Most inspections found no deficiencies, with several complaint investigations determined to be unsubstantiated. The most recent report from September 20, 2025, was a complaint investigation that found no violations, although there was a minor delay in providing resident records that was ultimately resolved. Earlier reports show isolated issues, including one substantiated finding in August 2025 where staff failed to respond timely to a resident’s calls for assistance, resulting in emergency services being called. More serious deficiencies occurred in 2022 and earlier, involving staffing shortages, medication errors, and supervision failures, some leading to resident injury and elopement, but these issues have not recurred in recent years. Overall, the facility’s record shows improvement over time, with recent inspections reflecting compliance and resolution of prior concerns.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation that staff did not provide resident records to the resident's authorized representative.
Findings
The investigation found that although there was a delay in providing the requested resident records, the facility did not deny the request and ultimately provided the records. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not provide resident#1's authorized representative with resident records requested on 08/18/2025. Interviews with three staff members indicated the request was received but required verification of legitimacy before release. Records were sent by 09/18/2025. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted regarding an allegation that staff did not safeguard a resident's personal belongings, specifically a missing wedding ring.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of documentation, and a police report. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The allegation was that staff did not safeguard resident R-1's personal belongings, specifically a missing wedding ring. Interviews and documentation did not corroborate the allegation. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 245Census: 212Memory care unit census: 35Number of interviewed residents: 3Number of interviewed staff: 5
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Elizabeth Irra
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Kay Cano
Administrator
Facility administrator met during the investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2025-07-17 regarding staff not timely responding to resident calls for assistance, resulting in hospitalization, and other related complaints.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff failed to respond timely to a resident's call for help, resulting in the resident having to call 911. Other allegations related to missed medications, failure to follow physician orders, failure to provide meals, and failure to check on the resident were found to be unsubstantiated based on interviews and record reviews.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff did not answer resident's calls for assistance timely, resulting in hospitalization. Other allegations including staff neglect related to missed medications, failure to follow physician orders, failure to provide meals, and failure to check on the resident were unsubstantiated.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Staff failed to respond to resident R1's repeated pull cord calls for assistance, resulting in R1 having to call 911 for emergency help.
Type A
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 245Census: 215Deficiency count: 1Plan of Correction due date: 1
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Christian Gutierrez
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
David Sicairos
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Kay Cano
Administrator
Facility administrator notified and interviewed during investigation
Cherry Castro
Med-Tech
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and interviewed
Unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted due to multiple allegations including inadequate supervision resulting in resident falls and injuries, unsafe transfers, pressure injuries due to neglect, worsening resident condition, and isolation of a resident in her room.
Findings
The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Interviews with residents and staff, as well as review of medical and hospital documentation, indicated that incidents were either assist to ground rather than falls, injuries were minor and promptly addressed, and residents did not have pressure injuries or worsening conditions due to neglect. The allegation of isolation was also unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated for all allegations including inadequate supervision, unsafe transfers, pressure injuries, worsening condition, and isolation. Documentation and interviews did not support the claims, and the facility responded appropriately to incidents.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by a complaint received on 2025-02-19 regarding allegations that staff did not adequately address a change in a resident's condition and did not inform the resident's representative of incidents as required.
Findings
The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff and residents denied the claims, and documentation showed appropriate tracking and communication of residents' health conditions. The findings remain unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that staff failed to adequately address changes in resident R1's condition and failed to inform R1's power of attorney (POA) of incidents. Interviews with staff and residents, as well as review of records, did not substantiate these allegations. The report notes that although the allegations may have happened or be valid, there was insufficient evidence to prove violations occurred.
Licensing Program Analyst Mary Flores conducted an unannounced collateral visit to conduct interviews regarding a recent incident at a different licensed facility.
Findings
Interviews were conducted with 7 residents regarding the incident that occurred at their previous facility. An exit interview was conducted with the administrator and a copy of the report was provided.
Report Facts
Number of residents interviewed: 7
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Mary Flores
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced collateral visit and interviews
Kay Cano
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst and participated in exit interview
Marie Brooks
Wellness Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations that staff did not adequately address a change in a resident's condition and did not inform the resident's representative of incidents as required.
Findings
The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff and residents denied the allegations, and documentation showed appropriate tracking and communication of residents' health conditions. The resident's POA was involved during behavioral episodes, and staff assisted the resident accordingly.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved two allegations: 1) staff did not adequately address a change in resident R1's condition related to dementia, and 2) staff did not inform R1's POA of incidents. Both allegations were unsubstantiated after interviews with staff, residents, and the resident's POA, and review of records.
The inspection was a required unannounced annual inspection to evaluate compliance with regulatory standards for the Pasadena Highlands facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, with no deficiencies observed. The inspection covered infection control, operational requirements, physical plant safety, staffing, personnel records, resident records, residents' rights, planned activities, food service, incidental medical and dental care, disaster preparedness, and residents with special health needs.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations related to improper wound care, neglect, failure to note changes in medical condition, failure to seek timely medical attention, failure to provide wound care plan to family, and retaining a resident requiring a higher level of care.
Findings
The investigation found that although there were allegations of neglect and improper wound care resulting in worsening wounds, the resident was receiving hospice services and skilled care. Facility staff documented changes in condition and timely hospital transfers were made upon family request. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate any violations, and all allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved multiple allegations including improper wound care handling, neglect leading to wound worsening, failure to note medical condition changes, failure to seek timely medical attention, failure to provide wound care plan to family, and retaining a resident needing higher level care. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, family, hospice care, and review of medical and facility records. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.
An unannounced Case Management visit was conducted to evaluate the third floor Memory Care unit for health and safety compliance.
Findings
The facility was found to be in full compliance with health and safety standards, including fire clearance and emergency systems. The memory care unit was ready and appropriately equipped to house residents with dementia needs.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation that staff do not keep the facility free from pests.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence of pests in the facility. Interviews with staff and residents, inspection of the facility, and review of pest control documentation revealed no observations of roaches, rodents, or flies. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff do not keep the facility free from pests. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on interviews, inspections, and documentation review.
Report Facts
Capacity: 245Census: 190Pest control visits: 2
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Glenn Trueman
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Kay Cano
Administrator
Facility administrator met during the investigation
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations received on 2024-04-25 regarding pest control, sanitation of kitchen items, mildew presence, and food handling techniques at the facility.
Findings
The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Staff and residents denied the claims, observations and documentation supported proper pest control, sanitation, mildew cleaning, and food handling practices. The allegations were therefore determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff not keeping the facility free from pests, improper sanitization of kitchen items, presence of mildew, and improper food handling techniques. Interviews with staff and residents, observations, and document reviews did not confirm these allegations.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations received on 2024-04-25 regarding pest control, sanitation, mildew, and food handling practices at the facility.
Findings
The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Staff and residents denied the claims, observations and documentation supported proper pest control, sanitation, mildew cleaning, and food handling practices. The allegations were therefore unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint included allegations that staff did not keep the facility free from rodents, did not properly sanitize kitchen items, did not keep the facility free from mildew, and did not follow proper food handling techniques. All allegations were investigated and found to be unsubstantiated based on staff and resident interviews, observations, and documentation review.
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation of wrongful eviction of residents R1 and R2.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence of wrongful eviction. Staff and residents denied the allegation, and no eviction notices were found in the residents' files. The residents were moving out by choice, supported by a 30-day notice from the responsible party. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged wrongful eviction of residents R1 and R2. The allegation was unsubstantiated after interviews with staff, residents, and review of documentation showed no eviction notices or wrongful eviction actions.
The inspection was a required unannounced annual inspection to evaluate compliance with regulatory standards for the Pasadena Highlands facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, including infection control, operational requirements, physical plant safety, staffing, personnel training, resident records, residents' rights, planned activities, food service, incidental medical and dental care, and disaster preparedness. No deficiencies were observed during the visit.
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that staff was not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Interviews with staff and residents, as well as file reviews, indicated that the resident received proper care and medication management was appropriately handled by certified staff.
Complaint Details
The allegation was that staff was not providing adequate care and supervision to a resident, specifically that the resident was denied care and the private caregiver was not allowed to administer medication. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on interviews and documentation reviewed.
Report Facts
Capacity: 245Census: 164
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Kay Cano
Administrator
Met with during the investigation and named in findings
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision to a resident while in care.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Staff and residents interviewed denied the claim, and records showed adequate supervision and staffing. The resident in question was reported missing briefly but was not found after a search and police notification. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged inadequate supervision of a resident who went missing on 01/21/2023. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of resident files, and facility policies. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
The visit was an unannounced Case Management site visit focused on COVID-19 to assist the facility in reducing their COVID-19 positive cases.
Findings
The facility was closed for new admissions and conducting twice-weekly COVID-19 testing. Communal areas were closed due to the outbreak, and residents isolated in their rooms. Infection control measures including hand sanitizers, PPE availability, cleaning protocols, and mask usage were observed and enforced throughout the facility.
Report Facts
COVID-19 positive residents: 4Medtechs per shift: 2Memory Care staff: 4
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Bennette Pena
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the unannounced site visit.
Kay Cano
Executive Director
Met with the licensing team during the visit.
Sanda Lee
Assisted Living Director
Assisted with the tour of the facility.
John Arbona
Director of Plant Operations
Assisted with the tour of the facility.
David Sicairos
Supervisor
Named as supervisor in the report.
Casey Cortes
Public Health Nurse
Participated in the joint visit.
Sandy Gesell
Public Health Nurse
Participated in the joint visit.
Britany Bruner
Wellness Director
Called by Medtechs to perform assessments in emergencies.
An unannounced required 1-year visit focusing on the Infection Control Domain was conducted to evaluate compliance with health and safety regulations.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with infection control and safety standards, including adequate PPE supplies, proper signage, mask usage, and safe medication storage. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to an allegation that facility staff did not provide a resident's records to the authorized representative upon written request.
Findings
The investigation found that the initial document request lacked proper authorization or power of attorney, making it a HIPAA violation to provide the documents. An updated request with proper authorization was provided on 08/31/2022, and the facility agreed to provide the requested documents accordingly. Therefore, the allegation was unsubstantiated.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that facility staff did not provide resident's records to the authorized representative upon written request. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence and proper authorization in the initial request.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 245Census: 162
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Brodey DeBorde
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by a complaint received on 2022-01-11 regarding multiple allegations including resident injury from a fall, staffing shortages, care plan non-adherence, inadequate food services, and medication administration errors.
Findings
The investigation substantiated all allegations, finding that a resident fell resulting in brain injury, staffing shortages led to missed care such as repositioning and feeding, the resident's care plan was not consistently followed or updated, food services were delayed due to staff shortages, and medications were not administered according to physician orders including medication errors.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated based on evidence including interviews, record reviews, and video surveillance. Allegations included a resident fall causing injury, insufficient staffing, failure to follow care plans, inadequate food services, and medication administration errors.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 3Type A: 1
Deficiencies (4)
Description
Severity
Basic Services. Personal assistance and care as needed by the resident and as indicated in the pre-admission appraisal, including activities of daily living and medication assistance.
Type B
Personnel Requirements-General. Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers and competent to meet resident needs.
Type B
Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services. Licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications when needed; medication errors occurred including late administration, failure to crush medications, and wrong inhaler brought to resident.
Type A
Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. Residents shall have care and supervision delivered by sufficient and competent staff; resident fell without required escort assistance.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 245Census: 154Staffing shortage: 3Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 17, 2022Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 17, 2022Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 17, 2022Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 4, 2022
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Brodey DeBorde
Executive Director
Met with during investigation and named in findings related to resident fall and staffing
Noemi Galarza
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted complaint investigation and authored report
Lisa Hicks
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager overseeing investigation
S6
Staff member interviewed who confirmed medication errors
An unannounced required 1-year visit focusing on COVID-19 Infection Control Practices was conducted to evaluate compliance with health and safety regulations.
Findings
The inspection found deficiencies related to failure to screen visitors for COVID-19 symptoms and temperature checks, and improper medication storage in a resident's room. Infection control signage and PPE were observed, and staff were wearing masks. The facility removed medications from the resident's room during the visit and planned staff training on medication handling.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 2
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Front desk staff did not screen for COVID-19 symptoms or check temperature of Licensing Program Analysts upon arrival, posing immediate health and safety risks.
Type A
Facility did not comply with assisting a resident with self-administered medications as medications were improperly stored in resident's room #223, posing immediate health and safety risks.
Type A
Report Facts
Hospice residents: 23Hospice waivers: 25Client rooms inspected: 36Client rooms lacking hand sanitizer: 9Medication records reviewed: 4
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Brodie Deborde
Administrator
Met with Licensing Program Analysts during inspection and involved in medication deficiency observation
Laura
Nurse
Observed medications in resident's room during inspection
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations that staff did not follow a resident's Care Plan, did not aid a resident with incontinence needs, and did not ensure a resident's room was not malodorous.
Findings
The investigation found that the alleged resident (R1) was not and has never been a resident of the facility. Interviews with multiple facility directors and observations of resident rooms showed no evidence supporting the allegations. The complaint was determined to be unfounded and dismissed.
Complaint Details
The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened, and/or were without reasonable basis.
Report Facts
Monthly rate: 4000
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Alma Gonzalez
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation
Brodey De Borde
Executive Director
Interviewed during investigation and provided information about the allegations
Laura Sanchez
Health and Wellness Director
Interviewed during investigation and provided information about the allegations
Sanda Lee
Assisted Living Director
Interviewed during investigation and provided information about the allegations
Kay Cano
Corporate Health and Wellness Director
Interviewed during investigation and provided information about the allegations
The visit was a Case Management - Other type, conducted to address the facility's failure to report a Covid-19 outbreak in a timely manner.
Findings
The facility had an outbreak of Covid-19 involving 12 individuals starting on 2021-12-25 but failed to report the outbreak to the licensing agency and local health officer within the required 24 hours. A citation was issued for this failure to report.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Failure to notify the licensing agency and local health officer within 24 hours of an epidemic outbreak of Covid-19 involving 12 individuals.
Type A
Report Facts
Covid-19 positive individuals: 12Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 4, 2022
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Alberto Lopez
Licensed Program Analyst
Conducted the inspection and spoke with the Administrator regarding the Covid-19 outbreak reporting
Christine Yee
Supervisor
Supervisor overseeing the inspection
Bordie Deborde
Administrator
Facility Administrator who was spoken to about the failure to report the Covid-19 outbreak
Licensing Program Analyst conducted a Case Management-Deficiencies visit due to observations made during a complaint investigation (control #: 28-AS-20210607141758).
Findings
The inspection found that the right delayed egress door in the memory care unit did not open after the 15-second delay and the alarm did not sound, posing an immediate health and safety risk. Additionally, the required complaint poster was not displayed in the main entryway of the facility.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint investigation under control number 28-AS-20210607141758.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1Type B: 1
Deficiencies (2)
Description
Severity
Delayed egress door in the memory care unit did not open after 15 seconds and alarm did not sound.
Type A
Complaint poster with DSS/CCLD complaint phone number was not displayed in the main entryway.
Type B
Report Facts
Capacity: 245Census: 147Deficiencies cited: 2POC Due Date: Jun 10, 2021
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Brodey DeBorde
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and involved in exit interview.
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation of lack of supervision resulting in a resident eloping from the facility.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that a memory care resident eloped from the facility due to staff failing to supervise and ensure the delayed egress door closed properly. The resident was found safe after being missing for approximately 20 minutes. No injuries were observed upon return.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. The resident eloped on June 4, 2021, from the memory care unit. Staff failed to supervise and ensure the door closed after exiting. The resident was found safe approximately 1.5 miles away after a search and police involvement. The resident has a history of elopement and dementia diagnosis.
Severity Breakdown
Type A: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Personnel Requirements-General. Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met by evidence of failure to supervise resident (R1) who eloped through a delayed egress door that staff did not ensure closed properly.
Type A
Report Facts
Staff to resident ratio: 10Number of staff working during incident: 4Deficiency count: 1Plan of Correction due date: Jun 11, 2021
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Brodey DeBorde
Executive Director
Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and named in findings
Noemi Galarza
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation visit
Lisa Hicks
Licensing Program Manager
Named as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that residents were not being changed timely due to lack of staff.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility was short-staffed, with residents waiting 25 minutes to an hour for assistance. Staff reported being overwhelmed and that management had not improved staffing levels. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews and evidence.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. Residents and staff reported short staffing causing delays in care. The assisted living floor had reduced caregivers from 4-5 to 1-2, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Severity Breakdown
Type B: 1
Deficiencies (1)
Description
Severity
Facility personnel were not sufficient in numbers to provide necessary services to meet resident needs, resulting in residents waiting 25 minutes to an hour for assistance.
Type B
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 1Capacity: 245Census: 129Plan of Correction Due Date: May 17, 2021
Employees Mentioned
Name
Title
Context
Christine Wong
Licensing Program Analyst
Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Christine Yee
Licensing Program Manager
Oversaw the complaint investigation
Maria Alarcon
Business Office Director
Interviewed during investigation and participated in exit interview
Kay Cano
Administrator
Facility administrator mentioned in relation to investigation
Loading inspection reports...
Need Help?
Let us help you or a loved one find the perfect senior home.