4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
A member of the Enlivant senior living group, Foothills Place in Catalina, Tucson is an assisted living and memory care community that approaches senior living care with quality assistance and efficient services. Foothills Place heavily promotes independence for their residents to maintain a sense of individuality to live life on their own terms. The assisted living community aims to provide a vibrant environment for residents to feel a sense of belonging by providing personal care plans that lead to meeting the social, emotional, mental, and physical wellness of each. The professional staff of Foothills highly encouraged them to make deep connections between residents– a bond built on trust and respect. Foothills Place is the ideal place for seniors looking to thrive in a community that understands the every basic need of an adult.
Accommodations at Foothills Place are exerted through efficiency and genuinity. This approach allows for seniors and their families to trust and relax that their best intentions are being put first. Foothills’ services offered are designed to allow flexibility for families, these include respite care, short-terms stays, and urgent placement– living options allowing the staff to adapt to any necessary and immediate need. Some community amenities to highlight are the hair salon, apartment maintenance, housekeeping and laundry services, community outings, and activities.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 30th out of 67 homes in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 34m per day | ▼ 22% State avg: 43m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 54m per day | ▼ 15% State avg: 1h 3m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 58m per day | ▲ 27% State avg: 2h 20m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 49m per day | ▲ 5% State avg: 3h 39m per day · National avg: 3h 27m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 8m per day | ▲ 33% State avg: 6m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 25m per day | ▼ 19% State avg: 31m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Arizona average 6.3
Last Health inspection on Apr 2025
Arizona average 23.2
Arizona average 3.82
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
8 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 3 of 11 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 0.1
67% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 0.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
35% more staff per resident than Arizona average
9% worse than Arizona average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 10 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
10
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
10 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 23 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
23
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.9 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 53 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
53
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.6 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 53 | 0 | 53 | 11,319 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 18 | 0 | 18 | 5,050 | 92 | 100% | 7.5 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 23 | 0 | 23 | 4,689 | 92 | 100% | 8.9 |
| Registered Nurse | 10 | 0 | 10 | 2,037 | 82 | 89% | 10 |
| Physical Therapist | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2,031 | 92 | 100% | 6.6 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1,496 | 69 | 75% | 6.4 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,253 | 66 | 72% | 7 |
| Dental Services Staff | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,223 | 82 | 89% | 8.1 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1,171 | 72 | 78% | 6.4 |
| Medication Aide/Technician | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,142 | 75 | 82% | 9.5 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 3 | 0 | 3 | 814 | 67 | 73% | 6.2 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 667 | 62 | 67% | 8.7 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 8 | 0 | 8 | 651 | 62 | 67% | 5.9 |
| Administrator | 2 | 0 | 2 | 640 | 69 | 75% | 6.5 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 615 | 66 | 72% | 8.9 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 594 | 66 | 72% | 9 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 508 | 60 | 65% | 6.4 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 4% | 3.1 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
3.3
56% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 7.6
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
19.4
21% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 16.1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.6%
41% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 11.2%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.2%
54% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 20.8%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
100% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 2.1%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.3%
74% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 5.1%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.3%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 5.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
35% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 4.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.6%
75% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 10.3%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.5%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 97.2%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 94.6%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.1%
In line with Arizona averageArizona average: 91.5%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
12% better than Arizona averageArizona average: 1.0%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
6% worse than Arizona averageArizona average: 87.3%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
13% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
73% of new residents, often for short stays.
15% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
66Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Foothills Place from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #54 / 75Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 54th out of 75 homes in Arizona for Payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Arizona average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #47 / 75Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 47th out of 75 homes in Arizona for Payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Arizona average. Well-run Arizona facilities typically land around 58–71% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Arizona that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Pets Allowed
Most residents stay long-term, while a smaller portion are admitted for short-term rehab.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (73% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 16 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
4.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Tucson's city center to Foothills Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
The information below is reported by the Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing.
| Splendido at Rancho Vistoso | NH AL HOS MC RC SNF | Tucson | 42
Facility
42
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#224 / 528 |
84.0%
Facility
84.0%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#23 / 63 | +24% | 5.13
Facility
5.13
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#9 / 67 | -4% | +26% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#57 / 71 | 82
Facility
82
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#9 / 54 | 10
Facility
10
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#11 / 71 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#16 / 71 | 1 | 35 | - |
8
Facility
8
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#708 / 819 | Tucson Mather Plaza, LLC | $30.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$30.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#9 / 75 | $11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#13 / 75 | 38.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
38.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#63 / 75 | 35273 | ||||
| Foothills Place | NH AL | Tucson | 66
Facility
66
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#187 / 528 |
97.1%
Facility
97.1%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#2 / 63 | +44% | 4.02
Facility
4.02
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#30 / 67 | -38% | -1% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | - | 11
Facility
11
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#15 / 71 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#63 / 71 | 1 | 64 | A+ |
27
Facility
27
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#517 / 819 | Chandler Monks | $9.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#43 / 75 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#54 / 75 | 54.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
54.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#47 / 75 | 35251 | ||||
| Brookdale Santa Catalina | NH AL IL MC SNF | Tucson (Sin Vacas) | 155
Facility
155
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#34 / 528 | - | - | 4.24
Facility
4.24
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#21 / 67 | -37% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | 71
Facility
71
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#32 / 54 | 30
Facility
30
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#50 / 71 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#56 / 71 | - | 31 | A+ |
0
Facility
0
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#802 / 819 | Anna Munoz | $16.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#69 / 75 | $7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#35 / 75 | 44.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
44.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#2 / 75 | 35253 | ||||
| Haven Health Tucson | NH AL MC SNF | Tucson | 118
Facility
118
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#95 / 528 |
89.8%
Facility
89.8%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#15 / 63 | +33% | 2.49
Facility
2.49
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#67 / 67 | +3% | -39% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | 60
Facility
60
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#50 / 54 | 19
Facility
19
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#29 / 71 | 3.8
Facility
3.8
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#38 / 71 | 2 | 106 | - |
27
Facility
27
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#517 / 819 | Jason Seastrand | $18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$18.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#12 / 75 | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#19 / 75 | 41.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
41.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#70 / 75 | 35165 | ||||
| Devon Gables | NH AL IL MC SNF | Tucson (Rose Hill) | 312
Facility
312
AZ AVG
54
Rank
#1 / 528 |
72.8%
Facility
72.8%
AZ AVG
67.6
Rank
#32 / 63 | +8% | 4.13
Facility
4.13
AZ AVG
4.06
Rank
#25 / 67 | +12% | +2% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 71 | 67
Facility
67
AZ AVG
82
Rank
#41 / 54 | 20
Facility
20
AZ AVG
23.2
Rank
#33 / 71 | 3.3
Facility
3.3
AZ AVG
3.8
Rank
#28 / 71 | 1 | 227 | - |
58
Facility
58
AZ AVG
37
Rank
#168 / 819 | Heather Friebus | $21.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$21.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$14.7M
Rank
#17 / 75 | $12.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$12.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#10 / 75 | 58.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
58.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
AZ AVG
48.1%
Rank
#36 / 75 | 35145 |
Foothills Place is located in Tucson, Arizona.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Arizona.
Foothills Place has a walk score of 27. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Foothills Place's occupancy is 57.1%.
Yes, Foothills Place allows residents to bring their pets.
Foothills Place is registered as a for-profit in AZ.
Yes — there are 4 photos of Foothills Place in the photo gallery on this page.
Foothills Place is located at 3701 N Swan Rd, Tucson, AZ 85718.
(520) 200-3539 will put you in contact with the team at Foothills Place.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
