Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
116
61 employees · 55 contractors · 35 on an average day Bradbury Commons
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Ponca City, OK
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Bradbury Commons
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Ponca City, OK
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bradbury Commons accepts Medicare and private pay.
Bradbury Commons in Ponca City, Oklahoma, provides independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing care. Residential options range from private housing for independent seniors to assisted living support for daily routines like bathing, dressing, and medication management. Rehabilitation therapy assists residents during recovery, and administrator Adam Young oversees daily operations across this 95-bed facility.
Community life centers around accessible local options, supported by a walk score of 65 that allows residents to run select daily errands nearby on foot. Financial arrangements accept Medicare and direct private payments.
Interested families considering care options in Ponca City can reach out to Bradbury Commons to learn more about specific care programs, confirm bed availability, or arrange a guided walk-through.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q3 2025 (July 1 – September 30, 2025).
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
116
61 employees · 55 contractors · 35 on an average day
116 total staff / 59 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q3 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.97 : 1
↑ 21% · OK 1.62This facility: 1.97 staff per resident, 21% above the Oklahoma average of 1.62 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
116 staff ÷ 59 residents
See full Oklahoma ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↓ 9% · OK 8.2 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 9% below the Oklahoma average of 8.2 h (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
24,074 staff hours this quarter
See full Oklahoma ranking →84.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oklahoma average: 93.9% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (22), Licensed Practical Nurse (19), Medication Aide/Technician (4), Occupational Therapy Aide (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Registered Nurse (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
95
Rank #22 / 42Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oklahoma facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
95
Rank #22 / 42Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oklahoma facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #6 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 46 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oklahoma facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #6 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 46 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oklahoma facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
65
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #32 / 37Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 37 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oklahoma average, with its Statewide rank out of 37. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #32 / 37Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 37 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oklahoma average, with its Statewide rank out of 37. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
46.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 44 residents and 95 beds. Source: state inspection report (May 2025)
Lower than the Oklahoma average: 71.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
79
days
About This Community
CountyKay
CMS Certification Number375521
Bradbury Commons is administered by Adam Young.
Resident Council
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Two inspection records, one home. Oklahoma inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Oklahoma, the State Department of Health, Protective Health Services is the regulatory body responsible for conducting unannounced inspections and reporting on facility compliance.
Since 2019 · 7 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 2 deficiencies 10 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 2 deficiencies 10 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Oklahoma state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2019 vs. Oklahoma state average
Overall vs. OK average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Oklahoma average:
• Total deficiencies (71% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (71% below)
• Total deficiencies (71% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (71% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | OK Average | vs. OK Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 2 | 7.0 | This facility has 71% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Oklahoma nursing home (2 vs. OK avg 7).↓ 71% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 0.2 | 0.7 | This facility has 71% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Oklahoma nursing home (0.2 vs. OK avg 0.7).↓ 71% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | OK Average | vs. OK Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 10 | 11.0 | This facility has had 9% fewer total inspections than the Oklahoma average (10 vs. OK avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 9% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
1
↓ 80% · OK 4.9This facility: 1, 80% below the Oklahoma average of 4.9 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
7
Rank #8 / 42Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Oklahoma State average, with a ranking across all 42 OK facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 69% · OK 22.8This facility: 7, 69% below the Oklahoma average of 22.8 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
7
Rank #40 / 42Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Oklahoma mean across 42 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 46% · OK 4.78This facility: 7, 46% above the Oklahoma average of 4.78 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
7 of 7 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.7 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 150% · OK 0.4This facility: 1, 150% above the Oklahoma average of 0.4 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 72% · OK 21.6This facility: 6, 72% below the Oklahoma average of 21.6 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.1 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 11, 2019 · 7 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 2 of 7 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 11, 2019
7 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 7 citations
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (29%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (29%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (14%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (14%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (14%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 7 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
OK avg $34KOklahoma average: $33,889. Average among the 149 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
OK avg 1.55Oklahoma average: 1.55. Average among the 149 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
OK avg 0.36Oklahoma average: 0.36. Average among the 149 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oklahoma average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 19% · OK 3.7This facility: 3.0, 19% below the OK average of 3.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 30% · OK 2.9This facility: 2.0, 30% below the OK average of 2.9 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
13.3
Score · lower is better
↑ 70% · OK 7.8This facility: 13.3, 70% above the OK average of 7.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
25.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 80% · OK 14.3This facility: 25.7, 80% above the OK average of 14.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 4 better, 7 worse, 2 near OK average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 3 worse, 1 near OK average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
31.9%
↑ 136% · OK 13.6This facility: 31.9, 136% above the OK average of 13.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
31.9%
↑ 136% · OK 13.6This facility: 31.9, 136% above the OK average of 13.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.0%
↑ 8% · OK 13.0This facility: 14.0, 8% above the OK average of 13.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
14.0%
↑ 8% · OK 13.0This facility: 14.0, 8% above the OK average of 13.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.2%
↑ 91% · OK 16.4This facility: 31.2, 91% above the OK average of 16.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.2%
↑ 91% · OK 16.4This facility: 31.2, 91% above the OK average of 16.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
↓ 18% · OK 2.7This facility: 2.2, 18% below the OK average of 2.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
↓ 18% · OK 2.7This facility: 2.2, 18% below the OK average of 2.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
↑ 3% · OK 4.8This facility: 4.9, 3% above the OK average of 4.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
↑ 3% · OK 4.8This facility: 4.9, 3% above the OK average of 4.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4%
↑ 58% · OK 4.7This facility: 7.4, 58% above the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4%
↑ 58% · OK 4.7This facility: 7.4, 58% above the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3%
↑ 158% · OK 3.2This facility: 8.3, 158% above the OK average of 3.2 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3%
↑ 158% · OK 3.2This facility: 8.3, 158% above the OK average of 3.2 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.0%
↑ 222% · OK 3.4This facility: 11.0, 222% above the OK average of 3.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.0%
↑ 222% · OK 3.4This facility: 11.0, 222% above the OK average of 3.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
↓ 89% · OK 17.8This facility: 2.0, 89% below the OK average of 17.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
↓ 89% · OK 17.8This facility: 2.0, 89% below the OK average of 17.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
↓ 1% · OK 91.3This facility: 90.7, 1% below the OK average of 91.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
↓ 1% · OK 91.3This facility: 90.7, 1% below the OK average of 91.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.0%
↓ 5% · OK 94.7This facility: 90.0, 5% below the OK average of 94.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.0%
↓ 5% · OK 94.7This facility: 90.0, 5% below the OK average of 94.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.86
↓ 62% · OK 2.28This facility: 0.86, 62% below the OK average of 2.28 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.86
↓ 62% · OK 2.28This facility: 0.86, 62% below the OK average of 2.28 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.72
↓ 7% · OK 2.91This facility: 2.72, 7% below the OK average of 2.91 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.72
↓ 7% · OK 2.91This facility: 2.72, 7% below the OK average of 2.91 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
64.6%
↑ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 64.6, 20% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
64.6%
↑ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 64.6, 20% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
56.7%
↑ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 56.7, 12% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
56.7%
↑ 12% · US 50.6This facility: 56.7, 12% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
↑ 13% · OK 1.8This facility: 2.0, 13% above the OK average of 1.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
↑ 13% · OK 1.8This facility: 2.0, 13% above the OK average of 1.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.1%
↑ 2% · OK 76.5This facility: 78.1, 2% above the OK average of 76.5 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.1%
↑ 2% · OK 76.5This facility: 78.1, 2% above the OK average of 76.5 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.4%
↑ 10% · OK 74.6This facility: 82.4, 10% above the OK average of 74.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.4%
↑ 10% · OK 74.6This facility: 82.4, 10% above the OK average of 74.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.1%
↑ 23% · OK 27.0This facility: 33.1, 23% above the OK average of 27.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.1%
↑ 23% · OK 27.0This facility: 33.1, 23% above the OK average of 27.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
24.9%
↑ 46% · OK 17.1This facility: 24.9, 46% above the OK average of 17.1 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
24.9%
↑ 46% · OK 17.1This facility: 24.9, 46% above the OK average of 17.1 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Bradbury Commons’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 41 Oklahoma nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−32.8% operating margin
−3.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.1M) trims the net loss to −$3.0M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Oklahoma homes
54.3% payroll share of revenue
OK average 56.7%Rank #14 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.5M while revenue rose $1.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oklahoma homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.4M | +$1.0M | Trend 20182025 | OK median $10.4M | Rank in OK Rank #25 / 41Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Below OK median Higher net patient revenue than 40% of OK homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $12.5M | +$1.6M | Trend 20182025 | OK median $11.3M | Rank in OK Rank #18 / 41Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 58% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$3.1M | −$0.7M | Trend 20182025 | OK median $0.1M | Rank in OK Rank #36 / 41Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 13% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −32.8% | −3.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | OK median 0.5% | Rank in OK Rank #37 / 41Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | OK median $0.1M | Rank in OK Rank #13 / 29Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 57% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$3.0M | −$0.7M | Trend — | OK median $0.2M | Rank in OK Rank #41 / 41Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Oklahoma homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.1M | +$0.5M | Trend 20182025 | OK median $5.3M | Rank in OK Rank #23 / 41Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | Below OK median Higher payroll than 45% of OK homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 54.3% | −0.3 pts | Trend 20182025 | OK median 50.1% | Rank in OK Rank #14 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 68% of homes | Near OK average The OK average is 56.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · OK benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oklahoma payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OK payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.1M | $7.5M | $7.8M | $7.3M | $7.8M | $7.1M | $8.4M | $9.4M |
| Operating expenses | $7.5M | $8.3M | $8.8M | $9.4M | $10.1M | $10.4M | $10.8M | $12.5M |
| Net patient income | −$0.4M | −$0.8M | −$0.9M | −$2.1M | −$2.3M | −$3.3M | −$2.4M | −$3.1M |
| Operating margin | −6.1% | −10.4% | −11.8% | −28.8% | −29.7% | −46.8% | −28.9% | −32.8% |
| Net income | −$0.3M | −$0.7M | −$0.7M | −$1.7M | −$2.0M | −$3.2M | −$2.3M | −$3.0M |
| Payroll costs | $4.3M | $4.5M | $4.6M | $4.6M | $4.2M | $4.0M | $4.6M | $5.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 60.3% | 60.4% | 58.3% | 63.1% | 53.7% | 55.6% | 54.6% | 54.3% |
| Beds | 137 | 137 | 137 | 137 | 137 | 137 | 137 | 137 |
| Gross revenue | $8.2M | $8.8M | $9.0M | $8.0M | $8.2M | $7.9M | $9.1M | $10.2M |
| Salaries | $3.2M | $3.4M | $3.3M | $3.2M | $3.2M | $3.1M | $3.6M | $4.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.1M |
| Contract labor | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | — | $0.9M | — | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Other operating costs | $3.2M | $3.7M | $4.2M | $4.8M | $5.9M | $6.5M | $6.2M | $7.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $182 | $191 | $207 | $215 | $228 | $235 | $226 | $245 |
| Cost per day | $193 | $211 | $232 | $277 | $295 | $346 | $292 | $325 |
| Average length of stay | 98.6 days | 79.6 days | 73.8 days | 208.2 days | 105.7 days | 105.3 days | 79.4 days | 78.8 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
270 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
96 · 36%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
174 · 64%
Resident snapshot
59 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
16 · 27%
Medicaid
20 · 34%
Private pay & other
23 · 39%
Leaving
267 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
86 · 32%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
181 · 68%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Bradbury Commons
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Ponca City's city center to Bradbury Commons's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Bradbury Commons
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Oklahoma
Bradbury Commons is located in PONCA CITY, Oklahoma.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Oklahoma.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Bradbury Commons
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Bradbury Commons in a walkable area?
Bradbury Commons has a walk score of 65. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Bradbury Commons?
Bradbury Commons's occupancy is 46.3%.
03 Are pets allowed at Bradbury Commons?
No, Bradbury Commons has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Bradbury Commons?
The team at Bradbury Commons can be reached at info@bradburycommons.com.
05 Does Bradbury Commons operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Bradbury Commons is registered as a for-profit in OK.
06 Who is the administrator of Bradbury Commons?
Adam Young is the administrator of Bradbury Commons.
07 What is the overall rating for Bradbury Commons?
Bradbury Commons received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
