Most inspections found no deficiencies, and several complaint investigations were unsubstantiated, indicating generally consistent compliance with regulations. However, the facility has had some deficiencies over time, primarily related to resident care documentation, medication management, staffing levels, and staff training records. The most recent report from July 31, 2025, identified several deficiencies including retaining a bedridden resident without proper fire clearance, missing staff first aid training and TB test results, and an outdated medical assessment for a resident with dementia; this resulted in a $500 civil penalty. Earlier substantiated complaints involved failure to follow care plans leading to pressure wounds, unmet diapering and dietary needs, and insufficient staffing causing delays in food service. While some issues have recurred, the facility has also shown improvement in areas such as infection control and physical plant safety, but recent findings suggest ongoing attention is needed in staff training and resident care documentation.
Deficiencies (last 6 years)
Deficiencies (over 6 years)3 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
25% better than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies per year
43210
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Census
Latest occupancy rate84% occupied
Based on a July 2025 inspection.
This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.
The inspection was an unannounced required annual inspection conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements and regulatory standards for the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to have several deficiencies including retaining one bedridden resident without appropriate fire clearance, staff lacking valid first aid training and missing TB test results, and a resident with dementia lacking an updated medical assessment. An immediate civil penalty of $500 was issued due to the bedridden resident issue.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1Type B: 3
Deficiencies (4)
Description
Severity
Facility retained one bedridden resident without a bedridden fire clearance, posing an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk.
Type A
Staff #3, Staff #4, Staff #5, and Staff #6 did not have valid first aid training in file.
Type B
Staff #1's file did not have a TB test result.
Type B
Resident #6 with dementia did not have an updated medical assessment.
The visit was an unannounced required annual inspection conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the facility.
Findings
The inspection found no deficiencies during the visit. The facility demonstrated compliance with infection control, physical plant safety, resident rights, food service, medical and dental care, and disaster preparedness requirements.
Report Facts
Hospice waiver residents: 6Home health residents: 7Residents' rooms inspected: 14Residents on modified diet: 3Days of perishable food supply: 2Days of non-perishable food supply: 7Days since last fire/disaster drill: 6CARE Tool domains to complete later: 5
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Daniel Konishi
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced required annual inspection
Carmen Hernandez
Business Office Manager
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and received the report
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted to address allegations including staff not responding to resident call buttons in a timely manner and the facility not issuing a refund to a resident's responsible party.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Interviews with residents and staff, record reviews, and facility tours did not corroborate the complaints, resulting in an unsubstantiated determination.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included delayed staff response to resident call pendants and failure to issue a refund to a resident's responsible party. Interviews with residents and staff, as well as record reviews, did not support the allegations. Specific delays in call pendant response were noted on two dates but were explained by staff. The refund issue was clarified with staff stating the family would receive a refund of $628.10 and that a 30-day termination notice was required for refunds.
Report Facts
Delay in pendant response: 18Delay in pendant response: 24Refund amount: 628.1Capacity: 163Census: 135
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Erik Zaragoza
Evaluator / Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Gabriela Castro
Licensing Program Analyst
Assisted in conducting the complaint investigation
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation regarding an allegation that staff retaliated against a resident by issuing a 30-day eviction notice after the resident expressed safety concerns to the city council.
Findings
The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and a physical tour. Findings showed that the eviction notice was issued due to the resident's aggressive behavior and violation of house rules. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the retaliation allegation, and the complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
Allegation: Staff retaliates against resident by issuing a 30-day eviction notice after the resident raised safety concerns. Investigation found multiple incidents of aggressive behavior by the resident and no evidence of retaliation. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 163Census: 136Incidents of aggressive behavior: 5
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations received on 2025-01-08 regarding staff not observing residents for changes in condition, not assisting with grooming, delayed response to call buttons, lack of housekeeping services, and failure to safeguard residents' personal belongings.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, file reviews, and physical plant tours. All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence, with staff and residents denying the claims and documentation supporting appropriate care and services.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to observe residents for changes in condition, grooming assistance, timely response to call buttons, housekeeping services, and safeguarding personal belongings. Interviews with 7 staff and 10 residents, file reviews, and observations did not corroborate the allegations.
Unannounced case management visit to follow up on the incident report submitted by the licensee dated 09/16/2024 regarding a staff and a resident.
Findings
No deficiencies were cited during the visit. Staff #1 was terminated due to actions not following company protocols, and the facility plans to conduct in-service training for current staff.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Laura Rodriguez
Executive Director
Met during the visit and advised regarding the findings; named in relation to the incident and follow-up.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2024-08-01 regarding sexual abuse of a resident and staff not ensuring resident privacy.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations of sexual abuse and lack of privacy. Interviews, observations, and file reviews indicated conflicting statements and no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that a resident (R1) was sexually abused by another resident (R2) and that staff did not ensure resident privacy. The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, and review of police and medical records. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
An unannounced case management visit was conducted to follow up on an incident report and SOC 341 submitted by the Executive Director regarding a resident altercation.
Findings
The visit confirmed that on 08/02/2024, a resident exhibited aggressive behavior towards two other residents, resulting in a scratch. Staff intervened and no ambulance or police were contacted. The resident involved was scheduled to move to a higher level of care facility, and no current issues were reported by the facility.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 163
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Laura Rodriguez
Executive Director
Interviewed during the visit and named in the incident report
The inspection was an unannounced required annual inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations for the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to have appropriate infection control practices, sufficient staffing, proper physical plant and environmental safety, and compliance with personnel record and training requirements. However, deficiencies were cited related to personnel health screenings and TB test results missing from staff files.
Deficiencies (1)
Description
One staff member does not have a health screening and TB test result, and one staff member does not have a TB test result, posing a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Report Facts
Hospice waiver residents: 9Home health residents: 8Modified diet residents: 5Resident rooms inspected: 10Resident files inspected: 10Deficiencies cited: 1Plan of Correction due date: Aug 2, 2024
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Laura Rodriguez
Administrator
Met during inspection and named in relation to plan of correction and facility operations
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted regarding an allegation that staff did not ensure residents were served food free from contamination, which reportedly caused illness among residents and staff.
Findings
The investigation found that a norovirus outbreak occurred affecting 32 residents and 18 staff, but there was no evidence that the facility's food caused the outbreak. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure residents were served food free from contamination, resulting in over twenty residents and three staff becoming sick. The investigation concluded the outbreak was norovirus-related, but the source was undetermined and not linked to the facility's food. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Residents sick: 32Staff sick: 18
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Luis Mora
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Laura Rodriguez
Administrator
Facility administrator interviewed during investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to multiple allegations including failure to follow a resident's care plan resulting in a prohibited health condition, resident falls resulting in injury, and inadequate assistance with oral hygiene and dressing.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff did not follow Resident #1's care plan, leading to a Stage III pressure wound. Other allegations regarding multiple falls resulting in a hip fracture, leaving a resident unattended on the floor, failure to transfer the resident routinely, and inadequate assistance with oral hygiene and dressing were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that staff did not follow Resident #1's care plan, resulting in a prohibited health condition (pressure wound). Additional allegations included multiple falls resulting in a hip fracture, resident left unattended on the floor, failure to transfer resident routinely, and inadequate assistance with oral hygiene and dressing. The allegation regarding failure to follow the care plan was substantiated, while the others were unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to update Resident #1's appraisal to document repositioning self after staff repositioning, leading to a Stage III pressure ulcer.
Type A
Report Facts
Immediate Civil Penalty: 500Capacity: 163Census: 133Plan of Correction Due Date: Due date was 04/20/2024 as stated for the plan of correction.
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Valeria Maldonado
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report.
Fernando Fierros
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation.
Laura Rodriguez
Executive Director
Facility representative met during the investigation and exit interviews.
The visit was an unannounced case management inspection conducted to investigate a complaint dated 2023-01-30 regarding resident falls and care deficiencies.
Findings
The facility failed to update the care plan for Resident #1 to reflect the resident's increased fall risk after multiple falls, resulting in continued falls and inadequate supervision. The deficiency was related to failure to update the physician's report and care plan to address the resident's changed condition.
Complaint Details
The investigation was triggered by a complaint dated 2023-01-30 concerning Resident #1 who sustained multiple falls after a hip fracture and surgery. Staff acknowledged knowledge of the resident's increased agitation and fall risk, but the facility failed to update the care plan accordingly.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to update Resident #1's Physician's Report and Appraisal to indicate that the resident was a fall risk, posing a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk.
Type B
Report Facts
Resident falls: 3Staff interviewed: 7Plan of Correction due date: Apr 26, 2024
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Valeria Maldonado
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced visit and investigation.
Fernando Fierros
Supervisor
Supervisor overseeing the inspection.
Laura Rodriguez
Administrator
Facility administrator named in the report header.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by a complaint received on 2022-06-23 regarding allegations that the licensee did not ensure pre-admission appraisal was done correctly and that the facility did not issue the correct refund amount.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Interviews with residents and staff, as well as document reviews, indicated that the facility completed the required pre-admission appraisal and provided an appropriate refund amount to the resident's family. Therefore, the allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved two allegations: 1) The licensee did not ensure pre-admission appraisal was done correctly, and 2) The facility did not issue the correct refund amount. After investigation, including interviews and document review, the allegations were found unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted regarding an allegation that staff do not maintain the facility at a comfortable temperature for residents.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Temperature measurements throughout the facility were within regulatory range, staff and residents denied the allegation, and the thermostat in the concerned resident's room was functioning properly.
Complaint Details
The allegation was that a resident did not have heat for over a week and that the temperature in the resident's room was 69 degrees F. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, temperature measurements, review of work orders and physician reports, and observation. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
Report Facts
Capacity: 163Census: 134Temperature: 82Temperature: 72.8Temperature: 75.3Temperature Range: 73.9 to 78.0Number of staff interviewed: 5Number of residents interviewed: 13
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Alberto Lopez
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Laura Rodriguez
Executive Director
Facility representative interviewed and involved in investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to an allegation that staff were not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for residents.
Findings
The investigation found that although some residents reported issues with their A/C units, the Executive Director and staff denied the allegations, and documentation showed the A/C units were operational. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the complaint, resulting in an unsubstantiated finding.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff were not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for residents. The investigation included interviews with residents and staff, review of maintenance records and A/C service reports, and observations. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations that staff did not assist residents with activities of daily living (ADLs) and did not meet residents' needs.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegations were unsubstantiated. Interviews with facility staff and residents indicated that most residents reported receiving assistance with ADLs and that their needs were met. There was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not assist residents with ADLs and did not meet residents' needs. The investigation included interviews with the Executive Director, Resident Care Director, staff, residents, a former resident, family members, and hospice agency representatives. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by complaints received on 03/07/2023 regarding allegations that the facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents, failed to provide a comfortable temperature, and had insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation of insufficient staffing, finding that 8 out of 10 residents reported waiting an hour or more for food due to lack of staff. The allegations regarding unsafe environment and uncomfortable temperature were unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and file review.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unannounced and conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Jewel Baptiste. Allegations included failure to provide a safe environment, comfortable temperature, and sufficient staffing. The insufficient staffing allegation was substantiated; others were unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. Evidence showed residents waited an hour or more for food due to lack of staff.
An unannounced Annual Continuation visit was conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements at Ivy Park Cerritos.
Findings
The inspection found that PRN medications for residents R1 through R5 were missing without discontinued orders, posing an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. The administrator certificate was expired but processing and pending.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services. Once ordered by the physician, nonprescription PRN medications shall be given in accordance with the physician’s directions. PRN medications were missing without a discontinued order, posing an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type A
Report Facts
Capacity: 163Census: 130Plan of Correction Due Date: Sep 15, 2023
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Laura Rodriguez
Executive Director
Met during inspection and participated in exit interview
An unannounced annual/required inspection was conducted at Ivy Park Cerritos to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations and assess the facility's physical plant, food supply, safety equipment, and resident accommodations.
Findings
The inspection found the facility to be well-maintained with functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, fully charged fire extinguishers, a well-stocked kitchen and pantry meeting Title 22 guidelines, and clean and sanitary conditions throughout. Resident rooms were properly furnished and bathrooms equipped with necessary safety features.
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 10Staff interviewed: 5Studio apartments: 90One-bedroom apartments: 42Two-bedroom apartments: 12Approved hospice waiver: 10Inspection start time: 930Inspection end time: 1500Water temperature range: 105Water temperature range: 120
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Laura Rodriguez
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst and participated in facility tour and exit interview
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 06/22/2021 regarding failure to provide resident medical records, charging for unneeded services, refusal to accept resident after hospitalization, and illegal eviction.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff and administrators interviewed were unable to provide information or recall the resident involved due to management changes and missing records. Therefore, the allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated as there was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred. The allegations included failure to provide medical records, charging for unnecessary services, refusal to readmit a resident after hospitalization, and illegal eviction. Interviews with current and former staff and administrators were inconclusive due to staff turnover and missing resident files.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 163Census: 130
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Elizabeth Irra
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Tony Vasallo
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager on report
Lilit Chaparyan
Executive Director
Interviewed during investigation; began employment September 2022
Krystal Jenkins
Former Administrator
Attempted interview; no longer employed at facility
Brittney Buchannan
Administrator
Interviewed during initial complaint visit on 06/30/21
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted following a complaint received on 2022-02-11 regarding multiple allegations including disrepair of air conditioner, untimely food service, chemicals in water, and toaster disrepair.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, inspection of physical plant and documents, and observation of facility operations. All allegations were denied by staff and most residents, and observations and documentation supported that the facility was functioning properly. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included residents' air conditioner in disrepair, staff not serving food timely, staff putting chemicals in water used by residents, and facility toaster in disrepair. Interviews and observations did not support these allegations.
This was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by multiple allegations received on 01/14/2021 regarding resident care issues including lack of resident rotation resulting in pressure injuries, medication administration failures, unmet diapering needs, and dietary noncompliance.
Findings
The investigation substantiated all allegations: Resident #1 was not rotated regularly causing worsening pressure injuries; medication (insulin injections) was not consistently administered as ordered; diapering needs were not met with soiled diapers observed; and dietary instructions were not followed, with the resident given orange juice despite dietary restrictions. A $500 civil penalty was issued.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Allegations included failure to rotate resident causing pressure injuries, failure to administer medication properly, unmet diapering needs, and failure to follow dietary restrictions. Evidence included interviews, medical and hospice records, and observations. A civil penalty of $500 was issued.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 4
Deficiencies (4)
Description
Severity
Failure to ensure residents with injection medications are taking them as prescribed, including lack of a plan for when health declines or refusal occurs.
Type B
Failure to ensure Resident #1 was rotated frequently to prevent wound worsening.
Type B
Failure to ensure Resident #1's diapering needs were met, including frequent changing to keep area dry.
Type B
Failure to follow dietary plan by providing Resident #1 orange juice despite hospice instructions.
Type B
Report Facts
Civil Penalty: 500Capacity: 163Census: 124Plan of Correction Due Date: Jan 13, 2023Plan of Correction Due Date: Dec 30, 2022
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Cynthia D Chan
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report.
Tony Vasallo
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation and signed the report.
Lilit Chaparyan
Executive Director
Facility representative met during the investigation.
Peter Zertuche
Investigation Branch Investigator
Conducted interviews and obtained medical records related to pressure injury allegation.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations that facility staff did not dispense correct medications to residents and did not provide care to residents.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, and review of records. Residents denied the allegations regarding medication and care, and staff reported no complaints. Medication management was found to be proper. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations, resulting in an unsubstantiated finding.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated based on interviews with 13 residents and staff, and review of medication management for 6 residents. No evidence supported the allegations that staff failed to dispense correct medications or provide care.
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation regarding allegations that staff were not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for residents.
Findings
The investigation found that 12 out of 13 residents reported comfortable temperatures and functioning air/heating units. Staff addressed complaints from one resident (R1) and maintenance records showed the unit was working correctly. Temperature readings were within regulatory limits. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff were not maintaining a comfortable room temperature for residents. The allegation was unsubstantiated after interviews, observations, and record reviews showed compliance with temperature regulations and proper maintenance.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations that staff mismanaged a resident's medication and did not prevent inappropriate interactions between residents.
Findings
The investigation found that the medication mismanagement allegation was unsubstantiated as the resident only received one medication as prescribed, with two others discontinued. The allegation regarding inappropriate interactions between residents was also unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence and conflicting statements.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff mismanaging resident medication and failure to prevent inappropriate resident interactions. Interviews and document reviews did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations.
Report Facts
Capacity: 163Census: 122
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Jewel Baptiste
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Lisa Hicks
Licensing Program Manager
Named in report as Licensing Program Manager
Lililit Chaparyan
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and provided information
An unannounced annual visit was conducted using the Infection Control Evaluation Tool to evaluate the facility's compliance with regulations.
Findings
The facility was toured including common areas and resident rooms. No deficiencies were observed. Safety features, medication storage, food supply, and infection control measures were all found to be in compliance.
Report Facts
Resident medications reviewed: 10Water temperature range (Fahrenheit): 107.9Water temperature range (Fahrenheit): 111.2Food supply duration (days): 2Food supply duration (days): 7
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Julius Osorio
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and involved in facility tour
David Sicairos
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced annual visit and inspection
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted regarding an allegation that a resident was being intimidated while in care.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of records, and a facility tour. No evidence was found to substantiate the allegation, with staff and most residents denying any intimidation. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that a male staff member intimidated residents by staring at them intensely during dinner. Interviews with 5 staff members and 11 residents found no corroboration. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Staff interviewed: 5Residents interviewed: 11
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
David Sicairos
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit.
Sahar Mosalla
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2021-01-14 regarding resident care issues including pressure injuries due to lack of rotation, unmet diapering needs, and dietary noncompliance.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that Resident #1 was not rotated regularly resulting in worsening pressure injuries, diapering needs were not consistently met leading to soiled diapers and wound contamination, and dietary instructions were not followed as orange juice was given despite contraindications. However, the allegation that Resident #1's medication was not administered was unsubstantiated as the resident self-administered insulin until unable, after which hospice staff administered it.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations related to resident rotation, diapering, and dietary needs. The medication administration allegation was unsubstantiated. A $500 civil penalty was issued related to the substantiated findings.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 3
Deficiencies (3)
Description
Severity
Resident #1 was not rotated frequently enough to prevent wound worsening.
Type B
Resident #1's diapering needs were not met, resulting in soiled diapers and wound contamination.
Type B
Facility staff did not follow Resident #1's dietary plan and gave orange juice despite contraindications.
Type B
Report Facts
Civil Penalty Amount: 500Plan of Correction Due Date: Jun 21, 2022Capacity: 163Census: 133
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Cynthia D Chan
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report.
Kianny Soto
Director of Assisted Living
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and exit interview.
Sahar Mosalla
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation.
Peter Zertuche
Investigation Branch Investigator
Conducted interviews and obtained medical records related to pressure injury allegation.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by a complaint received on 2021-11-04 alleging that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in a timely manner.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident #1 had a change of condition on 2021-10-24 and staff did not call 911 immediately because the resident regularly refused medication and care. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove a violation.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff failed to seek timely medical attention for Resident #1 after a change of condition on 2021-10-24. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of resident records, and found that the resident refused insulin and meals regularly. Staff did not call 911 immediately on 10/24/21 because it was not unusual for the resident to refuse care. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Blood sugar level: 345Complaint received date: Nov 4, 2021
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Tony Vasallo
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Wei Siew Ho
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager on the report
Brittney Buchannan
Administrator
Facility administrator named in the report
Carmen Galicia
Business Manager
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2022-02-03 regarding inadequate food service and lack of resident privacy at the facility.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegations of inadequate food service and lack of resident privacy were unsubstantiated. Interviews with residents, staff, and the Business Manager indicated that food service was adequate and residents were provided privacy with staff knocking before entering rooms.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included inadequate food service and residents not being provided privacy. Interviews and evidence did not corroborate these allegations.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 163Resident census: 128
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Nune Margaryan
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Wei Siew Ho
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Carmen Galicia
Business Manager
Interviewed during the investigation regarding allegations
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation received on 2020-11-20 that food services at the facility were inadequate.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, and a tour of the kitchen and food supply. Residents and staff consistently stated that food service was adequate, with sufficient portions and options, and extra food available if requested. The food supply was sufficient for the residents. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that food services were inadequate. After investigation, including interviews with staff and residents and inspection of food supply, the allegation was found to be unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 163Census: 117Number of residents interviewed: 11Number of staff interviewed: 3Food supply sufficiency: 2Food supply sufficiency: 7
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Nina Galarza
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Nune Margaryan
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Brittney Buchannan
Facility administrator met during the investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by complaints received on 2021-07-08 regarding the facility not sharing CCLD information with residents and staff not ensuring resident safety.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the facility did not provide Provider Information Notices (PINs) to residents and that staff did not respond timely to emergency pendants, with 31 instances of response times of 20 minutes or more. Another allegation regarding facility disrepair and fire alarm functionality was unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations that the facility did not share CCLD information with residents and that staff did not ensure the safety of residents, specifically regarding emergency pendant response times. The allegation of facility disrepair was unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1Type B: 1
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Failure to respond timely to resident emergency pendants, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Type A
Failure to provide and post Provider Information Notices (PINs) to residents, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Type B
Report Facts
Resident census: 116Total capacity: 163Instances of delayed pendant response: 31Residents interviewed: 6
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Nina Galarza
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Glenn Trueman
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Brittney Buchannan
Administrator met with during investigation and interviewed
The inspection was an unannounced visit conducted for the purpose of the required annual inspection of the facility.
Findings
The inspection found no deficiencies. The facility was in compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. The facility was well maintained with required furniture, clean bathrooms with grab bars, unobstructed exits, and proper infection control practices.
Report Facts
Hot water temperature: 109.4
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
La'Keisha Phillips
Director of Assisted Living
Assisted with the inspection visit and discussed infection control practices
The inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint alleging that staff denied resident visitation at the facility.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility had a Coronavirus Visitation Policy allowing essential visitors while restricting non-essential visits. Interviews with staff and residents indicated no denial of visitation to essential workers. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that on 01/27/2020, an individual was denied visitation by a staff member. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of visitation policies, and concluded the allegation was unsubstantiated.