Deficiencies (last 4 years)
Deficiencies (over 4 years)
4.3 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
23% worse than Texas average
Texas average: 3.5 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
8
6
4
2
0
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Nov 5, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate complaints regarding the facility's failure to ensure valid reasons and physician orders for resident discharges, and failure to provide proper documentation and notification related to residents' needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies during transfers or discharges.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation revealed failures in discharge documentation and notification processes affecting multiple residents, including lack of physician discharge orders, absence of documented reasons for discharge, and failure to provide written notices to residents and their representatives. Family members reported not being informed timely or given written discharge paperwork.
Findings
The facility failed to document valid reasons and physician orders for discharge for four residents and failed to provide sufficient preparation, orientation, and written notification to residents and their representatives regarding transfers or discharges for five residents. These failures placed residents at risk of diminished continuity of care, unsafe discharges, and lack of advocacy.
Deficiencies (2)
Failed to ensure there was a valid reason for discharge and a resident's physician order for discharge was documented when a discharge was conducted for four residents.
Failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation of resident representatives to ensure safe and orderly transfers or discharges, including failure to notify residents and their responsible parties in writing of the reasons for transfer or discharge.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for discharge orders: 7
Residents with missing discharge orders: 4
Residents reviewed for transfer/discharge notification: 5
BIMS scores: Various BIMS scores reported for residents, e.g., 0, 3, 9, 10, 11 indicating cognitive impairment levels.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LVN C | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Described nurse responsibilities for discharge paperwork and family notification. |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Provided information on discharge procedures, remodeling impact, and notification practices. |
| ADON | Assistant Director of Nursing | Discussed discharge notification practices and training. |
| RN B | Registered Nurse | Provided discharge paperwork to residents and receiving facilities but not to responsible parties. |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Discussed discharge process, family notification, and reasons for resident transfers. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jun 5, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding a fall incident involving Resident #1, who was not adequately supervised during incontinent care, resulting in a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that CNA B did not provide adequate supervision to Resident #1 during incontinent care, leading to a fall. The fall was witnessed, and Resident #1 sustained serious injuries including a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. The facility corrected the issue before the survey and provided in-service training to staff on falls, safety, abuse/neglect, and care procedures.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision of Resident #1 during care, leading to a fall and serious injury. The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and observations, confirming the fall was witnessed and related to inadequate supervision. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the survey began and implemented staff in-services and monitoring.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure residents remained free from accidents and hazards and to provide adequate supervision, resulting in Resident #1 falling from bed and sustaining a traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Report Facts
Fall risk score: 15
Fall risk score: 16
Staff in-service participants: 5
Staff in-service participants: 17
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CNA B | Certified Nursing Assistant | Named in the finding for inadequate supervision leading to Resident #1's fall |
| CNA C | Certified Nursing Assistant | Witnessed the fall and notified LVN A |
| LVN A | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Assessed Resident #1 after the fall and followed protocol |
| RN B | Registered Nurse | Assessed Resident #1's injuries and documented the incident |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Notified of the fall, oversaw corrective actions and staff in-services |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Investigated the fall and implemented corrective actions including staff education and QAPI meetings |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Apr 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to initiate Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) within 20 business days following the date services were agreed upon in the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting for Resident #2.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on Resident #2's case where the facility did not initiate NFSS within 20 business days after the IDT meeting on 5/17/2024. The HHSC PASSR Unit Program Specialist confirmed the facility was out of compliance with Texas Administrative Code §554.2704(i)(7). Interviews with facility staff including the Director of Nursing, Director of Rehabilitation, MDS coordinator, and Administrator revealed communication and procedural issues contributing to the delay. The facility provided a loaner customized wheelchair during the delay. The new DOR initiated an IDT meeting scheduled for 4/11/2025 to address continuation of therapy and wheelchair services.
Findings
The facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the PASRR Level II determination and evaluation report for Resident #2 and did not initiate NFSS within the required 20 business days after the IDT meeting. This delay could cause residents with mental health disorders or psychiatric conditions to experience delays or lack of needed specialized services or equipment. Interviews and record reviews confirmed the failure to submit the NFSS request timely, with explanations involving staff transitions and communication gaps.
Deficiencies (1)
Failed to initiate Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) within 20 business days following the date services were agreed upon in the IDT meeting for Resident #2.
Report Facts
Date of IDT meeting: May 17, 2024
Date of scheduled follow-up IDT meeting: Apr 11, 2025
BIMS score: 9
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDS K | Conducted the IDT meeting and submitted information to PASSR regarding specialized service requests | |
| DOR | Director of Rehabilitation | Responsible for submitting NFSS requests; new to position since February 2025; scheduled IDT meeting for 4/11/25 |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding NFSS process and communication issues; involved in collaboration between therapy and MDS |
| Administrator | Oversaw MDS and PASRR services; responsible for ensuring NFSS requests were submitted within required timeframe |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 5
Date: Apr 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding abuse, neglect, and failure to follow PASRR specialized service requirements at Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated with findings of abuse and neglect related to Resident #1's fall and injury, failure to initiate PASRR services timely for Resident #2, inappropriate antipsychotic medication use for Resident #78, expired insulin storage, and infection control breaches during incontinent care for Resident #63.
Findings
The facility failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect, specifically Resident #1 who fell and fractured her right humerus due to inadequate assistance. The facility also failed to initiate PASRR specialized services timely for Resident #2, improperly prescribed antipsychotic medication without appropriate diagnosis for Resident #78, failed to discard expired insulin in medication carts, and failed to follow proper infection control practices during incontinent care for Resident #63.
Deficiencies (5)
Failed to protect Resident #1 from abuse and neglect resulting in a fall and right humerus fracture.
Failed to initiate PASRR specialized services within 20 business days for Resident #2.
Failed to ensure Resident #78 was not prescribed antipsychotic medication without appropriate diagnosis.
Failed to discard expired insulin in medication cart in 200 hallway.
Failed to follow proper infection prevention and control practices; CNA reused wipes and did not sanitize hands between glove changes during incontinent care for Resident #63.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for abuse: 10
Residents reviewed for PASRR: 5
Residents reviewed for pharmacy services: 33
Medication cart insulin expiration: 28
Number of staff in-serviced on abuse and neglect topics: 14
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CNA A | Named in abuse and neglect finding related to Resident #1 fall. | |
| CNA B | Assisted during Resident #1 fall and named in infection control breach observation. | |
| RN C | Registered Nurse | Assessed Resident #1 after fall and named in abuse investigation. |
| Administrator | Oversaw investigation and corrective actions related to Resident #1 fall and PASRR issues. | |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Provided interviews regarding abuse, PASRR, and infection control findings. |
| Physical Therapy Director | Interviewed regarding Resident #1's assistance needs. | |
| DOR | Director of Rehabilitation | Interviewed regarding PASRR NFSS initiation delays. |
| CNA E | Interviewed regarding Resident #78 behavior status. | |
| CNA F | Interviewed regarding Resident #78 behavior status. | |
| RN G | Interviewed regarding medication order reconciliation. | |
| ADON H | Assistant Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding psychotropic medication order process. |
| LVN I | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Interviewed regarding insulin expiration and medication storage. |
| LVN J | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Interviewed regarding insulin expiration and medication storage. |
| CNA L | Interviewed regarding hand hygiene and infection control practices. | |
| CNA M | Interviewed regarding training on incontinent care and hand hygiene. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Mar 5, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to accurately code a resident's fall with major injury in the Minimum Data Set (MDS).
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall on 01/30/2025 resulting in right rib fractures, but the fall was not initially coded as a major injury in the MDS. The facility reported the fall to HHSC on 01/31/2025 and conducted in-services on abuse, neglect, and falls. The MDS was later corrected after hospital documentation was reviewed.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was coded in the MDS for a fall with major injury on 01/30/2025, which could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care. Interviews and record reviews confirmed the fall occurred with a major injury (right rib fracture), but the MDS initially did not reflect this injury accurately.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment, specifically Resident #1's fall with major injury was not accurately coded in the MDS.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments: 8
Date of fall with major injury: Jan 30, 2025
Date facility reported fall to HHSC: Jan 31, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LVN B | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Completed head-to-toe assessment after Resident #1's fall and provided details about the incident and interventions |
| MDS A | MDS Coordinator | Ran Risk Assessment report and acknowledged the initial coding error in the MDS for Resident #1's fall |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Provided details about the fall, in-services conducted, and the impact of the coding error on Resident #1's care |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Acknowledged the fall was reported but the injury was not included in the MDS coding, describing it as a technical error |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Jan 26, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to concerns about the facility's failure to maintain accurate and complete medical records for residents, specifically regarding blood sugar documentation for two residents.
Complaint Details
The visit was complaint-related due to concerns about inaccurate medical record documentation. Staff A admitted to documentation errors under stress but stated no negative outcomes occurred. The Director of Nursing confirmed the errors and stated no physician notification or change of condition was made because the errors were documentation mistakes.
Findings
The facility failed to accurately document blood sugar levels for two residents on specified dates, resulting in documentation errors that could potentially place residents at risk. Staff admitted to mistakes in recording blood sugar levels but reported no negative outcomes due to these errors.
Deficiencies (2)
Failure to accurately document Resident #73's blood sugar level on 01/24/2024 at 3:51 p.m.
Failure to accurately document Resident #305's blood sugar level on 01/21/2024 at 4:41 p.m.
Report Facts
Blood sugar reading: 32
Blood sugar reading: 132
Blood sugar reading: 361
Blood sugar reading: 261
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff A | Admitted to making documentation errors for blood sugar readings of Residents #73 and #305. | |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Confirmed documentation errors and stated no physician notification or change of condition was made. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 3
Date: Jan 5, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted based on complaints and concerns regarding the facility's failure to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans, ensure adequate supervision to prevent falls, and provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on issues related to care planning for drug use, fall prevention and supervision, and oxygen therapy administration. The investigation found substantiated deficiencies in these areas affecting multiple residents.
Findings
The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for recreational drug use for Resident #10, failed to provide adequate supervision and interventions to prevent repeated falls for Resident #4, and failed to administer oxygen at physician-ordered levels for Residents #1, #2, and #3. These failures posed risks of inadequate care and potential harm to residents.
Deficiencies (3)
Failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with measurable objectives and time frames for Resident #10's recreational drug use after paraphernalia was found in his room.
Failed to ensure Resident #4 received adequate supervision and effective interventions to prevent repeated falls with injuries.
Failed to provide safe and appropriate respiratory care by administering oxygen at incorrect flow rates for Residents #1, #2, and #3.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 3
Falls: 9
Oxygen flow rate: 1.5
Oxygen flow rate: 4
Oxygen flow rate: 3.5
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LVN A | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Nurse for Resident #1 who verified oxygen setting below ordered level |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Provided interviews regarding care planning and supervision responsibilities |
| Administrator | Interviewed regarding care planning decisions for Resident #10 | |
| MDS Coordinator I | Interviewed regarding care planning for Resident #4 | |
| LVN F | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Interviewed regarding Resident #4's falls and care plans |
| LVN J | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Interviewed regarding Resident #4's falls and care plans |
| CNA H | Certified Nursing Assistant | Interviewed regarding care and supervision of Resident #4 |
| Director of Rehabilitation | Interviewed regarding fall prevention interventions for Resident #4 | |
| CNA L | Certified Nursing Assistant | Interviewed regarding Resident #4's attempts to get up without assistance |
| PT G | Physical Therapist | Interviewed regarding fall interventions for Resident #4 |
| ADON B | Assistant Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding oxygen and feeding pump rounds |
| Admissions Coordinator C | Interviewed regarding oxygen setting checks | |
| RN E | Charge Nurse | Interviewed regarding oxygen setting checks for Residents #2 and #3 |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Oct 2, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint regarding the facility's failure to provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident preferences, and goals, specifically related to Resident #1's abnormal skin discoloration and subsequent injury.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated based on findings that the facility staff failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards, resulting in delayed medical treatment for Resident #1.
Findings
The facility failed to document, monitor, and assess Resident #1's abnormal skin discoloration prior to and upon return from an outing, resulting in delayed identification of spiral angulated fractures. Staff interviews revealed lack of documentation and incomplete assessments, with the Director of Nursing acknowledging documentation lapses.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals, specifically failure to document, monitor, and assess Resident #1's abnormal skin discoloration and injury.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for quality of care: 5
Date of Resident #1 admission: Sep 8, 2023
Date of Resident #1 admission record: Sep 25, 2023
Date of Resident #1 outing: Sep 23, 2023
Date of Radiology Interpretation: Sep 23, 2023
BIMS score: 4
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| RN D | Registered Nurse | Named in failure to document and assess Resident #1's condition |
| LVN T | Licensed Vocational Nurse | Named in assessment of Resident #1 upon return and notification of MD |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Acknowledged documentation lapses by RN D and discussed policy |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Nov 8, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted following a complaint related to the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement of Resident #22, who left the facility undetected and was missing for 19 minutes.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that Resident #22 eloped from the facility on 11/8/2022 at 11:13 PM, was missing for 19 minutes, and was found safe after being transferred to the ER. The resident had expressed pain and distress prior to elopement and reported staff were not responsive. The resident used a visible keypad code to exit the front door. The responsible party had previously expressed concern about the resident's risk of elopement but had not informed staff.
Findings
The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent Resident #22, who had severe cognitive impairment and was at risk for elopement, from leaving the facility. The resident exited through a front door secured by a keypad code that was visible and accessible. Staff were unaware of the resident's exit until after the fact. No injuries occurred, but the incident posed a serious risk of harm. The facility lacked policies on elopement prevention beyond admission risk evaluation.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure adequate supervision to prevent elopement of Resident #22.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for supervision: 15
Residents affected: 1
Pain medication time: 22.75
Elopement time: 23.22
Missing duration: 19
Speed limit: 50
Monitoring frequency: 15
Resident checks frequency: 2
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



