Inspection Reports for Sakura Gardens of Los Angeles

325 S Boyle Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, United States, CA, 90033

Back to Facility Profile
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 125 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 8 Aug 5, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was a continuation annual required inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for Sakura Gardens at Los Angeles, a residential care facility for the elderly.
Findings
Multiple Type B deficiencies were identified including missing health screenings, annual training, first aid certifications for staff, missing tuberculosis test results and ambulatory status in resident files, outdated reappraisals, an inoperable emergency backup generator, and lack of recent fire/earthquake/emergency drills. The facility environment and food services were found to be in compliance.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 8
Deficiencies (8)
DescriptionSeverity
Five out of five staff files lacked a Health Screening form.Type B
Three out of five staff files lacked verification of annual training including dementia training.Type B
Three out of five staff files lacked verification of first aid certification.Type B
Two out of five residents' files lacked Tuberculosis test results in physician's reports.Type B
One out of five residents' files lacked ambulatory status in physician's report.Type B
One out of five residents' files lacked an updated reappraisal for change of condition.Type B
Disaster plan calls for use of an inoperable onsite backup generator.Type B
No record of fire/earthquake/emergency drills since December 19, 2023.Type B
Report Facts
Staff files missing health screening: 5 Staff files missing annual training verification: 3 Staff files missing first aid certification: 3 Residents missing TB test results: 2 Residents missing ambulatory status: 1 Residents missing updated reappraisal: 1 Days of perishables supply: 2 Days of non-perishable food supply: 7 Fire extinguishers per floor: 2 Last fire extinguisher inspection date: Sep 23, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolDirectorMet during the inspection and received the report.
Alfonso LozoyaBusiness ManagerMet during the inspection.
Fernando FierrosLicensing Program ManagerNamed as licensing program manager overseeing the inspection.
Luis DeLeonLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and signed the report.
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 125 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 3 Aug 4, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required 1-year visit to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the facility serving elderly residents.
Findings
The inspection found deficiencies including failure to respond timely to resident call signals, hot water temperatures exceeding Title 22 regulations, and missing evacuation chairs at one stairwell, all posing immediate health and safety risks.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 3
Deficiencies (3)
DescriptionSeverity
Two out of three call signals from residents' rooms were not responded to by staff.Type A
Three out of seven bathrooms or common area sinks had hot water temperatures above 120 degrees Fahrenheit.Type A
One out of two stairwells did not have an evacuation chair available.Type A
Report Facts
Call signals not responded: 2 Bathrooms/common area sinks with hot water above 120°F: 3 Stairwells missing evacuation chair: 1 Capacity: 183 Census: 125
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolDirectorMet during inspection and exit interview
Alfonso LozoyaBusiness ManagerMet during inspection
Fernando FierrosLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report as licensing program manager
Luis DeLeonLicensing Program AnalystConducted inspection and signed report
Inspection Report Census: 128 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 Jun 6, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted to address a repeat violation related to water temperature, following a previous licensing report and citation.
Findings
A repeat violation of CCR Section 87303(e)(2) due to water temperature was identified, resulting in an immediate civil penalty of $250 for failure to correct and repeat violations within 12 months.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Violation of CCR Section 87303(e)(2) due to water temperature
Report Facts
Civil penalty amount: 250
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobenionExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during visit and named in discussion of violations
Mayra CotaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced Case Management visit
Inspection Report Plan of Correction Census: 128 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Jun 6, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was a Plan of Correction (POC) unannounced inspection to verify correction of a previously cited deficiency related to water heater repairs.
Findings
The deficiency related to water heater temperature compliance was cleared by obtaining repairs and temperature logs. No new deficiencies were cited during this visit.
Report Facts
Number of resident bathrooms temperature checked: 12 Number of residents interviewed: 12 Number of staff interviewed: 2
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and participated in exit interview
Mayra CotaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the Plan of Correction visit and inspection
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 128 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 May 29, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted due to an allegation that staff did not ensure hot water was available at the facility for residents in care.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that hot water was not adequately available, with water temperatures in 10 out of 14 resident bathrooms measured between 89.6 and 91.7 degrees F, below the required range of 105 to 120 degrees F. Residents and staff corroborated the issue, reporting inconsistent and insufficient hot water delivery.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on evidence including water temperature measurements and interviews with residents and staff confirming the lack of adequate hot water for several days.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
Water supplies and plumbing fixtures were not maintained to deliver hot water at the required temperature range of 105-120 degrees F, with water temperatures measured between 89.9 and 91.7 degrees F in 10 resident bathrooms, posing an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk.Type A
Report Facts
Resident census: 128 Total capacity: 183 Water temperature range: 89.6 Water temperature range: 91.7 Required water temperature range: 105 Required water temperature range: 120 Deficiency count: 1
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and exit interview
Mayra CotaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Wei Siew HoLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 126 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 Mar 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that staff did not ensure the facility generators were not in disrepair.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility generators had been non-operable for at least a year due to stolen copper wiring, causing a blackout lasting about two hours. The allegation was substantiated and a deficiency was cited for failure to maintain the facility in good repair, posing a potential health and safety risk to residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on interviews, observations, and a tour of the facility. The generators were confirmed to be non-operable for at least one year due to stolen copper wiring, causing a blackout lasting two hours.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
Facility generators were non-operable due to stolen wiring, resulting in the facility not being kept in good repair and posing a potential health and safety risk to residents.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 126 Deficiency count: 1 Plan of Correction due date: 7
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolExecutive DirectorInterviewed during the complaint investigation regarding generator disrepair
Glenn TruemanLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Wei Siew HoLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 126 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 Feb 13, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by a complaint received on 2024-11-18 alleging that staff did not meet residents' needs and ignored residents' requests.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff failed to provide insulin and diabetic supplies to Resident #1, posing an immediate health and safety risk. Another allegation that staff ignored residents' requests was unsubstantiated based on interviews and observations.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not meet residents' needs, specifically failing to provide insulin and diabetic supplies to Resident #1, and that staff ignored residents' requests. The insulin-related allegation was substantiated, while the allegation regarding ignoring residents' requests was unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
Failure to provide resident with insulin and diabetic supplies as required by regulation.Type A
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 126 Deficiencies cited: 1 Special Incident Report blood sugar level: 561 Plan of Correction due date: Feb 14, 2025
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolExecutive DirectorMet during investigation and exit interview
Mayra CotaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Wei Siew HoLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation
Inspection Report Follow-Up Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 Feb 13, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced case management visit was conducted due to deficiencies noted during a prior complaint visit on 2024-11-26.
Findings
The inspection found incomplete Medication Administration Record (MAR) logs for Resident 2, missing multiple initials for medications required daily or several times a day, posing potential health and safety risks.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
Incomplete MAR logs for Resident 2 missing multiple initials for medication administration required daily or several times a day.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 183
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Dennis RobeniolExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during the visit
Mayra CotaLicensing EvaluatorConducted the inspection and signed the report
Wei Siew HoSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the inspection
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 128 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Feb 4, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 2024-12-04 regarding infection control, bed bugs, facility disrepair, food quality and quantity, and adherence to resident admission agreements.
Findings
The investigation found that staff were following infection control protocols despite a stomach virus outbreak, bed bugs were an isolated incident that did not spread, elevators were old but maintained with at least one working at all times, food quality and quantity were adequate with variety and options for seconds, and residents were properly notified about room moves with no rent increases. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation addressed nine allegations including improper infection control, bed bug infestation, facility disrepair, inadequate food service, and non-adherence to admission agreements. Interviews with residents and staff, document reviews, and facility tours were conducted. The findings were unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 9 Staff interviewed: 6 Facility capacity: 183 Facility census: 128
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Christian GutierrezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Jina MaleksarkissiansAdministratorFacility administrator interviewed during investigation
Tony VasalloLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 131 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Jan 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that a resident was sexually abused while in care.
Findings
The investigation found no sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of sexual abuse. Staff and residents denied witnessing or experiencing abuse, and medical tests initially indicating HIV positive were later corrected. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that a resident with dementia was sexually abused while in care due to testing positive for HIV. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of medical and facility records, and found no corroborating evidence. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 131
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Bennette PenaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
David SicairosLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation
Jina MaleksarkissiansExecutive DirectorSpoke with Licensing Program Analyst by phone regarding the visit
Alfonso LozoyaBusiness Office ManagerMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and received exit interview
Tomoko HinoMarketing DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit
Inspection Report Census: 141 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Dec 19, 2024
Visit Reason
Licensing Program Analyst conducted an unannounced case management visit to tour the physical plant of the facility and assess its condition.
Findings
The facility was observed to be clean and in good repair with no deficiencies noted. Security improvements included welding shut back entrances of a former building and installing reinforced fencing with barbed wire.
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Tomoko HinoSales DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit.
Inspection Report Census: 141 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 Dec 9, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Case Management - Other visit related to complaint control 28-AS-20241204135046, focusing on observations made during a physical plant inspection.
Findings
The inspection found that three out of four bathrooms had hot water temperatures exceeding the required range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit, with temperatures measured between 132.3F and 134F, resulting in a citation being issued.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Hot water temperature in three bathrooms did not measure between the required range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit.
Report Facts
Bathrooms with hot water temperature out of range: 3 Facility census: 141 Facility capacity: 183
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Christian GutierrezLicensing Program AnalystGenerated the Case Management - Deficiencies report and conducted the inspection.
Alfonso LozoyaBusiness Office DirectorMet with the Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection.
Tony VasalloSupervisorNamed as supervisor in the report.
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 130 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 2 Sep 12, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations that the licensee did not ensure residents were provided with a comfortable environment and that the facility was in disrepair.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the dining room air conditioning was inadequate, causing extreme heat and discomfort for residents, and that the air conditioning unit had been stolen about six months ago and not replaced, leaving the facility in disrepair.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that residents were not provided a comfortable environment due to inadequate air conditioning in the dining room and that the facility was in disrepair because the air conditioner had not been working for the past six months. The allegations were substantiated based on interviews and observations.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
DescriptionSeverity
A comfortable temperature for residents was not maintained at all times, with the dining room temperature being extremely hot a week prior, posing a potential health and safety risk.Type B
The premises were not maintained in a state of good repair and did not provide a safe and healthful environment due to the stolen and unreplaced air conditioning unit.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 130 Deficiencies cited: 2 Plan of Correction Due Dates: 7 Plan of Correction Due Dates: 18
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissiansAdministratorNamed in relation to findings about facility disrepair and air conditioning issues
Nune MargaryanLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Wei Siew HoLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation report
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 130 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Jun 28, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required 1-year annual visit using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools to evaluate compliance with regulatory requirements.
Findings
No deficiencies were observed during the annual inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with infection control, physical plant safety, operational requirements, staffing, personnel records, resident records, residents' rights, planned activities, food services, incidental medical and dental services, and resident special health needs. A technical violation will be provided for further information needed on the emergency disaster plan.
Report Facts
Residents files reviewed: 10 Staff files reviewed: 9 Residents receiving home health services: 5 Hospice waiver residents: 10 Facility capacity: 183 Census: 130
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissianAdministratorAdministrator present during inspection; certificate pending renewal
Jose VillalobosLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Fernando FierrosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the inspection
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 130 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Jun 25, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required 1-year visit to evaluate compliance using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools.
Findings
The facility was found to have sufficient staffing with all staff over 18 years old and operational signal systems. Nine staff files were reviewed showing proof of training and certifications. The inspection was not completed due to time constraints and will continue at a later date.
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissianAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and participated in exit interview.
Jose VillalobosLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced required 1-year visit using CARE Tools.
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 4 May 17, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 11/20/2023 regarding inadequate supervision, improper medication dispensing, disrespectful staff behavior, and failure to safeguard residents' belongings at Sakura Gardens at Los Angeles.
Findings
The investigation substantiated several allegations including inadequate supervision leading to resident injuries, improper medication administration with increased dosages without physician orders, disrespectful and loud behavior by staff towards residents, and failure to safeguard residents' personal belongings during laundry. Some allegations related to failure to inform authorized representatives and failure to provide food or water were unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations received on 11/20/2023 concerning inadequate supervision, staff yelling at residents, disrespectful treatment, improper medication dispensing, and failure to safeguard personal belongings. The investigation included multiple visits and interviews, and substantiated several allegations while others were found unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 2 Type B: 2
Deficiencies (4)
DescriptionSeverity
Failure to provide adequate care and supervision resulting in resident injuries on 11/3/23 requiring hospitalization and hip surgery.Type A
Failure to treat residents with dignity and respect; staff yelling and mocking residents.Type B
Failure to properly administer medications according to physician orders, including increasing frequency of behavioral medications without orders.Type A
Failure to safeguard residents' personal property and valuables, including loss and misplacement of clothing due to laundry practices.Type B
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 183 Medication administration frequency: 3 Staff interviewed: 11 Plan of Correction due dates: May 18, 2024 Plan of Correction due dates: May 22, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissiansExecutive DirectorMet during investigation and named in report
Noemi GalarzaLicensing Program AnalystConducted complaint investigation
Lisa HicksLicensing Program ManagerOversaw complaint investigation
Daniel KonishiAdministratorFacility administrator named in report
S5Memory Care Unit Caregiver StaffNamed in findings for yelling at residents, disrespectful behavior, and improper handling of residents
S4Memory Care Unit Caregiver StaffNamed in findings for yelling at residents
S10StaffObserved sitting on resident's walker and involved in disrespectful behavior
S11Housekeeper StaffFound resident on floor after fall
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 131 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 2 May 9, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Case Management - Deficiencies visit in conjunction with complaint control #28-AS-20231120121606, focusing on observations made during the physical plant inspection of the Memory Care Unit.
Findings
Two deficiencies were identified: an open bottle of Listerine Antiseptic Mouthwash was found unsecured on a window seal posing an immediate health/safety risk, and a resident's Physician Report was outdated, lacking the required annual medical assessment for dementia care.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by complaint control #28-AS-20231120121606. The report includes substantiated deficiencies related to physical plant safety and medical assessment compliance.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1 Type B: 1
Deficiencies (2)
DescriptionSeverity
Open bottle of Listerine Antiseptic Mouthwash found unsecured on window seal posing immediate health/safety risk.Type A
Resident's Physician Report dated 02/02/2021, missing required annual medical assessment for dementia care.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 131 Plan of Correction Due Date: May 10, 2024 Plan of Correction Due Date: May 16, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissiansAdministratorMet with during inspection and informed of report purpose.
Tyler ReyesLicensing EvaluatorGenerated the Case Management - Deficiencies report and conducted inspection.
Fernando FierrosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the licensing evaluation.
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 99 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 2 May 9, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations that staff did not provide a safe and comfortable environment for residents and that the facility was in disrepair.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that homeless individuals have been entering the facility campus through holes cut in fencing, squatting in an abandoned building on site, and causing safety and health risks. The facility was found to be in disrepair due to theft of copper wiring and damage to the backup power generator, phone, and fax lines, which affected resident phone service.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Homeless individuals were found to be entering the facility campus by cutting holes in fencing, squatting in an abandoned Intermediate Care Facility (ICF) building, and stealing copper wiring and other materials, causing safety and operational issues.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
DescriptionSeverity
Residents were not afforded a safe, comfortable, and healthful environment due to homeless individuals entering the facility campus through holes in fencing.Type B
The facility was not clean, safe, sanitary, or in good repair as the backup power generator, phone and fax lines, and dining hall AC units were damaged by theft and vandalism.Type B
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 10 Staff interviewed: 4 Residents confirming phone issues: 2 Staff corroborating wiring tampering: 4 Facility capacity: 183 Facility census: 99 Plan of Correction due date: May 24, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Erik ZaragozaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
David SicairosLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation
Jina MalesarkissiansAdministratorFacility administrator present during the investigation
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 99 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 May 9, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was a case management follow-up conducted after a complaint investigation related to incidents at the facility, including police being called and failure to submit required incident reports.
Findings
The facility failed to submit incident reports for multiple serious incidents including police calls, disconnection of resident phone lines, and theft of copper wiring and backup generator parts, posing potential safety risks to residents.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint investigation control #28-AS-20240501153246. The complaint was substantiated by findings of unreported serious incidents.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
Failure to submit incident reports for events involving police being called, phone and fax disconnection, AC unit and backup generator dismantling, posing safety risks to residents.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 99 Plan of Correction Due Date: May 16, 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissiansAdministratorFacility administrator present during the inspection
Erik ZaragozaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the case management visit and authored the report
David SicairosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the licensing evaluation
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 129 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 0 Mar 20, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the allegation that the administrator is not at the facility for the required amount of time.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst interviewed the administrator, staff, and residents and found that the administrator is generally available and present at the facility as required. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation, and the complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the administrator was not available for residents and staff and was not in the building as required. After investigation, including interviews with the administrator, 6 staff, and 5 residents, the allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 129
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Jina MaleksarkissianAdministratorInterviewed during complaint investigation regarding administrator availability
Cynthia D ChanLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Tony VasalloLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report as Licensing Program Manager
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 134 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 1 Feb 8, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a Case Management - Deficiencies visit related to complaint control #28-AS-20231120121606, focusing on observations made during the physical plant inspection of the Memory Care Unit.
Findings
The inspection found that all resident bedrooms in the Memory Care Unit had surveillance cameras installed in a wall corner of each room with wiring connected to electrical outlets, which was determined to be non-compliant with Title 22 regulations and posed potential health and safety risks to persons in care.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by complaint control #28-AS-20231120121606 and involved observations related to surveillance cameras in resident rooms.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
All resident rooms in the Memory Care Unit have surveillance cameras installed in a wall corner of each room with wiring that connects to electrical outlets, posing potential health and safety risks.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 183 Census: 134 Plan of Correction Due Date: Due date for correcting the cited deficiency is 02/15/2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Rodora MeranaMemory Care DirectorSpoke with Licensing Program Analyst regarding the surveillance cameras
Noemi GalarzaLicensing Program AnalystGenerated the Case Management - Deficiencies report
Lisa HicksSupervisorNamed as supervisor in the report
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 134 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 2 Feb 8, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to investigate multiple allegations including staff interfering with residents' sleep, improper storage of residents' personal hygiene items, rushing residents during meals, and issues regarding the facility administrator's certification status.
Findings
Two allegations were substantiated: staff waking residents too early affecting their sleep, and improper storage of residents' hygiene products in the laundry room posing health and safety risks. Two allegations were unsubstantiated: staff rushing residents during meals and the facility administrator's certification status, as the Executive Director held a valid certificate despite no longer being employed.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations that staff interfere with residents' sleep by waking them too early and that residents' personal hygiene items were improperly stored in the laundry room. The allegations that staff rushed residents during meals and that the facility administrator lacked an active certificate were unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (2)
DescriptionSeverity
Memory Care NOC shift staff waking residents between 4:30 AM - 5:00 AM, interfering with sleep.Type B
Laundry room used as storage for residents' hygiene products, including toothbrushes and incontinence supplies, posing health and safety risks.Type B
Report Facts
Staff interviewed: 8 Staff interviewed: 7 Plan of Correction due date: 2024
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Noemi GalarzaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and authored the report.
Lisa HicksLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation.
Rodora Marina MeranaMemory Care DirectorInterviewed during the investigation and assisted with the visit.
Daniel KonishiAdministratorFormer Executive Director mentioned in relation to administrator certification and facility management.
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 134 Capacity: 183 Deficiencies: 5 Feb 7, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations including resident falls due to staff neglect, failure to follow fall protocols, administration of medications not on the medication list, and failure to report falls to proper agencies.
Findings
The investigation substantiated multiple allegations: the resident sustained multiple falls due to staff neglect; staff failed to follow protocols regarding resident falls including notifying hospice and reporting to licensing agencies; and staff administered medication not prescribed to the resident. The facility failed to update or provide a fall prevention plan and did not report incidents within required timeframes.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Allegations included multiple resident falls due to staff neglect, failure to follow fall protocols, administration of unprescribed medication, and failure to report falls to hospice and licensing agencies. The facility failed to notify hospice of falls, did not follow hospice care plans, and did not report incidents within seven days as required.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 3 Type B: 2
Deficiencies (5)
DescriptionSeverity
Failure to ensure resident had a plan of care for fall risk after hospice documentation, posing immediate risk to health and safety.Type A
Failure to ensure resident received medication as prescribed; resident was given acetaminophen 500mg not prescribed.Type A
Failure to provide care and supervision meeting individual needs, including updating care plans and notifying staff.Type A
Failure to follow protocol for resident care after falls on 1/15/24 and 1/24/24, posing potential risk to health and safety.Type B
Failure to submit timely written reports to licensing agency and responsible persons regarding falls on 1/15/24 and 1/24/24.Type B
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 183 Resident census: 134 Incident dates: 2 Plan of Correction due dates: 3
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Mary G FloresLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Tony VasalloLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation
Tomoko HinoSales Marketing DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and exit interview
Daniel KonishiAdministratorFacility administrator interviewed during investigation
Inspection Report Census: 133 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 0 Oct 10, 2023
Visit Reason
Subsequent Case Management Visit for Change of capacity to increase licensed capacity from 177 to 183 non-ambulatory residents.
Findings
The facility's physical plant meets Title 22 Regulations, fire clearance was approved for the increased capacity, and no deficiencies were noted during the visit.
Report Facts
Capacity increase: 183 Residents in Transitional Memory Care Units: 24 Residents in Memory Care Units: 23 Residents in Assisted Living: 136 Bedridden residents allowed: 47
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiExecutive DirectorMet with during visit and assisted with the capacity change visit
Tena HerreraLicensing Program AnalystConducted the Subsequent Case Management Visit
Inspection Report Census: 132 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 1 Sep 26, 2023
Visit Reason
Licensing Program Analyst conducted a Case Management Visit for Change of capacity at Sakura Gardens at Los Angeles facility.
Findings
The facility was inspected for a capacity increase from 177 to 183 non-ambulatory residents. Several furnishing and maintenance issues were noted in the Transitional Memory Care Units, preventing approval of the capacity increase at this time.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Rooms 119-124 lacked proper furnishings such as bed, dresser, lamp, chair, shower curtain; air conditioner covers in rooms 119 and 120 were not properly secured; room 123 had debris and boxes; dining area lacked proper dining ware; insufficient linens available.
Report Facts
Capacity change requested: 183 Current census: 132 Licensed capacity: 177 Number of rooms toured: 13 Bedridden residents allowed: 47 Residents in Transitional Memory Care Units: 24 Residents in Memory Care Units: 23 Residents in Assisted Living: 136
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiExecutive DirectorAssisted with the visit and was present during inspection
Tena HerreraLicensing Program AnalystConducted the Case Management Visit
Rodora Marina MeranaMemory Care DirectorReceived a copy of the report during exit interview
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 132 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 0 Aug 22, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation in response to allegations that staff were not safeguarding residents' personal belongings and not preventing residents' rooms from being broken into.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with the administrator, staff, and residents, and a review of a resident's file. The allegations were denied by staff and administrator, and residents were unable to corroborate the claims. There was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations, so the allegations were unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff not safeguarding residents' personal belongings and rooms being broken into. Interviews and evidence did not support the allegations.
Report Facts
Capacity: 177 Census: 132
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiAdministratorAdministrator who assisted with the complaint investigation and was interviewed regarding the allegations
Angelica ReaLicensing Program AnalystEvaluator who conducted the complaint investigation
Lisa HicksLicensing Program ManagerManager overseeing the complaint investigation
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 131 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 2 Jul 10, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was a required unannounced annual inspection conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Tena Herrera to evaluate compliance with regulatory standards at Sakura Gardens at Los Angeles.
Findings
The facility was generally compliant with infection control, staffing, personnel training, resident rights, and operational requirements. However, two deficiencies were noted: water temperature in resident rooms exceeded the regulatory maximum, and medications were found unsecured in an unlocked medication cart.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 2
Deficiencies (2)
DescriptionSeverity
Water temperature in resident rooms reached 145.4 degrees F, exceeding the maximum allowed temperature of 120 degrees F, posing an immediate health and safety risk.Type A
Medication cart was unlocked and medications were accessible to residents, posing an immediate health and safety risk.Type A
Report Facts
Residents present: 131 Total licensed capacity: 177 Water temperature: 145.4 Medication review: 12 Staff interviews: 5 Resident interviews: 5
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiExecutive DirectorNamed in relation to findings on water temperature adjustment and medication storage
Tena HerreraLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and documented findings
David SicairosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the inspection
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 125 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 0 Jul 29, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was an annual unannounced visit focusing on the Infection Control domain to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies issued. The environment was clean, PPE supplies were adequate, infection control measures were in place, and medications were administered as prescribed.
Report Facts
Residents in Assisted Living building: 102 Residents in Memory Care unit: 23 Rooms inspected: 14 Hospice waiver capacity: 10 PPE supply duration: 30 Perishable food supply duration: 2 Non-perishable food supply duration: 7
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during the inspection and provided information about facility operations
Cynthia ChanLicensing Program AnalystConducted the annual inspection
Ya-Ting YangLicensing Program AnalystConducted the annual inspection
Inspection Report Annual Inspection Census: 123 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 0 Jul 19, 2021
Visit Reason
An unannounced Annual Required / Infection Control visit was conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with health and safety regulations.
Findings
The facility was found to be in good repair with no observed deficiencies. Infection control practices were adequate, medications were properly stored, and the kitchen met regulatory standards. No citations were issued.
Report Facts
Water temperature range: 112 Water temperature range: 120.2 PPE supply duration: 30 Resident rooms inspected for water temperature: 13 Memory care wing capacity: 23
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and participated in exit interview
Alma GonzalezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection visit
Rebecca OrendainSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the inspection
Inspection Report Complaint Investigation Census: 120 Capacity: 177 Deficiencies: 1 May 11, 2021
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation following a complaint received on 08/14/2020 regarding the facility's air conditioning being broken.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the air conditioning in the Assisted Living building was broken due to a defective compressor, and the facility had installed a temporary chiller while awaiting a new HVAC unit installation completed on 09/18/2020. The air conditioning in the Memory Care building was functioning properly.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on interviews with the Executive Director, residents, and review of HVAC repair quotes and documentation. The allegation was that the facility air conditioner was broken at or around 08/14/2020 and had also not been working the previous year (2019).
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
DescriptionSeverity
87303(b) Maintenance and Operation: A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained at all times. This requirement was not met as evidenced by the facility air conditioner not properly working and failure to ensure comfortable temperatures for residents, posing a potential safety risk.Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 177 Census: 120 Plan of Correction Due Date: May 18, 2021
Employees Mentioned
NameTitleContext
Daniel KonishiExecutive DirectorInterviewed regarding the air conditioning issues and facility operations
Alma GonzalezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and interviews
Rebecca OrendainLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation report

Loading inspection reports...