Most inspections at this facility were clean, with no deficiencies cited, including the most recent follow-up inspection on September 23, 2025, which found no issues. However, several complaint investigations substantiated concerns related primarily to resident supervision and staffing, including two incidents where residents with dementia eloped or fell due to inadequate supervision, resulting in serious injuries and civil penalties totaling $10,000. The facility also received citations for delayed outbreak reporting and failure to follow care plans, though other complaints about food service, hygiene, and odor control were unsubstantiated. Improvements were noted over time, with the May 15, 2025, plan of correction inspection clearing previous deficiencies and the latest report showing compliance. Several complaint investigations were unsubstantiated, indicating that many concerns raised did not result in findings against the facility.
The inspection was an unannounced case management follow-up visit to verify the Immediate Exclusion of Staff member S1 from the facility.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst verified that the excluded staff member S1 was no longer employed or present at the facility. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.
Report Facts
Capacity: 150Census: 136
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Blaine Lyons
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced case management inspection
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by multiple allegations received on 2025-02-19 regarding staff response times to resident calls, adherence to care plans, resident repositioning, prevention of inappropriate behavior, and reporting requirements.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff did not respond to residents' call lights in a timely manner and did not follow residents' care plans, specifically regarding two-person assistance. The allegations that staff did not ensure resident repositioning and did not prevent inappropriate behavior were unsubstantiated. The allegation that staff did not follow reporting requirements was unfounded.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations that staff did not respond timely to call lights and did not follow care plans, including failure to use two-person assistance as required. The allegations regarding failure to reposition residents and prevent inappropriate behavior were unsubstantiated. The allegation regarding failure to follow reporting requirements was unfounded.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Facility personnel were not sufficient in numbers and competent to meet resident needs, evidenced by call light response times exceeding 60 minutes.
Type B
Staff ignored company policy of using two-person assist when care plan called for it and worked independently.
Type B
Report Facts
Call light calls: 310Call light response times: 2Census: 136Total capacity: 150Plan of Correction due date: 2025
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Kimberley Mota
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Blaine Lyons
Administrator
Facility administrator met with the Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Named as facility administrator in the report header
Inspection Report Plan of CorrectionCensus: 139Capacity: 150Deficiencies: 0May 15, 2025
Visit Reason
Unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) inspection conducted to verify correction of previous deficiencies.
Findings
The facility was found to be clean and residents were appropriately cared for. Door alarms and delayed egress alarms were functioning properly. The Plan of Correction has been cleared with no deficiencies or citations issued at the time of inspection.
Report Facts
Residents in Memory Care unit: 32Memory Care unit staff: 7Activities personnel in Memory Care unit: 2One-on-one staff: 1
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Mina Kutulas
Director of Resident Services
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and toured facility
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Administrator was out of the facility but available by phone during inspection
The visit was conducted as a Case Management - Incident Visit to follow up on a self-reported incident involving a resident elopement reported to Community Care Licensing.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident with dementia who eloped from the community, resulting in an immediate risk to the resident's health and safety. A civil penalty of $500 was issued for Zero Tolerance, Absence of Supervision.
Complaint Details
The visit was complaint-related, following a self-reported incident where Resident 1, diagnosed with dementia and unable to leave unassisted, eloped from the facility on 04/20/2025. The resident was found safe off premises 2.4 miles away. The complaint was substantiated with a deficiency cited and a civil penalty issued.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Facility failed to provide supervision to Resident 1 resulting in an elopement, which is an immediate risk to health, safety, and rights of persons in care.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted regarding allegations that staff were not taking precautions to mitigate the spread of illness in the facility.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility did not notify the Department within the required 24-hour timeframe about an outbreak of illness, substantiating the allegation. Several residents experienced vomiting and diarrhea, and the facility failed to report the outbreak timely as required by regulations.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff were not taking precautions to mitigate the spread of illness. The allegation was substantiated based on evidence that the Administrator did not notify the Department in the required timeframe.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to report an outbreak within 24 hours as required by CCR 87211(a)(2).
Type A
Report Facts
Census: 139Total Capacity: 150Deficiencies cited: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: May 12, 2025
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Kimberley Mota
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Facility Administrator involved in findings and plan of correction
The inspection was an unannounced 1-Year Required Annual Inspection conducted to ensure the health and safety of residents in care.
Findings
The facility was observed to be clean, in good repair, and odor-free with necessary safety features in place. No immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed, and all required documentation in resident and staff files was found.
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted to follow up on substantiated complaint allegations regarding neglect, lack of care and supervision resulting in severe injury and facility disrepair.
Findings
The investigation substantiated neglect and lack of supervision leading to a resident (R1), identified as a fall risk, exiting the patio door unsupervised and falling outside, resulting in a fractured hip requiring hospitalization and surgery. A civil penalty of $9,500 was issued for serious bodily injury.
Complaint Details
Complaint number 21-AS-20230724142905 was substantiated for neglect and lack of care and supervision resulting in severe injury and facility disrepair.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Violation of Health and Safety Code §1569.269(a)(6) Enumerated rights and CCR Title 22 §87303(a) Maintenance and Operation due to neglect and lack of supervision resulting in severe injury.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 07/22/2024 regarding inadequate toileting, food service, odor control, and addressing residents' condition changes.
Findings
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed during visits on 07/24/2024 and 10/19/2024, there was no evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Staff were found to provide adequate food service, maintain cleanliness and odor control, address changes in residents' conditions, and meet residents' toileting needs in a timely manner.
Complaint Details
The complaint included allegations that staff did not ensure timely toileting, did not provide adequate food service, did not keep the facility free from odor, and did not address changes in residents' physical, medical, mental, and social conditions. All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 150Census: 140
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Genai Bradshaw
Memory Care Activities Director (Acting Facilities Manager)
Met with during the investigation and named in relation to findings
The visit was an informal meeting conducted to discuss an incident that occurred on February 17, 2023, which resulted in a complaint investigation with substantiated findings, and to address areas of concern including staffing and administrator duties.
Findings
No deficiencies were cited during the informal conference office visit. The facility has implemented staffing improvements such as an evening supervisor and a 'hero position' to oversee operations and provide additional staff where needed.
Complaint Details
The visit was related to a complaint investigation with substantiated findings from an incident on February 17, 2023.
Report Facts
Capacity: 150Census: 142
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Met during the visit and discussed staffing and administrative duties
The visit was a Case Management - Incident inspection conducted to follow up on a self-reported incident involving residents R1 and R2.
Findings
No deficiencies were found at the time of the visit and no citations were issued. The facility has been in contact with Police, Community Care Licensing, and the Ombudsman’s Office.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a self-reported incident report submitted to Community Care Licensing regarding residents R1 and R2. The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed incident details, gathered records, and took statements from the Administrator. Further follow-up will occur once additional information is gathered.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Named in relation to statements taken during the incident follow-up visit.
Unannounced case management visit to investigate deficiencies related to failure to report an incident as required by regulation.
Findings
The facility failed to report an incident to the Community Care Licensing Regional Office due to a 'failed to send' notification that was not resent, resulting in the incident going unreported and posing a possible threat to resident health and safety.
Complaint Details
Investigation revealed the facility did not report the incident as required. Staff attempted to send the report but received a 'failed to send' notification and did not resend, leading to the incident going unreported.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to submit a written report of a serious injury incident to the licensing agency within seven days as required by CCR Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8.
Type B
Report Facts
Census: 140Total Capacity: 150Plan of Correction Due Date: Jan 10, 2024
Unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted due to allegations of neglect/lack of care and supervision resulting in severe injury and facility disrepair.
Findings
Investigation substantiated neglect by staff resulting in a resident exiting the facility unsupervised, leading to a fall and hip fracture requiring hospitalization. Additionally, poor lighting in the patio area contributed to the fall and injury, confirming the facility was in disrepair.
Complaint Details
Complaint was substantiated. The resident was left outside unsupervised for approximately one and a half hours, resulting in a hip fracture requiring surgery. Facility lighting issues were also substantiated as contributing factors.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Failure to provide care, supervision, and services that meet individual resident needs, resulting in resident injury.
Type A
Facility was not clean, safe, sanitary, and in good repair; lighting in patio area was unrepaired and contributed to resident fall and injury.
The visit was an unannounced case management inspection to follow up on a self-reported incident involving resident R1 and staff S1.
Findings
The facility was found to be operating with COVID-19 protocols in place, including visitor screening and mask requirements. No deficiencies or citations were found at the time of the visit.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a self-reported incident report submitted to Community Care Licensing regarding resident R1 and staff S1. The facility has been in contact with Police, CCL, and Ombudsman’s Office. The Licensing Program Analyst will review information and follow up once additional information is gathered.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Administrator who provided statements during the incident follow-up visit.
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the case management inspection and gathered information.
An unannounced Annual Required – 1 year Infection Control inspection was conducted at Carlton Plaza of Davis.
Findings
The facility was found to be clean, with proper infection control measures in place, including mask-wearing by staff and proper food storage. No deficiencies or citations were issued during this inspection.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 150Resident Census: 139
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
Unannounced visit/investigation of a complaint received on 2022-09-02 alleging the facility did not notice a change of resident condition.
Findings
The investigation included a tour, record review, and interviews. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there was insufficient evidence to prove the violation occurred, resulting in an unsubstantiated finding with no deficiencies or citations issued.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged the facility did not notice a change in condition of resident (R1). The allegation was found unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
An unannounced inspection was conducted focusing on Covid-19 protocols following recent reported cases in the Memory Care Unit.
Findings
No deficiencies or citations were found during the inspection. The facility was clean, residents were well-groomed, and staff were observed following Covid-19 safety protocols including mask and glove use.
Report Facts
Census: 132Total Capacity: 150
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst and showed around the facility
The inspection was an unannounced case management visit to check on the facility's hydration program for residents and review the Infection Control Plan.
Findings
No deficiencies or citations were found during the inspection. The facility has an Infection Control Plan being compiled, with six nurses designated as Infection Control Preventionists, and a hydration program in Memory Care with a variety of drinks offered to residents.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Genevieve Elder
Director of Resident Services
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and exit interview.
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Discussed facility operations and Infection Control Plan with Licensing Program Analyst.
Toni Jones
Memory Care Director
Discussed hydration program in Memory Care with Licensing Program Analyst.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation of questionable death and other complaints including neglect, lack of supervision, and failure to provide adequate care.
Findings
The investigation found the allegation of questionable death to be unfounded with no citations issued. Other allegations related to neglect, hygiene, food service, falls, and medical attention were unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence, and no citations were issued.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was initiated due to allegations including questionable death, neglect/lack of supervision resulting in pressure injuries and falls, failure to meet hygiene needs, failure to provide food service, and failure to ensure timely medical attention. The questionable death allegation was found unfounded, and other allegations were unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 150Census: 137
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Chris Arnhold
Licensing Program Analyst
Assisted in complaint investigation and delivery of findings
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Facility administrator met with investigators during the complaint investigation
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations that residents were not being provided services and that the facility was not staffed adequately.
Findings
The investigation found that residents were being fed regularly, receiving bathroom and grooming assistance, and showering assistance was provided. Staffing records showed adequate staff to meet resident needs. The allegations were unsubstantiated and no citations were issued.
Complaint Details
The complaint was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Report Facts
Capacity: 150Census: 137
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Met with investigators during the complaint investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations including a resident not being provided bed linens and the facility not following proper COVID-19 protocols.
Findings
The investigation substantiated both allegations: the resident's bed was not made correctly lacking proper bottom sheets on multiple occasions, and staff failed to properly doff, discard, and store PPE during an active COVID-19 case, violating infection control requirements.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on evidence including photographs, observations, interviews, and record reviews. The allegations of improper provision of bed linens and failure to follow COVID-19 PPE protocols were validated.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Failure to discard PPE in a tightly-lidded container as required, posing potential health, safety, and personal rights risks.
Type B
Failure to provide the resident with the required bottom bed sheet on multiple occasions, posing potential health, safety, and personal rights risks.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 150Census: 135Deficiency count: 2Plan of Correction Due Date: Mar 23, 2022
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Lindsey Feifert
Director of Resident Services
Met with the Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation
An unannounced Annual Required – 1 year Infection Control inspection was conducted at Carlton Plaza of Davis.
Findings
The facility was found to be clean, with proper infection control measures in place including PPE usage and Covid-19 protocols. No deficiencies or citations were issued during this inspection.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 150Resident Census: 137
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Miriam Faris
Administrator
Met during inspection and exit interview
Jill Nakagawa
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection
Loading inspection reports...
Need Help?
Let us help you or a loved one find the perfect senior home.