Inspection Reports for
The Meadows at Country Place
10 COUNTRY PLACE, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95831
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 5 years)
Deficiencies (over 5 years)
0.8 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
80% better than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
4
3
2
1
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
71% occupied
Based on a May 2025 inspection.
This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 24
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 0
Date: May 2, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a required 1 year annual inspection to evaluate the facility's compliance with health and safety regulations.
Findings
The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required furniture and safety equipment in place. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rangi Giner | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and involved in facility tour and evaluation. |
| Kevin Gould | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and evaluation of the facility. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 24
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 0
Date: May 22, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a required one-year annual inspection to evaluate the facility's compliance with health and safety regulations.
Findings
The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required furniture and sufficient lighting. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection, and all safety equipment including fire extinguishers, smoke detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors were compliant.
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 29
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Apr 27, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced Required – 1 Year annual inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations.
Findings
No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with health and safety regulations, including medication storage, temperature controls, and first aid supplies.
Report Facts
Hospice waiver capacity: 10
Residents using hospice services: 2
Hot water temperature: 112.9
Facility temperature: 70
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Junelle Pangilinan | Medication Technician | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection |
| Victoria Brown | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection |
| Stephen Richardson | Supervisor | Supervisor of Licensing Program Analyst |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 23
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Sep 20, 2022
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 06/21/2022 regarding the facility not providing PPE to staff and serving poor quality food.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility was not providing PPE to staff and that staff were not serving good quality food. The investigation concluded the complaint was unfounded, meaning the allegations were false or without reasonable basis.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff were observed wearing masks and PPE was available. Residents and staff reported satisfaction with the quality of food served. No violations were cited.
Report Facts
Capacity: 34
Census: 23
Estimated Days of Completion: 90
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 23
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Mar 28, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced Required – 1 Year annual inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations and ensure health and safety standards at the facility.
Findings
The inspection found that the facility generally met health and safety standards, including locked medication storage and proper first aid supplies. However, a deficiency was cited for water temperatures exceeding the regulatory maximum, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Deficiencies (1)
Maintenance and Operation: Water temperature in the bathroom and two resident rooms exceeded the allowed range of 105-120°F, posing an immediate health and safety risk to residents.
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Victoria Brown | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and cited deficiencies |
| Stephen Richardson | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
| Gurshahbaz Singh | Administrator | Facility administrator during inspection |
| Junelle Pangilinan | Medication Technician | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection |
| Beatrice Diwata | Medication Technician | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 23
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Mar 28, 2022
Visit Reason
This was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations including failure to follow COVID protocols and illegal eviction of a resident.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Allegations included facility staff not following COVID protocols and illegal eviction. The Administrator did not allow Resident #1 to return after hospital discharge due to COVID diagnosis and mask-wearing issues, which was confirmed by documentation and interviews.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the Administrator did not allow a resident to return to the facility after hospital discharge due to COVID diagnosis and failure to wear a mask in public, violating residents' personal rights and eviction regulations.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87468.2(a)(6) Additional Personal Rights of Residents were not upheld as the Administrator did not allow a resident to return due to not wearing a mask, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87224(a) Eviction regulations were violated as the Administrator did not provide proper eviction notice and did not allow the resident to return after hospital discharge due to COVID diagnosis.
Report Facts
Estimated Days of Completion: 60
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Victoria Brown | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit |
| Gurshahbaz Singh | Administrator | Named in findings related to COVID protocol and eviction violations |
| Junelle Pangilinan | Medication Technician | Met during investigation |
| Beatriz Diwata | Medication Technician | Met during investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 23
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Mar 28, 2022
Visit Reason
This visit was conducted to conclude the investigation of allegations regarding an illegal eviction at the facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was related to an allegation of illegal eviction. The allegation was substantiated by findings that the administrator submitted a false incident report to the Department.
Findings
The investigation found that the administrator submitted a false statement to the Department by misrepresenting the circumstances of a resident's removal from the facility. This false claim poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87207 False Claims: The administrator provided a statement to Community Care Licensing that was misleading regarding a resident's removal from the facility. This false statement poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents.
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Gurshahbaz Singh | Administrator | Named in false statement finding regarding resident eviction |
| Victoria Brown | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 16
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 0
Date: May 21, 2021
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that facility staff were not adequately trained and that the facility was retaining a resident requiring a higher level of care.
Complaint Details
The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened, or were without reasonable basis.
Findings
The investigation found no reasonable basis for the complaints. Staff training was adequate, hospice care was approved for the resident, and incident reports showed appropriate changes in level of care. Both allegations were deemed unfounded and the complaint was dismissed.
Report Facts
Capacity: 34
Census: 16
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ruth Wallace | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Liza Seguban | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in the investigation |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 16
Capacity: 34
Deficiencies: 0
Date: May 13, 2021
Visit Reason
The visit was a Required - 1 Year unannounced inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations for the facility.
Findings
No deficiencies were observed or cited during the inspection. The facility met all health and safety requirements including proper storage, temperature controls, emergency preparedness, and medication security.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 34
Census: 16
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...
