Inspection Reports for
Irondale Post Acute
7150 POPLAR ST, COMMERCE CITY, CO, 80022-2261
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 5 years)
Deficiencies (over 5 years)
7.2 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
38% worse than Colorado average
Colorado average: 5.2 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
24
18
12
6
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
76% occupied
Based on a October 2025 inspection.
This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Dec 8, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding the facility's failure to ensure appropriate treatment and services for residents with feeding tubes, specifically focusing on Resident #2's tube feeding administration as ordered by the physician.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on whether the facility ensured appropriate tube feeding care for Resident #2. The deficiency was substantiated based on record review and staff interviews confirming failure to implement feeding orders timely.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received enteral feeding as ordered by the physician for five days after admission. The feeding orders were not entered into the resident's computerized physician orders (CPO) until five days after admission, resulting in missed nutritional requirements. Staff interviews confirmed the admitting nurse failed to verify and enter hospital discharge feeding orders into the facility's system.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0693: The facility failed to ensure feeding tubes were used only with medical reason and resident agreement, and did not provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube. Resident #2 did not receive enteral feeding as ordered for five days after admission due to missing physician orders in the CPO.
Report Facts
Enteral feeding volume: 1430
Feeding rate: 65
Delay in order entry: 5
Inspection Report
Enforcement
Census: 72
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Oct 9, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to an immediate jeopardy situation related to failure to prevent resident elopement and failure to maintain safe evacuation routes, including a padlocked emergency egress gate, creating hazardous conditions for residents.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #4 from eloping, resulting in the resident being missing for approximately 46 hours. The facility also failed to maintain safe and accessible evacuation routes, with a padlocked gate blocking emergency egress. These failures created an immediate jeopardy situation affecting all 72 residents.
Deficiencies (2)
F 0689: The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #4 from eloping and failed to maintain an effective evacuation plan with accessible emergency egress routes, including a padlocked gate blocking exit, creating immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety.
F 0867: The facility failed to implement an effective quality assurance program to identify and address compliance concerns, including elopement prevention and emergency evacuation safety, resulting in repeated deficiencies and immediate jeopardy.
Report Facts
Residents present during inspection: 72
Residents on unsecured units: 55
Residents on secured unit: 17
Duration resident missing: 46
Time resident unmonitored: 4
Date of resident elopement: Sep 20, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| NHA #1 | Nursing Home Administrator | Provided plan to remove immediate jeopardy and participated in investigation and education efforts |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Reviewed residents for elopement risk, updated care plans, and initiated staff education |
| MD | Medical Director | Provided oversight, reviewed records, and participated in QAPI meetings |
| RN #2 | Registered Nurse | Documented resident agitation and refusal of care on day of elopement |
| LPN #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Discovered Resident #4 missing from room and attempted to locate |
| CNA #2 | Certified Nurse Aide | Last staff to see Resident #4 at dinner time before elopement |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Apr 30, 2025
Visit Reason
The investigation was conducted due to a complaint and incident involving Resident #3 who fell and was injured in the facility's transportation van on 2025-01-22. The visit aimed to assess the facility's compliance with safety and supervision requirements during resident transportation.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation substantiated that Resident #3 was not secured properly in the van on 2025-01-22, leading to a fall and serious injuries. The facility's investigation confirmed the failure of van driver #1 to secure the wheelchair and subsequent corrective actions were taken including suspension and termination of the driver, staff training, and policy revisions.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was properly secured in her wheelchair during transport, resulting in a fall that caused multiple fractures, brain injury, and pain. The facility implemented corrective actions including staff training and policy updates, but the incident was cited as immediate jeopardy with serious harm to the resident.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0689: The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was provided safe transportation by not securing her wheelchair properly in the van, resulting in a fall and serious injuries including fractures and brain hemorrhage.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 3
Incident date: Jan 22, 2025
Correction date: Jan 28, 2025
Training completion date: Jan 29, 2025
Van driver termination date: Jan 27, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Van driver #1 | Named in the finding for failing to secure Resident #3's wheelchair, leading to the fall and injuries. | |
| Van driver #2 | Assisted Resident #3 properly securing wheelchair after the incident and interviewed regarding safe transport practices. | |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Provided the facility's corrective action plan and participated in the investigation. |
| Registered Nurse #1 | RN | Interviewed regarding the incident and communication after Resident #3's fall. |
| Social Services Director | SSD | Mentioned in progress notes related to Resident #3's emotional support. |
| Director of Rehabilitation | DOR | Interviewed about Resident #3's therapy and wheelchair equipment after the fall. |
| Activities Director | AD | Trained on wheelchair securement and helped transport residents until new van driver hired. |
| Maintenance Supervisor | MS | Inspected van and wheelchair restraints and interviewed about securing wheelchairs. |
| Clinical Resource Nurse | CRN | Interviewed regarding the incident and facility's knowledge about wheelchair securement. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Nov 20, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding a fall incident involving Resident #1, who was a high fall risk and sustained a hip fracture that was not reported or identified promptly.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that Resident #1, a high fall risk resident, fell on 9/6/24 but the fall was not reported until 9/12/24. The delay in reporting led to a six-day delay in identifying and treating a hip fracture. The facility substantiated the complaint and took corrective actions including staff termination and re-education.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 remained free from accidents, resulting in a fall on 9/6/24 that caused a hip fracture which was not identified until 9/12/24 due to failure to report the fall. The facility conducted an investigation, terminated an LPN who denied knowledge of the fall, and re-educated staff on fall policies and reporting procedures.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0689: The facility failed to ensure a nursing home area was free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents. Resident #1 sustained a fall on 9/6/24 resulting in a hip fracture that was not reported until 9/12/24, delaying treatment for six days.
Report Facts
Date of fall: Sep 6, 2024
Date fall reported: Sep 12, 2024
Correction date: Sep 12, 2024
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #2 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Denied knowledge of Resident #1's fall and was terminated. |
| CNA #3 | Certified Nurse Aide | Verified Resident #1 sustained a fall on 9/6/24. |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Conducted investigation, interviewed staff, and oversaw corrective actions. |
| NHA | Nursing Home Administrator | Conducted investigation and reviewed video footage of the fall. |
| ADON | Assistant Director of Nursing | Provided education to staff on fall policy and reporting. |
Inspection Report
Routine
Census: 36
Deficiencies: 8
Date: Dec 14, 2023
Visit Reason
Routine inspection to evaluate compliance with healthcare regulations including resident safety, respiratory care, pain management, pharmaceutical services, infection control, and hospice care.
Findings
The facility had multiple deficiencies including failure to ensure fall prevention interventions for residents, improper oxygen therapy administration, inadequate pain management resulting in missed doses and hospitalization, failure to remove expired emergency narcotic kits, improper medication labeling, unsanitary food handling practices, inadequate hospice communication and documentation, and insufficient infection control practices including housekeeping and surface disinfection.
Deficiencies (8)
F 0689: The facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for two residents, including inconsistent use of fall mats and non-skid socks.
F 0695: The facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy for one resident and did not accurately complete the MDS respiratory treatment section.
F 0697: The facility failed to provide effective pain management for one resident, missing seven doses of hydrocodone, leading to increased pain, anxiety, and emergency hospitalization.
F 0755: The facility failed to communicate and coordinate removal of an expired emergency narcotic kit after implementing an automated dispensing system.
F 0761: The facility failed to ensure tiotropium bromide inhalers were dated upon opening as required by policy and professional standards.
F 0812: The facility failed to ensure staff washed and dried hands appropriately while plating and serving resident meals, risking contamination.
F 0849: The facility failed to establish effective communication and documentation processes with hospice providers for two residents receiving hospice care.
F 0880: The facility failed to maintain infection control by not ensuring housekeeping staff followed proper cleaning techniques, were properly trained, and adhered to disinfectant contact times, including failure to disinfect high-touch surfaces.
Report Facts
Residents in sample: 36
Missed hydrocodone doses: 7
BIMS score: 7
BIMS score: 9
BIMS score: 10
BIMS score: 15
Disinfectant contact time: 10
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Registered nurse #1 | RN | Named in oxygen therapy and pain management findings |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Interviewed regarding multiple findings including pain management, hospice communication, and infection control |
| Assistant Director of Nursing | ADON | Interviewed regarding oxygen therapy and infection control |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #1 | LPN | Interviewed regarding oxygen therapy and fall prevention |
| Certified Nurse Aide #1 | CNA | Interviewed regarding fall prevention and hospice communication |
| Nutrition Services Manager | NSD | Interviewed regarding food handling and hand hygiene |
| Consulting Registered Dietitian | CRD | Interviewed regarding food handling and hand hygiene |
| Director of Housekeeping | DOH | Interviewed regarding housekeeping deficiencies and training needs |
| Housekeeper #1 | Observed and interviewed regarding cleaning practices | |
| Housekeeper #2 | Observed and interviewed regarding cleaning practices | |
| Social Services Director | SSD | Interviewed regarding hospice communication and coordination |
| Pharmacist | Interviewed regarding medication ordering and emergency medication stock | |
| Pharmacy Consultant | PC | Interviewed regarding emergency narcotic kit removal |
| Pharmacy Director | PD | Interviewed regarding emergency narcotic kit removal |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 9
Date: Dec 14, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was a routine survey to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident safety, respiratory care, pain management, pharmaceutical services, food safety, hospice care, infection prevention and control, and housekeeping.
Findings
The facility had multiple deficiencies including failure to ensure fall interventions for residents, improper oxygen therapy administration, inadequate pain management resulting in missed doses and hospitalization, failure to remove expired emergency narcotic kits, improper medication labeling, unsanitary food handling practices, inadequate hospice communication and documentation, insufficient housekeeping cleaning and disinfection practices, and lack of a certified infection preventionist for several months.
Deficiencies (9)
F 0689: The facility failed to ensure fall interventions were consistently implemented for Residents #38 and #20, including proper placement of fall mats and use of non-skid socks or shoes.
F 0695: The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 received oxygen therapy as ordered and accurately completed respiratory treatment documentation.
F 0697: The facility failed to provide effective pain management for Resident #40, resulting in missed doses of hydrocodone, increased pain, anxiety, and hospitalization.
F 0755: The facility failed to coordinate removal of an expired emergency narcotic kit after implementing an automated dispensing system.
F 0761: The facility failed to ensure tiotropium bromide inhalers were dated upon opening as required.
F 0812: The facility failed to ensure staff washed and changed gloves appropriately when handling and serving ready-to-eat food.
F 0849: The facility failed to establish effective communication and documentation processes with hospice providers for Residents #24 and #56.
F 0880: The facility failed to maintain an infection control program by not ensuring proper housekeeping cleaning techniques, staff training, and adherence to disinfectant contact times.
F 0882: The facility failed to employ a qualified infection preventionist with completed specialized training for several months.
Report Facts
Residents in sample: 36
Missed hydrocodone doses: 7
BIMS score: 7
BIMS score: 9
BIMS score: 11
BIMS score: 15
BIMS score: 10
Disinfectant contact time: 10
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Registered nurse #1 | RN | Named in findings related to fall interventions and pain management |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Interviewed regarding multiple deficiencies including falls, pain management, infection control, and hospice communication |
| Assistant Director of Nursing | ADON | Acting infection preventionist and interviewed regarding oxygen therapy and infection control |
| Certified nurse aide #1 | CNA | Interviewed regarding fall intervention refusals and hospice communication |
| Certified nurse aide #2 | CNA | Interviewed regarding fall interventions |
| Licensed practical nurse #1 | LPN | Interviewed regarding oxygen therapy and emergency narcotic kit |
| Licensed practical nurse #2 | LPN | Interviewed regarding emergency narcotic kit and medication labeling |
| Nutrition services manager | NSD | Interviewed regarding food handling and hand hygiene training |
| Consulting registered dietitian | CRD | Interviewed regarding food handling and hand hygiene |
| Director of Housekeeping | DOH | Interviewed regarding housekeeping deficiencies and training needs |
| Housekeeper #1 | HSKP | Observed and interviewed regarding cleaning practices |
| Housekeeper #2 | HSKP | Observed and interviewed regarding cleaning practices |
| Social Services Director | SSD | Designated hospice coordinator interviewed regarding hospice communication |
| Pharmacist | Pharmacist | Interviewed regarding medication ordering and emergency kit |
| Pharmacy consultant | PC | Interviewed regarding emergency narcotic kit |
| Pharmacy director | PD | Interviewed regarding emergency narcotic kit |
Inspection Report
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Sep 13, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with discharge summary documentation requirements for residents discharged from the facility.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure discharge summaries were completed thoroughly for two residents (#6 and #14) discharged during the review period. Key sections of the discharge summaries and post-discharge plans were incomplete or missing signatures, and the facility lacked consistent oversight to ensure completion.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0661: The facility failed to ensure discharge summaries included a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of the resident's status for Residents #6 and #14. Several sections of the discharge assessments were incomplete, unsigned, and lacked documentation of discharge instructions.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for discharge: 15
Residents with incomplete discharge summaries: 2
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 | Interviewed regarding discharge assessment process and completion | |
| Social Services Director (SSD) | Interviewed regarding discharge assessment oversight and completion | |
| Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed regarding discharge summary requirements and acknowledged incomplete assessments |
Inspection Report
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Sep 13, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with discharge summary documentation requirements for residents discharged from the facility.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure discharge summaries were completed thoroughly for two residents (#6 and #14), missing key information about the resident's stay and post-discharge care. The discharge assessments were not consistently completed or signed by staff or residents, and the facility lacked oversight to ensure thorough completion.
Deficiencies (1)
F0661: The facility failed to ensure discharge summaries included a recapitulation of the resident's stay and a final summary of resident status for Residents #6 and #14. Key sections of the discharge assessments were incomplete or missing signatures.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for discharge: 15
Residents with incomplete discharge summaries: 2
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 | Interviewed regarding discharge assessment completion process | |
| Social Services Director (SSD) | Interviewed regarding discharge assessment process and facility oversight | |
| Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed regarding discharge summary requirements and acknowledged incomplete assessments |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Mar 6, 2023
Visit Reason
The investigation was conducted due to a complaint regarding an incident of physical abuse between residents in the facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on an incident of physical abuse where Resident #4 spat on Resident #3. The facility substantiated the abuse and took actions including notifying police, placing Resident #3 on 15-minute checks, and educating staff on appropriate responses to verbal aggression.
Findings
The facility failed to prevent an incident of physical abuse where Resident #4 spat on Resident #3. The facility also failed to provide accurate skin assessments and wound care orders for some residents, failed to conduct proper neurological assessments after a resident's fall, and failed to provide appropriate dementia care interventions for Resident #3.
Deficiencies (4)
F0600: The facility failed to protect residents from abuse by not preventing Resident #4 from spitting on Resident #3, causing minimal harm.
F0684: The facility failed to accurately document skin assessments for Residents #5 and #9 and failed to have accurate wound care physician orders for Resident #9.
F0689: The facility failed to ensure a registered nurse conducted an assessment and neurological assessments were completed for Resident #6 after an unwitnessed fall.
F0744: The facility failed to provide appropriate dementia care to Resident #3 by not consistently providing person-centered approaches to address triggered verbal and physical behaviors and not documenting specific interventions to prevent altercations.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 2
Employees in in-service: 35
Resident census: 84
Residents with dementia diagnosis: 44
Fall date: 1
Neurological assessment monitoring period: 72
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) | Provided facility policies and led investigation of abuse incident | |
| Director of Nursing (DON) | Provided policies, interviewed regarding skin assessments and fall protocols | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 | Witnessed abuse incident, involved in investigation and interviews | |
| Social Services Director (SSD) | Interviewed regarding abuse incident and resident behaviors | |
| Dietary Manager (DM) | Witnessed abuse incident and notified NHA | |
| Hospitality Aide (HA) #2 | Witnessed abuse incident and interviewed | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 | Interviewed about fall and neurological assessment procedures | |
| Registered Nurse (RN) #1 | Interviewed about neurological assessment procedures |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Sep 1, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with regulatory standards related to resident nutrition and kitchen sanitation at Irondale Post Acute.
Findings
The facility failed to identify and address severe weight loss in Resident #40, resulting in actual harm to a few residents. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation as the dish machine sanitizer was not functioning, potentially affecting 84 of 85 residents.
Deficiencies (2)
F 0692: The facility failed to ensure Resident #40 maintained body weight and did not sustain severe weight loss, with a 21.4 pound or 11.86% loss in 25 days unaddressed by staff.
F 0812: The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation as the dish machine sanitizer was absent on 08/29/2022, risking cross contamination for 84 of 85 residents.
Report Facts
Weight loss: 21.4
Weight loss percentage: 11.86
Weight loss percentage: 15.43
Residents affected: 84
Residents affected: 85
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| RD #2 | Registered Dietician | Responsible for reviewing residents' weights and failed to identify Resident #40's severe weight loss. |
| RN #1 | Registered Nurse | Interviewed regarding awareness of Resident #40's weight loss. |
| CNA #1 | Certified Nurse Aide | Observed Resident #40's variable intake and weight loss but did not notify staff. |
| CNA #2 | Certified Nurse Aide | Obtained Resident #40's weight and normally notified RD of significant changes. |
| Physician #1 | Resident's Physician | Interviewed about Resident #40's weight loss and expected notification. |
| DON | Director of Nursing | Responsible for oversight of weight loss identification and notification processes. |
| Dishwasher #1 | Dishwasher Staff Member | Tested dish machine sanitizer and found no sanitizer present. |
| DM | Dietary Manager | Responsible for ensuring dish machine sanitation and staff compliance. |
| RD #1 | Registered Dietician | Tested dish machine sanitizer and instructed to stop use due to lack of sanitizer. |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Expected proper sanitation and interventions for weight loss. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Deficiencies: 6
Date: Feb 13, 2020
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as an annual survey to assess compliance with regulatory requirements for nursing home care.
Findings
The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans for multiple residents, ensure proper insulin administration according to physician orders, provide appropriate discharge planning, ensure safe function of medical equipment, and provide adequate respiratory and psychosocial care.
Deficiencies (6)
F 0656: The facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans addressing specific resident needs including dialysis port care, discharge preferences, non-pharmacological interventions for behaviors and pain, and wanderguard use.
F 0658: The facility failed to ensure safe function of air mattress for resident #24 and failed to follow insulin parameters for resident #53.
F 0660: The facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process for resident #15, including addressing goals, interdisciplinary involvement, social service support, and appropriate care planning.
F 0684: The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders for insulin administration, resulting in insulin being given when blood sugar was below ordered parameters for residents #15 and #37.
F 0695: The facility failed to ensure resident #41 received respiratory treatments consistent with professional standards, including lack of oxygen saturation monitoring and documentation.
F 0758: The facility failed to timely and appropriately address depressive symptoms with non-pharmacological interventions and failed to appropriately assess behaviors prior to psychotropic medication dose changes for residents #15 and #10.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed: 26
Residents with deficient care plans: 5
Residents with insulin administration issues: 2
Residents with respiratory care issues: 1
Residents with psychotropic medication issues: 2
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



