5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community in Charleston, South Carolina, offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home and skilled nursing care, and respite care. Independent living means having a private home with community services and no daily care, while assisted living adds help with tasks such as dressing, bathing, and taking medication. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision. Nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care onsite around the clock, and respite care offers a short stay when someone’s usual caregiver needs to travel or recover.
The range of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time, since care can continue within the same community rather than requiring a move elsewhere. Bishop Gadsden has 123 beds. Jonna Cook serves as the administrator.
Payment options are Medicare and private pay. Medicare can cover short term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means the family pays directly. Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 40 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nurse staffing time allocated to each resident.
Rehabilitation services include short term rehabilitation and BG Therapy for residents who need recovery focused care. The community also has a wellness center, pool, spa, onsite clinic, and pharmacy, giving residents access to exercise, swimming, personal care, and health related services without leaving the community.
More than 120 acres include nature trails, a community garden, and a croquet court. Residents can spend time outdoors, garden, walk, or play croquet. Dining options include a café and fine dining, and religious services are available for residents who wish to attend.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 116 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 40mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +235% above South Carolina average
0 of 6 metrics below South Carolina average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 31 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
31 staff · 3.4-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 36 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 16 agency contractors.
36 staff · 3.2-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 91 total: 64 of the facility's own employees and 27 agency contractors.
91 staff · 2.3-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
206
154 employees · 52 contractors · 69 on an average day
206 total staff / 22 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
9.36 : 1
206 staff ÷ 22 residents
See full South Carolina ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
2.6 h
↓ 67% · SC 7.9 hThis facility: 2.6 h, 67% below the South Carolina average of 7.9 h (among South Carolina facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
16,245 staff hours this quarter
See full South Carolina ranking →94.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
South Carolina average: 89.1% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (27), Licensed Practical Nurse (16), Medical Director (3), Registered Nurse (2), Feeding Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
123
Rank #49 / 132Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 132 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other South Carolina facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community is legally operated by Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community, and administered by Jonna Cook.
Sourced directly from the team at Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community.
100% corrected
10 of 10 citations corrected Latest inspection: Apr 25, 2025 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 3 of 10 citations · 6 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 10 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the South Carolina average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 82% · SC 2.8This facility: 5.0, 82% above the SC average of 2.8 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
72.7%
↑ 35% · US 53.7This facility: 72.7, 35% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.1%
↑ 29% · US 50.6This facility: 65.1, 29% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 10% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 10% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 78% · SC 1.5This facility: 0.3, 78% below the SC average of 1.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.5%
↑ 22% · SC 81.5This facility: 99.5, 22% above the SC average of 81.5 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.0%
↑ 18% · SC 78.0This facility: 92.0, 18% above the SC average of 78.0 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
20.1%
↓ 19% · SC 24.7This facility: 20.1, 19% below the SC average of 24.7 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.9%
↑ 6% · SC 14.1This facility: 14.9, 6% above the SC average of 14.1 (among SC facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
63% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
37% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
22Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 104 South Carolina nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−24.4% operating margin
+5.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 6 reported years. Other income ($15.4M) turns it into a net profit to $1.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most South Carolina homes
57.8% payroll share of revenue
SC average 60.8%Rank #50 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.5M while revenue rose $5.9M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with South Carolina homes.
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2019 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $57.7M | +$5.9M | Trend 20192024 | SC median $11.8M | Rank in SC Rank #1 / 104Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Top 2% in SC Higher net patient revenue than 100% of SC homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $71.8M | +$4.7M | Trend 20192024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$14.1M | +$1.2M | Trend 20192024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −24.4% | +5.1 pts | Trend 20192024 | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $15.4M | — | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.3M | +$0.2M | Trend — | SC median — | Rank in SC Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Spends less of revenue on staff than most South Carolina homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2019 → 2024Trend | SC median | Compared with SC homesRank in SC | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $33.4M | +$2.5M | Trend 20192024 | SC median $7.4M | Rank in SC Rank #1 / 104Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Top 2% in SC by size Higher payroll than 100% of SC homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 57.8% | −1.7 pts | Trend 20192024 | SC median 57.6% | Rank in SC Rank #50 / 104Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 104 nursing homes we track in South Carolina for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the South Carolina average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in South Carolina that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 52% of homes | 3.0 pts under SC average The SC average is 60.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the South Carolina payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin SC payroll average
| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $33.3M | $34.7M | $36.4M | $39.4M | $51.8M | $57.7M |
| Operating expenses | $38.6M | $40.8M | $43.3M | $55.1M | $67.0M | $71.8M |
| Net patient income | −$5.4M | −$6.1M | −$6.9M | −$15.7M | −$15.2M | −$14.1M |
| Operating margin | −16.1% | −17.6% | −18.8% | −39.8% | −29.4% | −24.4% |
| Net income | $6.4M | −$1.1M | $8.9M | −$2.6M | $1.1M | $1.3M |
| Payroll costs | $16.6M | $17.6M | $18.0M | $23.9M | $30.8M | $33.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 49.9% | 50.7% | 49.5% | 60.6% | 59.5% | 57.8% |
| Beds | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 100 |
| Gross revenue | $33.8M | $34.9M | $37.0M | $40.4M | $54.7M | $60.5M |
| Salaries | $14.6M | $15.6M | $16.2M | $20.7M | $26.5M | $28.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $2.0M | $2.0M | $1.9M | $3.2M | $4.3M | $5.0M |
| Contract labor | — | $0.2M | $0.2M | — | $0.3M | — |
| Other operating costs | $22.0M | $23.2M | $25.2M | $31.2M | $36.2M | $38.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $2,667 | $2,756 | $2,787 | $4,327 | $1,781 | $1,745 |
| Cost per day | $3,097 | $3,241 | $3,311 | $6,047 | $2,305 | $2,170 |
| Average length of stay | 215.0 days | 233.4 days | 266.7 days | 198.1 days | 19.8 days | 22.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 3 earlier years
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (63% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 22 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1 Bishop Gadsden Way, Charleston, SC 29412-3506
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the SC Dept. of Public Health (DPH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The South Carolina average is: 60.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashley River Healthcare | NH SNF | Charleston (Sandhurst) | 125
Facility
125
SC AVG
108
Rank
#46 / 132 |
80.5%
Facility
80.5%
SC AVG
88.6%
Rank
#70 / 84 | -9% | 3.48
Facility
3.48
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#75 / 116 | -41% | -16% | $46.2k
Facility
$46.2k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#110 / 119 | 11
Facility
11
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#52 / 116 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#68 / 116 | 1 | 101 | - |
45
Facility
45
SC AVG
33
Rank
#14 / 46 | - | $12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#43 / 104 | $7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#40 / 104 | 60.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
60.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#32 / 104 | 425362 | ||||
| Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community | NH AL IL MC SNF | Charleston | 123
Facility
123
SC AVG
108
Rank
#49 / 132 | - | - | 5.67
Facility
5.67
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#6 / 116 | +61% | +37% | $0
Facility
$0
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#1 / 119 | 10
Facility
10
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#44 / 116 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#59 / 116 | 1 | 26 | - | - | Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community | $57.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$57.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#1 / 104 | $33.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$33.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#1 / 104 | 57.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
57.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#50 / 104 | 425411 | ||||
| Kempton of Charleston | NH AL MC SNF | Charleston | 89
Facility
89
SC AVG
108
Rank
#83 / 132 | - | - | 5.13
Facility
5.13
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#28 / 116 | +8% | +24% | $6.0k
Facility
$6.0k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#57 / 119 | 4
Facility
4
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#11 / 116 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#15 / 116 | - | 20 | - | - | Spring Street Senior Housing Opco LLC | $9.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$9.1MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#77 / 104 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 09/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#73 / 104 | 63.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
63.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#24 / 104 | 425418 | ||||
| Nhc Healthcare Charleston | NH HC HOS SNF | Charleston | 132
Facility
132
SC AVG
108
Rank
#28 / 132 | - | - | 5.85
Facility
5.85
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#11 / 116 | +37% | +42% | $25.5k
Facility
$25.5k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#100 / 119 | 9
Facility
9
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#39 / 116 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#49 / 116 | 1 | 78 | A+ | - | Nhc Healthcare-Charleston LLC | $17.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#19 / 104 | $10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#16 / 104 | 59.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
59.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#35 / 104 | 425381 | ||||
| Wellmore of Daniel Island | NH AL IL MC SNF | Charleston (Daniel Island) | 174
Facility
174
SC AVG
108
Rank
#12 / 132 | - | - | 5.28
Facility
5.28
SC AVG
4.12
Rank
#23 / 116 | +3% | +28% | $8.4k
Facility
$8.4k
SC AVG
$27.4k
Rank
#66 / 119 | 17
Facility
17
SC AVG
12.9
Rank
#88 / 116 | 3.4
Facility
3.4
SC AVG
3.4
Rank
#65 / 116 | 2 | 44 | - |
12
Facility
12
SC AVG
33
Rank
#35 / 46 | Wellmore Of Daniel Island LLC | $9.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$13.4M
Rank
#75 / 104 | $7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
$7.9M
Rank
#50 / 104 | 80.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
80.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
SC AVG
60.8%
Rank
#9 / 104 | 425414 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other SC nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community is located in CHARLESTON, South Carolina.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in South Carolina.
According to SC state health department records, Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community's license number is CRC-0451.
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community's occupancy is 90.3%.
No, Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community has a no-pet policy.
The team at Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community can be reached at JONNA.COOK@BISHOPGADSDEN.ORG.
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community is registered as a non-profit in SC.
Jonna Cook is the administrator of Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community.
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
