ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 9 points below the Michigan average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
ALM's inspection grade is 75 / 100, a C — 9 points below the Michigan average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Regency at Waterford is a nursing home in Waterford Township, Michigan, offering nursing care, skilled nursing, hospice care, palliative care, and respite care. Nursing care and skilled nursing include licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while hospice care addresses end of life needs and palliative care focuses on comfort and symptom relief during serious illness.
Respite care provides a short term stay and may suit a family whose usual caregiver needs time away. The community has 150 beds, with private rooms for one resident and semi private rooms shared by two residents.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 26 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily nursing time allocated to each resident. Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay: Medicare can apply to covered skilled care, Medicaid may help eligible residents whose resources do not cover a long stay, and private pay allows a family to pay directly.
Ciena Healthcare operates Regency at Waterford.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 127 nursing homes we track in Michigan for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 26mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +99% above Michigan average
2 of 6 metrics below Michigan average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 12 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
12 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 41 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
41 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 67 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
67 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
177
147 employees · 30 contractors · 76 on an average day
177 total staff / 120 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.48 : 1
↓ 12% · MI 1.67This facility: 1.48 staff per resident, 12% below the Michigan average of 1.67 (among Michigan facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
177 staff ÷ 120 residents
See full Michigan ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.9 h
≈ 0% · MI 7.9 hThis facility: 7.9 h, level with the Michigan average of 7.9 h (among Michigan facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
54,904 staff hours this quarter
See full Michigan ranking →90.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Michigan average: 91.4% · Contractors this quarter: Clinical Nurse Specialist (8), Respiratory Therapy Technician (7), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Speech Language Pathologist (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Assistant (2), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #17 / 131Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 131 nursing homes we track in Michigan for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Michigan facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #121 / 157Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 157 nursing homes we track in Michigan for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Michigan facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #56 / 90Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 56th out of 90 nursing homes we track in Michigan for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Michigan average, with its Statewide rank out of 90. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on residents per day and 150 beds.
Similar to the Michigan average: 84.2%
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
9 points below the Michigan average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
225 severity-weighted points (61 deficiencies) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified MI facility (median: 78)
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
30 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified MI facility (median: 28)
100% corrected
61 of 61 citations corrected Latest inspection: May 27, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, serious), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 20 of 61 citations · 10 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 61 citations.
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
48 of 61 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 13 of 61 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Michigan average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 9% · MI 7.2This facility: 7.8, 9% above the MI average of 7.2 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.0
Score · lower is better
↓ 9% · MI 14.3This facility: 13.0, 9% below the MI average of 14.3 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 5 better, 4 worse, 2 near MI average
3 short-stay measures: 1 worse, 2 near MI average
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.7%
↓ 10% · MI 10.8This facility: 9.7, 10% below the MI average of 10.8 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.8%
↑ 15% · MI 12.0This facility: 13.8, 15% above the MI average of 12.0 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.5%
↓ 22% · MI 20.0This facility: 15.5, 22% below the MI average of 20.0 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 94% · MI 1.5This facility: 3.0, 94% above the MI average of 1.5 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.7%
↓ 9% · MI 3.0This facility: 2.7, 9% below the MI average of 3.0 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9%
↑ 35% · MI 5.1This facility: 6.9, 35% above the MI average of 5.1 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9%
↑ 9% · MI 5.4This facility: 5.9, 9% above the MI average of 5.4 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1%
↓ 74% · MI 4.3This facility: 1.1, 74% below the MI average of 4.3 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.6%
↓ 35% · MI 14.8This facility: 9.6, 35% below the MI average of 14.8 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.8%
↑ 4% · MI 95.3This facility: 98.8, 4% above the MI average of 95.3 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.2%
↓ 1% · MI 95.0This facility: 94.2, 1% below the MI average of 95.0 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
≈ 0% · MI 1.1This facility: 1.1, level with the MI average of 1.1 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
85.8%
↑ 3% · MI 83.3This facility: 85.8, 3% above the MI average of 83.3 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.7%
↓ 11% · MI 79.5This facility: 70.7, 11% below the MI average of 79.5 (among MI facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
12% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
18% of new residents, often for short stays.
70% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
120Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Regency at Waterford’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 124 Michigan nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−9.1% operating margin
+0.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($1.7M) trims the net loss to −$0.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Michigan homes
55.3% payroll share of revenue
MI average 55.9%Rank #44 / 124Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue fell $0.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Michigan homes.
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MI median | Compared with MI homesRank in MI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $18.9M | −$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | MI median $12.5M | Rank in MI Rank #26 / 124Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | Above MI median Higher net patient revenue than 80% of MI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $20.6M | −$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.7M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −9.1% | +0.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.7M | — | Trend — | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.1M | +$0.8M | Trend — | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staff spending in line with Michigan homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MI median | Compared with MI homesRank in MI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $10.5M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | MI median $6.7M | Rank in MI Rank #27 / 124Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 79% of homes | Above MI median Higher payroll than 79% of MI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 55.3% | +2.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | MI median 52.7% | Rank in MI Rank #44 / 124Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Near MI average The MI average is 55.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Michigan payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MI payroll average
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $16.8M | $17.1M | $17.6M | $16.5M | $15.0M | $17.1M | $19.3M | $18.9M |
| Operating expenses | $17.0M | $17.9M | $18.0M | $18.6M | $17.4M | $19.4M | $21.2M | $20.6M |
| Net patient income | −$0.2M | −$0.8M | −$0.4M | −$2.2M | −$2.4M | −$2.4M | −$1.9M | −$1.7M |
| Operating margin | −1.4% | −4.9% | −2.5% | −13.1% | −16.2% | −13.8% | −9.9% | −9.1% |
| Net income | −$0.0M | −$0.8M | −$0.5M | −$0.5M | −$1.2M | −$0.9M | −$0.9M | −$0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $7.7M | $8.3M | $8.2M | $7.4M | $6.0M | $8.2M | $10.3M | $10.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.7% | 48.7% | 46.7% | 44.8% | 40.1% | 48.1% | 53.3% | 55.3% |
| Beds | 150 | 150 | 150 | 203 | 150 | 150 | 200 | 200 |
| Gross revenue | $22.7M | $25.8M | $27.8M | $31.0M | $28.0M | $30.3M | $32.0M | $30.2M |
| Salaries | $6.4M | $6.9M | $6.8M | $6.2M | $4.9M | $6.8M | $8.6M | $8.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.5M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | $0.5M | $3.0M | $1.9M | $1.5M | $0.5M |
| Other operating costs | $9.4M | $9.6M | $9.8M | $11.2M | $11.4M | $11.2M | $10.9M | $10.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $348 | $345 | $357 | $362 | $370 | $378 | $428 | $408 |
| Cost per day | $353 | $362 | $366 | $409 | $430 | $430 | $471 | $445 |
| Average length of stay | 65.8 days | 167.5 days | 191.3 days | 83.4 days | 106.9 days | 96.1 days | 96.3 days | 92.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Most new residents arrive under Medicaid (70% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 3 - 4 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Waterford Township's city center to Regency at Waterford's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Regency at Waterford is located in Waterford Township, Michigan.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Michigan.
Regency at Waterford has a walk score of 21. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Regency at Waterford's occupancy is 81.2%.
No, Regency at Waterford has a no-pet policy.
Regency at Waterford is registered as a for-profit.
Regency at Waterford received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Regency at Waterford has 150 beds.
Regency at Waterford offers Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
