Inspection Reports for Preferred Care at Old Bridge

NJ

Back to Facility Profile

Deficiencies (last 5 years)

Deficiencies (over 5 years) 8.8 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.

69% worse than New Jersey average
New Jersey average: 5.2 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies per year

12 9 6 3 0
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025

Census

Latest occupancy rate 130 residents

Based on a March 2025 inspection.

This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.

Census over time

80 100 120 140 Jan 2021 Mar 2021 Jul 2022 Mar 2023 Dec 2024 Mar 2025

Notice

Deficiencies: 0 Date: Nov 20, 2025

Visit Reason
This document serves to inform individuals about the privacy practices of NJDHSS, including how their medical information may be used and disclosed, and their rights related to this information.

Findings
The notice explains the types of information covered, reasons for use and disclosure of health information, individuals' rights regarding their health information, and the legal duties of NJDHSS to protect privacy.

Report Facts
Effective date: 2011

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Devon L. GrafDirector, Office of Legal and Regulatory ComplianceListed as NJDHSS Privacy Officer contact for questions about the notice

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2 Date: Oct 23, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted based on complaints alleging failure to reasonably accommodate residents' needs, including call bell accessibility and timely assistance, as well as inadequate assistance with toileting and personal hygiene care.

Complaint Details
Complaint NJ# 420827 and 2636492. The complaint investigation found substantiated deficiencies related to call bell accessibility and inadequate assistance with activities of daily living including toileting and hygiene.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure residents' call bells were within reach and could be activated, and residents' needs were not met timely after call bell activation for 3 of 9 residents. Additionally, the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance with toileting and personal hygiene care for 4 of 6 residents, evidenced by soiled linens, unmet shower schedules, and delayed incontinence care.

Deficiencies (2)
Resident call bells were not accessible or within reach, and residents' needs were not met timely after call bell activation.
Failure to provide appropriate assistance with toileting needs and personal hygiene care, including soiled linens and missed showers.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for call bell accommodation: 9 Residents reviewed for ADL assistance: 6 BIMS scores: 8 BIMS scores: 13 BIMS scores: 15 BIMS scores: 12 BIMS scores: 13 Shower dates documented: 3

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
LPN/UM #1Licensed Practical Nurse / Unit ManagerConfirmed call bell tied under mattress and inaccessible for Resident #6; stated CNAs and nurses responsible for call bell accessibility
CNA #1Certified Nursing AssistantAcknowledged call bell for Resident #4 was out of reach and did not take Resident #4 to bathroom despite request
LPN/UM #2Licensed Practical Nurse / Unit ManagerDescribed call bell answering process and responsibility; stated residents should be checked every two hours for incontinence care
CNA #2Certified Nursing AssistantDescribed call bell system alerts and response expectations; unable to attend Resident #8 timely due to other assignments
CNA #3Certified Nursing AssistantAssigned to Resident #9; stated did not have time to provide incontinence care prior to breakfast
CNA #4Certified Nursing AssistantAcknowledged call bell for Resident #4 was out of reach and admitted error in not assisting resident to bathroom

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2 Date: Jul 10, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted based on complaints NJ187513 and NJ187972 to investigate the facility's compliance with care planning and supervision protocols related to residents identified as elopement risks.

Complaint Details
The investigation was complaint-driven based on complaints NJ187513 and NJ187972. The complaints were substantiated as the facility failed to develop required care plans and failed to prevent elopement incidents.
Findings
The facility failed to develop an elopement risk care plan for Resident #5 despite identification as an elopement risk, and failed to adequately supervise Resident #2 who eloped from the facility when a family member held the door open, violating facility policy and safety protocols.

Deficiencies (2)
Failed to develop an elopement risk care plan for Resident #5 identified as an elopement risk.
Failed to follow protocol and provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement of Resident #2 who left the facility unattended.
Report Facts
BIMS score: 12 BIMS score: 4 Deficiency count: 2 Care plan update timeframe: 14

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Director of NursingDirector of Nursing (DON)Interviewed regarding care plan requirements and elopement incident
RN #1Registered NurseInterviewed regarding supervision of Resident #2 on day of elopement

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 130 Deficiencies: 9 Date: Mar 31, 2025

Visit Reason
A Recertification Survey was conducted from 3/25/2025 to 3/31/2025 to determine compliance with 42 CFR Part 483, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities, triggered by complaints NJ00174183 and NJ00180900.

Complaint Details
Complaint numbers NJ00174183 and NJ00180900 triggered the survey. The medication administration error deficiency was substantiated based on observation, interview, and record review.
Findings
Deficiencies were cited related to medication administration errors, specifically a medication administration error rate of 6.25% involving Resident #79 and three nurses. The facility failed to ensure all medications were administered without error. A plan of correction included re-education and competency training for involved staff. Additional Life Safety Code deficiencies were found related to means of egress, emergency lighting, hazardous areas, sprinkler systems, corridor doors, and electrical equipment maintenance.

Deficiencies (9)
Medication administration error rate of 6.25% identified during observation of Resident #79, involving three nurses.
Means of egress not maintained free of obstructions and impediments.
Emergency lighting battery backup not provided above emergency generator transfer switch.
Hazardous areas fire-rated doors not self-closing or automatic-closing and not separated by smoke resisting partitions.
Sprinkler heads loaded with dust and debris in multiple locations.
Corridor doors not resisting passage of smoke and gaps present on doors.
Fire doors assemblies not inspected, tested, and documented annually.
Electrical equipment maintenance and testing not conducted or documented as required.
Emergency generator not exercised for 4 continuous hours every 36 months.
Report Facts
Census: 130 Medication administration error rate: 6.25 Sample size: 27 Number of residents involved in medication error deficiency: 5 Number of nurses involved in medication error deficiency: 3 Number of medication administration opportunities observed: 32 Number of medication administration errors observed: 2 Dates of survey: 2025-03-25 to 2025-03-31

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Licensed Practical Nurse #1Licensed Practical NurseObserved preparing and administering medications to Resident #79; involved in medication error deficiency.
Licensed Practical Nurse #2Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed regarding medication administration for Resident #79.
Certified Nursing Aide #1Certified Nursing AideInterviewed regarding care of Resident #79 and breakfast tray delivery.
Director of NursingDirector of NursingProvided in-service education and competency training related to medication administration.
Director of MaintenanceDirector of MaintenanceResponsible for correcting Life Safety Code deficiencies including means of egress, emergency lighting, sprinkler system maintenance, door repairs, and electrical equipment inspections.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1 Date: Mar 26, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding medication administration errors at the facility.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that the facility failed to ensure medication administration without error of 5% or more. The errors involved insulin administration timing and supply issues for Resident #79. The investigation included observations, interviews with nursing staff, the Director of Nursing, Consultant Pharmacist, and review of medical records and facility policies.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure medication error rates were below 5%, with a 6.25% error rate observed during medication administration to five residents. Specifically, errors were identified in the timing and administration of Insulin Lispro and Insulin Glargine for Resident #79, including administering insulin at incorrect times relative to meals and lack of adequate insulin supply.

Deficiencies (1)
Medication administration error rate of 6.25% due to errors in insulin administration timing and supply.
Report Facts
Medication administration opportunities: 32 Medication administration errors: 2 Medication administration error rate: 6.25 Residents observed: 5 Nurses observed: 3 Blood sugar reading: 279 Insulin Lispro units administered: 6 BIMS score: 3

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
LPN #1Licensed Practical NurseObserved administering medications and interviewed regarding insulin administration errors
NS/RNNurse Supervisor/Registered NurseAssisted in locating backup insulin supply and interviewed during investigation
Consultant PharmacistConsultant PharmacistInterviewed regarding insulin administration timing and standards
Director of NursingDirector of NursingInterviewed regarding insulin administration protocols and facility policies
CNA #1Certified Nursing AideInterviewed regarding feeding and care of Resident #79
LPN #2Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed as medication nurse for Resident #79 and regarding insulin administration

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 121 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Dec 12, 2024

Visit Reason
A complaint survey was conducted on behalf of the New Jersey Department of Health from 12/09/24 through 12/12/24.

Complaint Details
Complaint survey conducted on behalf of the New Jersey Department of Health from 12/09/24 through 12/12/24; facility found in compliance.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with the requirements of 42 CFR, Part 483, Subpart B, for long term care facilities based on this complaint visit.

Report Facts
Sample Size: 13

Inspection Report

Routine
Deficiencies: 6 Date: Mar 6, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with federal regulations regarding resident care, including timely transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, development and implementation of comprehensive care plans, nutritional management, physician orders, and food safety.

Findings
The facility was found deficient in several areas including failure to timely transmit MDS assessments, failure to develop comprehensive care plans addressing nutritional concerns for multiple residents, failure to provide recommended nutritional supplements, failure to identify and address significant weight loss, failure to ensure physician addressed severe weight loss, and failure to maintain safe and appetizing food temperatures during meal service.

Deficiencies (6)
Failure to timely transmit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of completion.
Failure to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan addressing nutritional concerns, weight loss, and malnutrition for residents.
Failure to provide recommended nutritional supplements such as mighty shakes and super cereal to residents experiencing weight loss.
Failure to identify and address severe weight loss and obtain re-weights for residents, and failure to comprehensively evaluate and assess residents identified as malnourished or at risk for malnutrition.
Failure to ensure the attending physician addressed severe weight loss for a resident.
Failure to ensure food and drink were served at safe and appetizing temperatures, with hot foods served below the acceptable temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit and cold beverages above 45 degrees Fahrenheit.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for MDS transmission: 28 Residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans: 27 Residents reviewed for nutrition: 4 Weight loss: 7.6 Weight loss percentage: 5.3 Food temperature: 117 Food temperature: 119.3 Food temperature: 124 Beverage temperature: 53 Beverage temperature: 141.5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
RD #1Registered DietitianDocumented nutritional assessments and initiated care plans for residents
RD #2Registered DietitianConducted Mini Nutritional Assessments and was employed January 2023 to February 10, 2023
RD #3Registered DietitianInterim dietitian from February 11, 2023, provided nutritional assessments and care plan revisions
DONDirector of NursingAcknowledged deficiencies and participated in interviews and meetings with survey team
LNHALicensed Nursing Home AdministratorParticipated in meetings and interviews with survey team
UM/LPNUnit Manager/Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed regarding weight monitoring and communication of nutritional recommendations
FSDFood Service DirectorProvided information on food service operations and temperature maintenance

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 121 Deficiencies: 6 Date: Mar 6, 2023

Visit Reason
A Recertification Survey was conducted to determine compliance with 42 CFR Part 483, Requirements for Long Term Care Facilities.

Findings
Deficiencies were cited related to timely transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, failure to develop comprehensive care plans for residents with nutritional concerns, failure to maintain acceptable nutritional and hydration status, failure to ensure physician supervision addressing nutritional issues, and failure to maintain safe and appetizing food temperatures. Staffing ratios for Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) did not meet state minimum requirements on multiple days.

Deficiencies (6)
Failure to timely transmit a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to CMS within required timeframes.
Failure to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for residents with nutritional concerns.
Failure to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, including failure to identify and address significant weight loss and failure to provide recommended nutritional supplements.
Failure to ensure physician supervision addressed significant nutritional issues for a resident.
Failure to ensure food and drink were served at safe and appetizing temperatures.
Failure to maintain required minimum direct care staffing ratios for Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) on day shifts.
Report Facts
Census: 121 Deficiencies cited: 6 Staffing ratios: 12 Staffing ratios: 9 Staffing ratios: 13 Staffing ratios: 12 Staffing ratios: 13 Staffing ratios: 13 Staffing ratios: 12 Staffing ratios: 13 Staffing ratios: 15 Staffing ratios: 15 Staffing ratios: 15 Staffing ratios: 12 Food temperatures: 117 Food temperatures: 119.3 Food temperatures: 124 Food temperatures: 53 Food temperatures: 141.5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
MDS CoordinatorNamed in relation to findings on untimely MDS transmission and care plan development
Registered DietitianNamed in relation to nutritional assessment and care plan deficiencies
Director of Nursing (DON)Named in relation to oversight of care plan and nutritional deficiencies
Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA)Named in relation to oversight and interviews
Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN)Named in relation to nutritional supplement administration and communication
Food Service Director (FSD)Named in relation to food temperature and meal service findings
Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)Named in relation to nutritional supplement administration and staffing
Staff CoordinatorNamed in relation to staffing ratio findings
Nurse Practitioner (NP)Named in relation to physician supervision and nutritional care

Inspection Report

Life Safety
Capacity: 82 Deficiencies: 5 Date: Mar 6, 2023

Visit Reason
A Life Safety Code Survey was conducted by the New Jersey Department of Health on 3/02/2023 and 3/06/2023 to assess compliance with Medicare/Medicaid participation requirements related to fire safety and life safety code standards.

Findings
The facility was found noncompliant with fire safety requirements including failure to have self-closing fire-rated doors on hazardous areas, malfunctioning bathroom exhaust systems, non-functional GFCI electrical outlets near water sources, lack of annual electrical receptacle testing, and absence of a remote emergency stop button for the emergency generator.

Deficiencies (5)
Failure to ensure fire-rated doors to hazardous areas were self-closing and separated by smoke resisting partitions.
Failure to ensure ventilation systems were properly maintained; exhaust systems in 2 of 12 resident bathrooms were not functioning.
One of 18 electrical outlets near water sources was not equipped with a safe and secured Ground-Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI).
Failure to functionally test electrical receptacles in resident rooms annually for grounding, polarity, and blade tension.
Failure to ensure a remote manual stop station for the emergency generator was installed.
Report Facts
Resident sleeping rooms: 82 Resident bathrooms inspected: 12 Bathrooms with non-functioning exhaust: 2 Electrical outlets tested near water sources: 18 Electrical outlets with deficient GFCI: 1

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
AdministratorPresent during survey and informed of findings.
Director of MaintenancePresent during survey, involved in corrective actions and confirmations of findings.
Maintenance AssistantIn-serviced regarding regulations and corrective actions.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 102 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Jul 11, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a complaint survey based on multiple complaint numbers alleging violations related to abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment at the facility.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation involved multiple complaint numbers alleging abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including racial verbiage used by a housekeeper and injuries of unknown origin to a resident. The facility investigated and found no evidence to support the allegations but failed to report the results to the NJDOH as required.
Findings
The facility failed to report the results of all alleged violation investigations to the New Jersey Department of Health within prescribed timeframes. The investigation found no evidence to corroborate the allegations of racial verbiage by a housekeeper or unknown origin injuries to a resident, but the facility did not report the allegations to the state agency as required.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to report the results of all alleged violation investigations to the NJDOH within prescribed timeframes.
Report Facts
Census: 102 Sample Size: 15 Plan of Correction Completion Date: Sep 2, 2022 Survey Date Range: 2022-07-11 to 2022-07-13

Inspection Report

Plan of Correction
Deficiencies: 1 Date: Sep 28, 2021

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with mandatory staffing ratios as required by New Jersey law, following review of staffing reports and interviews.

Findings
The facility failed to meet required staffing ratios for 5 of 14 shifts reviewed, potentially affecting all residents. The facility has implemented corrective actions including increased staffing rates, advertising, job fairs, agency contracts, and ongoing monitoring by the Director of Nursing.

Deficiencies (1)
Failed to ensure staffing ratios were met for 5 of 14 shifts reviewed.
Report Facts
Staffing ratio: 7 Staffing ratio: 12 Staffing ratio: 11 Staffing ratio: 11 Staffing ratio: 10

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Director of NursingResponsible for conducting weekly meetings and monthly audits of staffing patterns and ratios

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 5 Date: Mar 11, 2021

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to concerns regarding medication administration errors, wound care, pain management, and restorative nursing care for residents, including Resident #10, #25, and #77.

Findings
The facility failed to ensure proper administration of Midodrine according to physician's hold parameters, accurate documentation and pre-medication for pain management, appropriate use and documentation of restorative nursing interventions including multipodus boots and positioning wedges, and proper destruction and documentation of controlled medications. Multiple medication errors were identified over several months despite education and quality assurance efforts.

Deficiencies (5)
Midodrine medication was administered outside of physician ordered parameters multiple times by various nurses without proper documentation or adherence to hold parameters.
Failure to accurately document and pre-medicate Resident #25 for pain prior to wound care and activities of daily living, resulting in unmanaged pain.
Failure to apply and document use of multipodus boots and positioning wedges as ordered, and failure to update care plan accordingly.
Improper destruction and documentation of controlled drug (Tramadol) including discarding tablets in resident's trash and lack of witnessing nurse signatures.
Consultant Pharmacist recommendations regarding Midodrine medication errors were not fully acted upon in a timely manner despite repeated reports and education.
Report Facts
Medication errors: 33 Medication errors: 19 Wound size: 2 Wound size: 1.5 Wound size: 0.3 Medication errors: 33 Medication opportunities: 76 Medication errors: 3 Medication opportunities: 31 Medication errors: 1

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
LPN #4Licensed Practical NurseNamed in multiple medication errors administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #5Licensed Practical NurseNamed in multiple medication errors administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #6Licensed Practical NurseNamed in multiple medication errors administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #7Licensed Practical NurseNamed in multiple medication errors administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #9Licensed Practical NurseNamed in multiple medication errors administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
AN #1Agency NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
AN #2Agency NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
AN #3Agency NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
AN #4Agency NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
AN #5Agency NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
AN #6Agency NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #12Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed about Midodrine administration and medication error procedures
LPN #18Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed about Midodrine administration and medication error procedures
LPN #19Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed about Midodrine administration and medication error procedures
RN #5Registered NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
RN #6Registered NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
RN #8Registered NurseInterviewed about Midodrine administration and medication error procedures
RN #11Registered NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #13Licensed Practical NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters and inservice records
LPN #15Licensed Practical NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #16Licensed Practical NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #17Licensed Practical NurseNamed in medication error administering Midodrine outside hold parameters
LPN #19Licensed Practical NurseInterviewed about Midodrine administration and medication error procedures
DONDirector of NursingInterviewed about medication errors, education, and quality assurance efforts
LNHALicensed Nursing Home AdministratorInterviewed about medication errors and quality assurance efforts
CPConsultant PharmacistInterviewed about medication errors and recommendations
LPNLicensed Practical NurseObserved improperly destroying controlled medication (Tramadol) and administering pain medication
RNRegistered NurseObserved during pain medication administration and destruction of medication
PTPhysical TherapistInterviewed about restorative nursing program and multipodus boots
CNACertified Nursing AideInterviewed about resident care, pain, and use of multipodus boots
LPN/UMLicensed Practical Nurse/Unit ManagerInterviewed about medication error protocol and restorative nursing program

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 99 Deficiencies: 6 Date: Mar 11, 2021

Visit Reason
A COVID-19 Focused Infection Control Survey and a Recertification Survey were conducted to determine compliance with infection control regulations and long term care facility requirements.

Findings
Deficiencies were cited related to medication administration not following physician hold parameters, inaccurate documentation of skin condition, failure to implement restorative nursing programs as per physical therapy recommendations, inadequate pain management including delayed administration of breakthrough medication, and improper destruction and documentation of controlled medications.

Deficiencies (6)
Medication used to treat was administered outside of physician hold parameters multiple times by various nurses over six months.
Inaccurate documentation of a resident's skin condition and failure to properly document wound treatments as ordered.
Failure to apply positioning devices and implement restorative nursing program as per physical therapy discharge recommendations, including lack of measurable goals in care plan.
Failure to timely administer breakthrough pain medication and assess pain prior to wound dressing changes; failure to use seat cushion as ordered to reduce pain.
Improper destruction and documentation of controlled drug (Schedule IV) including lack of witnessing nurse signature and disposal in regular trash.
Consultant Pharmacist recommendations regarding medication errors and hold parameters were not acted upon timely; repeated medication errors occurred without documented physician rationale or disciplinary action.
Report Facts
Medication administration outside hold parameters: 33 Medication refusal: 12 Medication refusal: 15 Medication destruction: 2 Medication error repeat: 3

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Director of NursingProvided statements about medication error protocols, education, and quality assurance plans.
Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit ManagerDiscussed medication error protocol, education, and medication administration practices.
Consultant PharmacistProvided drug regimen reviews and discussed medication errors and follow-up with facility.
Physical TherapistProvided physical therapy discharge recommendations and caregiver training.
Certified Nursing AidesInvolved in resident care and positioning; provided statements about resident responses and use of devices.
Licensed Practical NurseAdministered medications, described medication refusal and destruction, and discussed pain management.

Inspection Report

Routine
Census: 95 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jan 29, 2021

Visit Reason
A COVID-19 Focused Infection Control Survey was conducted by the New Jersey Department of Health to assess compliance with infection control regulations related to COVID-19.

Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with 42 CFR §483.80 infection control regulations and has implemented the CMS and CDC recommended practices for COVID-19.

Report Facts
Sample size: 5

Viewing

Loading inspection reports...