Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
55
45 employees · 10 contractors · 20 on an average day Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Oconto, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 4 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 4 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Oconto, WI
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 4 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — 4 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center provides nursing home, skilled nursing, hospice care, palliative care, memory care, and respite care in Oconto, WI. Nursing home and skilled nursing include licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while memory care offers a secured setting with supervision for a resident at risk of wandering.
Hospice care supports end-of-life needs, and palliative care focuses on comfort and symptom relief. Respite care provides a short stay for a family caregiver who needs time to travel or recover, so the range of care may suit a resident whose needs change over time or a caregiver who needs short-term support.
The home has 50 beds, making it a smaller community where staff and residents can get to know each other. Total nurse staffing is 3h 8m per resident per day, representing the daily nursing time assigned to each resident. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, allowing families to use eligible public coverage or pay directly.
A Walk Score of 41 places the area in a car-dependent setting, so most errands require a car or a ride, and a resident who no longer drives would need transportation for them. The therapy gym and outpatient therapy support rehabilitation on site, while the courtyard and community garden offer outdoor spaces.
Residents can use the barber and beauty salon, join art and music activities, and take part in personalized therapeutic activities designed for memory care. Pets are allowed, so a resident may continue living with a pet. Judy Story serves as the administrator, and Champion Care is the owner.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 150th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 8m
This nursing home is ranked 150th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 8mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +26% above Wisconsin average
5 of 6 metrics below Wisconsin average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
40m
↓ 32% · WI 58mThis facility: 40m per resident per day, 32% below the Wisconsin average of 58m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 4 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
4 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
48m
↑ 26% · WI 38mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 26% above the Wisconsin average of 38m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
1h 41m
↓ 35% · WI 2h 35mThis facility: 1h 41m per resident per day, 35% below the Wisconsin average of 2h 35m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 70% · WI 4mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 70% below the Wisconsin average of 4m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 47m
↓ 25% · WI 3h 43mThis facility: 2h 47m per resident per day, 25% below the Wisconsin average of 3h 43m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
24m
↓ 39% · WI 39mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 39% below the Wisconsin average of 39m (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
55
45 employees · 10 contractors · 20 on an average day
55 total staff / 40 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.38 : 1
↓ 43% · WI 2.40This facility: 1.38 staff per resident, 43% below the Wisconsin average of 2.40 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
55 staff ÷ 40 residents
See full Wisconsin ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.8 h
↑ 7% · WI 7.3 hThis facility: 7.8 h, 7% above the Wisconsin average of 7.3 h (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
14,196 staff hours this quarter
See full Wisconsin ranking →94.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wisconsin average: 88.4% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #114 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
50
Rank #114 / 197Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 197 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Wisconsin facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #117 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #117 / 191Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Wisconsin facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
41
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #65 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #65 / 167Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Wisconsin average, with its Statewide rank out of 167. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
78.8%
This home usually has availability
Based on 39.4 residents and 50 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Wisconsin average: 72.1%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
160
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Care
CountyOconto
CMS Certification Number525670
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Oconto Health And Rehabilitation Center, and administered by Judy Story.
Profit StatusFor-profit
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Outpatient Therapy
Hydrotherapy
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech TherapyListed as: Speech language pathology
Certified Nursing Assistants
Registered Nurses
Ostomy Care and Training
IV Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
Tube Feeding
Dental Services
Podiatry Services
Weight Loss Management
Pain Management
Dietitian
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
- On-site physician services including internal medicine, podiatry, ophthalmology and dental care
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Behavioral Services
Bariatric CareSpecialized care for people with severe obesity, including safe transfers, equipment, mobility support, and management of related health needs.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Activity and Recreation Staff
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
TransportationListed as: Scheduled transportation
Fax(920) 834-2537
Pets not allowedVisiting pets welcome.
Cable Tv
Wi-Fi
Library
Courtyard
Garden
Beauty Salon
Activities
Arts & Crafts
Music Programs
Social Gatherings
Pet Visits
Therapeutic Recreation
Penny Drop
- Personalized therapeutic activities (memory care)
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
85 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
4 points above the Wisconsin average for CMS-certified facilities (81/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
90 severity-weighted points (41 deficiencies) · 18% higher than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 76)
Enforcement
Typical
2 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 0) · $18,819 in fines
Persistence
Strong
23 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WI facility (median: 27)
Total health inspections
13
↑ 110% · WI 6.2This facility: 13, 110% above the Wisconsin average of 6.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
41
Rank #122 / 168Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 122nd out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Wisconsin State average, with a ranking across all 168 WI facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 45% · WI 28.3This facility: 41, 45% above the Wisconsin average of 28.3 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.15
Rank #45 / 168Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Wisconsin mean across 168 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 26% · WI 4.24This facility: 3.15, 26% below the Wisconsin average of 4.24 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
41 of 41 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
2
↑ 122% · WI 0.9This facility: 2, 122% above the Wisconsin average of 0.9 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 1.2 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
39
↑ 51% · WI 25.8This facility: 39, 51% above the Wisconsin average of 25.8 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · WI 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Wisconsin average of 0.5 (among Wisconsin facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 25, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 9 of 41 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 25, 2026
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 17, 2025
4 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 12, 2025
6 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 12, 2025
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 22, 2024
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 03, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 20, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 03, 2024
6 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 03, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 16, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 24, 2023
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 11, 2023
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 07, 2023
7 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 41 citations
Resident Rights
9 deficiencies (22%)
Quality of Life & Care
9 deficiencies (22%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
6 deficiencies (15%)
Pharmacy Services
6 deficiencies (15%)
Infection Control
4 deficiencies (10%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (10%)
Nutrition & Dietary
1 deficiency (2%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (2%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
17 of 41 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 24 of 41 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Jul 3, 2024 · $8,968 civil money penalty
Jul 3, 2024 · $8,968 civil money penalty
Total fines
$8,968
↓ 92% · WI $107KThis facility: $8,968, 92% below the Wisconsin average of $106,807. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #109 / 168Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 168 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Wisconsin average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 168 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 51% · WI 2.03This facility: 1, 51% below the Wisconsin average of 2.03. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WI avg 0.71Wisconsin average: 0.71. Average among the 146 Wisconsin facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jul 3, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,968
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,968Fine amount comparison
This facility
$8,968
Wisconsin average
$106,807
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wisconsin and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wisconsin average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 32% · WI 3.0This facility: 4.0, 32% above the WI average of 3.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 50% · WI 9.0This facility: 4.5, 50% below the WI average of 9.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 56% · WI 18.9This facility: 8.2, 56% below the WI average of 18.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 3 worse, 3 near WI average
6 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 near WI average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.1%
↓ 74% · WI 15.8This facility: 4.1, 74% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.1%
↓ 74% · WI 15.8This facility: 4.1, 74% below the WI average of 15.8 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.8%
↓ 66% · WI 17.0This facility: 5.8, 66% below the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
5.8%
↓ 66% · WI 17.0This facility: 5.8, 66% below the WI average of 17.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.8%
↓ 37% · WI 23.6This facility: 14.8, 37% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.8%
↓ 37% · WI 23.6This facility: 14.8, 37% below the WI average of 23.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 2.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 2.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 2.7 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 3.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 3.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 3.3 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.8%
↑ 59% · WI 4.9This facility: 7.8, 59% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.8%
↑ 59% · WI 4.9This facility: 7.8, 59% above the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
↓ 3% · WI 4.9This facility: 4.8, 3% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
↓ 3% · WI 4.9This facility: 4.8, 3% below the WI average of 4.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.8%
↑ 297% · WI 6.0This facility: 23.8, 297% above the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.8%
↑ 297% · WI 6.0This facility: 23.8, 297% above the WI average of 6.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.2%
↑ 84% · WI 15.9This facility: 29.2, 84% above the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.2%
↑ 84% · WI 15.9This facility: 29.2, 84% above the WI average of 15.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
↑ 3% · WI 96.0This facility: 98.6, 3% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
↑ 3% · WI 96.0This facility: 98.6, 3% above the WI average of 96.0 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
↑ 2% · WI 95.6This facility: 97.6, 2% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
↑ 2% · WI 95.6This facility: 97.6, 2% above the WI average of 95.6 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 6 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
55.0%
↑ 2% · US 53.7This facility: 55.0, 2% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
55.0%
↑ 2% · US 53.7This facility: 55.0, 2% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.7%
↑ 6% · US 50.6This facility: 53.7, 6% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
53.7%
↑ 6% · US 50.6This facility: 53.7, 6% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WI 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WI average of 1.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.4%
↑ 9% · WI 86.9This facility: 94.4, 9% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.4%
↑ 9% · WI 86.9This facility: 94.4, 9% above the WI average of 86.9 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.6%
↓ 1% · WI 82.2This facility: 81.6, 1% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.6%
↓ 1% · WI 82.2This facility: 81.6, 1% below the WI average of 82.2 (among WI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 164 Wisconsin nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−6.5% operating margin
−3.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.3M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wisconsin homes
51.4% payroll share of revenue
WI average 58.7%Rank #111 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.7M while revenue rose $0.9M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wisconsin homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.0M | +$0.9M | Trend 20162024 | WI median $8.3M | Rank in WI Rank #143 / 164Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 143rd out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 13% of homes | Below WI median Higher net patient revenue than 13% of WI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.3M | +$1.0M | Trend 20162024 | WI median $8.4M | Rank in WI Rank #141 / 164Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 141st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.3M | −$0.2M | Trend 20162024 | WI median −$0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #99 / 164Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 99th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −6.5% | −3.4 pts | Trend 20162024 | WI median −1.0% | Rank in WI Rank #105 / 164Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 105th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 36% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | WI median $0.1M | Rank in WI Rank #135 / 162Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 162 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.3M | −$0.5M | Trend — | WI median $0.2M | Rank in WI Rank #114 / 164Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Wisconsin homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 31% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wisconsin homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | WI median | Compared with WI homesRank in WI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $2.6M | +$0.7M | Trend 20162024 | WI median $4.4M | Rank in WI Rank #141 / 164Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 141st out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | Below WI median Higher payroll than 14% of WI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 51.4% | +6.9 pts | Trend 20162024 | WI median 56.9% | Rank in WI Rank #111 / 164Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Wisconsin for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wisconsin average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wisconsin that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | 7.3 pts under WI average The WI average is 58.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · WI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wisconsin payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WI payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $4.2M | $4.4M | $4.4M | $4.1M | $5.0M | |
| Operating expenses | $2.6M | $2.3M | $2.3M | $3.3M | $3.7M | $4.5M | $4.3M | $5.3M | |
| Net patient income | −$0.3M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.9M | $0.7M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$0.3M | |
| Operating margin | −11.6% | 5.4% | 6.0% | 21.0% | 14.9% | −4.4% | −3.0% | −6.5% | |
| Net income | $0.0M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $1.1M | $1.3M | $0.2M | $0.2M | −$0.3M | |
| Payroll costs | $1.6M | $1.4M | $1.5M | $2.0M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $1.8M | $2.6M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 68.5% | 57.8% | 60.5% | 48.9% | 48.5% | 47.4% | 44.5% | 51.4% | |
| Beds | 45 | 45 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| Gross revenue | $2.3M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $4.3M | $4.6M | $4.8M | $5.1M | $6.0M | |
| Salaries | $1.3M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.6M | $2.2M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.5M | |
| Other operating costs | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $1.2M | $1.6M | $2.5M | $2.4M | $2.7M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $163 | $178 | $176 | $276 | $282 | $287 | $314 | $372 | |
| Cost per day | $182 | $168 | $165 | $218 | $240 | $299 | $323 | $396 | |
| Average length of stay | 126.6 days | 144.8 days | 161.4 days | 158.6 days | 167.0 days | 110.1 days | 107.9 days | 159.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
89 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
21 · 24%
Medicaid
14 · 16%
Private pay & other
54 · 61%
Resident snapshot
40 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 10%
Medicaid
35 · 88%
Private pay & other
1 · 3%
Leaving
84 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
15 · 18%
Medicaid
16 · 19%
Private pay & other
53 · 63%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Matterport
Experience a digital walkthrough
Loading tour...
Places of interest near Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center
0.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Oconto's city center to Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.8 miles to nearest hospital (Bellin Health Oconto Hospital and Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Wisconsin
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center is located in Oconto, Wisconsin.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Wisconsin.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 41. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center?
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 78.8%.
03 Are pets allowed at Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center?
No, Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center?
The team at Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center can be reached at info@oconto-health.com.
05 Does Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center is registered as a for-profit in WI.
06 Who is the administrator of Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center?
Judy Story is the administrator of Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center.
07 What is the overall rating for Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center?
Oconto Health and Rehabilitation Center received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
