| SP4 | Did not complete required staff training |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 6
Jul 17, 2024
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to complaints alleging that Resident A did not receive her prescribed medications, specifically Keppra and Vimpat.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident A missed multiple doses of prescribed medications due to failures in medication ordering, administration, and documentation by facility staff. The facility also failed to ensure medication competency for self-administration and did not have proper medication orders at admission.
Complaint Details
Complaint investigation initiated after allegations that Resident A did not receive her medications. The complaint was substantiated with violations established related to medication administration and facility procedures.
Deficiencies (6)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident A did not receive medications as prescribed by the licensed health care professional. |
| Facility failed to ensure the safety and protection of Resident A by allowing self-administration of medications without verifying competency. |
| Facility did not have appropriate medication orders at the time of Resident A's admission. |
| Facility was not following Resident A's service plan by allowing her to administer her own medications. |
| Staff did not document administration of medications as required on the medication administration record (MAR). |
| Facility failed to contact the appropriate licensed health care professional when prescribed medications were not administered. |
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 72
Complaint receipt date: Jul 12, 2024
Investigation initiation date: Jul 17, 2024
Medication missed doses: 3
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Reported details about Resident A's medication administration and admission |
| Jennifer Frey | Nurse Practitioner | Conducted initial evaluation and medication review for Resident A |
| Naomi Wells | Case Manager | Reported on Resident A's condition and medication issues |
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Author of the Special Investigation Report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 1
Jul 17, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was initiated due to a complaint received from Adult Protective Services alleging that Resident B left the facility unattended.
Findings
The investigation confirmed that Resident B left the facility unattended on 07/13/2024, contrary to the resident's service plan which stated Resident B was not to be left unattended outside the community. The facility failed to ensure Resident B's protection by not following the service plan.
Complaint Details
Complaint received from Adult Protective Services alleging Resident B left the facility unattended. APS denied the allegations but the investigation established the violation.
Deficiencies (1)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident B left the facility unattended, violating the service plan requirement for supervision. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Named in identifying information |
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Conducted investigation and authored report |
| Andrea L. Moore | Manager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing Section | Approved the report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 3
Apr 24, 2024
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to a complaint alleging neglect of Resident A's basic care needs, including failure to change bed linens and provide showers, as well as concerns about understaffing and food quality.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility did not neglect Resident A's basic care needs or food quality but did establish violations for Resident A not receiving showers as scheduled, understaffing impacting resident care, and failure to update service plans for residents adequately.
Complaint Details
Complaint received from Adult Protective Services alleging neglect of Resident A's basic care needs, including unclean bed linens and lack of showers. APS denied opening the investigation. The complaint also included allegations of understaffing and poor food quality.
Deficiencies (3)
| Description |
|---|
| Facility could not demonstrate that Resident A was offered a shower at least once a week as required. |
| Facility does not have adequate staff to meet resident needs, evidenced by long call light response times and staffing below facility guidelines. |
| Resident service plans were not updated to adequately include current resident care needs. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Complaint Receipt Date: Mar 19, 2024
Investigation Initiation Date: Apr 24, 2024
Call light response time (Resident B): 31
Call light response time (Resident C): 34
Staffing below guidelines: 6
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Krystyna Badoni | Administrator | Named as administrator and authorized representative |
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding Resident A's care and staffing |
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Author of the report |
| Andrea L. Moore | Manager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing Section | Approved the report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 3
Apr 1, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging violations including Resident B's privacy being violated, Resident A not receiving nightly checks, incorrect medications administered to Resident A, Resident A not receiving showers, and Resident A's sheets not being changed.
Findings
The investigation established violations for Resident B's privacy being violated, Resident A not receiving nightly checks, and incorrect documentation of medication administration after Resident A's discharge. The allegation of incorrect medications administered to Resident A was not substantiated, nor were allegations regarding Resident A not receiving showers or sheets not being changed.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged Resident B’s privacy was violated, Resident A did not receive nightly checks, Resident A received incorrect medications, Resident A did not receive showers, and Resident A’s sheets were not changed. Violations were substantiated for privacy violation, lack of nightly checks, and incorrect medication documentation. The medication error allegation was not substantiated, nor were the shower and sheet allegations.
Deficiencies (3)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident B’s privacy was violated when staff showed Resident B’s medication administration record to a relative. |
| Resident A did not receive nightly checks as required by the service plan. |
| Staff incorrectly documented that medications were administered to Resident A after discharge. |
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 72
Complaint receipt date: Mar 26, 2024
Investigation initiation date: Mar 27, 2024
Inspection visit date: Apr 1, 2024
Report due date: May 25, 2024
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding Resident A's care and facility policies |
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Author of the inspection report |
| SP4 | Staff member who administered incorrect medication and violated privacy by showing Resident B’s chart | |
| SP1 | Staff interviewed regarding Resident A’s care and medication administration | |
| SP2 | Staff interviewed regarding Resident A’s nightly checks | |
| SP3 | Staff interviewed regarding Resident A’s nightly checks | |
| SP5 | Staff interviewed regarding Resident A’s laundry and family interactions | |
| SP6 | Staff interviewed regarding administration of pain medication to Resident A |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 1
Feb 21, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging money was stolen from Resident A, increased wait times for assistance, and failure to provide showers to Resident A.
Findings
The investigation found no violation regarding the stolen money allegation and the shower allegation, but established a violation for increased wait times for assistance, with an average call light response time of 21 minutes, exceeding the facility expectation of five minutes.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged money was stolen from Resident A, Resident A had increased wait times for assistance, and Resident A did not receive showers. The money stolen allegation was not substantiated. The increased wait times allegation was substantiated. The shower allegation was not substantiated.
Deficiencies (1)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident A experienced increased wait times for assistance, with an average call light response time of 21 minutes. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Average call light response time (minutes): 21
Number of showers received: 8
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding Resident A's missing money and care concerns |
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Author of the Special Investigation Report |
| Andrea L. Moore | Manager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing Section | Approved the Special Investigation Report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 2
Dec 8, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was initiated due to a complaint alleging that Resident C was not provided timely medical attention for a urinary tract infection and did not receive required laboratory testing.
Findings
The investigation established a violation that Resident C was not provided timely medical attention and that prescribed medication was not administered as documented. The allegation that Resident C did not receive required INR laboratory testing was not established due to lack of evidence. Additional findings included failure to document medication administration for Resident C's prescribed antibiotic.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged Resident C experienced delays in receiving a urinalysis test and antibiotic treatment for a urinary tract infection. The complaint also alleged Resident C did not receive required INR laboratory testing while at the facility.
Deficiencies (2)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident C was not provided timely medical attention for a urinary tract infection. |
| Resident C's prescribed Keflex antibiotic was not administered as documented in the medication administration record. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Complaint Receipt Date: Dec 6, 2023
Investigation Initiation Date: Dec 8, 2023
Medication administration record review period: 3
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding communication delays and facility management of Resident C's clinical needs |
| Kim Davis | Licensee Corporate Health and Wellness Director | Responsible for clinical issues; interviewed regarding Resident C's medication and clinical management |
| Greg Morrison | Nurse Practitioner | Interviewed regarding prescription and laboratory orders for Resident C |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 2
Nov 13, 2023
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to a complaint alleging that Resident A's bathroom was flooded resulting in mold.
Findings
The investigation confirmed the bathroom flooding occurred and was properly addressed with cleaning, drywall replacement, repainting, and mold assessment which found no mold. However, a detectable cat urine odor and scattered litter were observed in Resident A's room, indicating the room was not clean and in good repair. Additionally, Resident A's service plan inaccurately reflected independence in pet care, as staff assistance was provided.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident A's bathroom was flooded resulting in mold. The violation was established as the flooding occurred and the room was not maintained clean and in good repair due to cat urine odor and litter issues. The service plan was also found inaccurate regarding pet care independence.
Deficiencies (2)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident A's room was not kept clean due to detectable cat urine odor and scattered litter. |
| Resident A's service plan did not accurately reflect the resident's current level of function regarding pet care assistance. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Complaint Receipt Date: Oct 18, 2023
Investigation Initiation Date: Oct 23, 2023
Report Date: Nov 13, 2023
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding flooding and restoration of Resident A's room |
| Julie Viviano | Licensing Staff | Conducted investigation and authored report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 1
Nov 13, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that the boiler was not working and there was no hot water in the facility.
Findings
The investigation confirmed that the boiler did not maintain appropriate hot water temperatures, affecting resident showers, laundry, and kitchen sanitization. Multiple repairs were made, but the boiler requires replacement, especially with the upcoming winter season.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the boiler was not working and there was no hot water in the home. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews, on-site investigation, and review of maintenance records.
Deficiencies (1)
| Description |
|---|
| The boiler does not supply an adequate amount of hot water at all times to meet the needs of residents and service areas. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Service dates: 5
Hot water temperature range: 100.0 to 119.1
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding boiler issues and ongoing repairs |
| Julie Viviano | Licensing Staff | Author of the Special Investigation Report |
Inspection Report
Renewal
Census: 10
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 14
Nov 3, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Renewal Licensing Study to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements and to determine if the facility meets standards for license renewal.
Findings
The facility was found to be in substantial compliance overall but had multiple deficiencies including lack of detailed medication administration plans, invalid admission agreements, missing tuberculosis screenings and risk assessments, inadequate employee health screenings, ventilation and maintenance issues, unsafe storage of hazardous materials, lack of written disaster plans, and improper food handling and storage practices.
Deficiencies (14)
| Description |
|---|
| Resident medication administration records and service plans lacked detailed information on behaviors requiring medication and use of nonpharmaceutical interventions. |
| Resident D had bedside assistive devices without physician orders or proper service plan documentation; facility was unaware of bedrails. |
| Admission agreements for several residents were either unsigned or signed by inactive durable power of attorney, rendering them invalid. |
| Facility did not have tuberculosis tests within 12 months of admission for some residents and did not complete annual TB risk assessment. |
| Employee records lacked tuberculosis screening within 10 days of hire and before occupational exposure; annual TB risk assessment not completed. |
| Facility administrator or designees did not ensure employee competencies with staff training program. |
| No continuous air flow in bathroom, spa room, and janitor closet on west side of building. |
| Missing ceiling tiles in various laundry rooms and bathrooms. |
| Hot water temperature at plumbing fixtures used by residents was only 88 degrees, below required 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. |
| Dishwasher sanitized with heat cycle but facility had no record of testing heat sanitation. |
| Leftover food in refrigerators including ice cream, tea, and sandwiches was not discarded as required. |
| Bathroom on main level was used as storage for wheelchairs, walkers, and medical equipment, violating use restrictions. |
| Janitor closet in memory care was unlocked with accessible dirty rags posing risk to cognitively impaired residents. |
| No written disaster plans for emergencies such as fire, explosion, loss of heat, power, or water. |
Report Facts
Number of residents interviewed/observed: 10
Number of staff interviewed/observed: 10
Facility capacity: 72
Water temperature: 88
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 1
Oct 9, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging the facility failed to provide Resident A with medications after a hospital stay due to a pharmacy computer issue.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident A did not receive medications for several days due to a pharmacy system issue, but the family assisted with medication administration. The facility failed to complete the medication log for some medications, resulting in a violation being established.
Complaint Details
Complaint alleged the facility failed to provide Resident A with medications due to a pharmacy computer issue causing medications to remain in discontinued status after hospital discharge. The complaint was not substantiated for failure to provide medications but substantiated for failure to complete medication logs.
Deficiencies (1)
| Description |
|---|
| Facility failed to complete the medication log for Resident A's medications on 09/27. |
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Complaint Receipt Date: Oct 5, 2023
Investigation Initiation Date: Oct 9, 2023
Report Due Date: Dec 4, 2023
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Fallon Williams | Administrator | Interviewed regarding medication administration and pharmacy issues |
| Deanna Turner | Regional Nurse | Interviewed regarding pharmacy policy and medication administration |
| Denay Barber | Pharmacy Worker | Interviewed regarding pharmacy notification and medication order status |
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Author of the Special Investigation Report |
| Andrea L. Moore | Manager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing Section | Approved the Special Investigation Report |
Inspection Report
Renewal
Deficiencies: 0
Nov 14, 2022
Visit Reason
The document serves as a renewal notification for the Home for the Aged license of Bickford of W Lansing, confirming substantial compliance with public health code and administrative rules over the past year.
Findings
An administrative review revealed substantial compliance with applicable regulations, resulting in the renewal of the facility's license for 12 months effective 12/09/22.
Report Facts
License duration: 12
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kimberly Horst | Licensing Staff | Author of the renewal notification letter |
Inspection Report
Original Licensing
Capacity: 72
Deficiencies: 0
May 24, 2017
Visit Reason
The visit was conducted as an original licensing study to determine compliance with applicable licensing statutes and administrative rules for Bickford of W Lansing.
Findings
The study determined substantial compliance with licensing statutes and administrative rules, resulting in the recommendation to issue a temporary license with a maximum capacity of 72 residents.
Report Facts
Capacity: 72
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Aaron L. Clum | Licensing Staff | Author of the licensing study report and recommendation |
| Russell B. Misiak | Area Manager | Approved the licensing recommendation |
| Mitch Backs | Administrator | Administrator of the facility |
Loading inspection reports...



