King David Center, located in Florida, is committed to enhancing the quality of life for its residents by creating a lively, safe, and inclusive community that promotes independence, wellness, and continuous learning. The center provides a range of residential options and healthcare services, including skilled nursing, independent living, assisted living, and memory care. In the Skilled Nursing Facility, the center delivers compassionate and expert care for individuals with complex medical needs, focusing on specialized, goal-oriented treatment plans to aid recovery and enhance independence.
For those requiring long-term care, the nurturing environment fosters a sense of community and ensures a high quality of life. The center’s comprehensive services encompass skilled nursing, rehabilitative therapies, and compassionate assistance, all delivered with the utmost professionalism and warmth. Residents can enjoy a variety of amenities, such as a Speakeasy Lounge, creative arts center, and intergenerational activities, fostering a dynamic and engaging lifestyle.
Cultural sensitivity is a significant strength at King David Rehabilitation Center, particularly for Asian families, as staff demonstrate warmth, understanding, and tailored support, which is highly appreciated by this community.
CommunityCare & staff
Overall quality of life and resident wellbeing
The center faces challenges with communication and staffing, particularly regarding the consistency and reliability of physical therapy sessions, and there are concerns about the nurse-to-patient ratio impacting care quality.
Quality of lifeCare & staff
Home Information KING DAVID CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHABILITATION
This nursing home maintains occupancy well above most state peers, signaling sustained demand. The facility operates with a larger bed count than most state competitors, supporting broader intake. Residents tend to stay here longer than similar facilities across the state.
Home revenue ranks in the upper tier statewide, reflecting strong billing volume. Payroll spending sits in the top tier, showing a strong investment in staffing resources. Total income exceeds the majority of state facilities, highlighting strong profitability.
Medicare nights run higher than most peers, indicating robust short-stay referrals. Medicaid nights sit above most state facilities, underscoring deep Title XIX coverage. Private pay nights lead the state, showing strong demand from market-rate residents.
Occupancy
Beds
271
Occupancy
98.0%
Total Bed Days Available
98915
Avg. Length of Stay
312 days
Avg. Residents per Day
266
Finance
Home Revenue
$62,783,890.00
Payroll Costs
$16,410,311.00
Profit
$3,899,055.00
Total Home Costs
$49,173,082.00
Payroll % of Revenue
Percentage of home revenue spent on payroll costs.
26.1%
House Specifics:
CCN
335545
Owner Name
NEW, ARTHUR
Rural vs. Urban
Urban
County
Kings
Type of Control
Proprietary — Corporation
Operations
Total Admissions
336
Total Discharges
311
% Medicaid Admissions
2%
% Medicare Admissions
56%
% Private Pay Admissions
41%
% Medicaid Discharges
24%
% Medicare Discharges
59%
% Private Pay Discharges
18%
Quality Ratings
Overall Rating
CMS 5-star rating based on health inspections, staffing, and quality measures.
5 / 5
Health Inspection Rating
Rating based on deficiencies found during state health inspections.
4 / 5
Staffing Rating
Rating based on nurse staffing hours per resident per day.
3 / 5
QM Rating
Quality Measures rating based on clinical outcomes for residents.
5 / 5
Nurse Hours / Resident / Day
Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day.
3.34 hrs
Medicaid, Medicare & Private
Medicare Nights
Number of resident nights paid by Medicare for short-term or rehab care.
57948
Medicaid Nights
Resident nights covered by Medicaid for long-term care or support services.
22064
Free Market Nights
Nights paid privately by residents or families, without Medicare/Medicaid coverage.
17006
271-bed community
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
12 years in operation
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care.
Walk Score: 90 / 100
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
BBB Rating: B- (Not Accredited)
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices. How BBB ratings work
How BBB ratings work
BBB ratings provide context about a business’s trust and complaint history. They are not a measure of care quality or regulatory compliance.
Ratings range from A+ (highest) to F (lowest).
What the rating reflects
Complaint history and resolution
Business practices and transparency
Time in operation
About this community
Facility Type
Nursing Home
Additional licensing details
County:Kings
Ownership & operating entity
King David Center is legally operated by SGRNC, LLC (For Profit).
What does this home offer?
Minimum Age: 55
Building Type: Medium-high rise building
Inspection History
In New York, the Department of Health, Office of Aging and Long Term Care performs unannounced onsite inspections to monitor compliance with state and federal healthcare regulations.
0 visits/inspections
6 complaint inspections
New York average: 37 complaint visits
New York average: 0 inspections
39 complaints
Formal expressions of dissatisfaction or concern made by residents, or their families regarding various aspects of the care, services, and environment provided.
New York average: 111 complaints
21 citations
Citations indicate regulatory violations. A higher number implies the facility had several areas requiring improvement.
New York average: 29 citations
0 enforcement actions
Penalties or interventions imposed by state regulators when facilities do not comply with quality, safety or regulatory standards.
Inspection Report Summary for King David Center
During the reporting period, comprising 13 standard health citations and 8 life safety code citations. These citations were issued in two on‑site inspections; a third inspection was conducted and resulted in no citations. No citations were identified as involving actual harm or immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety. The citation summary indicates that the facility’s citation burden is below the state average of 31 total citations.
The inspection conducted on January 10, 2024 generated the largest number of cited items, with 14 citations in total. Standard health deficiencies identified during this survey included accuracy of assessments, hospice services, menu preparation and delivery, posted nurse staffing information, reasonable accommodations for resident needs and preferences, and requirements for resident participation in care planning. Life safety deficiencies cited on the same date involved corridor doors, construction of corridor walls, discharge from exits, essential electrical systems, HVAC, portable fire extinguishers, sprinkler system installation, and sprinkler system maintenance and testing. The November 10, 2021 inspection, which also resulted in citations, listed six standard health deficiencies but no life safety citations.
Complaint metrics for the period from August 1, 2021 to July 31, 2025 show that the facility received 39 complaints, equating to 15.2 complaints per 100 occupied beds. Facility‑reported incidents represented 10.0 % of all complaints. Six complaint‑related on‑site inspections were completed, and four complaint‑related citations were issued, yielding a rate of 1.6 citations per 100 occupied beds. Complaint‑related citations by category were reported as 0 for administration, dietary services, other services, and physical environment; 1 for quality of care; and 1 for resident rights, for a total of 2 citations. The page also lists a total of 4 complaint‑related citations, and the category subtotals do not sum to this stated total.
Enforcement actions during the reporting period were nonexistent; the facility has had no enforcement actions against its operator from September 1, 2015 through August 31, 2025.
Source: CMS Health Citations
(Apr 2019 – Jan 2024)
3
Inspections
20
Total Citations
0
Critical (J-L)
0
Serious (G-I)
6.67
Citations/Inspection
Jan 2024
Last Inspection
Citation Severity Distribution
Minor (A-C)
1
Moderate (D-F)
19
Serious (G-I)
0
Critical (J-L)
0
What do these levels mean?
Top Deficiency Categories
Resident Rights
4
20% of total
Pharmacy Services
2
10% of total
Quality of Life & Care
1
5% of total
Administration
1
5% of total
Environmental
1
5% of total
Citation Sources
Standard Inspections20
Complaint Investigations1
State Comparison (NY)
Avg Citations (State)
18.5
This Facility: 20
Avg Critical (State)
0.2
This Facility: 0
Recent Citations (Last 3 Years)
Date
Severity ?
Category
Tag
Status
Jan 10, 2024
D
Administration
F0849
Corrected
Jan 10, 2024
C
Nursing Services
F0732
Corrected
Jan 10, 2024
D
Nutrition
F0803
Corrected
Jan 10, 2024
D
Care Planning
F0641
Corrected
Jan 10, 2024
D
Resident Rights
F0553
Corrected
Jan 10, 2024
D
Resident Rights
F0558
Corrected
Nov 10, 2021
D
Environmental
F0914
Corrected
Nov 10, 2021
D
Quality of Care
F0686
Corrected
Nov 10, 2021
D
Care Planning
F0641
Corrected
Nov 10, 2021
E
Care Planning
F0656
Corrected
Nov 10, 2021
D
Resident Rights
F0550
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Nursing Services
F0711
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Pharmacy
F0757
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Pharmacy
F0758
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Care Planning
F0637
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Care Planning
F0641
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
E
Care Planning
F0656
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Care Planning
F0657
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Care Planning
F0842
Corrected
Apr 26, 2019
D
Resident Rights
F0584
Corrected
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics
(Data as of Jan 2026)
Ownership: For-Profit Partnership
Resident Census by Payment Source
218Total Residents
Medicare66(30.3%)ⓘ
Medicaid150(68.8%)ⓘ
Private Pay/Other2(0.9%)ⓘ
Programs & Services
Residents' Groupⓘ
Family Engagement
Active councils help families stay involved in care decisions and facility operations.
Active
Resident Council
ⓘ
Quality Measures
CMS quality measures assess care quality for long-stay and short-stay residents.
Lower percentages generally indicate better outcomes for most measures.
Source: CMS Nursing Home Compare
(Data as of Jan 2026)
High-Risk Clinical Events
6.2Score
36% better than avgState avg: 9.8
Composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and ADL decline
Functional Decline
7.5Score
59% better than avgState avg: 18.1
Composite score based on ADL decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence
Long-Stay Resident Measures
Measures for residents who stay 101 days or more. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care.
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased
9.5%
Lost Too Much Weight
5.2%
Urinary Tract Infection
0.3%
Depressive Symptoms
3.4%
Falls with Major Injury
2.5%
Pneumococcal Vaccine
100.0%
Antipsychotic Use
6.2%
Walking Ability Worsened
8.3%
Influenza Vaccine
97.2%
High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers
5.7%
Low Risk Long-Stay Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence
4.6%
Short-Stay Resident Measures
Measures for residents who stay 100 days or less (typically rehabilitation patients).
Pneumococcal Vaccine
100.0%
30% better than avg State: 76.6%
Short-Stay Residents Who Received a New Antipsychotic Medication
0.7%
43% better than avg State: 1.3%
Influenza Vaccine
89.0%
13% better than avg State: 78.8%
Guides for Better Senior Living
From costs to care, explore the most important topics to make informed
decisions about your future.
Guides for Better Senior Living
From costs to care, explore the most important topics to make informed
decisions about your future.