Most inspections found no deficiencies, and several complaint investigations were unsubstantiated, indicating generally good compliance with regulations. The most recent report from May 1, 2025, had one minor deficiency related to staff not having up-to-date first aid and CPR certifications. Earlier reports showed some issues with staffing levels, communication, and inadequate resident activities, which were substantiated but did not result in fines or enforcement actions. The facility also had a substantiated complaint in May 2024 regarding the alert system and resident monitoring, but improvements were noted in subsequent investigations. Overall, the facility appears to be maintaining compliance with only isolated and mostly minor issues over time.
An unannounced annual required inspection visit was conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements at the facility.
Findings
The facility was generally found to be clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished with no major physical plant issues. However, a Technical Advisory was issued due to three of six staff members not having up-to-date first aid/CPR certifications.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Three of six staff members did not have the required first aid/CPR certifications up to date.
Report Facts
Staff files reviewed: 7Resident files reviewed: 6Medication administration records audited: 6Staff without up-to-date first aid/CPR certifications: 3Fire/Disaster Drills last conducted: Apr 30, 2025Perishable food supply: 5Non-perishable food supply: 7
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Bernadette Allen
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection visit.
Richard Pacheco
Maintenance Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and assisted with physical plant tour.
Amanda Monroy
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst and assisted with inspection; received exit interview.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to allegations that staff do not respond timely to residents' calls for assistance, do not ensure residents are provided with planned daily activities, and do not maintain a facility activities calendar.
Findings
Based on interviews with staff and residents, review of records including staff rosters, activity calendars, and in-service trainings, and direct observations, there was insufficient evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. The staff were found to respond timely to calls, planned daily activities were provided, and the facility maintained an activities calendar. No citations were issued.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff do not respond timely to residents' calls for assistance, residents must wait up to one hour for help, planned daily activities are not provided due to lack of an activities director, and the facility does not maintain an activities calendar. Interviews with staff (S1-S4) and residents (R1-R8) mostly denied these allegations, with the majority confirming timely assistance and presence of planned activities and calendar. The investigation concluded the allegations were unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 62Resident interviews: 8Staff interviews: 4Resident denials of allegation #1: 5Resident denials of allegation #2: 7Resident denials of allegation #3: 7
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Paloma Keitelman
Business Office Manager
Met with during investigation and participated in exit interview
The inspection was conducted as a complaint investigation following allegations that the facility did not provide comfortable accommodations, quality food, and the correct refund amount.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence to support the allegations. Resident and staff interviews, as well as record reviews, indicated that noise complaints were addressed appropriately, food quality was maintained despite temporary use of Styrofoam containers, and refund amounts were correctly applied as credits to resident accounts. All allegations were unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included uncomfortable accommodations due to noise from pipe repairs, poor food quality linked to use of Styrofoam containers causing gout and hospitalization, and incorrect refund amounts. After interviews and document reviews, no violations were found.
Report Facts
Refund amount allegedly not reimbursed: 810Refund amounts paid: 3853Refund amounts paid: 3043Resident hospitalization duration: 11Rehabilitation duration: 28Residents interviewed: 8Residents living at facility Aug-Sept 2023: 4
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Regina Cloyd
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted complaint investigation and interviews
Mia Nakanatzu
Executive Director II
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and exit interview
Ralph Balbin
Administrator
Facility administrator named in report header
Ulysses Coronel
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager on report
Paloma Keitelman
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analysts during initial complaint investigation
An unannounced annual required visit was conducted to assess compliance with licensing regulations and infection control practices.
Findings
The facility was found to be sanitary, appropriately furnished, and compliant with Title 22 regulations. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection visit.
Report Facts
Licensed capacity: 128Current census: 57
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
David España
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection and risk assessment
Mia Nakamatzu
Facility staff member who accompanied the Licensing Program Analyst during the visit
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 05/17/2024 regarding staff record-keeping, monitoring of resident condition changes, resident care related to incontinence, and restrictions on resident removal by responsible parties.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Staff and resident interviews, document reviews, and observations indicated that while some concerns were raised, there was no preponderance of evidence to prove violations occurred. All allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation addressed four main allegations: 1) staff not maintaining accurate records, 2) staff not monitoring a resident's change in condition, 3) resident left in soiled diapers for extended periods, and 4) staff not allowing resident's responsible party to remove the resident from the facility. Each allegation was investigated through interviews and document review, and all were found unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations that the facility's signal system did not produce an auditory signal loud enough to summon staff and that there was a lack of supervision of residents.
Findings
The investigation substantiated both allegations. It was found that the facility's alert pendant system and phone system were not reliably summoning staff, causing delays in resident assistance. Additionally, a fall risk resident was not adequately monitored overnight, resulting in the resident waiting several hours for help after a fall.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. The facility failed to provide an auditory signal loud enough to summon staff when residents pressed their medical alert pendants, and failed to adequately supervise a resident who fell during the night and waited several hours for assistance.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Facilities shall have signal systems which shall transmit a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location or produce an auditory signal at the living unit loud enough to summon staff. This regulation was not met as staff did not ensure resident’s alert pendant signaled to staff to summon them to provide assistance.
Type B
Every facility shall provide basic services including monitoring the activities of residents to ensure their health, safety, and well-being. This regulation was not met as a fall risk resident was not monitored through the night.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 57Deficiency count: 2Plan of Correction Due Date: May 30, 2024Resident wait time: 3Resident wait time: 4Resident wait time: 8.5
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Wendy Gibbs
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Milca Osorio
Health and Wellness Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during exit interview
Ralph Balbin
Administrator
Named in relation to facility operations and plan of correction
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation to determine whether facility staff failed to provide a resident's representative with a statement itemizing all separate charges incurred.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence to support the allegation that the facility failed to provide the resident's representative with an itemized statement of charges. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated after interviews, record reviews, and facility inspection.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that resident #1's representative was not provided with an itemized statement for a $2,000 rate increase beyond the contracted basic service rate of $6,094. The investigation reviewed the Residency Agreement, assessments, account reports, and interviewed staff. It was found that itemized charges were included in the contract and acknowledged by the resident's representative. Staff interviews and documentation did not support the allegation. The complaint was unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 60Basic Service Rate: 6505Basic Service Rate Discount: 1626Personal Service Rate: 1211Personal Service Plan Maximum Rate: 7965Community Fee before Move-In: 5000Total Personal Service Charges: 8402Medication Management Charge: 1101Chronic Condition Management Charge: 1982Nutrition Charge: 330Service Coordinator Charge: 110
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations that staff did not issue a refund.
Findings
The investigation revealed that refunds were issued according to the terms of the signed admission agreement, and interviews with residents and staff did not support the allegation. Therefore, the complaint was unsubstantiated and no deficiencies were cited.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not issue a refund. The investigation found that residents R1 and R2 were refunded their community fee as per the admission agreement, and accounting mailed the remaining credit balance. Interviews with staff and residents mostly disagreed with the allegation. The complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to allegations received on 07/26/2023 regarding inadequate activities for residents and prevention of residents having visitors during reasonable hours.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff did not provide adequate activities for residents due to staffing issues and failure to follow the community activities calendar. However, the allegation that staff prevent residents from having visitors during reasonable hours was found to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff do not provide adequate activities for residents, citing staffing shortages and lack of adherence to the activity calendar. The allegation that staff prevent residents from having visitors during reasonable hours was unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to ensure that the facility has an active activity planner that all residents attend, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 65Deficiencies cited: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 2, 2024
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jose Calderon
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Eva M Alvarez
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Ralph Balbin
Administrator
Facility administrator involved in the investigation
Dimple Kamdar
Operations Director
Facility operations director interviewed during investigation
S1
Facility driver and activities director interviewed regarding staffing and activities
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2023-10-05 regarding staff failing to safeguard resident's personal property and financial abuse of a resident at the facility.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with residents and staff, review of relevant documents, and facility tours. No evidence was found to substantiate the allegations of theft or financial abuse. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated, and no deficiencies were cited during the visit.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved two allegations: 1) staff failed to safeguard resident's personal property, including theft of items, and 2) resident was being financially abused through overcharging for services. Interviews and document reviews did not find sufficient evidence to support these allegations, resulting in an unsubstantiated status.
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 60Number of allegations: 2Number of residents interviewed: 6Number of staff interviewed: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Wendy Gibbs
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Mia Nakamatzu
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and exit interview
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to allegations received on 07/26/2023 regarding inadequate activities for residents and prevention of residents having visitors during reasonable hours.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the facility failed to provide adequate planned activities for residents, posing a potential health and safety risk. The allegation that staff prevent residents from having visitors during reasonable hours was found to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff do not provide adequate activities for residents. The allegation that staff prevent residents from having visitors during reasonable hours was unsubstantiated based on interviews and review of residency agreements.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to ensure that the facility has an active activity planner that all residents attend, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 65Deficiency due date: Aug 11, 2023
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jose Calderon
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Dimple Kamdar
Operations Director
Interviewed during the investigation and recipient of the exit interview
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to investigate allegations including insufficient staff to meet residents' needs, inadequate communication with residents, failure to follow resident care plans, and delayed response to resident calls for assistance.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the facility lacked sufficient staff and did not adequately communicate updated information to residents. However, allegations that staff were not following care plans and not responding timely to calls for assistance were unsubstantiated. The facility had staffing instability with vacancies in key positions and plans for correction were developed.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for insufficient staffing and inadequate communication with residents. Allegations regarding failure to follow care plans and delayed response to calls were unsubstantiated based on resident and staff interviews and observations.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents.
Type B
Staff are not adequately communicating with residents regarding updated information.
Type B
Report Facts
Estimated Days of Completion: 90Capacity: 128Census: 62
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Mario Leon
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Ulysses Coronel
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Mia Nakamatzu
Executive Director
Facility representative met during exit interview and report delivery
Dimple Kamdar
Operations Specialist
Met during complaint visit and involved in plan of correction development
An unannounced annual required visit was conducted using the CARE Inspection Tool to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements and facility conditions.
Findings
The facility was found to be sanitary, appropriately furnished, and compliant with infection control practices. However, a deficiency was noted due to the absence of an administrator meeting certification or recertification requirements during the visit.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
No administrator available at the facility meeting Administrator Certification or Recertification Requirements as specified in CCR 87412(d).
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 67Plan of Correction Due Date: Jul 3, 2023Hot water temperature: 117.9Hospice waiver capacity: 10
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Antonine Richard
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection and cited deficiency
Julie Manzanares
Business manager met during inspection and received report
An unannounced annual required visit was conducted with a primary focus on Infection Control measures using the CARE Inspection Tool.
Findings
The facility was found to be sanitary, appropriately furnished, and in compliance with infection control protocols. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection visit.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted regarding allegations that the facility did not provide adequate supervision to residents, specifically concerning Resident 1 isolating Resident 2 and soliciting funds.
Findings
Interviews with staff and residents, record reviews, and observations found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation. Residents and staff stated that Resident 1 is not isolating Resident 2 or soliciting money, and Resident 2 is engaged in other activities and aware of their rights.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged inadequate supervision, isolation of Resident 2 by Resident 1, and solicitation of funds. The investigation found the allegation unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to a complaint received on 07/24/2020 regarding allegations of overcharging residents for unneeded services, improper resident assessments, retention of residents with unstageable pressure injuries, and retaining residents requiring a higher level of care.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, family members, and review of service records and facility documents. No evidence was found to support the allegations, and the complaints were determined to be unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited during this visit.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved four main allegations: charging residents for unneeded services, improper assessment of residents, retaining residents with unstageable pressure injuries, and retaining residents requiring a higher level of care. The investigation found no evidence to substantiate these allegations.
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 67
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Ralph Balbin
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation and participated in interviews
Ernand Dabuet
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit and authored the report
An unannounced annual required visit was conducted with a primary focus on Infection Control measures using the new CARE Inspection Tool.
Findings
The facility was found to be sanitary, appropriately furnished, and compliant with infection control protocols. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection visit.
Report Facts
PPE supply duration: 30Resident rooms: 92Hospice waiver capacity: 10
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Ralph Balbin
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and received the report.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation initiated due to allegations that a resident sustained multiple fractures, multiple pressure injuries, and multiple falls due to lack of supervision while in care.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegations. Record reviews and interviews indicated that the resident did not sustain multiple fractures, pressure injuries, or falls while at the facility. All allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that a resident sustained multiple fractures, multiple pressure injuries, and multiple falls due to lack of supervision. After review of hospital and facility records and interviews with staff and family, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 128Census: 62
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Ulysses Coronel
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Ralph Balbin
Administrator
Facility administrator interviewed during the investigation
Loading inspection reports...
Need Help?
Let us help you or a loved one find the perfect senior home.