Most inspections of this facility found no deficiencies, with the most recent reports from October 8, 2025, showing full compliance and no issues. However, earlier complaint investigations substantiated some concerns related to resident care, including neglect resulting in a stage 4 pressure injury, leaving a resident in soiled clothing, and lack of supervision, each resulting in a $500 civil penalty assessed in October 2024. Another substantiated complaint in late 2023 involved staff failing to provide required assistance to a resident who fell and sustained minor injuries. Several other complaint investigations were unsubstantiated, including allegations of staff misconduct and inadequate meals. The facility appears to have improved over time, with recent annual inspections consistently clean and no new deficiencies noted.
An unannounced required annual inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with all licensing requirements. No deficiencies were issued during the inspection. The facility was clean, safe, and well-maintained with all required equipment and documentation in place.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 6Census: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Iby Strong
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection
Simon Jacob
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager on report
Vinit Rathi
Facility Manager
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
Licensing Program Analyst Iby Strong conducted an unannounced quarterly Case Management/Legal Non-Compliance visit to evaluate the licensee's ongoing compliance with the requirements described in LIC9111 and the terms of a compliance plan agreed upon on January 22, 2025.
Findings
The facility was clean, safe, and in good repair with current and complete records. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed, and no deficiencies were issued during this compliance visit.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Iby Strong
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced quarterly Case Management/Legal Non-Compliance visit.
Nikita Mundhada
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection and participated in the exit interview.
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Sabel Martinez to tour the facility, obtain Plan of Correction documents, and secure signatures.
Findings
No immediate health or safety concerns were observed during the visit. The administrator received a copy of the report and licensee rights via email.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and received report and licensee rights.
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Sabel Martinez to review facility operations and request staff training records.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst toured the facility, secured report signatures, delivered amended reports, and conducted an exit interview with the Administrator. No deficiencies or violations were explicitly stated in the report.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Administrator who assisted the Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and participated in the exit interview.
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted in response to a previously substantiated complaint alleging neglect resulting in a resident sustaining a stage 4 pressure injury.
Findings
During the visit, an immediate $500 civil penalty was assessed related to the substantiated complaint of neglect. The civil penalty assessment is under review by the Program Administrator of the Community Care Licensing Division.
Complaint Details
The complaint (Complaint # 08-AS-20190809110049) was substantiated on September 30, 2020, regarding neglect causing a stage 4 pressure injury to a resident.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Neglect resulting in a resident sustaining a stage 4 pressure injury
Report Facts
Civil penalty amount: 500
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gaurav Rathi
Licensee / Administrator
Met with during the visit and involved in exit interview
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted to assess compliance and address a previously substantiated complaint allegation regarding resident care.
Findings
During the visit, an immediate $500 civil penalty was assessed related to a previously substantiated complaint about a resident being left in soiled clothing. The deficiency was amended from a Type B to a Type A deficiency.
Complaint Details
The visit was in response to a substantiated complaint (Complaint # 08-AS-20191231162534) reported on December 31, 2019, and substantiated on June 18, 2021, regarding staff leaving a resident in soiled clothing.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Resident left in soiled clothing
Type A
Report Facts
Civil penalty amount: 500
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Met with during the visit and involved in exit interview
The visit was an unannounced Case Management inspection conducted in response to a previously substantiated complaint regarding lack of supervision of a resident.
Findings
During the visit, an immediate $500 civil penalty was assessed related to the substantiated complaint. The deficiency was amended from a Type B to a Type A deficiency.
Complaint Details
Complaint # 08-AS-20220912085344 was substantiated on October 12, 2023, regarding lack of supervision of a resident.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Lack of supervision of a resident
Type A
Report Facts
Civil penalty amount: 500
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Met with during the inspection and involved in exit interview
The inspection was an unannounced required annual inspection conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the Point Loma Elder Care Facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies cited. All required safety equipment, furnishings, and supplies were present and in working order. Staff and client records contained the required documents.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations that staff did not treat a resident with dignity, physically assaulted a resident resulting in injuries, and destroyed the resident's personal belongings.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that a former employee did not treat a resident with dignity, citing a physical confrontation with the resident. However, allegations that staff assaulted the resident causing injuries and destroyed personal belongings were unsubstantiated due to conflicting statements and lack of corroboration.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff did not treat a resident with dignity. The allegation that staff physically assaulted the resident resulting in injuries and destroyed personal belongings was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence and conflicting statements.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Personal Rights - To be free from corporal or unusual punishment, infliction of pain, humiliation, intimidation, ridicule, coercion, threat, mental abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature was not met.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 6Census: 6Deficiency count: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: Nov 15, 2023Plan of Correction Completion Date: Dec 13, 2023
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Daniel Pena
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Simon Jacob
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Facility administrator involved in exit interview and report receipt
Hugo Duran
Caregiver
Facility staff member met during the unannounced visit
An unannounced Required Annual Inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be organized, clean, and in good repair with no safety hazards observed. All required furnishings, equipment, and supplies were present and properly maintained. No residents were bedridden or receiving hospice care, and no deficiencies or violations were noted.
The inspection was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation visit following a complaint received on 2022-09-12 alleging neglect and lack of supervision of a resident.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that facility staff failed to provide required assistance to one resident, resulting in a fall and minor injuries. The staff member omitted pertinent facts in the incident report, and immediate corrective action was taken by the administrator.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged neglect/lack of supervision of a resident who fell and sustained minor injuries. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews, observations, and records review.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Facility staff did not provide required assistance to 1 out of 6 residents, posing a potential safety risk.
Type A
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 1Plan of Correction Due Date: Nov 13, 2023
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gary Rathi
Administrator
Administrator involved in the investigation and exit interview
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations that staff did not afford residents dignity, yelled at residents, and did not afford residents to be free from intimidation.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and outside sources, as well as observations and records review. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence supporting claims of staff misconduct regarding dignity, yelling, or intimidation.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not afford residents dignity, yelled at residents, and intimidated residents. The investigation found no evidence to support these allegations, and they were deemed unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 6Census: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Carmen Lopez
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Rebecca Hedgecock
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Travonna Washington
Facility Manager/Co-Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during exit interview
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to an allegation that meals did not meet a resident's needs.
Findings
The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and a facility tour. It was found that the resident required a mechanical soft diet and assistance with all activities of daily living. The resident's medical condition declined and they were admitted to hospice care, where poor meal intake was noted. There was no evidence of denial of food or water, and the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that meals did not meet the resident's needs. The allegation was investigated and found unsubstantiated based on interviews and records review.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 6Census: 6Complaint control number: 08-AS-20220309105309
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Rebecca A Ruiz
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Travonna Washington
Administrator
Met with during the investigation and exit interview
An unannounced required 1-year visit was conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with licensing requirements and infection control protocols.
Findings
No deficiencies were cited or observed during the inspection. The facility's infection control mitigation plan, including disinfection, testing surveillance, screening protocols, and use of personal protective equipment, was evaluated and found satisfactory.
Report Facts
Capacity: 6Census: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gary Rathi
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted regarding an allegation that staff failed to follow the admission agreement and increased rent for Resident 1 improperly.
Findings
The investigation found that although the allegation may have occurred, there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the violation. The facility did not increase Resident 1's rent until over a year after the complaint was filed, and proper written notice was provided as required.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged failure to follow the admission agreement and improper rent increase for Resident 1. The investigation determined the complaint to be unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Resident rent amount: 5750Resident rent amount: 6250Complaint received date: Oct 19, 2020Facility capacity: 6Facility census: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Daniel Pena
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit and delivered findings
Joseph Buda
Caregiver
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation
An unannounced Required 1-Year Visit was conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with licensing requirements and COVID-19 mitigation protocols.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst conducted a tour and observed the clients in care, providing technical assistance on infection control. No deficiencies were cited or observed during this inspection.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Administrator present during the visit and participated in the exit interview.
Joseph Taylor
Live-In Caregiver
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection.
A virtual case management visit was conducted via FaceTime to deliver an amended report to the facility administrator.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst informed the licensee of the reasons for the amended report and provided the updated report for their records. An exit interview was conducted via video-call.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Daniel Pena
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the virtual case management visit and delivered the amended report.
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Facility administrator who participated in the visit and exit interview.
Unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted due to allegations that staff left a resident in soiled clothing, failed to provide proper care, and that the resident's signal system was not operating.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations that due to staffing shortages, residents, including Resident 1, did not receive adequate incontinence care during night shifts, and staff failed to ensure bed and chair alarms were operational, posing potential health and safety risks. The facility implemented schedule changes and policies to address these issues.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated based on evidence that staff left a resident in soiled clothing, failed to provide proper care, and did not maintain the resident's signal system. The preponderance of evidence standard was met, validating the allegations.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1Type B: 2
Deficiencies (3)
Description
Severity
Managed Incontinence: Licensee failed to ensure incontinent residents were kept clean and dry due to staff shortages on night shift.
Type A
Care of Persons with Dementia: Facility did not have adequate direct care staff to support residents' needs, including awake night supervision for residents with dementia.
Type B
Personnel Requirements–General: Facility personnel were not sufficient in numbers and competent to provide necessary services, including checking bed and chair alarms.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 6Census: 5Plan of Correction Due Date: Jan 8, 2020Plan of Correction Due Date: Jul 18, 2021
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Daniel Pena
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Gaurav Rathi
Administrator
Facility administrator involved in the investigation and exit interview
Loading inspection reports...
Need Help?
Let us help you or a loved one find the perfect senior home.