Inspection Reports for
The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows
6456 Lynchs Prairie Cove, Springdale, AR, 72762
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 3 years)
Deficiencies (over 3 years)
10.7 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
106% worse than Arkansas average
Arkansas average: 5.2 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
20
15
10
5
0
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Dec 4, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding a significant medication error where a resident was administered an incorrect, unordered medication, and concerns about infection control practices during wound care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated as the facility confirmed the medication error involving Resident #84 and identified infection control lapses during wound care for Resident #2. The medication error involved administration of another resident's opioid medication, and the infection control issue involved failure to change gloves and perform hand hygiene. Family members were involved and requested emergency care for Resident #84.
Findings
The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error involving the administration of the wrong opioid medication to Resident #84, causing potential harm. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during wound care for Resident #2, specifically failure to change gloves and perform hand hygiene.
Deficiencies (2)
Failure to ensure a resident was not administered an incorrect, unordered medication resulting in a significant medication error for Resident #84.
Failure to follow appropriate infection control practices during wound care for Resident #2, including not changing gloves or performing hand hygiene after cleaning the wound.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for medication errors: 4
Residents affected by medication error: 1
Residents reviewed for skin issues: 3
Residents affected by infection control deficiency: 1
Medication order date: Jul 15, 2024
Assessment Reference Date: Jul 20, 2025
Reportable initiated date: Oct 28, 2025
Vital sign monitoring period: 19
Wound care order date: Dec 2, 2025
Assessment Reference Date: Sep 15, 2025
Care Plan revision date: Jun 16, 2025
Policy revision dates: 201712
Policy revision dates: 201904
Policy revision dates: 202302
In-service date: Oct 28, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Administered incorrect opioid medication to Resident #84 |
| LPN #2 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Assisted in identifying medication error and communicated with family |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Confirmed medication administration practices and in-serviced staff |
| Administrator | Administrator | Provided information about the medication error and resident allergies |
| Treatment Nurse | Treatment Nurse | Observed failing to change gloves and perform hand hygiene during wound care for Resident #2 |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Dec 4, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding a medication error where a resident (Resident #84) was administered an incorrect, unordered opioid medication.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that Resident #84 was given an opioid medication belonging to another resident, which the resident was allergic to, causing lethargy and nausea. The family requested the resident be assessed in the emergency department. The medication error was confirmed by interviews with nursing staff, the Director of Nursing, the Administrator, and involved Licensed Practical Nurses. Corrective actions included in-service training on medication administration.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident #84 was not given the wrong opioid medication, resulting in minimal harm or potential for actual harm. The medication error was confirmed through record reviews and interviews, and corrective actions including staff in-service training were implemented prior to the survey.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure a resident was not administered an incorrect, unordered medication to prevent a significant medication error.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for medication errors: 4
Residents affected: 1
Medication order dosage: 50
Date of physician order: Jul 15, 2024
Date of medication error: Oct 27, 2025
Date of report initiation: Oct 28, 2025
Date of staff in-service: Oct 28, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Administered the wrong opioid medication to Resident #84 |
| LPN #2 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Assisted in discovering the medication error and notified family and administration |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Confirmed medication administration practices and in-servicing of staff |
| Administrator | Administrator | Provided information about the incident and facility policies |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Dec 4, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding a medication error where a resident (Resident #84) was administered an incorrect, unordered opioid medication.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated as the facility confirmed the medication error involving Resident #84. The resident was given another resident's opioid medication, causing adverse symptoms. The family requested emergency room assessment. The facility conducted interviews and in-serviced staff following the incident.
Findings
The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered the wrong opioid medication to Resident #84, who has known allergies to certain opioids. The resident experienced lethargy and nausea but had no lasting ill effects after being assessed and treated, including a visit to the emergency department. Corrective actions included staff in-service training on medication administration.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure a resident was not administered an incorrect, unordered medication resulting in a significant medication error.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for medication errors: 4
Opioid dosage: 50
Date of physician order: Jul 15, 2024
Date of medication error: Oct 27, 2025
Date of report initiation: Oct 28, 2025
Date of vital sign monitoring: Oct 28, 2025
Date of staff in-service: Oct 28, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Administered the wrong opioid medication to Resident #84 |
| LPN #2 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Assisted in discovering the medication error and communicated with family |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Confirmed medication administration practices and in-serviced staff |
| Administrator | Administrator | Provided information on the incident and facility policies |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Dec 4, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding a significant medication error where a resident was administered an incorrect, unordered medication, and concerns about infection prevention and control practices during wound care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated, revealing that Resident #84 was given an opioid medication they were allergic to, causing lethargy and nausea. The family requested emergency room evaluation. The facility acknowledged the medication error and provided staff in-service training. Infection control issues were also identified during wound care for Resident #2.
Findings
The facility failed to prevent a significant medication error involving Resident #84 who was given the wrong opioid medication, causing potential adverse effects. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during wound care for Resident #2, including failure to change gloves and perform hand hygiene appropriately.
Deficiencies (2)
Failed to ensure a resident was not administered an incorrect, unordered medication causing a significant medication error.
Failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control practices when providing wound care, including failure to change gloves and perform hand hygiene.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for medication errors: 4
Residents reviewed for skin issues: 3
Medication order date: Jul 15, 2024
Medication error date: Oct 27, 2025
Vital signs monitoring timeframe: 19
Competency training date: Oct 28, 2025
Assessment Reference Date: Jul 20, 2025
Assessment Reference Date: Sep 15, 2025
Care Plan revision date: Jun 16, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Administered wrong opioid medication to Resident #84 and involved in medication error incident. |
| LPN #2 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Assisted in identifying medication error and communicated with family and administration. |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Provided information about medication administration practices and confirmed in-service training. |
| Administrator | Administrator | Provided details about the medication error incident and resident allergies. |
| Treatment Nurse | Treatment Nurse | Observed providing wound care to Resident #2 and failed to change gloves or perform hand hygiene appropriately. |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 7
Date: Jul 18, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care, nursing staffing, medication management, food service safety, and infection control at The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows nursing facility.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to provide meal preferences correctly, inadequate personal hygiene care for residents, insufficient RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours, failure to post nurse staffing information daily, discrepancies in narcotic medication records, failure to perform proper hand hygiene before serving meals, and failure to prevent cross-contamination of food between residents.
Deficiencies (7)
Failed to provide foods preferable to a resident to meet their abilities to feed themselves.
Failed to ensure proper nail care and regular hair care for residents requiring assistance.
Failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked at least 8 consecutive hours a day.
Failed to post nurse staffing information daily including facility name, current date, actual hours worked, and resident census.
Failed to ensure narcotic medication for a resident was recorded correctly, with discrepancies in narcotic counts.
Failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene after touching clothing and face before serving a meal tray.
Failed to ensure a resident's food was not touched by another resident prior to consumption, risking contamination.
Report Facts
RN hours worked: 7.88
RN hours worked: 7.97
RN hours worked: 7.63
RN hours worked: 7.9
RN hours worked: 7.9
Medication discrepancy: 1
Residents affected: 11
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Certified Nursing Assistant #2 | CNA | Named in findings related to meal service errors and food contamination |
| Certified Nursing Assistant #3 | CNA | Interviewed regarding meal tray discrepancies and shower schedules |
| Certified Nursing Assistant #6 | CNA | Interviewed regarding nail care for Resident #27 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #4 | LPN | Interviewed regarding narcotic medication administration and staffing postings |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #5 | LPN | Interviewed regarding narcotic medication administration |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #7 | LPN | Interviewed regarding nail care for Resident #27 |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Provided multiple interviews regarding deficiencies in meal service, staffing, medication administration, and infection control |
| Administrator | Administrator | Interviewed regarding RN staffing hours |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 3
Date: Jul 18, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to notify the resident's responsible party/legal representative when a resident refused treatment, and concerns about nursing staffing and posting of nurse staffing information.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that the facility did not notify the responsible party of Resident #110's refusals of physical, occupational, and speech therapy. Interviews with staff confirmed lack of notification and documentation. The facility also failed to maintain required RN coverage and failed to post nurse staffing information properly.
Findings
The facility failed to notify the responsible party of Resident #110's refusals of therapy and treatment, and failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked at least 8 consecutive hours daily. Additionally, the facility did not post nurse staffing information daily with required details such as facility name, census, and actual hours worked.
Deficiencies (3)
Failure to notify resident's responsible party/legal representative of refusals of treatment and therapy for Resident #110.
Failure to ensure a Registered Nurse worked at least 8 consecutive hours a day.
Failure to post nurse staffing information daily including facility name, current date, number and actual hours worked by staff, and resident census.
Report Facts
RN hours worked: 7.1
RN hours worked: 7.88
RN hours worked: 7.63
RN hours worked: 6.79
RN hours worked: 7.9
RN hours worked: 7.9
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse #5 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed regarding notification of resident refusals |
| Certified Occupational Therapy Aid | Certified Occupational Therapy Aid (COTA) | Interviewed about therapy refusals and family notification |
| Social Services | Social Services (SS) | Interviewed about notification of resident refusals |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #8 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed about notification of resident refusals and new orders |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed about notification responsibilities and RN coverage |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #4 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed about posting nurse staffing information |
| Administrator | Administrator | Interviewed about RN hours and staffing |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 3
Date: Jul 18, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to notify the resident's responsible party/legal representative when a resident refused treatment, and concerns about nursing staffing and posting of nurse staffing information.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on failure to notify the responsible party of Resident #110's refusals of therapy and care, and issues with nursing staffing coverage and posting of staffing information. Interviews with staff and review of records confirmed these failures.
Findings
The facility failed to notify the responsible party of Resident #110's refusals of therapy and other care, and failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked at least 8 consecutive hours per day. Additionally, the facility did not post nurse staffing information daily with required details such as facility name, census, and actual hours worked.
Deficiencies (3)
Failed to notify resident's responsible party/legal representative of refusals of treatment and therapy.
Failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked at least 8 consecutive hours per day.
Failed to post nurse staffing information daily including facility name, current date, number and actual hours worked by staff, and resident census.
Report Facts
RN hours worked: 7.1
RN hours worked: 7.88
RN hours worked: 7.63
RN hours worked: 6.79
RN hours worked: 7.9
RN hours worked: 7.9
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Certified Occupational Therapy Aid | COTA | Interviewed regarding therapy refusals and notification practices for Resident #110 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #5 | LPN | Interviewed about notification of resident refusals and family notification responsibilities |
| Social Services | SS | Interviewed about notification of resident refusals and family notification |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #8 | LPN | Interviewed about awareness of resident refusals and notification of family and responsible parties |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Interviewed about notification responsibilities and RN coverage requirements |
| Administrator | Interviewed about RN hours worked and staffing coverage | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #4 | LPN | Interviewed about posting of staffing and assignment sheets |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 7
Date: Jul 18, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care, nursing staffing, medication management, food service safety, and infection control at The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows nursing home.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to provide preferred foods to a resident, inadequate nail and hair care for residents, failure to ensure an RN worked at least 8 consecutive hours daily, failure to post nurse staffing information daily, discrepancies in narcotic medication records, failure to perform proper hand hygiene before serving meals, and failure to prevent cross-contamination of food between residents.
Deficiencies (7)
Failed to provide foods preferable to a resident to meet their abilities to feed themselves.
Failed to ensure proper nail care and regular hair care for residents requiring assistance.
Failed to ensure a Registered Nurse worked at least 8 consecutive hours a day.
Failed to post nurse staffing information daily including facility name, current date, actual hours worked, and resident census.
Failed to ensure narcotic medication for a resident was recorded correctly, with a discrepancy in medication count.
Failed to perform hand hygiene after touching clothing and face before serving a meal tray to a resident.
Failed to ensure a resident's food was not touched by another resident prior to consumption, risking cross-contamination.
Report Facts
RN hours worked: 7.88
RN hours worked: 7.97
RN hours worked: 7.63
RN hours worked: 7.9
RN hours worked: 7.9
Resident #83 SAMS score: 3
Resident #27 BIMS score: 3
Resident #96 BIMS score: 1
Medication count discrepancy: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Provided statements regarding meal tray preparation, shower schedules, RN coverage, hand hygiene, and infection control practices. |
| CNA #2 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Observed serving meals and involved in food contamination incident; provided statements about meal tray items and hand hygiene. |
| CNA #3 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Interviewed about meal tray orders and shower schedules for residents. |
| CNA #6 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Interviewed about nail care and shower provision for Resident #27. |
| LPN #4 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed about nurse staffing postings and narcotic medication administration. |
| LPN #5 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed about narcotic medication administration process. |
| LPN #7 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed about nail care observations for Resident #27. |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Jul 21, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with physician orders and proper administration of oxygen therapy for residents, specifically focusing on adherence to prescribed oxygen flow rates and the presence of physician orders for oxygen use.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders for prescribed oxygen flow rates for Resident #105 and failed to ensure a physician order was obtained for oxygen administration for Resident #83. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed responsibility for ensuring oxygen orders are followed and that oxygen use requires a physician's order.
Deficiencies (2)
Failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders for prescribed oxygen flow rates for Resident #105.
Failed to ensure a physician order was obtained to administer oxygen for Resident #83.
Report Facts
Oxygen flow rate for Resident #105: 1.5
Oxygen flow rate for Resident #83: 2
Date of physician order for Resident #105: Jun 11, 2023
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse #2 | LPN | Confirmed oxygen flow rate for Resident #105 was below ordered rate and nurses are responsible for ensuring oxygen is at ordered rate |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #1 | LPN | Confirmed Resident #83 needed oxygen and that there should be an order for oxygen |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Confirmed nurses are responsible for ensuring oxygen orders are followed and oxygen use requires a physician's order |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Jul 21, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate complaints regarding the facility's failure to ensure staff followed physician's orders for prescribed oxygen flow rates and to verify that a physician's order was obtained for oxygen administration for two sampled residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found substantiated deficiencies related to oxygen administration orders and adherence for two residents, with minimal harm or potential for actual harm and few residents affected.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident #105 received oxygen at the prescribed flow rate of 3-6 liters per minute, with observations showing oxygen running at 1.5 liters per minute. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen administration for Resident #83, despite oxygen being administered at 2 liters per minute. Interviews with nursing staff and the Director of Nursing confirmed these failures and responsibility for ensuring orders are followed.
Deficiencies (2)
Failed to ensure staff followed physician's orders for prescribed oxygen flow rates for Resident #105.
Failed to ensure a physician order was obtained to administer oxygen for Resident #83.
Report Facts
Oxygen flow rate prescribed: 3
Oxygen flow rate prescribed: 6
Oxygen flow rate observed: 1.5
Oxygen flow rate observed: 2
Date of physician order start: Jun 11, 2023
Date of care plan initiation: Jun 12, 2023
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 | Interviewed confirming oxygen flow rate discrepancy for Resident #105 | |
| Director of Nursing (DON) | Confirmed responsibility for ensuring oxygen orders are followed and oxygen requires a physician's order | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 | Interviewed regarding oxygen order for Resident #83 and confirmed nurses' responsibility for ensuring orders |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Apr 5, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess the facility's compliance with care standards related to activities of daily living, specifically focusing on hygiene and grooming practices for residents who require assistance.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure that facial hair was removed to promote good hygiene and dignity for one resident (#3) who required assistance with activities of daily living. Interviews with staff confirmed that shaving female residents is the responsibility of CNAs and nurses and is considered a dignity issue. Documentation showed no refusal of shaving by the resident.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure facial hair was removed to promote good hygiene and dignity for a resident dependent on assistance for activities of daily living.
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Apr 5, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess the facility's compliance with care standards related to activities of daily living, specifically focusing on hygiene and dignity for residents requiring assistance.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure that facial hair was removed to promote good hygiene and dignity for one resident (#3) who required assistance with activities of daily living. Interviews with staff confirmed that shaving female residents is the responsibility of CNAs and nurses and is considered important for dignity.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to ensure facial hair was removed to promote good hygiene and dignity for one resident requiring assistance with activities of daily living.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Certified Nursing Assistant #1 | CNA | Named in discussion about responsibility for shaving female residents |
| Certified Nursing Assistant #2 | CNA | Named in discussion about responsibility for shaving female residents |
| Certified Nursing Assistant #3 | CNA | Named in discussion about responsibility for shaving female residents |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #1 | LPN | Named in discussion about responsibility for shaving female residents |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Named in discussion about responsibility for shaving female residents and facility policy |
| Administrator | Named in discussion about expectations for staff regarding policy and CMS guidelines |
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



