Inspection Reports for Oakmont of Mariner Point

The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2025-03-27 concerning resident care issues including unexplained lacerations, untimely medical treatment, inadequate feeding assistance, improper supervision of fall-risk residents, and unmet dietary needs.

The investigation found that although the allegations may have occurred or be valid, there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the complaints. Staff were monitoring the resident's condition and providing medical care as needed, and supervision and dietary support were documented despite some resident refusals. The complaints were therefore unsubstantiated.

The complaint involved multiple allegations about resident care including unexplained lacerations, failure to seek timely medical treatment, inadequate feeding assistance, improper supervision of fall-risk residents, and failure to meet dietary needs. Interviews with staff and review of care notes indicated monitoring and care were provided, but the resident often refused care or food. The resident had been on Hospice and had multiple moves within the facility. The investigation concluded the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The visit was an unannounced 1-Year Annual Required inspection conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.

The inspection found that the facility generally met licensing requirements, including adequate lighting, temperature control, safety equipment, and record completeness. However, a deficiency was cited for hot water temperature at a hallway bathroom sink measuring 135.1 degrees Fahrenheit, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.

The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2024-06-13 regarding medication dispensing, medication mismanagement, and inadequate supervision of residents.

The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated after reviewing training records, medication administration records, and interviewing staff responsible for resident supervision and transportation.

The complaint included allegations that staff dispensed medication without appropriate training, mismanaged residents' medications, and did not provide adequate supervision. The investigation found no evidence to substantiate these allegations.

The inspection was an unannounced 1-Year Annual Required inspection conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.

The Licensing Program Analyst toured the facility, reviewed resident and staff records, and observed safety and emergency preparedness measures. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

Unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations including lack of resident care and supervision, wound development due to staff negligence, unmet hygiene and feeding needs, and failure to follow personal hygiene and sanitation practices.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff were observed to provide appropriate care and supervision, wounds were attributed to the resident's medical condition, hygiene and feeding needs were met, and staff followed hygiene and sanitation protocols.

The complaint was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff leaving resident without care and supervision, wound development due to lack of supervision, unmet hygiene and feeding needs, and failure to follow hygiene and sanitation practices. Interviews and chart reviews did not support these claims.

The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by complaints received on 07/18/2023 regarding facility air conditioning disrepair, inadequate resident incontinent care, and insufficient staffing.

The investigation found that the air conditioning was repaired shortly after the complaint, staffing levels on the reviewed date were sufficient to provide appropriate care, and there was no documentation of incontinent care but no evidence of neglect. Overall, the complaints were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint investigation addressed allegations of facility air conditioning disrepair, staff not meeting residents' incontinent care needs, and insufficient staffing. The findings concluded the complaints were unsubstantiated.

The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to a complaint alleging that the facility call system was in disrepair.

The investigation found that the complaint was unsubstantiated. The facility's Phillips Lifeline pendant system was initially not operational but was repaired and observed to be operational at the time of the visit.

The complaint alleging the facility call system was in disrepair was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The visit was an unannounced 1-Year Annual Required inspection conducted by the Licensing Program Analyst to evaluate compliance with facility regulations.

The inspection found no deficiencies. The facility was toured, resident and staff records were reviewed, and safety measures such as fire clearance, fire extinguisher servicing, and fire drills were verified as compliant.

The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 10/20/2021 regarding staff failing to assist a resident (R1) with ADLs, withholding food and water, prohibiting phone use, verbal abuse, failure to assist with incontinence care, and short staffing.

After interviews with staff, the resident, and review of records, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence. Staff denied the allegations, and observations and records supported that residents were assisted appropriately. No deficiencies were cited.

The complaint involved six allegations against staff related to resident care and facility staffing. The investigation included interviews with resident R1, multiple staff members, the Executive Director, and attempts to contact the resident's family and hospice agency. The complaint was closed as unsubstantiated.

The visit was an unannounced case management visit to verify if an individual is currently employed at the facility.

The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed the staff roster and interviewed staff, verifying that the individual was not present, employed, or residing at the facility. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The visit was an unannounced case management visit conducted due to receiving an incomplete LIC624 form.

During the visit, the Licensing Program Analyst interviewed the facility's Health Services Director and reviewed the internal Incident Report, noting that proper notifications were made to the resident's family. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation that the facility did not safeguard a resident's credit card.

The investigation found that the allegation was unfounded. The facility kept the resident's credit card locked in a safe at the request of the resident's cousin, and the resident confirmed the card was in her possession during the alleged unauthorized use. The bank removed the disputed charge and issued a new card.

The complaint alleged that the facility did not safeguard a resident's credit card. The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded, meaning the allegation was false or without reasonable basis.

Unannounced post licensing visit to conduct an Infection Control Inspection at the facility.

The inspection found the facility compliant with infection control standards, including proper PPE use, sufficient food supply, posted visitor policies, and routine screening records. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The inspection was a pre-licensing visit conducted unannounced due to a change of ownership to evaluate the facility for licensing approval.

The inspection included evaluation of fire clearance, resident rooms, common areas, kitchen, and safety measures. Several deficiencies were observed including unlocked medications and poisonous disinfectants accessible to residents. The facility was not recommended for license until all deficiencies were cleared.

The visit was conducted as a Component II (COMP II) pre-licensing evaluation via telephone call to verify the applicant/administrator's understanding of Title 22 and various regulatory requirements for facility operation, staff qualifications, program policies, and application documentation.

The applicant/administrator successfully completed the COMP II telephone call, demonstrating understanding of facility operation, staff qualifications, program policies, and application document requirements. No deficiencies or violations were noted in the report.