Inspection Reports for Hampton Manor of Adrian

1491 US-223, Adrian, MI 49221, United States, MI, 49221

Back to Facility Profile

Deficiencies per Year

8 6 4 2 0
2021
2023
2024
2025
Unclassified

Census Over Time

0 30 60 90 120 150 Jan '23 Mar '24 Mar '24
Census Capacity
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 2 Jun 25, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that Resident A was not receiving her medications as prescribed.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that Resident A did not receive her prescribed medications due to facility staff documenting refusals inaccurately and failure to proactively reorder medications, resulting in missed doses. Additionally, the facility issued a discharge notice missing required information.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident A was not given her iron pill and blood pressure medication as prescribed, with staff documenting refusals that the resident denied. The investigation confirmed the allegation and additional findings related to discharge notice deficiencies.
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Resident A was not receiving her prescribed medications as ordered, with documentation errors and failure to reorder medications timely.
Discharge notice issued to Resident A lacked required information including reasons for discharge and complaint rights.
Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Complaint Receipt Date: Jun 20, 2025 Investigation Initiation Date: Jun 23, 2025 Report Due Date: Aug 20, 2025
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Elizabeth Gregory-WeilLicensing StaffAuthor of the inspection report
Shahid ImranAdministrator and Authorized RepresentativeFacility administrator named in the report
Andrea L. MooreManager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing SectionApproved the inspection report
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 1 Apr 23, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that Resident A was confined to bed against their rights and wishes, only allowed up for meals, showers, and bathroom use.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that Resident A's rights were violated by being forced to stay in bed against their will, despite their preference to be up more often. Staff confirmed strict bedrest orders were enforced, which decreased Resident A's strength.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident A was referred to hospice and confined to bed except for meals, showers, and bathroom use against their rights. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews and record review.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Resident A's rights violated by enforcing strict bedrest against their wishes.
Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Complaint Receipt Date: Apr 22, 2024 Investigation Initiation Date: Apr 22, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Shahid ImranAdministratorNamed as administrator and authorized representative of the facility
Jennifer HeimHealth Care SurveyorConducted the investigation and authored the report
Reggie ParishOperation ManagerInterviewed onsite regarding Resident A's condition and care
Kimberly McMurrayNurse PractitionerProvided medical notes regarding Resident A's condition and care plan
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 59 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 5 Mar 25, 2024
Visit Reason
The investigation was initiated due to multiple allegations including the facility director babysitting grandchildren at the facility, having a friend who informs her of survey visits, yelling at residents, providing unnecessary services to a resident, understaffing, inaccurate staff schedules, and inadequate food to meet resident preferences.
Findings
No violations were established for the allegations regarding babysitting grandchildren, prior notice of survey visits, yelling at residents, unnecessary services to a resident, understaffing, inaccurate staff schedules, and food availability. However, violations were established related to inadequate supervision of memory care residents in an unsecured hallway, lack of a compliant written memory care program description, failure to post therapeutic diet menus, failure to provide therapeutic diets as ordered, and failure to maintain records of food used.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was initiated based on allegations received on 03/19/2024 regarding multiple concerns at the facility including director babysitting grandchildren, prior notice of survey visits, yelling at residents, unnecessary services to a resident, understaffing, inaccurate staff schedules, and inadequate food to meet resident preferences. The investigation included interviews, observations, and document reviews.
Deficiencies (5)
Description
Residents from the memory care unit were routinely served meals in an unsecured hallway area without continuous staff supervision.
The facility lacks a written description of services for the memory care unit that meets statutory requirements.
The facility did not prepare and post menus for all therapeutic or special diets for the current week.
The facility did not ensure therapeutic or special diets were provided to residents as ordered.
The facility did not maintain a record of the kind and amount of food used for the preceding 3-month period.
Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Resident census: 59 Call lights response times: 60 Call light response time: 13 Call light response time: 10 Staffing levels: 5 Staffing levels: 6 Staffing levels: 4 Days since cook started: 21 Corrective action plan due days: 15
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Shahid ImranAuthorized Representative/AdministratorNamed in relation to the facility and exit conference.
Andrea KrausmannLicensing StaffAuthor of the Special Investigation Report.
Jessica RogersAssigned Licensing StaffContact for submission of corrective action plan and census information.
Reggie ParishManagerProvided employee and resident lists and call light response times.
Andrea L. MooreManager, Long-Term-Care State Licensing SectionApproved the report.
Inspection Report Renewal Census: 28 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 5 Mar 14, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Renewal Licensing Study for Hampton Manor of Madison to assess compliance with licensing requirements and verify corrective action plans.
Findings
The facility was found to be non-compliant with several rules including unsafe storage of hazardous materials, lack of proper sanitization records, absence of designated shift supervisors, insufficient protective measures for a bedside assistive device, and unclear medication administration instructions. Repeat violations were noted for sanitization and medication management.
Deficiencies (5)
Description
Unsecured hazardous and toxic materials stored in kitchen cupboards posing ingestion and poisoning risk.
Failure to maintain records demonstrating proper sanitization of multi-use utensils; repeat violation.
Staff schedule lacked a designated supervisor of resident care on each shift.
Bedside assistive device (Halo Ring) lacked sufficient use instructions, monitoring, and maintenance per facility policy.
Medication administration records lacked specific instructions for as needed medications and clarity on multiple medications for same indications; repeat violation.
Report Facts
Number of staff interviewed and/or observed: 18 Number of residents interviewed and/or observed: 28 Facility capacity: 120 Medication administration dates with blood sugar below 100: 9
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jessica RogersLicensing StaffAuthor of the report and contact for corrective action plan
Shahid ImranAdministrator Authorized RepresentativeFacility administrator named in the report
Ms. ParishInterviewed staff member providing information on sanitization and assistive device use
Employee #1Staff member who removed hazardous chemicals and provided information on assistive device
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 2 Jan 3, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that Resident A's medication orders were not implemented and that Resident A's personal belongings were stolen.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that Resident A's medication orders were not properly implemented, leading to harm and unnecessary hospitalization. Additionally, an employee was terminated for theft related to Resident A's belongings, but the facility was not held responsible for the theft. Multiple medication administration record (MAR) discrepancies were found indicating Resident A did not always receive medications as prescribed.
Complaint Details
Complaint alleged Resident A's medication orders were not followed, causing low blood sugar and hospitalization, and that Resident A's personal belongings were stolen. The medication-related allegations were substantiated; the theft allegations were not substantiated against the facility but an employee was terminated and police investigated.
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Failure to implement hospital medication orders for Resident A, resulting in harm and unnecessary hospitalization.
Medications left blank on Resident A's medication administration records, making it unclear if medications were administered as prescribed.
Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Complaint Receipt Date: Nov 17, 2023 Investigation Initiation Date: Nov 20, 2023 Report Due Date: Jan 16, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jessica RogersLicensing StaffAuthor of the inspection report and exit conference contact
Shahid ImranAuthorized Representative/AdministratorFacility administrator involved in the investigation and exit conference
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 2 Oct 11, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that Resident A's visitors were restricted from visiting and taking her out of the home, and that Resident A had bruises.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident A's visitors were permitted to visit, but Resident A was not allowed to leave the facility for a family wedding based on a licensed healthcare professional's recommendation. No bruising was observed on Resident A. However, a violation was established due to improper completion and activation of Resident A's Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care documents and an invalid admission contract.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident A's visitors were restricted from visiting and taking her out of the home and that Resident A had bruises. The allegation regarding visitation and bruising was not substantiated. The facility had a licensed healthcare professional's order restricting Resident A from leaving the facility, and no bruising was observed.
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Resident A's Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care paperwork was not completed correctly nor activated due to lack of two physician statements.
Resident A's admission contract was not valid as it was not appropriately signed nor were her Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care documents.
Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Complaint Receipt Date: Sep 28, 2023 Investigation Initiation Date: Sep 29, 2023 Report Due Date: Nov 27, 2023
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jessica RogersLicensing StaffConducted the investigation and authored the report
Shahid ImranAuthorized Representative/AdministratorFacility administrator involved in exit conference
Inspection Report Renewal Deficiencies: 0 May 26, 2023
Visit Reason
The document serves as a renewal notification for the Home for the Aged license following an administrative review of licensing activity over the past year.
Findings
The review revealed substantial compliance with the public health code and administrative rules regulating home for the aged facilities, resulting in the renewal of the facility's license.
Report Facts
License duration: 12
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jessica RogersLicensing StaffAuthor of the renewal notification letter
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 33 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 2 Jan 27, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted in response to a complaint alleging residents lacked protection and safety, neglect, medication errors, lack of organized programs, short staffing, and cleanliness issues.
Findings
The investigation substantiated violations related to resident protection and safety, including delayed staff response to call pendants and failure to update service plans. Other allegations such as medication errors, lack of organized programs, short staffing, kitchen and facility cleanliness were not substantiated. Additional findings revealed failure to report incidents to the department as required.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged residents lacked protection and safety, neglect, medication errors, lack of organized programs, short staffing on weekends, kitchen and facility cleanliness issues, and staff working under the influence. The allegation of neglect and lack of protection was substantiated; medication errors, organized program deficiencies, staffing, and cleanliness allegations were not substantiated.
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Residents lacked protection and safety; staff did not respond timely to call pendants and service plans were not updated after falls.
Failure to report incidents and accidents to the department within required timeframes.
Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Census: 33 Staff Schedule: 5 Staff Schedule: 3 Resident Falls: 7 Narcotic Medication Counts: 25 Narcotic Medication Counts: 21
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Reggie ParishOperations DirectorInterviewed regarding resident falls, staff training, and facility policies
Jessica RogersLicensing StaffAuthor of the inspection report
Shahid ImranAuthorized Representative/AdministratorFacility administrator involved in exit conference
Employee #1Interviewed regarding medication administration and narcotic counts
Employee #2Interviewed regarding medication administration and narcotic counts
Employee #3Housekeeping staff interviewed regarding cleaning schedules and practices
Employee #4Kitchen staff interviewed regarding kitchen cleanliness
Inspection Report Original Licensing Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Dec 3, 2021
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as an original licensing study to determine compliance with applicable licensing statutes and administrative rules for Hampton Manor of Madison.
Findings
The study determined substantial compliance with the home for the aged public health code and administrative rules. A temporary 6-month license with a maximum capacity of 120 beds was recommended and issued.
Report Facts
Licensed beds: 120 Residential units: 85 Memory care beds: 22 Assisted living beds: 98
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Shahid ImranAuthorized RepresentativeNamed in relation to technical assistance and licensing process.
Andrea KrausmannLicensing StaffAuthor of the licensing study report and contact for the facility.
Andrea L. MooreLong-Term-Care State Licensing Section ManagerApproved the licensing report.

Loading inspection reports...