Inspection Reports for Clinton Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care

The inspection was conducted in response to an anonymous complaint alleging the facility had bed bugs causing resident discomfort and that management was not taking the issue seriously.

The investigation found no evidence of bed bugs after inspection and pest control review, concluding no violation for bed bugs. However, additional findings revealed unsafe bed assistive devices for two residents, lacking proper service plan documentation and posing entrapment risks, resulting in established violations.

Complaint alleged the facility had bed bugs causing itching for a resident and that management was not addressing staff concerns seriously. The complaint was not substantiated as no bed bugs were found.

An administrative review of licensing activity for the past year was conducted to assess compliance with public health code and administrative rules regulating home for the aged facilities, resulting in license renewal.

The review revealed substantial compliance with applicable regulations, leading to the renewal of the Home for the Aged license effective from 08/01/2024 to 07/31/2025.

An administrative review of licensing activity for the past year was conducted to assess compliance with public health code and administrative rules regulating home for the aged facilities.

The review revealed substantial compliance with applicable regulations, resulting in the renewal of the facility's license effective January 18, 2024.

The investigation was initiated due to a complaint alleging inadequate incontinence care, insufficient bathing, skin care issues, falls due to inadequate staffing, insufficient food and water, medication errors, and verbal and physical abuse at Clinton Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care.

The investigation found no violations related to incontinence care, falls, food and water availability, or medication administration. However, violations were established for verbal and physical abuse allegations and for failure to maintain accurate records of residents' skin impairments.

The complaint alleged inadequate incontinence care and bathing, falls due to insufficient caregivers, inadequate food and water, medication errors due to untrained medication technicians, and verbal and physical abuse. Most allegations were not substantiated except for verbal and physical abuse and record-keeping deficiencies.

The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that call lights were not answered timely and staff were forced to care for COVID residents without PPE.

The investigation substantiated that call lights were not always answered timely, with some response times exceeding two hours. PPE was available for staff. Other allegations including medication administration, showering, bed covers, and room cleanliness were not substantiated.

The complaint alleged neglect due to untimely response to call lights and staff forced to care for COVID residents without PPE. The claim regarding call lights was substantiated; the claim regarding PPE was not substantiated as PPE was observed to be available. Other allegations such as medication not given, lack of showers, bed covers not changed, and rooms not cleaned were not substantiated.

The investigation was initiated due to allegations received from Adult Protective Services that Resident A lacked care, including concerns about medication administration, incontinence care, and overall treatment.

The investigation substantiated that Resident A's care was inconsistent with her service plan, with medication administration records and ADL logs showing multiple dates left blank, making it unclear if care tasks were completed. Despite no skin breakdown, it could not be determined if care and medications were always provided as required.

The complaint alleged that Resident A was left in soiled briefs for extended periods, had multiple UTIs, and did not receive medications timely. The allegation was substantiated based on review of records and interviews.

The visit was conducted as a renewal licensing study to evaluate compliance with applicable rules and regulations for Clinton Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care.

The facility was found to be in non-compliance with several rules including inadequate ventilation in multiple rooms, uncovered garbage cans, food stored without open dates, and refrigerators lacking thermometers.

The visit was conducted as an original licensing study to determine compliance with applicable licensing statutes and administrative rules for Clinton Creek Assisted Living & Memory Care.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with licensing statutes and administrative rules. The physical facility and program services were described in detail, and a temporary license with a maximum capacity of 62 beds was recommended for issuance.