Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
534
445 employees · 89 contractors · 299 on an average day Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Brooklyn, NY
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Brooklyn, NY
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 89 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare provides nursing home and skilled nursing care in Brooklyn’s Borough Park neighborhood. Skilled nursing includes licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while short-term rehabilitation supports recovery and long-term care supports ongoing nursing needs; Respite care provides a temporary stay for a family caregiver who needs time to travel or recover.
The home has 504 beds, with 97% occupied, and total nurse staffing of 3h 18m per resident per day, meaning that amount of nursing staff time is allocated to each resident daily. Medicare, Medicaid and private pay are accepted, giving families several ways to fund care depending on eligibility and resources.
Rehabilitation services include the named RehabStrong™ program, while the Nutrition Program and registered dietician oversight support meal planning for residents with special dietary needs. Video call support helps families communicate remotely, and pets are allowed so a resident may keep a pet at the community. Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is operated by Boro Park Operating Co, with Nachman Feig as director. The combination of short-term rehabilitation and respite care may suit a resident who needs recovery support or a family that needs temporary care while its usual caregiver travels or recovers.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 288th out of 493 nursing homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 18m
This nursing home is ranked 288th out of 493 nursing homes we track in New York for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 18m6 of 6 metrics below New York average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 76 total: 70 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
76 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
34m
↓ 19% · NY 42mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 19% below the New York average of 42m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 76 total: 70 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
76 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 83 total: 76 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
83 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
41m
↓ 10% · NY 46mThis facility: 41m per resident per day, 10% below the New York average of 46m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 83 total: 76 of the facility's own employees and 7 agency contractors.
83 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 243 total: 241 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
243 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
2h 3m
↓ 6% · NY 2h 11mThis facility: 2h 3m per resident per day, 6% below the New York average of 2h 11m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 243 total: 241 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
243 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↓ 6% · NY 7mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 6% below the New York average of 7m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 55m
↓ 8% · NY 3h 10mThis facility: 2h 55m per resident per day, 8% below the New York average of 3h 10m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
25m
↓ 11% · NY 28mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 11% below the New York average of 28m (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
534
445 employees · 89 contractors · 299 on an average day
534 total staff / 486 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.10 : 1
↓ 16% · NY 1.30This facility: 1.10 staff per resident, 16% below the New York average of 1.30 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
534 staff ÷ 486 residents
See full New York ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.6 h
↓ 1% · NY 7.7 hThis facility: 7.6 h, 1% below the New York average of 7.7 h (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
205,955 staff hours this quarter
See full New York ranking →84.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
New York average: 88% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Aide (17), Speech Language Pathologist (16), Respiratory Therapy Technician (16), Physical Therapy Assistant (9), Other Dietary Services Staff (9), Licensed Practical Nurse (7), Qualified Social Worker (7), Registered Nurse (6), Certified Nursing Assistant (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
62% of staff were vaccinated against the flu
Why it matters: staff move from resident to resident all day. When most of them are vaccinated, the flu is less likely to reach the people it is most dangerous for. Source: state health department data.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
504
Rank #14 / 567Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 567 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
504
Rank #14 / 567Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 567 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #134 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #134 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #106 / 509Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 106th out of 509 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 509. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #106 / 509Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 106th out of 509 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 509. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
97%
This home is often near full
Based on 489 residents and 504 beds. Source: state licensing agency resident count
Higher than the New York average: 85.8%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
92
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Home
StatusActive
CountyKings
License Number7001394N
CMS Certification Number335470
RehabStrong — Centers Health CareA Centers Health Care rehabilitation approach using personalized, technology-supported therapy to help residents regain strength and return home safely.
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is legally operated by Boro Park Operating Co, LLC (For Profit).
Owner NameBoro Park Operating Co, LLC (For Profit)
Resident Council
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehab
Amputee Recovery and Training
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Doctor on Staff
Subacute Care
Enteral Nutrition Therapy
Noninvasive Vent Care
Post-Surgical PleurX Management
LifeVest Management
Respiratory Management
Diabetes Management
Wound Care and Wound Vac
Post-Surgical Orthopedic Care
IV Antibiotic Therapy
On-Site Physician Services
Telemedicine Coordination with Specialist Physicians
Dietitian
Comfort and Palliative Care
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Video Call Support (Skype/Zoom)
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and Charting
Pets AllowedVaccination records required.
Admission CriteriaAdmissions team works with physicians and hospital case managers to determine skilled nursing needs.
In-Room Features
Adl Suite With Full Bathroom, Bedroom, Kitchen, Washer And Dryer
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
89 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
5 points above the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
43 severity-weighted points (18 citations) · about the same as the typical CMS-certified NY facility
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
43 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified NY facility (median: 51)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 29% · NY 4.2This facility: 3, 29% below the New York average of 4.2 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
18
Rank #257 / 496Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 257th out of 496 nursing homes we track in New York for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the New York State average, with a ranking across all 496 NY facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 12% · NY 20.5This facility: 18, 12% below the New York average of 20.5 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6
Rank #372 / 496Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 372nd out of 496 nursing homes we track in New York for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the New York mean across 496 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 24% · NY 4.83This facility: 6, 24% above the New York average of 4.83 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
18 of 18 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.4 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.4 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
18
↓ 5% · NY 19This facility: 18, 5% below the New York average of 19 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · NY 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the New York average of 0.8 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 06, 2024 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 5 of 18 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 06, 2024
6 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 21, 2022
11 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 26, 2019
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 18 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (28%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (22%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (11%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (11%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 18 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsLawsuit overview for Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Summary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Total Cases
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
26
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
26
Active Cases
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
7
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
7
Closed
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
18
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
18
Since
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2015
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2015
Most Recent
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2025
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2025
Last Scheduled Court Date
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 20, 2026
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 20, 2026
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
NY avg $73KNew York average: $72,735. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
NY avg 1.59New York average: 1.59. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
NY avg 0.1New York average: 0.1. Average among the 192 New York facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the New York average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
≈ 0% · NY 4.0This facility: 4.0, level with the NY average of 4.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 42% · NY 3.5This facility: 5.0, 42% above the NY average of 3.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · NY 8.0This facility: 7.8, 2% below the NY average of 8.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 2% · NY 14.5This facility: 14.2, 2% below the NY average of 14.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 4 worse, 1 near NY average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near NY average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.5%
↑ 13% · NY 13.6This facility: 15.5, 13% above the NY average of 13.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.5%
↑ 13% · NY 13.6This facility: 15.5, 13% above the NY average of 13.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.8%
↓ 12% · NY 11.1This facility: 9.8, 12% below the NY average of 11.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.8%
↓ 12% · NY 11.1This facility: 9.8, 12% below the NY average of 11.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.4%
↓ 7% · NY 18.6This facility: 17.4, 7% below the NY average of 18.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.4%
↓ 7% · NY 18.6This facility: 17.4, 7% below the NY average of 18.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6%
↓ 50% · NY 1.2This facility: 0.6, 50% below the NY average of 1.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6%
↓ 50% · NY 1.2This facility: 0.6, 50% below the NY average of 1.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
↓ 18% · NY 3.1This facility: 2.6, 18% below the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
↓ 18% · NY 3.1This facility: 2.6, 18% below the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.6%
↑ 16% · NY 6.5This facility: 7.6, 16% above the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.6%
↑ 16% · NY 6.5This facility: 7.6, 16% above the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
↓ 35% · NY 5.7This facility: 3.7, 35% below the NY average of 5.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7%
↓ 35% · NY 5.7This facility: 3.7, 35% below the NY average of 5.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
43.8%
↑ 118% · NY 20.1This facility: 43.8, 118% above the NY average of 20.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
43.8%
↑ 118% · NY 20.1This facility: 43.8, 118% above the NY average of 20.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.6%
↓ 22% · NY 13.7This facility: 10.6, 22% below the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.6%
↓ 22% · NY 13.7This facility: 10.6, 22% below the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.5%
↑ 8% · NY 91.8This facility: 99.5, 8% above the NY average of 91.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.5%
↑ 8% · NY 91.8This facility: 99.5, 8% above the NY average of 91.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 4% · NY 95.2This facility: 99.0, 4% above the NY average of 95.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 4% · NY 95.2This facility: 99.0, 4% above the NY average of 95.2 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.50
↑ 46% · NY 1.71This facility: 2.50, 46% above the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.50
↑ 46% · NY 1.71This facility: 2.50, 46% above the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.26
↓ 7% · NY 1.35This facility: 1.26, 7% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.26
↓ 7% · NY 1.35This facility: 1.26, 7% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
69.5%
↑ 30% · US 53.7This facility: 69.5, 30% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
69.5%
↑ 30% · US 53.7This facility: 69.5, 30% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.5%
↑ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 58.5, 16% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.5%
↑ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 58.5, 16% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↓ 3% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 3% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↓ 3% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 3% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 37% · NY 1.1This facility: 0.7, 37% below the NY average of 1.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 37% · NY 1.1This facility: 0.7, 37% below the NY average of 1.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.8%
↑ 27% · NY 77.6This facility: 98.8, 27% above the NY average of 77.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.8%
↑ 27% · NY 77.6This facility: 98.8, 27% above the NY average of 77.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7%
↑ 23% · NY 78.9This facility: 96.7, 23% above the NY average of 78.9 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.7%
↑ 23% · NY 78.9This facility: 96.7, 23% above the NY average of 78.9 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.9%
↑ 35% · NY 20.6This facility: 27.9, 35% above the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.9%
↑ 35% · NY 20.6This facility: 27.9, 35% above the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.7%
≈ 0% · NY 9.7This facility: 9.7, level with the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.7%
≈ 0% · NY 9.7This facility: 9.7, level with the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 455 New York nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
2.4% operating margin
−2.7 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $3.5M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most New York homes
45.5% payroll share of revenue
NY average 56.1%Rank #327 / 453Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 327th out of 453 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $11.8M while revenue rose $2.1M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with New York homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $114.7M | +$2.1M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $23.7M | Rank in NY Rank #2 / 455Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 455 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Top 2% in NY Higher net patient revenue than 100% of NY homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $111.9M | +$5.1M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $24.0M | Rank in NY Rank #6 / 455Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 455 nursing homes we track in New York for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 99% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $2.8M | −$3.0M | Trend 20172024 | NY median −$0.4M | Rank in NY Rank #39 / 455Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 455 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 92% of homes | Profit, shrinking Resident care made money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 2.4% | −2.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median −1.8% | Rank in NY Rank #137 / 455Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 137th out of 455 nursing homes we track in New York for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 70% of homes | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.8M | — | Trend — | NY median $0.2M | Rank in NY Rank #113 / 441Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 113th out of 441 nursing homes we track in New York for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $3.5M | −$2.7M | Trend — | NY median $0.1M | Rank in NY Rank #52 / 455Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 455 nursing homes we track in New York for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other New York homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 89% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most New York homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $52.2M | +$11.8M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $12.4M | Rank in NY Rank #10 / 455Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 455 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Top 2% in NY by size Higher payroll than 98% of NY homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 45.5% | +9.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median 52.6% | Rank in NY Rank #327 / 453Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 327th out of 453 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | 10.6 pts under NY average The NY average is 56.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · NY benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the New York payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NY payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $94.6M | $97.5M | $100.4M | $90.8M | $106.1M | $108.9M | $112.6M | $114.7M |
| Operating expenses | $91.5M | $95.3M | $98.4M | $93.7M | $94.0M | $100.0M | $106.8M | $111.9M |
| Net patient income | $3.1M | $2.2M | $2.0M | −$2.9M | $12.1M | $8.9M | $5.8M | $2.8M |
| Operating margin | 3.3% | 2.2% | 2.0% | −3.2% | 11.4% | 8.2% | 5.1% | 2.4% |
| Net income | $3.1M | $1.8M | $3.1M | $2.5M | $12.0M | $8.9M | $6.2M | $3.5M |
| Payroll costs | $39.3M | $39.9M | $43.3M | $41.7M | $39.4M | $34.9M | $40.4M | $52.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 41.6% | 41.0% | 43.2% | 45.9% | 37.1% | 32.0% | 35.9% | 45.5% |
| Beds | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 | 504 |
| Gross revenue | $110.9M | $114.5M | $117.1M | $105.7M | $121.2M | $124.0M | $125.9M | $127.6M |
| Salaries | $29.3M | $29.4M | $31.1M | $29.0M | $27.9M | $25.8M | $29.0M | $36.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $10.0M | $10.6M | $12.2M | $12.7M | $11.5M | $9.1M | $11.4M | $15.9M |
| Contract labor | $6.0M | $6.4M | $7.6M | $5.9M | $8.5M | $20.8M | $17.5M | $8.0M |
| Other operating costs | $52.2M | $55.4M | $55.1M | $52.0M | $54.7M | $65.1M | $66.4M | $59.7M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $531 | $533 | $555 | $562 | $605 | $626 | $642 | $648 |
| Cost per day | $514 | $521 | $544 | $579 | $536 | $575 | $609 | $632 |
| Average length of stay | 92.3 days | 86.4 days | 87.4 days | 85.7 days | 92.0 days | 92.1 days | 98.1 days | 92.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
1,899 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
1,049 · 55%
Medicaid
93 · 5%
Private pay & other
757 · 40%
Resident snapshot
486 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
150 · 31%
Medicaid
262 · 54%
Private pay & other
74 · 15%
Leaving
1,923 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
1,166 · 61%
Medicaid
218 · 11%
Private pay & other
539 · 28%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Reviews (1)
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare Reviews
Glee
Extremely poor caretakers. My father had hip surgery and can't go to the bathroom alone. After soiling himself and waiting more than 45 mins someone came to help him but left him in the bathroom. I will find every review site and warn every one away from this place
Rating Their Experiences
What do you like most about living here?
So far nothing
Are there enough caregivers to handle the residents' needs, especially during emergencies?
No
Are the common areas pleasant and comfortable for socializing or relaxing?
Yes
How would you rate the quality and variety of the meals? (1-5)
3
Are special diets handled well?
No
Is the dining schedule flexible enough to meet your preferences?
No
Places of interest near Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
4.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Brooklyn's city center to Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Brooklyn
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 56.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ditmas Park Nursing & Rehab | NH PC SNF | Brooklyn (Flatbush) | 240
Facility
240
NY AVG
185
Rank
#123 / 567 | A+ |
95.0%
Facility
95.0%
NY AVG
85.8%
Rank
#192 / 509 | +11% | 3.43
Facility
3.43
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#258 / 493 | +56% | -7% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 497 | 10
Facility
10
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#25 / 496 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#32 / 496 | - | 228 | A- |
93
Facility
93
NY AVG
64
Rank
#43 / 442 | Ditmas Park Rehabilitation And Care Center, LLC (For Profit) | $65.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$65.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#28 / 455 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#373 / 455 | 10.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
10.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#453 / 453 | 335648 | ||||
| Shore View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | NH PC SNF | Brooklyn (Sheepshead Bay) | 320
Facility
320
NY AVG
185
Rank
#49 / 567 | A+ |
88.1%
Facility
88.1%
NY AVG
85.8%
Rank
#347 / 509 | +3% | 2.70
Facility
2.70
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#454 / 493 | +65% | -26% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 497 | 2
Facility
2
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#1 / 496 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#1 / 496 | - | 282 | A+ |
85
Facility
85
NY AVG
64
Rank
#120 / 442 | Shore View Acquisition 1, LLC (For Profit) | $52.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$52.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#54 / 455 | $26.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$26.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#54 / 455 | 50.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#258 / 453 | 335288 | ||||
| Bedford Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | NH HOS SNF | Brooklyn | 200
Facility
200
NY AVG
185
Rank
#178 / 567 | A+ |
98.0%
Facility
98.0%
NY AVG
85.8%
Rank
#58 / 509 | +14% | 3.66
Facility
3.66
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#188 / 493 | +1% | 0% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 497 | 9
Facility
9
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#62 / 496 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#94 / 496 | - | 196 | - |
97
Facility
97
NY AVG
64
Rank
#14 / 442 | Williamsburg Services, LLC (For Profit) | $36.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$36.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#125 / 455 | $14.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#182 / 455 | 40.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
40.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#392 / 453 | 335626 | ||||
| Hopkins Center For Rehabilitation And Healthcare | NH SNF | Brooklyn (Boerum Hill) | 288
Facility
288
NY AVG
185
Rank
#81 / 567 | A- |
99.0%
Facility
99.0%
NY AVG
85.8%
Rank
#20 / 509 | +15% | 2.87
Facility
2.87
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#400 / 493 | -11% | -22% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 497 | 16
Facility
16
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#161 / 496 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#263 / 496 | - | 285 | - |
97
Facility
97
NY AVG
64
Rank
#14 / 442 | Kfg Operating 1, LLC (For Profit) | $52.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$52.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#47 / 455 | $25.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$25.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#55 / 455 | 47.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#300 / 453 | 335847 | ||||
| Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | NH SNF | Brooklyn (Borough Park) | 504
Facility
504
NY AVG
185
Rank
#14 / 567 | B+ |
97.0%
Facility
97.0%
NY AVG
85.8%
Rank
#106 / 509 | +13% | 3.30
Facility
3.30
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#288 / 493 | +8% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$74.3k
Rank
#1 / 497 | 18
Facility
18
NY AVG
20.5
Rank
#257 / 496 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#372 / 496 | - | 489 | - |
84
Facility
84
NY AVG
64
Rank
#134 / 442 | Boro Park Operating Co, LLC (For Profit) | $114.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$114.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#2 / 455 | $52.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$52.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#10 / 455 | 45.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
45.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#327 / 453 | 335470 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in New York
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is located in New York City, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York City.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare in?
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is in the Borough Park neighborhood of Brooklyn.
02 Who is the owner of Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare?
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare is legally operated by Boro Park Operating Co, LLC (For Profit).
03 Is Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare in a walkable area?
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare has a walk score of 84. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
04 What is the license number of Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare?
According to NY state health department records, Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare's license number is 7001394N.
05 What is the occupancy rate at Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare?
Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare's occupancy is 97%.
06 Are pets allowed at Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare?
Yes, Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare allows residents to bring their pets.
07 What is the best email address for Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare?
The team at Boro Park Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare can be reached at info@centershealthcare.org.
Updated on
