Inspection Reports for
Commonwealth Senior Living at East Paris

Resident A was administered insulin incorrectly: established. Additional findings: no.

One rule violation was established related to medication administration and employee supervision; a written corrective action plan was required.

Staff aggression towards Resident A: not established. Residents left soiled and needs unmet: not established. Failure to report incident timely: established.

One rule violation was established regarding failure to report an incident timely. Other allegations were not substantiated.

Resident D did not receive an updated admission contract after a change of ownership: established. The facility did not provide Resident D’s responsible persons with her discharge notice: established. Staff stopped providing care to Resident D due to her discharge notice: not established.

Two rule violations were established regarding admission contract and discharge notice; one allegation of care cessation was not established.

Resident C left soiled for a long period and missed lunch: established.

One violation was established for failing to provide care consistent with Resident C's service plan, resulting in her being left soiled for several hours.

Resident A care needs are not met: established. Resident A nutritional needs are not met: not established. Additional findings: not established.

One rule violation was established related to Resident A's care needs not being met. The allegation that Resident A's nutritional needs were not met was not established.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with the public health code and administrative rules regulating home for the aged facilities.

The study determined substantial compliance with applicable licensing statutes and administrative rules.