Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
573
501 employees · 72 contractors · 297 on an average day Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · New Hyde Park, NY
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Home Care, Hospice Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · New Hyde Park, NY
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 92 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Receive the highest quality of care from Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation, a distinct community in New Hyde Park, NY, offering skilled nursing, home health aides, and medical social services. Older adults can keep their peace of mind with a respectful and well-trained team, helping with their daily living activities and personal needs. The agency also utilizes innovation, providing 24-hour telephone availability for older adults’ convenience.
Physical, occupational, and speech therapies are conducted to improve older adults’ living experiences. The agency also provides medical supplies for older adults’ healthcare needs. Delivering care to those residing in Kings, Nassau, and Queens, this home care provider is ideal for those looking for a wide range of care options for their ever-changing needs while staying at home.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 279th out of 526 nursing homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 27m
This nursing home is ranked 279th out of 526 nursing homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 27mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +118% above New York average
4 of 6 metrics below New York average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 133 total: 126 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
133 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
1h 8m
↑ 63% · NY 42mThis facility: 1h 8m per resident per day, 63% above the New York average of 42m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 133 total: 126 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
133 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 24 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
24 staff · 8-hour shifts
12m
↓ 75% · NY 46mThis facility: 12m per resident per day, 75% below the New York average of 46m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 24 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
24 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 273 total: 256 of the facility's own employees and 17 agency contractors.
273 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
2h 6m
↓ 3% · NY 2h 11mThis facility: 2h 6m per resident per day, 3% below the New York average of 2h 11m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 273 total: 256 of the facility's own employees and 17 agency contractors.
273 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↓ 6% · NY 7mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 6% below the New York average of 7m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 56m
↓ 7% · NY 3h 10mThis facility: 2h 56m per resident per day, 7% below the New York average of 3h 10m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 1m
↑ 118% · NY 28mThis facility: 1h 1m per resident per day, 118% above the New York average of 28m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
573
501 employees · 72 contractors · 297 on an average day
573 total staff / 474 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.21 : 1
↓ 7% · NY 1.30This facility: 1.21 staff per resident, 7% below the New York average of 1.30 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
573 staff ÷ 474 residents
See full New York ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↑ 4% · NY 7.7 hThis facility: 8 h, 4% above the New York average of 7.7 h (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
216,999 staff hours this quarter
See full New York ranking →89% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
New York average: 88% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (17), Physical Therapy Assistant (10), Respiratory Therapy Technician (9), Physical Therapy Aide (9), Registered Nurse (7), Speech Language Pathologist (6), Other Dietary Services Staff (6), Licensed Practical Nurse (4), Qualified Social Worker (2), Other Social Services Staff (1), Qualified Activities Professional (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
88% of staff were vaccinated against the flu
Why it matters: staff move from resident to resident all day. When most of them are vaccinated, the flu is less likely to reach the people it is most dangerous for. Source: state health department data.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
527
Rank #10 / 567Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 567 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
527
Rank #10 / 567Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 567 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #240 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 240th out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #240 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 240th out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
71
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #193 / 519Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 193rd out of 519 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 519. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #193 / 519Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 193rd out of 519 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 519. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95.1%
This home is often near full
Based on 501 residents and 527 beds. Source: state licensing agency resident count
Higher than the New York average: 86.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
109
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
CountyQueens
NYS Safe Sharps Collection Program — New York StateA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation (Not for Profit).
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
Family Council
Short-Term Rehab
Sub-Acute Care / Short-Term Rehabilitation
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Telemedicine
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Volunteer Support Groups
Pets not allowed
Auditorium
Gift Shop
Activities
Crochet
Religious AffiliationJewish
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
92 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
9 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
10 severity-weighted points (6 citations) · 5× lower than the typical CMS-certified NY facility (median: 45)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
56 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified NY facility (median: 52)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 29% · NY 4.2This facility: 3, 29% below the New York average of 4.2 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #18 / 530Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 530 nursing homes we track in New York for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the New York State average, with a ranking across all 530 NY facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 71% · NY 20.5This facility: 6, 71% below the New York average of 20.5 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #18 / 530Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 530 nursing homes we track in New York for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the New York mean across 530 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 59% · NY 4.83This facility: 2, 59% below the New York average of 4.83 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
6 of 6 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.4 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.4 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 68% · NY 19This facility: 6, 68% below the New York average of 19 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.8 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 09, 2025 · 1 citation (Abuse/Neglect, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 2 of 6 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 09, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 23, 2023
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 18, 2021
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (33%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (33%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (17%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
5 of 6 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 6 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsLawsuit overview for Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Total Cases
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
122
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
122
Active Cases
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
32
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
32
Closed
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
88
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
88
Since
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2012
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2012
Most Recent
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2026
Last Scheduled Court Date
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 14, 2026
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 14, 2026
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
NY avg $73KNew York average: $72,735. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
NY avg 1.59New York average: 1.59. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NY avg 0.1New York average: 0.1. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the New York average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 25% · NY 4.0This facility: 5.0, 25% above the NY average of 4.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 42% · NY 3.5This facility: 5.0, 42% above the NY average of 3.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 30% · NY 8.0This facility: 5.6, 30% below the NY average of 8.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 60% · NY 14.5This facility: 5.8, 60% below the NY average of 14.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 11 better, 2 worse
8 short-stay measures: 5 better, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.2%
↓ 40% · NY 13.6This facility: 8.2, 40% below the NY average of 13.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.2%
↓ 40% · NY 13.6This facility: 8.2, 40% below the NY average of 13.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.1%
↓ 45% · NY 11.1This facility: 6.1, 45% below the NY average of 11.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.1%
↓ 45% · NY 11.1This facility: 6.1, 45% below the NY average of 11.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.9%
↓ 84% · NY 18.6This facility: 2.9, 84% below the NY average of 18.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
2.9%
↓ 84% · NY 18.6This facility: 2.9, 84% below the NY average of 18.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
↑ 84% · NY 1.2This facility: 2.2, 84% above the NY average of 1.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
↑ 84% · NY 1.2This facility: 2.2, 84% above the NY average of 1.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
↓ 24% · NY 3.1This facility: 2.4, 24% below the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4%
↓ 24% · NY 3.1This facility: 2.4, 24% below the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↓ 21% · NY 6.5This facility: 5.1, 21% below the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↓ 21% · NY 6.5This facility: 5.1, 21% below the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3%
↑ 10% · NY 5.7This facility: 6.3, 10% above the NY average of 5.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3%
↑ 10% · NY 5.7This facility: 6.3, 10% above the NY average of 5.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.8%
↓ 56% · NY 20.1This facility: 8.8, 56% below the NY average of 20.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.8%
↓ 56% · NY 20.1This facility: 8.8, 56% below the NY average of 20.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
↓ 70% · NY 13.7This facility: 4.1, 70% below the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.1%
↓ 70% · NY 13.7This facility: 4.1, 70% below the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · NY 91.8This facility: 100.0, 9% above the NY average of 91.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · NY 91.8This facility: 100.0, 9% above the NY average of 91.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · NY 95.2This facility: 100.0, 5% above the NY average of 95.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 5% · NY 95.2This facility: 100.0, 5% above the NY average of 95.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.13
↓ 34% · NY 1.71This facility: 1.13, 34% below the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.13
↓ 34% · NY 1.71This facility: 1.13, 34% below the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.32
↓ 76% · NY 1.35This facility: 0.32, 76% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.32
↓ 76% · NY 1.35This facility: 0.32, 76% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.4%
↑ 5% · US 53.7This facility: 56.4, 5% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.4%
↑ 5% · US 53.7This facility: 56.4, 5% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.3%
↑ 17% · US 50.6This facility: 59.3, 17% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.3%
↑ 17% · US 50.6This facility: 59.3, 17% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.2%
↓ 79% · US 0.8This facility: 0.2, 79% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.2%
↓ 79% · US 0.8This facility: 0.2, 79% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
↓ 85% · NY 1.1This facility: 0.2, 85% below the NY average of 1.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.2%
↓ 85% · NY 1.1This facility: 0.2, 85% below the NY average of 1.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 28% · NY 77.6This facility: 99.3, 28% above the NY average of 77.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 28% · NY 77.6This facility: 99.3, 28% above the NY average of 77.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
↑ 24% · NY 78.9This facility: 98.2, 24% above the NY average of 78.9 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2%
↑ 24% · NY 78.9This facility: 98.2, 24% above the NY average of 78.9 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.1%
↓ 12% · NY 20.6This facility: 18.1, 12% below the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
18.1%
↓ 12% · NY 20.6This facility: 18.1, 12% below the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.6%
↓ 63% · NY 9.7This facility: 3.6, 63% below the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.6%
↓ 63% · NY 9.7This facility: 3.6, 63% below the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 479 New York nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−30.9% operating margin
+3.5 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($29.6M) trims the net loss to −$74.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most New York homes
77.9% payroll share of revenue
NY average 56.4%Rank #32 / 477Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 477 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $4.9M while revenue rose $3.9M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with New York homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $93.6M | +$3.9M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $23.1M | Rank in NY Rank #9 / 479Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Top 2% in NY Higher net patient revenue than 98% of NY homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $122.5M | +$2.0M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $23.9M | Rank in NY Rank #3 / 479Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$28.9M | +$1.9M | Trend 20172024 | NY median −$0.4M | Rank in NY Rank #476 / 479Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 476th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −30.9% | +3.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median −2.0% | Rank in NY Rank #449 / 479Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 449th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 6% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $29.6M | — | Trend — | NY median $0.2M | Rank in NY Rank #5 / 464Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 464 nursing homes we track in New York for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 99% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$74.2M | +$15.1M | Trend — | NY median $0.0M | Rank in NY Rank #479 / 479Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 479th out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most New York homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $72.9M | −$4.9M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $12.2M | Rank in NY Rank #2 / 479Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 479 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Top 2% in NY by size Higher payroll than 100% of NY homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 77.9% | −8.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median 52.7% | Rank in NY Rank #32 / 477Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 477 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | 21.5 pts over NY average The NY average is 56.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · NY benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the New York payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NY payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $81.0M | $86.3M | $87.7M | $67.9M | $71.2M | $75.4M | $89.7M | $93.6M |
| Operating expenses | $95.3M | $98.6M | $101.3M | $101.2M | $103.3M | $107.9M | $120.5M | $122.5M |
| Net patient income | −$14.3M | −$12.4M | −$13.6M | −$33.4M | −$32.1M | −$32.5M | −$30.8M | −$28.9M |
| Operating margin | −17.6% | −14.3% | −15.5% | −49.2% | −45.1% | −43.1% | −34.4% | −30.9% |
| Net income | $2.9M | −$10.3M | $21.7M | $26.7M | $40.9M | $139.2M | −$89.3M | −$74.2M |
| Payroll costs | $58.6M | $59.4M | $61.5M | $65.4M | $65.8M | $68.2M | $77.8M | $72.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 72.3% | 68.9% | 70.1% | 96.4% | 92.4% | 90.5% | 86.7% | 77.9% |
| Beds | 527 | 527 | 527 | 527 | 527 | 527 | 527 | 527 |
| Gross revenue | $81.0M | $86.3M | $87.7M | $67.9M | $71.2M | $75.4M | $89.7M | $93.6M |
| Salaries | $42.7M | $43.0M | $45.2M | $46.2M | $47.2M | $51.3M | $59.8M | $55.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $15.9M | $16.4M | $16.3M | $19.2M | $18.6M | $16.9M | $18.0M | $17.1M |
| Contract labor | $3.1M | $3.0M | $4.2M | $2.8M | $3.0M | $4.3M | $6.5M | $11.5M |
| Other operating costs | $36.7M | $39.2M | $39.8M | $35.8M | $37.5M | $39.7M | $42.7M | $49.6M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $401 | $436 | $432 | $420 | $507 | $510 | $507 | $514 |
| Cost per day | $472 | $499 | $499 | $627 | $736 | $730 | $681 | $672 |
| Average length of stay | 112.6 days | 113.5 days | 121.8 days | 127.0 days | 125.8 days | 103.7 days | 97.3 days | 108.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
1,649 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
678 · 41%
Medicaid
186 · 11%
Private pay & other
785 · 48%
Resident snapshot
474 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
49 · 10%
Medicaid
275 · 58%
Private pay & other
150 · 32%
Leaving
1,646 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
614 · 37%
Medicaid
408 · 25%
Private pay & other
624 · 38%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation
1.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from New Hyde Park's city center to Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Queens
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 56.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation | NH HC HOS PC SNF | New Hyde Park (Glen Oaks) | 527
Facility
527
NY AVG
185
Rank
#10 / 567 | A- |
95.1%
Facility
95.1%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#193 / 519 | +10% | 3.44
Facility
3.44
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#279 / 526 | +77% | -6% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 6
Facility
6
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#18 / 530 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#18 / 530 | - | 501 | A+ |
71
Facility
71
NY AVG
64
Rank
#240 / 442 | Parker Jewish Institute For Health Care And Rehabilitation (Not For Profit) | $93.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$93.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#9 / 479 | $72.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$72.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#2 / 479 | 77.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
77.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#32 / 477 | 335132 | ||||
| Union Plaza Care Center | NH SNF | Queens (Flushing) | 280
Facility
280
NY AVG
185
Rank
#84 / 567 | A+ |
94.4%
Facility
94.4%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#218 / 519 | +9% | 2.80
Facility
2.80
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#456 / 526 | -1% | -24% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 9
Facility
9
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#67 / 530 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#95 / 530 | - | 264 | - |
97
Facility
97
NY AVG
64
Rank
#14 / 442 | Esther Friedman | $46.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$46.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#74 / 479 | $24.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$24.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#62 / 479 | 53%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#235 / 477 | 335799 | ||||
| Cypress Garden Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Queens (Flushing) | 268
Facility
268
NY AVG
185
Rank
#105 / 567 | A |
97.0%
Facility
97.0%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#108 / 519 | +12% | 2.76
Facility
2.76
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#456 / 526 | +15% | -25% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 13
Facility
13
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#145 / 530 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#128 / 530 | - | 260 | A+ |
96
Facility
96
NY AVG
64
Rank
#22 / 442 | Kprh IV Operations, LLC (For Profit) | $45.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$45.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#82 / 479 | $16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#143 / 479 | 37.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
37.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#442 / 477 | 335446 | ||||
| Hollis Park Manor | NH SNF | Queens (Jamaica) | 80
Facility
80
NY AVG
185
Rank
#485 / 567 | A+ |
95.0%
Facility
95.0%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#196 / 519 | +10% | 4.18
Facility
4.18
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#98 / 526 | +125% | +14% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 10
Facility
10
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#82 / 530 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#128 / 530 | - | 76 | - |
81
Facility
81
NY AVG
64
Rank
#149 / 442 | Hollis Park Manor Nursing Home, Inc (For Profit) | $12.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#393 / 479 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#377 / 479 | 58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#161 / 477 | 335333 | ||||
| Fairview Rehab and Nursing Home | NH PC SNF | Queens (Forest Hills) | 200
Facility
200
NY AVG
185
Rank
#178 / 567 | B |
100.0%
Facility
100.0%
NY AVG
86.4%
Rank
#1 / 519 | +16% | 3.19
Facility
3.19
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#348 / 526 | +143% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 531 | 22
Facility
22
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#338 / 530 | 7.3
Facility
7.3
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#466 / 530 | - | 200 | A+ |
75
Facility
75
NY AVG
64
Rank
#198 / 442 | Fairview Nursing Care Center, Inc (For Profit) | $54.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$54.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.4M
Rank
#45 / 479 | $21.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$21.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.1M
Rank
#90 / 479 | 38.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
38.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.4%
Rank
#431 / 477 | 335146 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in New York State
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation is in New York City, New York State. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Community First Choice Option
Community First Choice Option
- Who it is for
- New York Medicaid members who need attendant services and supports at home
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid Community First Choice Option supplies home/community attendant services and supports to eligible individuals needing an institutional level of care.
What it provides
- Home and community-based assistance with daily activities and health-related tasks that can be performed by an aide or direct-care worker.
Expanded In-Home Services for the Elderly Program (EISEP)
Expanded In-Home Services for the Elderly Program (EISEP)
- Who it is for
- New Yorkers 60+ who need help with personal care or chores and are not eligible for Medicaid
- Income limit
- EISEP uses income-based sliding cost sharing.
Eligibility
- General
- Age 60+ with need for help with personal care or household chores, not eligible for Medicaid; locally assessed for nonmedical in-home support.
What it provides
- Case management and; when assessed and available; in-home assistance; noninstitutional respite and ancillary support.
Nursing Home Transition and Diversion (NHTD) Medicaid Waiver
Nursing Home Transition and Diversion (NHTD) Medicaid Waiver
- Who it is for
- New York Medicaid recipients with nursing-facility level of care who can live safely in the community
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid recipients with community-based long-term-care coverage, nursing-facility level of care, and a safe community plan; age 65+, or age 18–64 with a physical disability. Conflicting case-management or managed long-term-care enrollment must be resolved.
What it provides
- Assessed waiver supports that allow eligible people to leave a nursing facility or avoid admission and live in the community.
Senior Citizen Rent Increase Exemption (SCRIE)
Senior Citizen Rent Increase Exemption (SCRIE)
- Who it is for
- New York City tenants 62+ in rent-regulated apartments with limited income
Eligibility
- General
- New York City tenants age 62+ in qualifying rent-regulated apartments who meet the income test and spend more than one-third of household income on rent.
- NY specifics
- New York City only: the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens and Staten Island.
What it provides
- Freezes qualifying rent increases; landlords receive a tax-abatement credit equal to exempted increases.
Senior Citizen Homeowners’ Exemption (SCHE)
Senior Citizen Homeowners’ Exemption (SCHE)
- Who it is for
- New York City homeowners 65+ with limited income
- Income limit
- Current NYC program page lists combined owner/spouse/co-owner annual income no more than $58,399. Future July 2027 legislative changes must not be applied to the present benefit year.
Eligibility
- General
- Owners generally must be 65+, with spouse/sibling exceptions; ownership generally required for 12 consecutive months and property must be the primary residence, with stated exceptions.
- NY specifics
- New York City only: the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens and Staten Island.
What it provides
- Income-based exemption reduces taxable assessed value; not necessarily the tax bill by the same percentage.
New York Foundation for Senior Citizens (NYFSC) Home Sharing Program
New York Foundation for Senior Citizens (NYFSC) Home Sharing Program
- Who it is for
- New York City adults with spare private space, or adults looking for a shared home, where one of the pair is 60+
Eligibility
- General
- Adult hosts with spare private space are matched with adult guests; at least one of the matchmates must be age 60 or older.
- NY specifics
- New York City only: the Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Queens and Staten Island.
What it provides
- Free home-sharing matching service; living arrangements and contributions are agreed between matchmates.
Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC)
Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC)
- Who it is for
- New Yorkers 65+ with qualifying income who have, or can get, Medicare Part D
- Income limit
- Annual income up to $75,000 single or $100,000 married.
Eligibility
- General
- New York residents 65+ with qualifying income who are enrolled or eligible to enroll in Medicare Part D and are not receiving full Medicaid benefits. Enrollment is available throughout the year.
What it provides
- Supplements eligible Medicare Part D prescription costs through income-based fee or deductible plans; premium assistance depends on program rules.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation in?
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation is in the Glen Oaks neighborhood of New Hyde Park.
02 Who is the owner of Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation?
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation is legally operated by Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation (Not for Profit).
03 Is Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation has a walk score of 71. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation?
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation's occupancy is 95.1%.
05 Are pets allowed at Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation?
No, Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
06 What is the best email address for Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation?
The team at Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation can be reached at research@parkerinstitute.org.
07 Does Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation is registered as a non-profit in NY.
Updated on
