Inspection Reports for The Pines on Carmel Senior Living
5820 Carmel Rd, Charlotte, NC 28226, United States, NC, 28226
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies per Year
16
12
8
4
0
Severe
High
Moderate
Unclassified
Census Over Time
Census
Capacity
NC DHSR Star Rating History
| Date | Rating | Score | Merits | Demerits | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | 83.5 | 5 | 0 | Monitoring Visit | |
| Aug 4, 2025 | 78.5 | 0 | 10 | Monitoring Visit | |
| May 15, 2025 | 88.5 | 4.5 | 16 | Annual Inspection | |
| Jul 31, 2024 | 70 | 2.5 | 0 | Monitoring Visit | |
| Jul 31, 2024 | 67.5 | 0 | 10 | Monitoring Visit | |
| Apr 18, 2024 | 77.5 | 2.5 | 0 | Monitoring Visit | |
| Oct 26, 2023 | 75 | 0 | 10 | Monitoring Visit | |
| Jul 25, 2023 | 85 | 0 | 10 | Monitoring Visit | |
| Mar 15, 2023 | 100 | 5 | 0 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| Jan 26, 2023 | 95 | 4.5 | 9.5 | Annual Inspection | |
| Aug 24, 2021 | 67.5 | 20 | 0 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| Aug 4, 2021 | 47.5 | 4.5 | 57 | Annual Inspection | |
| Dec 1, 2020 | 67 | 12.5 | 2 | Complaint Investigation | |
| Dec 1, 2020 | 56.5 | 0 | 35.5 | Complaint Investigation | |
| Mar 4, 2020 | 92 | 7.5 | 0 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| Nov 20, 2019 | 84.5 | 4.5 | 20 | Annual Inspection | |
| Jun 22, 2017 | 102.5 | 4.5 | 2 | Annual Inspection | |
| Apr 21, 2015 | 100.5 | 4.5 | 4 | Annual Inspection | |
| May 22, 2014 | 95 | 3.75 | 0 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| Mar 19, 2014 | 91.25 | 1.25 | 9 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| Jan 8, 2014 | 99 | 4.5 | 5.5 | Annual Inspection | |
| Sep 18, 2012 | 102.5 | 4.5 | 2 | Annual Inspection | |
| Apr 28, 2011 | 98.5 | 4.5 | 6 | Annual Inspection | |
| Apr 21, 2011 | 96.25 | 3.75 | 0 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| Aug 31, 2010 | 92.5 | 2 | 9.5 | Annual Inspection | |
| Jun 18, 2009 | 102.5 | 4.5 | 2 | Annual Inspection |
Inspection Report
Monitoring
Deficiencies: 1
Jul 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was conducted as a monitoring inspection to assess compliance with regulations following previous findings related to resident supervision and safety.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of seven sampled residents who eloped from the Special Care Unit (SCU) without staff knowledge, resulting in a Type A2 violation due to substantial risk of harm and neglect. The facility submitted a plan of correction with a deadline of August 9, 2025.
Severity Breakdown
Type A2 Violation: 1
Deficiencies (1)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 7 sampled residents who eloped from the Special Care Unit without staff’s knowledge. | Type A2 Violation |
Report Facts
Sampled residents: 7
Correction deadline: Aug 9, 2025
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Deficiencies: 0
Jun 25, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was a Biennial Follow Up Construction Survey conducted to verify correction of previously noted deficiencies.
Findings
Deficiencies noted during the Biennial Construction Survey have been corrected and no further action is required at this time.
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Deficiencies: 8
Mar 27, 2025
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted an annual survey from March 25, 2025 through March 27, 2025 to assess compliance with health care, medication administration, nutrition, and medication storage regulations.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to notify the primary care provider (PCP) and hospice for elevated blood sugars, failure to implement physician orders for medications, failure to serve therapeutic diets as ordered, failure to clarify medication orders, inaccurate medication administration records, and unsafe medication storage in resident rooms.
Deficiencies (8)
| Description |
|---|
| Failed to ensure PCP notification for elevated blood sugars and finger stick blood sugars (FSBS) greater than 350 for Resident #3. |
| Failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for medication used to treat anxiety and agitation for Resident #4. |
| Failed to serve therapeutic diets as ordered related to nectar thickened liquids for Resident #3. |
| Failed to ensure clarification of medication orders for Residents #6 and #2 related to medications for fluid retention, low potassium, and oxygen. |
| Failed to ensure signed physician orders for medications used for self-administration for Resident #7. |
| Failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for Resident #3 related to medications used to treat elevated blood sugars. |
| Failed to ensure electronic medication administration records (eMARs) were accurate for Residents #2 and #6 related to documentation of medication administration and oxygen. |
| Failed to ensure resident medications were stored in a safe and secure manner for Residents #10 and #2, with medications found unsecured on a shelf and bedside table respectively. |
Report Facts
Sampled residents: 8
Medication administration errors: 18
Medication orders: 2
Medication doses: 5
Medication doses: 3
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Special Care Coordinator (SCC) | Responsible for reviewing medication reports and reporting findings; unaware of insulin administration errors | |
| Health and Wellness Director (HWD) | Responsible for reviewing progress notes and medication reports daily; unaware of insulin administration errors and notification failures | |
| Medication Aide (MA) | Administered insulin incorrectly for Resident #3 due to confusion over blood sugar parameters | |
| Administrator | Oversight of medication administration and notification responsibilities; unaware of deficiencies found | |
| Resident Care Coordinator (RCC) | Responsible for reviewing orders and eMARs, clarifying orders, and assuring proper medication administration | |
| Pharmacist | Provided information on medication orders and dispensing discrepancies |
Inspection Report
Capacity: 125
Deficiencies: 16
Dec 11, 2024
Visit Reason
The report documents a Construction Section Biennial Survey conducted to assess the facility's conformance with applicable adult care home licensing rules and building codes.
Findings
Multiple deficiencies were cited related to physical plant and fire safety code compliance, including fire alarm door locking issues, missing fire-rated doors, housekeeping and maintenance problems such as unclean ceilings and unpleasant odors, hazards from improperly stored oxygen bottles and trip hazards, fire safety equipment not maintained or operating properly, mechanical equipment issues including disconnected dryer ducts and freezer doors not sealing, and non-functioning exhaust fans in specified areas.
Deficiencies (16)
| Description |
|---|
| Exit doors relocked when fire alarm was placed in silent mode, violating NFPA 72 requirements. |
| Kitchen pantry door removed, eliminating required one hour fire separation. |
| Ceilings and ceiling equipment not kept clean, including dust accumulation and water damage. |
| Facility not free of chronic unpleasant odors, including strong sewer odor in MCU Right Hall Spa. |
| Oxygen bottles improperly stored without restraint, creating hazard. |
| Trip hazards from cords and equipment across door entrances. |
| Fire safety equipment not maintained in operating condition, including corroded sprinkler escutcheon rings and missing light globes. |
| Resident room doors with holes and gaps compromising smoke resistance. |
| Fire resistant rated ceilings with cracks, gaps, and loose vents allowing smoke/fire spread. |
| Doors with inoperable automatic self-closing hardware affecting fire safety. |
| Mechanical dryers ductwork disconnected creating fire hazard. |
| Fire extinguisher in basement not inspected during annual servicing. |
| Freezer doors not closing properly due to ice buildup. |
| Roof leaks covered by tarp awaiting repair. |
| Cross corridor door by Room 61 does not close and latch when released by fire alarm. |
| Exhaust fans not working in laundry, kitchen janitor's closet, and MCU spa areas. |
Report Facts
Total licensed beds: 125
Special Care Unit beds: 25
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
May 2, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation following incidents of resident elopement from the Special Care Unit (SCU) without staff knowledge.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to residents at risk of elopement, resulting in two residents eloping from the SCU. The investigation revealed deficiencies in the facility's Wandering and Elopement Prevention Plan, lack of interventions for high-risk residents, and inadequate staff awareness and documentation related to resident supervision and safety.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated with findings that Resident #1 eloped through a window on 03/05/24 and Resident #2 eloped through a courtyard gate on 03/24/24. Both incidents posed substantial risk for physical harm and were classified as Type A2 violations.
Severity Breakdown
Type A2 Violation: 1
Deficiencies (1)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failure to provide supervision to 2 of 7 sampled residents who eloped from the Special Care Unit without staff knowledge. | Type A2 Violation |
Report Facts
Residents sampled: 7
Residents eloped: 2
Distance Resident #1 found from facility: 8.6
Elopement risk score Resident #2: 4
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Sep 19, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to supervise a resident with a known history of exit seeking behaviors and wandering, which resulted in the resident eloping from the facility without staff's knowledge.
Findings
The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 who eloped from the facility, crossing a busy highway and being missing for almost 2 hours, posing substantial risk for serious harm and neglect. The facility did not have adequate interventions or precautions in place despite awareness of the resident's behaviors and mental health concerns.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation substantiated that Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 08/04/23, walking 0.5 miles and crossing a busy multiple-lane highway without staff knowledge, resulting in the resident missing for almost 2 hours. The facility was aware of the resident's mental health diagnosis and wandering behaviors but failed to implement adequate supervision or interventions.
Severity Breakdown
Unabated Type A2 Violation: 1
Deficiencies (1)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failure to provide supervision to Resident #1 with known wandering and exit seeking behaviors, resulting in elopement and substantial risk of harm. | Unabated Type A2 Violation |
Report Facts
Number of sampled residents: 5
Number of times front door opened: 22
Correction deadline: 2023
Fine amount per day: 1000
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Maintenance | Director of Maintenance | Assisted in searching for Resident #1 after elopement. |
| Facility Administrator | Facility Administrator | Interviewed regarding Resident #1's elopement and facility supervision. |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Deficiencies: 1
Jun 8, 2023
Visit Reason
Report of a Construction Section Complaint Follow-Up Survey conducted on June 8, 2023 to verify correction of previously cited deficiencies.
Findings
The facility was found not maintaining its fire protective equipment in a safe and operating manner. Specifically, the fire alarm system and two emergency exit doors leading into the SCU courtyard were not working in sync, leaving the exit doors unlocked at all times.
Complaint Details
Complaint follow-up survey conducted; deficiencies cited requiring a Plan of Correction.
Deficiencies (1)
| Description |
|---|
| Facility's fire alarm system and two emergency exit doors leading into SCU courtyard are not working in sync, leaving exit doors unlocked at all times. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 24
Deficiencies: 1
May 2, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to supervise a resident with known exit-seeking behaviors, which resulted in the resident eloping from the facility without staff knowledge.
Findings
The facility failed to supervise Resident #4, who eloped from the facility and was found at her previous address several miles away. The investigation revealed inadequate supervision, lack of documentation of follow-up interventions, and issues with unsecured exit doors due to storm damage and ongoing repairs.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation substantiated that Resident #4 eloped from the facility on 04/21/23 and was missing for approximately 3 hours. The facility was notified by the resident's responsible party. This failure resulted in substantial risk for serious harm and neglect.
Severity Breakdown
Type A2 Violation: 1
Deficiencies (1)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failure to provide supervision to Resident #4 with known exit-seeking behaviors, resulting in elopement from the facility. | Type A2 Violation |
Report Facts
Resident census: 24
High-risk score: 26
Distance: 6.8
Correction due date: 2023
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Deficiencies: 4
Dec 9, 2022
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section conducted an annual survey of THE PINES ON CARMEL SENIOR LIVING from December 6 to 9, 2022.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure timely follow-up on an endocrinology consultation for a diabetic resident, resulting in delayed medication adjustments. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation and administration of medications, including insulin and pain medications, for multiple residents. Medication administration records were incomplete with multiple omissions and inaccuracies, and medication orders were not always processed or followed up appropriately.
Deficiencies (4)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failure to assure referral and follow-up to meet the routine and acute health care needs of a resident with diabetes, including delayed follow-up on endocrinology consultation and medication orders. | — |
| Failure to ensure documentation and implementation of written procedures, treatments or orders from a physician and other licensed health professionals for medications to treat diarrhea, pain, fever, and chronic joint pain. | — |
| Failure to administer medications as ordered for residents with insulin orders administered incorrectly or without signed physician orders, and pain medications not administered as ordered. | Type B Violation |
| Failure to ensure medication administration records (MAR and eMAR) were accurate and complete for multiple residents, with many medications documented as not recorded and no reasons provided for omissions. | — |
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 4
Hemoglobin A1c: 12.3
Hemoglobin A1c: 11.9
Medication doses: 30
Medication doses: 300
Medication doses: 300
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Responsible for follow-up on endocrinology consultation and medication orders for Resident #2. |
| Corporate Registered Nurse | Corporate Registered Nurse (RN) | Conducted chart audits and was unaware of missing endocrinology notes and medication order issues. |
| Medication Aide | Medication Aide (MA) | Administered medications and reported issues with medication orders and documentation. |
| Assistant Director of Nursing | Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) | Responsible for medication cart audits and eMAR review. |
| Administrator | Administrator | Oversaw facility operations and was unaware of medication administration and documentation issues. |
| Pharmacist | Pharmacist | Facility's contracted pharmacy pharmacist who provided information on medication orders and administration. |
| Pharmacy Technician | Pharmacy Technician | Facility's contracted pharmacy technician who handled medication orders and communications. |
| Primary Care Provider | Primary Care Provider (PCP) | Provided medical orders and was unaware of delayed endocrinology consultation notes and medication administration issues. |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Deficiencies: 5
Jun 9, 2021
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section conducted a follow-up survey on 06/09/21 and 06/10/21 with an exit conference via telephone on 06/11/21 to verify correction of previous deficiencies.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure competency validation, diabetic care training, medication administration training, and physician notification for out-of-range fingerstick blood sugars for sampled staff and residents. Specifically, Staff D lacked documentation of competency validation for Licensed Health Professional Support tasks, diabetic care training, and medication aide training. Resident #5's physician was not notified of low blood sugar readings, and medications were administered contrary to physician orders.
Deficiencies (5)
| Description |
|---|
| Failed to ensure competency validation for Licensed Health Professional Support tasks including collecting and testing fingerstick blood samples for Staff D. |
| Failed to ensure Staff D completed training on the care of diabetic residents prior to insulin administration. |
| Failed to ensure physician notification for Resident #5 when fingerstick blood sugars were outside ordered parameters. |
| Failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered for Resident #5, including holding metformin when blood sugar was less than 60. |
| Failed to ensure completion of Medication Aide Clinical Skills Validation Checklist and 15-hour medication aide training for Staff D. |
Report Facts
Number of sampled staff with deficiencies: 1
Number of sampled residents with deficiencies: 1
Dates of survey visit: 2021-06-09 to 2021-06-10
Fingerstick blood sugar readings below threshold: 2
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff D | Medication Aide | Named in findings related to lack of competency validation, diabetic care training, medication aide training, and medication administration. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 56
Capacity: 125
Deficiencies: 11
Apr 1, 2021
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted an annual survey, complaint investigation and follow up survey from March 29, 2021 through April 1, 2021.
Findings
The facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures within regulatory limits, ensure adequate staffing levels, provide proper discharge notices, complete required staff training and competency validations, provide adequate supervision for residents with wandering and behavioral issues, ensure timely referral and follow-up for health care needs, administer medications according to orders, and maintain complete resident records. These failures resulted in risks of injury, neglect, and compromised resident safety and care.
Severity Breakdown
Type A1 Violation: 3
Type A2 Violation: 2
Type B Violation: 5
Deficiencies (11)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failed to maintain hot water temperatures between 100 and 116 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathrooms and common areas, with temperatures observed up to 142 degrees Fahrenheit. | Type B Violation |
| Failed to ensure minimum staff were present to meet resident needs for 4 of 48 shifts sampled, resulting in inadequate supervision and care. | Type B Violation |
| Failed to provide appropriate and safe discharge with 30-day notice and appeal rights for 2 of 4 sampled residents discharged to emergency room for psychiatric evaluation and wound care. | Type B Violation |
| Failed to ensure completion of required medication aide training and clinical skills validation for 5 of 6 sampled staff administering medications. | Type B Violation |
| Failed to provide supervision for 2 residents with exit seeking and suicidal ideation behaviors, resulting in elopement and unsafe conditions. | Type A2 Violation |
| Failed to ensure referral and follow-up to health care providers for 3 residents regarding delayed treatment for UTI and diarrhea, lack of blood sugar monitoring orders, and elevated blood sugar results. | Type A1 Violation |
| Failed to clarify medication orders with primary care provider for medications including depression, gastroesophageal reflux, potassium chloride, and laxative, resulting in administration without valid orders. | Type B Violation |
| Failed to administer medications as ordered for antidiarrheal and medications for heartburn, anxiety, and Parkinsonism. | Type B Violation |
| Failed to provide resident assessment, current FL2, and medication record to EMS when resident was transported to emergency room for medical evaluation. | — |
| Failed to ensure residents were free from neglect related to health care, personal care, supervision, and implementation of residents' rights. | — |
| Failed to ensure the Administrator implemented and maintained compliance with rules and statutes governing adult care homes, including staffing, supervision, personal care, medication aide training, and resident rights. | Type A1 Violation |
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 11
Staffing shortage: 1.82
Staffing shortage: 1.66
Staffing shortage: 3.7
Staffing shortage: 3.85
Facility capacity: 125
Special Care Unit capacity: 25
Resident census: 56
Medication doses: 30
Medication doses: 31
Medication doses: 31
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff A | Medication Aide | Named in findings for missing medication aide training and clinical skills validation. |
| Staff D | Medication Aide | Named in findings for missing medication aide training and clinical skills validation. |
| Staff E | Medication Aide | Named in findings for missing medication aide training and clinical skills validation. |
| Staff F | Medication Aide | Named in findings for missing medication aide training and clinical skills validation. |
| Staff H | Medication Aide | Named in findings for missing medication aide training and clinical skills validation. |
| Maintenance Manager | Interviewed regarding hot water temperature issues. | |
| Business Office Manager | Interviewed regarding staff records and training documentation. | |
| Former Health and Wellness Director | Interviewed regarding staff training, supervision, and discharge procedures. | |
| Former Administrator | Interviewed regarding facility operations and compliance. | |
| Regional Operations Manager | Interviewed regarding oversight and staff training. | |
| Current Administrator | Interviewed regarding facility compliance and operations. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Oct 28, 2020
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted a follow-up and complaint investigation survey onsite from 10/28/20 to 10/30/20 with a desk review on 11/02/20 and telephone exit on 11/03/20.
Findings
The facility failed to notify a resident's physician to request a refill order for an as-needed medication (Clonazepam 1mg) for Resident #4, resulting in the resident experiencing increased anxiety for at least five days due to lack of medication availability between 10/25/20 and 10/29/20.
Complaint Details
This was a complaint investigation and follow-up survey triggered by concerns about medication management for Resident #4. The complaint was substantiated as the facility did not notify the physician or pharmacy to refill the controlled substance medication, Clonazepam 1mg, leading to a medication gap from 10/25/20 to 10/29/20.
Deficiencies (1)
| Description |
|---|
| Facility failed to notify Resident #4's physician to request a refill order for Clonazepam 1mg as needed for anxiety, resulting in increased anxiety for the resident. |
Report Facts
Medication doses received: 60
Medication doses administered: 60
Dates of medication unavailability: 5
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 75
Capacity: 125
Deficiencies: 4
Aug 17, 2020
Visit Reason
Complaint investigation survey conducted due to concerns about staffing shortages and infection control in the Assisted Living and Special Care Unit.
Findings
The facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels in the Assisted Living and Special Care Unit, resulting in medication administration errors and inadequate resident supervision. Infection control practices were deficient, including improper PPE use, lack of social distancing, and failure to cohort COVID-19 positive residents. Multiple medications were not administered as ordered for several residents.
Complaint Details
Complaint investigation triggered by concerns about staffing shortages, medication administration errors, and infection control deficiencies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Severity Breakdown
Type A1: 1
Type A2: 1
Type B: 2
Deficiencies (4)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failure to ensure minimum staff were present to meet the needs of residents in the Assisted Living unit for 22 of 54 shifts sampled. | Type B |
| Failure to maintain CDC, LHD, and NC DHHS COVID-19 infection prevention guidelines, including improper disinfectant use, lack of screening, and PPE misuse. | Type A1 |
| Failure to administer medications as ordered for 6 of 7 sampled residents and failure to administer any medications to 15 residents in the Special Care Unit on 08/08/20. | Type A2 |
| Failure to ensure minimum staff were present to meet the needs of residents in the Special Care Unit for 23 of 48 shifts sampled. | Type B |
Report Facts
Staffing shortages: 22
Staffing shortages: 23
Residents with COVID-19: 11
Staff with COVID-19: 3
Resident deaths: 2
Residents census: 75
Residents census: 25
Medication errors: 6
Missed medication doses: 15
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Health & Wellness Nurse | Health & Wellness Nurse | Responsible for infection control training, medication oversight, and staff scheduling |
| Unnamed Administrator | Facility Administrator | Oversight of facility operations and staffing |
| Unnamed Lead Medication Aide | Lead Medication Aide | Responsible for scheduling Assisted Living unit staff and reviewing medication administration |
| Unnamed Special Care Coordinator | Special Care Coordinator | Formerly responsible for scheduling SCU staff and reporting staffing concerns |
| Unnamed Medication Aide | Medication Aide | Reported staffing shortages and medication administration issues |
| Unnamed Personal Care Aide | Personal Care Aide | Reported staffing shortages and care challenges in SCU |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Deficiencies: 2
Dec 18, 2019
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted a follow-up survey on 12/17/19-12/18/19 to assess compliance with previously identified deficiencies.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #5 who experienced multiple falls without increased supervision or documentation. Additionally, the facility failed to assure physician notification for Residents #5 and #6 when blood pressure readings were outside ordered parameters.
Deficiencies (2)
| Description |
|---|
| Failure to provide supervision according to assessed needs for Resident #5 related to multiple falls without increased supervision or documentation. |
| Failure to assure physician notification for Residents #5 and #6 with blood pressure measurements outside of ordered parameters. |
Report Facts
Unwitnessed falls: 7
Blood pressure readings outside parameters: 6
Blood pressure readings outside parameters: 3
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Wellness Director | Wellness Director | Interviewed regarding supervision policies, documentation, and physician notification processes. |
| Administrator | Administrator | Interviewed regarding expectations for incident reporting, supervision, and physician notification. |
| Resident #5's PCP | Primary Care Provider | Interviewed regarding expectations for blood pressure monitoring and notification. |
| Resident #6's physician's nurse | Physician's Nurse | Interviewed regarding blood pressure monitoring and notification for Resident #6. |
| Medication Aide | Medication Aide | Interviewed regarding responsibilities for blood pressure monitoring and physician notification. |
| Personal Care Aide | Personal Care Aide | Interviewed regarding supervision of Resident #5 and knowledge of falls. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Deficiencies: 7
Aug 23, 2019
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted an annual and follow-up survey and complaint investigation from 08/20/19 to 08/22/19, initiated by a complaint on 07/24/19.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with dementia and repeated falls, failed to assure referral and follow-up for acute healthcare needs for two residents, failed to implement wound care treatments as ordered for one resident, failed to provide proper dining utensils for residents in the special care unit, failed to maintain an accurate therapeutic diet list, failed to serve therapeutic diets as ordered, and failed to ensure medication aides completed required state training.
Complaint Details
Complaint investigation initiated by Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services on 07/24/19 related to supervision and care concerns.
Severity Breakdown
Type A2 Violation: 1
Deficiencies (7)
| Description | Severity |
|---|---|
| Failed to provide supervision for a resident with dementia and repeated falls, resulting in injuries including a lumbar compression fracture. | — |
| Failed to assure referral and follow-up to meet acute healthcare needs for two residents, including delayed treatment for a resident who suffered a stroke and failure to notify physician of abnormal blood pressures. | Type A2 Violation |
| Failed to implement wound care treatments as ordered for a resident with a mid back wound, including failure to apply dressings and cleanse wounds. | — |
| Failed to ensure all residents in the special care unit were provided a non-disposable place setting including a knife at each meal. | — |
| Failed to maintain an accurate and current listing of residents with physician-ordered therapeutic diets for guidance of food service staff. | — |
| Failed to serve therapeutic diets as ordered for a resident with nectar thickened liquids diet, including serving honey thickened liquids. | — |
| Failed to ensure a medication aide completed the required 5, 10, or 15-hour state approved medication aide training. | — |
Report Facts
Falls: 6
Falls: 5
Blood pressure readings: 2
Place settings: 21
Medication aide training hours: 15
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff E | Medication Aide | Documented medication administration but lacked documentation of required state approved medication aide training. |
| Wellness Director | Wellness Director (WD) | Responsible for oversight of medication aides and falls management; unaware of some deficiencies in care and documentation. |
| SCU Coordinator | Special Care Unit Coordinator | Responsible for reporting resident care needs and supervision levels; involved in fall supervision and care. |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Responsible for overall facility compliance and staff oversight; interviewed regarding multiple deficiencies. |
| Medication Aide | Medication Aide | Interviewed regarding resident care, medication administration, and fall supervision. |
| Dietary Manager | Dietary Manager | Responsible for diet lists and food service; acknowledged issues with therapeutic diet list and meal service. |
| Speech Therapist | Speech Therapist | Provided therapy and diet recommendations for Resident #9. |
| Nurse Practitioner | Nurse Practitioner | Primary care provider for Resident #2; discussed expectations for notification of changes in resident condition. |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Deficiencies: 2
Oct 17, 2018
Visit Reason
This is a Biennial Follow Up Construction Survey conducted to verify correction of previously cited deficiencies related to building equipment and physical plant safety.
Findings
Deficiencies were found in the building's fire safety and exhaust ventilation systems, including unsealed cable penetrations in fire-resistance-rated ceilings and a ventilation system that was running but not exhausting air properly.
Deficiencies (2)
| Description |
|---|
| Building fire safety was not maintained in a safe and operating condition due to unsealed cable bundles penetrating fire-resistance-rated ceiling assemblies and use of unapproved orange foam for sealing. |
| Exhaust ventilation system failed to maintain proper operation as it was running but not removing any air in the SCU Building Restroom. |
Inspection Report
Capacity: 125
Deficiencies: 14
Aug 22, 2018
Visit Reason
The facility underwent a Construction Section Biennial Survey to assess conformance with applicable adult care home licensing rules and North Carolina Building Codes.
Findings
Multiple deficiencies were cited related to physical plant and safety, including improper operation of special locking doors, hazards from unsecured oxygen cylinders, lack of ground fault interrupters on electrical outlets in wet locations, fire safety doors not closing or latching properly, obstructed fire suppression systems, fire safety penetrations not properly sealed, sprinkler system issues, doors requiring excessive force to open, corridor doors held open improperly, electrical system deficiencies, and ventilation system failures.
Deficiencies (14)
| Description |
|---|
| Facility failed to have properly operating doors with special locking arrangements; emergency override switch on SCU courtyard gate is momentary and relocks automatically. |
| Oxygen cylinders not physically secured, posing hazard if they fall and break valves. |
| Electrical outlets in wet locations lacked ground fault interrupters; GFCI receptacle in AL building therapy did not trip when tested. |
| Fire and smoke barrier doors did not close or latch properly, including double-egress cross-corridor doors and doors missing closers. |
| Exit signs and emergency lights failed to illuminate on backup power in multiple locations. |
| Commercial kitchen hood fire suppression system had obstructed manual actuator and missing nozzle aimed at deep fryer; nozzle deficiency corrected before surveyors departed. |
| Fire rated doors did not close completely or latch, including corridor doors with missing latch bolts or door hardware issues. |
| Fire safety penetrations in fire-resistance-rated ceilings and walls were not properly firestopped, including gaps around cables, holes, and unapproved foam sealant. |
| Fire sprinkler escutcheon plates were missing or dropped down, exposing openings that allow spread of smoke and heat. |
| Items stored within 18 inches below fire sprinkler heads, obstructing spray. |
| Doors required more than allowed force to open, hitting doorframes in multiple locations. |
| Smoke tight corridor doors not maintained in safe and operating condition; doors held open by heavy items or wedges preventing proper closure. |
| Electrical system deficiencies including missing weather resistant cover on GFCI receptacle near Bedroom 55 porch. |
| Exhaust ventilation system in SCU restroom was running but not removing air. |
Report Facts
Total licensed capacity: 125
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Deficiencies: 2
May 4, 2017
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted an annual survey and complaint investigation on May 3-4, 2017. The complaint investigation was initiated by the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services on March 10, 2017.
Findings
The facility failed to assure that two non-nursing staff had no substantiated findings on the North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry prior to employment. Additionally, medication administration errors were found for one resident, including failure to administer metformin and clonazepam as ordered by the prescribing practitioner, resulting in a 7% medication pass error rate.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was initiated by the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services on March 10, 2017.
Deficiencies (2)
| Description |
|---|
| Failed to assure 2 of 6 non-nursing staff had no substantiated findings on the North Carolina Health Care Personnel Registry prior to working in the facility. |
| Failed to assure medications (metformin and clonazepam) were administered as ordered by a licensed prescribing practitioner for 1 of 3 residents observed during a medication pass. |
Report Facts
Medication pass error rate: 7
Staff sampled: 6
Staff with deficiencies: 2
Employees Mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff B | Housekeeper | Failed to have HCPR check documented prior to hire |
| Staff H | No documentation of HCPR check prior to hire; registry check showed no substantiated findings | |
| Business Office Manager | BOM | Responsible for ensuring HCPR checks were completed on new hires |
| Food Service Director | Completed reference checks but did not complete HCPR checks on new hires | |
| Administrator | Responsible for ensuring HCPR checks were completed on new hires | |
| Resident #1's primary care Physician's Assistant | PA | Ordered medication changes that were not properly administered |
| Medication Aide | MA | Administered medications; unaware of medication order changes for Resident #1 |
| Facility Nurse | FN | Responsible for reviewing medication orders and eMAR accuracy; unaware of medication administration errors |
| Assistant Resident Care Director | ARCD | Responsible for reviewing medication orders and eMAR accuracy; unaware of medication administration errors |
Inspection Report
Biennial Survey
Capacity: 125
Deficiencies: 9
Sep 15, 2016
Visit Reason
The facility was surveyed for conformance with the applicable portions of the 2005 Rules for Licensing of Adult Care Homes of Seven or More Beds and applicable portions of the 1996 (1997 Revisions) Edition of the North Carolina Building Code(s), Institutional Occupancy and the 1996 Rules for Licensing of Adult Care Homes of Seven or More Beds in effect at the time of initial licensure.
Findings
The survey found multiple deficiencies including obstructed access to electrical panels, improper storage of oxygen cylinders, failure to maintain fire safety equipment in safe operating condition such as fire resistant doors not latching, gaps in fire resistant ceilings, non-operational emergency lights, and lack of documented monthly fire extinguisher inspections.
Deficiencies (9)
| Description |
|---|
| Access to electrical panels obstructed by stored items in multiple locations including Electrical Room adjacent to Room #44, Mechanical Room adjacent to Room #42, Kitchen, and Special Care Unit. |
| Oxygen cylinders stored improperly in a rack manufactured for soft drinks/sodas, not restrained to prevent falling. |
| Fire resistant rated cross corridor doors adjacent to room #46 did not latch to remain closed when released from magnetic hold open devices. |
| Smoke resistant cross corridor doors adjacent to Room #39 did not completely close or latch, creating a gap. |
| Resident room corridor door to Room #52 contacts door frame preventing it from closing and latching. |
| Gaps in fire resistant rated ceilings in Special Care Unit telephone room and Telephone Room where fire sprinkler piping and data cabling penetrate. |
| Wall mounted emergency lights adjacent to rooms #60 and #64 in Special Care Unit did not operate on battery power. |
| Illuminated directional exit light at main entrance did not operate on battery power. |
| No record of monthly inspections for portable facility fire extinguishers. |
Report Facts
Licensed capacity: 125
Special Care Unit beds: 25
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Deficiencies: 2
Apr 1, 2015
Visit Reason
The Adult Care Licensure Section and the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services conducted an annual survey on March 31, 2015 and April 1, 2015 to assess compliance with regulations.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in providing timely feeding assistance to a resident requiring help during meals and failed to administer medications as ordered by the licensed prescribing practitioner for a resident with diabetes.
Deficiencies (2)
| Description |
|---|
| Failed to provide timely feeding assistance upon receipt of the meal for 1 of 1 resident (#8) who required feeding assistance. |
| Failed to assure medications were administered as ordered by the licensed prescribing practitioner for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #5) with an order for Novolog insulin with supper. |
Report Facts
Resident #8 meal consumption: 75
Resident #8 meal consumption: 80
Novolog insulin dosage: 15
Novolog insulin dosage: 17
Finger Stick Blood Sugar (FSBS) range: 82
Finger Stick Blood Sugar (FSBS) range: 291
Finger Stick Blood Sugar (FSBS) range: 78
Finger Stick Blood Sugar (FSBS) range: 271
Loading inspection reports...



