Most inspections found no deficiencies, and several complaint investigations were unsubstantiated, indicating that many concerns raised were not confirmed. However, some reports did identify deficiencies primarily related to resident rights, reporting requirements, and supervision. Notably, in February 2025, the facility was cited for falsifying a resident’s Physician Report and unlawfully retaining a resident in Memory Care, which posed an immediate risk to health and safety. The most recent report from October 14, 2025, was clean with no deficiencies found. While the facility has addressed some issues over time, such as correcting a prior deficiency by September 11, 2025, there is no clear pattern of consistent improvement or decline.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted to investigate allegations that staff stole money from a resident and were going through residents' personal belongings without consent.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegation of staff stealing $70 from a resident was unfounded as the resident later found the money misplaced. The allegation of staff going through residents' personal belongings without consent was also unsubstantiated based on interviews and record review. Therefore, all allegations were deemed unfounded.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that staff stole money from a resident and went through residents' personal belongings without consent. The allegations were investigated through interviews with residents and staff and record review. The findings were that the allegations were unfounded and could not be corroborated.
Report Facts
Amount of money allegedly stolen: 70Number of residents present: 121Facility capacity: 140Number of staff interviewed: 5Number of residents interviewed: 2
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Fred Arias
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit and interviews
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Facility administrator named in the report
Alisa Ortiz
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation
This unannounced Case Management – Deficiencies inspection was conducted to issue citations for deficiencies observed during the investigation into Complaint Control No. 22-AS-20250924155802.
Findings
The licensee failed to report Resident #1's hospitalization on September 5, 2025, to the licensing agency as required, posing a potential safety risk to persons in care. Civil penalties for repeat violations are being assessed.
Complaint Details
Investigation was triggered by Complaint Control No. 22-AS-20250924155802. The deficiency related to failure to report Resident #1's hospitalization was substantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to submit a written report to the licensing agency within seven days of Resident #1's hospitalization on September 5, 2025.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 124Plan of Correction Due Date: Oct 21, 2025
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Sean Haddad
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection and issued the report
Brisseth Arrellano
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and admitted to the failure to report hospitalization
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted to investigate the allegation that the facility did not maintain a clean and sanitary environment.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence to support the allegation. Inspections, interviews, and medical record reviews revealed no bad odors or gastrointestinal issues related to Resident #1, and no residents were bothered by odors or became ill. The allegation was found to be unfounded.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident #1 had gastrointestinal issues causing odor that affected other residents. The investigation included facility inspection, interviews with administrator, residents, and staff, and review of Resident #1's medical records. No corroborating evidence was found and the complaint was determined to be unfounded.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted due to an allegation that staff did not adequately supervise a resident resulting in the resident's injury.
Findings
The investigation found that 12 out of 12 resident interviews and 2 out of 2 staff interviews did not corroborate the allegation. Documentation showed the resident had a history of falls and sustained a bruise but no injury from the fall. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged inadequate supervision of a resident resulting in injury. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on interviews, document review, and observations.
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 123
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Celine Rodriguez
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and unannounced visit
Brisseth Arrellano
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation and exit interview
Pamela Bradley
Administrator
Named as facility administrator
Sheila Santos
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation
The visit was an unannounced follow-up inspection to verify correction of a Type B deficiency issued during the Annual Inspection on August 28, 2025.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with the terms of the Plan of Correction for the cited Type B deficiency 87303(a) after inspection of the apartment unit of Resident #1 with the Maintenance Supervisor. A Letter of Deficiency Citations Cleared was provided at the end of the visit.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Type B deficiency 87303(a) previously cited during the Annual Inspection
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 123
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jessica Cho
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced follow-up visit
Patty Jimenez
Business Office Manager
Met with the Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and exit interview
Francisco Sarabia
Maintenance Supervisor
Participated in the inspection of Resident #1's apartment unit
The inspection was an unannounced Required 1-Year annual evaluation using the Care Inspection Tool to assess compliance with licensing requirements.
Findings
The facility was generally clean, sanitary, and in good repair except for one unit where mold was observed on a ceiling panel caused by a water pipe drip. The ceiling panel was removed and replaced during the visit. All other areas including bedrooms, bathrooms, common areas, and safety equipment were found to be in compliance.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
One out of twelve units inspected had mold on a ceiling panel caused by a water pipe drip, posing a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 124Deficiencies cited: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: Sep 5, 2025
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jessica Cho
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection and signed the report
Brisseth Arrellano
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and involved in exit interview
Patricia Jimenez
Business Office Manager
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and involved in exit interview
This unannounced inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint alleging that the facility's air conditioning units were in disrepair, resulting in poor performance, outages, and uncomfortable temperatures.
Findings
The investigation found no health or safety issues related to the air conditioning system. Interviews with residents and staff, inspection of temperatures in resident rooms, and review of maintenance records showed that the facility has been diligently working to diagnose and fix the air conditioning issues, and residents were not impacted by uncomfortable temperatures. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility’s AC system was not properly maintained causing poor performance and uncomfortable temperatures. The investigation was unsubstantiated as no evidence confirmed the allegation.
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 11Rooms temperature checked: 12
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Sean Haddad
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Armando J Lucero
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Francisco Sarabia
Maintenance Supervisor
Interviewed regarding the air conditioning system maintenance and issues
This unannounced inspection was conducted to investigate complaints alleging that a resident sustained a head injury and multiple falls due to lack of supervision.
Findings
The investigation found that while the resident had multiple falls, none resulted in serious injury or hospitalization. The facility had updated the resident's care plan and conducted staff training to address fall risks. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations, and the complaint was deemed unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that a resident sustained a head injury and multiple falls due to lack of supervision. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and review of medical and care records. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 140Resident census: 112Number of residents interviewed: 12Number of care staff interviewed: 2
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Sean Haddad
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Interviewed during investigation regarding resident care and falls
This unannounced Case Management – Deficiencies inspection was conducted to issue citations for deficiencies observed during the investigation into Complaint Control No. 22-AS-20250205085503.
Findings
The inspection found that Resident #1 had multiple unwitnessed falls in early February 2025, including one on February 1 that was not reported to licensing as required, posing a potential safety risk. Deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.
Complaint Details
Investigation was triggered by Complaint Control No. 22-AS-20250205085503. The deficiency related to failure to report Resident #1's fall on February 1, 2025, was substantiated based on documents and admission by the administrator.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to submit a written report to the licensing agency within seven days of a serious injury occurrence, specifically the failure to report Resident #1's fall on February 1, 2025.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 115Deficiency count: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: Mar 17, 2025
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and admitted failure to report fall
Sean Haddad
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection and issued citations
Armando J Lucero
Licensing Program Manager
Supervisor and Licensing Program Manager overseeing the inspection
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations that facility staff falsified a resident's Physician Report and that a resident was unlawfully retained in Memory Care.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations that the facility staff falsified the resident's Physician Report and unlawfully retained the resident in Memory Care. Documentation and interviews revealed conflicting Physician Reports and lack of communication with the resident's authorized representative prior to placement in Memory Care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. The allegations included falsification of the resident's Physician Report and unlawful retention of the resident in Memory Care. The preponderance of evidence standard was met based on interviews and document reviews.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1Type B: 1
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
False Claims. No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. The Physician report dated 02/11/24 was not filled out by Scan's Nurse Practitioner as Nurse Practitioner was not working on 02/11/24. This poses an immediate risk to resident’s health and safety.
Type A
Personal Rights. Residents in residential care facilities for the elderly shall have personal rights including communication with their authorized representative. The facility did not communicate with R1's Authorized Representative prior to placing R1 in Memory Care, despite Physician report dated 02/12/24 indicating R1 does not have a diagnosis of Dementia and is able to leave the facility unassisted.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 104Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 14, 2025Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 20, 2025
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Alvaro Ramirez Jr.
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Facility Administrator met during the investigation and named in findings
Sheila Santos
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted to follow up on an allegation that staff do not ensure the facility is free from mold.
Findings
The investigation included tours of the facility, resident interviews, and review of physical plant areas. Evidence showed a past water damage incident with adequate containment and no current mold presence. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff do not ensure the facility is free from mold. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated after investigation including tours, interviews, and review of the facility.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations received on April 17, 2024, regarding the facility's failure to provide requested records to an authorized representative, failure to allow resident participation in care planning, and failure to allow the resident to choose a healthcare provider.
Findings
The investigation substantiated all allegations, finding that the facility did not provide requested records for March 2024 to the authorized representative, did not arrange a meeting with the resident and authorized representative for care planning, and did not allow the resident to choose their healthcare provider. These deficiencies pose potential risks to persons in care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Allegations included failure to provide requested records to the authorized representative, failure to allow resident participation in care planning, and failure to allow resident to choose healthcare provider. Evidence included document reviews and interviews confirming these issues.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 3
Deficiencies (3)
Description
Severity
Facility did not provide Resident 1's records for March 2024 to the authorized representative, violating confidentiality requirements.
Type B
Facility failed to arrange a meeting with Resident 1 and their authorized representative prior to placing Resident 1 in Memory Care, violating resident participation in decision-making requirements.
Type B
Facility did not allow Resident 1 to fully participate in planning their care, including attending meetings or communications regarding care and services, as evidenced by a telemedicine visit with a provider not chosen by the resident.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 94Deficiency count: 3Plan of Correction Due Date: Nov 29, 2024
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Alvaro Ramirez Jr.
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Facility administrator met during the investigation and exit interview
This unannounced inspection was conducted as a Required – 1 Year Inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations.
Findings
The inspection included a facility tour, review of infection control, resident and staff file reviews, and medication inspections. One deficiency was cited related to water temperature taps exceeding safe limits in memory care rooms, posing an immediate safety risk. The licensee adjusted the temperature during the inspection and submitted a plan of correction.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Faucets in rooms 103, 104, 115, and 243 tested at temperatures above 125 degrees F, posing an immediate safety risk to residents in memory care.
Type A
Report Facts
Water temperature readings: 126Water temperature readings: 133Water temperature readings: 124Water temperature readings: 129Resident rooms total: 115Resident bedrooms inspected: 12Resident files reviewed: 6Staff files reviewed: 6Residents interviewed: 6Staff interviewed: 6Medications inspected: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analysts during inspection and discussed inspection purpose
The visit was a case management inspection conducted to discuss an amended report related to a complaint control #22-AS-20240226102932 dated 2024-06-21.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst called the facility administrator to discuss the amended complaint report and conducted an exit interview by telephone. The administrator agreed to print, sign, and email the amended report and case management report back to the analyst.
Complaint Details
The visit was related to complaint control #22-AS-20240226102932 dated 2024-06-21. The report discussed was an amended complaint report.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jeri Miles
Administrator
Facility administrator involved in discussion and exit interview regarding amended complaint report.
Rosie Quiroz
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted telephone discussion and exit interview with facility administrator.
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to complaints received on 2024-02-26 regarding inadequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away, failure to notify the resident's authorized representative of a placement change, inappropriate placement of a resident in a locked unit, and untimely reappraisal following a change in resident's condition.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident wandering away, failed to notify the authorized representative of a change in placement, and inappropriately placed a resident in a locked unit without proper notice. The allegation regarding untimely reappraisal following a change in condition was unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations of inadequate supervision leading to a resident wandering away, failure to notify the authorized representative of placement changes, and inappropriate placement in a locked unit. The allegation of untimely reappraisal was unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Facility did not provide the resident and responsible party with a 30 day notice and did not communicate with the authorized representative prior to placing the resident in delayed egress memory care unit, substituting supervision needed to meet resident's needs.
Type B
Facility failed to provide safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations and care and supervision as required, posing potential risk to residents in care.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 89Staffing: 2Staffing: 2Plan of Correction Due Date: Jun 25, 2024
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jeri Miles
Executive Director
Met during investigation and named in findings related to deficiencies and plan of correction
Brisseth Rivera
Health and Wellness Director
Met during investigation and named in findings related to deficiencies and plan of correction
The visit was conducted as a subsequent investigation related to a complaint (Complaint Control #22-AS-20240226102932) regarding the facility's compliance with resident rights.
Findings
The facility failed to provide the required 30-day written notice to Resident 1 and their responsible party prior to moving the resident from Assisted Living to the Memory Care unit, posing a potential risk to residents in care.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint investigation (Complaint Control #22-AS-20240226102932). The deficiency was substantiated as the facility did not provide the required written notice to Resident 1's responsible party within 30 days of the room change.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to provide 30-day written notice to Resident 1 and their responsible party prior to moving from Assisted Living to Memory Care unit.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 89Plan of Correction Due Date: Jun 25, 2024
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation initiated due to an allegation that the facility was not adhering to a resident's admission agreement.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility did not adhere to the resident's admission agreement by failing to issue a prorated refund upon the resident's move-out, which was substantiated based on interviews and document reviews.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. The allegation was that the facility was not adhering to the resident's admission agreement, specifically failing to issue a prorated refund after the resident moved out following hospitalization.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Facility did not comply with the admission agreement regarding refunds, posing a potential Personal Rights risk to persons in care.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 92Deficiency Type B: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: Apr 30, 2024
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jessica Cho
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Jeri Miles
Executive Director
Facility representative interviewed during investigation and named in findings
An unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a complaint alleging that the facility did not provide requested records to an authorized representative.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility did not provide records initially because the requestor was not an authorized representative until a change of POA was received. Records were subsequently provided, and the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged the facility did not provide requested records to an authorized representative. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation.
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 89
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Ruth Martinez
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Jeri Miles
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation
The visit was an unannounced Case Management inspection conducted in connection to a complaint identified by Complaint Control Number 22-AS-20230919083629.
Findings
During the visit, the Licensing Program Analyst interviewed a resident and obtained records related to the complaint. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director, and a copy of the report was provided.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint with Control Number 22-AS-20230919083629. No substantiation status is provided in the report.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jeri Miles
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and exit interview.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted to follow up on allegations including inappropriate pushing of a resident, unexplained injuries, inappropriate staff speech, and multiple falls among residents.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and witnesses, and a review of documentation. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence to prove the violations occurred.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that a resident was inappropriately pushed, residents sustained unexplained injuries, staff spoke inappropriately to a resident, and residents sustained multiple falls. The investigation concluded these allegations were unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 140Census: 96
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Rosie Quiroz
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Patricia Jimenez
Business Office Manager
Met with investigator during inspection and exit interview
Robert Jakini
Administrator
Facility administrator named in report header
Alisa Ortiz
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation that the facility failed to provide a refund.
Findings
The investigation revealed that the facility required payment of monthly rent despite the resident not admitting due to lack of a dementia diagnosis. The facility's admission agreement requires a thirty-day notice for a refund. The allegation was determined to be unfounded.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged the facility failed to provide a refund. The allegation was found to be unfounded, meaning it was false, could not have happened, or was without a reasonable basis.
This unannounced inspection was conducted for the purpose of an Annual Inspection to evaluate compliance with regulations.
Findings
The inspection found no health and safety issues; the facility was clean, organized, and compliant with COVID-19 protocols. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.
Report Facts
Staff present: 30Residents in memory care unit: 18Perishable food supply: 2Non-perishable food supply: 7
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Michael Sokolowski
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
The inspection visit was conducted as part of the investigation of complaint number 22-AS-20210623125429.
Findings
The licensing program analyst observed deficiencies related to the unsafe storage of centrally stored medicines, specifically an unlocked medication cart at the entrance to the dementia care unit, posing an immediate risk to resident health and safety.
Complaint Details
The visit was complaint-related, investigating complaint number 22-AS-20210623125429. The report does not explicitly state substantiation status.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Facility did not ensure that centrally stored medicines were kept safe, locked, and only accessible to persons responsible for the supervision of medications. The LPA observed medication cart unlocked at the entrance to dementia care unit.