Inspection Reports for
Garden Court at Villa Santa Barbara
227 E Anapamu St, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, United States, CA, 93101
Back to Facility ProfileCitations (last 5 years)
Citations (over 5 years)
1 citations/year
Citations are regulatory findings recorded during state inspections.
75% better than California average
California average: 4 citations/yearCitations per year
4
3
2
1
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
74% occupied
Based on a March 2026 inspection.
This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Census: 93
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Mar 24, 2026
Visit Reason
The visit was a case management incident inspection conducted in response to a death report received by the licensing agency.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst conducted a case management incident visit regarding a death report dated 03/22/2026. The resident did not have a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, and the administrator was requested to provide the death certificate, cause of death, and recent medical appointments.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the case management incident visit. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 93
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Feb 18, 2026
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations that the licensee does not ensure the facility is maintained in a sanitary condition.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility was not maintained in a sanitary condition, specifically citing photos of a metal tray with possible mold and a yellow leaf. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated after investigation.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst toured the facility and found no observable mold. Staff and resident interviews confirmed the cleanliness of the facility and the trays in question were found clean. Based on all interviews and documents obtained, the allegation was found to be unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 126
Census: 93
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Garrett Haner-Tomasko | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Apple Pelare | Backup Administrator | Met with the Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation |
| Tina Tran | Wellness Director | Interviewed during the investigation |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 93
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Feb 18, 2026
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced annual facility inspection conducted by the Licensing Program Analyst to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.
Findings
The Licensing Program Analyst conducted a cursory tour of the three-story facility noting features such as carbon monoxide detectors and a recently tested sprinkler system. The annual inspection was not completed and may be resumed at a later time.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Pelare | Backup Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and exit interview. |
| Garrett Haner-Tomasko | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the annual facility inspection. |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Named as Licensing Program Manager on the report. |
| Robert Glock | Administrator/Director | Facility Administrator/Director named in the report. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 99
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Dec 10, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2024-12-18 concerning staff behavior, food withholding, accommodation of resident food needs, and visitor restrictions at Garden Court at Villa Santa Barbara.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation addressed multiple allegations including inappropriate staff behavior in presence of residents, failure to provide a healthy and safe environment, withholding food from residents, failure to accommodate resident food needs, and denial of resident visitors. All allegations were found unsubstantiated based on interviews, document reviews, and observations.
Findings
All allegations investigated were found to be unsubstantiated. No inappropriate staff behavior in presence of residents was observed, the facility was found to provide a healthy and safe environment, residents were not withheld food and dining services were accommodating, special dietary needs were addressed within physician orders, and resident visitation rights were respected.
Report Facts
Capacity: 126
Census: 99
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Met during investigation and provided statements regarding staff relationships, dining services, and visitation policies |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Evaluator who conducted the complaint investigation visits and interviews |
| Kelly Burley | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 101
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Oct 30, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an Informal Conference held to discuss complaint investigation 29-AS-20241001130402 regarding allegations that facility staff did not respond timely to a resident's call button, resulting in injury. A general compliance review of the facility was also discussed.
Complaint Details
Complaint alleged staff failed to answer Resident 1's call button in a timely manner, leading to a fall and serious injury including a fracture. The complaint investigation found staff did not respond to the call, resulting in the resident being unattended for hours and sustaining injuries.
Findings
The investigation revealed that staff did not respond to Resident 1's call for assistance, resulting in the resident falling and sustaining a facial laceration, hematoma, and wrist fracture. The licensee representatives discussed corrective strategies including enhanced monitoring, staff training, and system oversight. A potential civil penalty of $10,000 for serious bodily injury is under review.
Report Facts
Civil penalty amount: 10000
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in the Informal Conference discussing complaint and compliance |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Attended Informal Conference and involved in complaint investigation |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Attended Informal Conference and involved in complaint investigation |
| Tina Tran | Wellness Director | Attended Informal Conference discussing complaint and compliance measures |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 95
Capacity: 126
Citations: 1
Date: Apr 14, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that staff did not answer a resident's call button in a timely manner, resulting in the resident sustaining a fracture.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. It involved neglect/lack of care and supervision by facility staff that resulted in a fracture due to failure to respond timely to Resident 1's calls for assistance. The investigation included interviews, medical record reviews, and testing of the call system. Staff admitted to failing to assist the resident, and the facility was found noncompliant.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that facility staff failed to respond timely to Resident 1's call for assistance, which led to the resident falling and sustaining a facial laceration and a midshaft radius fracture requiring surgery. The facility was cited for not meeting the required care and supervision standards and assessed an immediate civil penalty of $500.
Citations (1)
Facility staff did not ensure Resident 1’s call button was responded to timely, posing an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.
Report Facts
Immediate civil penalty: 500
Resident call attempts: 500
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and informed of findings and penalties. |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit and delivered findings. |
| Johnny Canto | Investigator | Conducted further investigation including interviews and records review. |
| Tina Tran | Wellness Director | Present during initial complaint investigation visit. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 96
Capacity: 126
Citations: 1
Date: Jan 15, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced required Annual Inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations for the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE).
Findings
The inspection revealed medication administration discrepancies for Resident 1, including under-administration of Senna and an extra dose of Acyclovir. Deficiencies were cited related to medication management and a plan of correction was required.
Citations (1)
Unexplainable under-count of Resident 1's medications, posing an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Report Facts
Census: 96
Total Capacity: 126
Plan of Correction Due Date: Jan 17, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Met during inspection and involved in findings |
| Tina Tran | Wellness Director, RN | Met during inspection |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and authored the report |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 96
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Sep 6, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 2023-09-18 regarding staff not assisting residents with incontinence needs, failure to keep the facility free of odor, and a resident developing a pressure injury while in care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to assist with incontinence, facility odor issues, and a pressure injury. Investigations included interviews with staff, residents, visitors, hospice personnel, and review of documentation. The pressure injury was identified as moisture-associated skin damage, not a pressure ulcer.
Findings
After multiple visits, interviews, and document reviews, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence. Staff were found to be responsive to residents' needs, no foul odors were confirmed, and the alleged pressure injury was determined to be moisture-associated skin damage that had healed.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 126
Census: 96
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and visits |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation report |
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Facility administrator met during the investigation |
| Tina Tran | Wellness Director | Met during the investigation and provided information |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: May 29, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that facility staff did not meet a resident's needs, specifically concerning pressure injuries sustained by Resident 1 (R1).
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that facility staff did not meet Resident 1's needs, including concerns about pressure injuries. The investigation included interviews, document reviews, and observations. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence of pressure injuries or wounds in hospital and hospice records.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation that facility staff failed to meet R1's needs. Medical and hospice records did not confirm any pressure injuries or wounds, and staff provided appropriate care. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 126
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit and issued final findings |
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Facility administrator met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Tina Tran | Wellness Director | Wellness Director interviewed during investigation and provided information on resident care |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Named as Licensing Program Manager on the report |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Census: 89
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Mar 6, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced Case Management site visit conducted to follow up on an immediate exclusion served to Staff #1 (S1) via certified mail, confirming removal of the excluded staff member from the facility.
Findings
The Administrator confirmed that Staff #1 has not worked at the facility since 4/22/2018 and that the staff member was not observed at the facility during the visit. No citations were issued during the visit.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and provided personnel roster to verify staff exclusion. |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the unannounced Case Management site visit. |
| Karolyn Sorenson | Regional Operations Specialist | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 88
Capacity: 126
Citations: 2
Date: Feb 27, 2024
Visit Reason
An unannounced required Annual Inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements for the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE).
Findings
The inspection revealed medication management deficiencies including unexplainable overcounts of medications for Resident 1 and the presence of eight expired medications. Plans of correction were required to address these issues by 02/29/2024.
Citations (2)
Unexplainable overcount of Resident 1's medications posing immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk.
Presence of eight bottles of expired medications belonging to Resident 1 posing immediate health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Expired medications: 8
Medication overcount: 21
Medication overcount: 34
Medication count: 46
Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 29, 2024
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Robert Glock | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and involved in medication recount |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the unannounced annual inspection and authored the report |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 93
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Dec 11, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that staff were refusing to allow a resident to remove their personal belongings from the facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff refused to allow a resident to remove their personal belongings. The investigation included interviews and document reviews, concluding the allegation was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegation was unsubstantiated. The Administrator and Wellness Director confirmed that the resident was responsible for themselves with no POA or Responsible Party on file, and after communication with the resident's family, the resident's belongings were eventually removed from the facility.
Report Facts
Facility capacity: 126
Resident census: 93
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeannette Olson | Evaluator / Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Rick Olds | Administrator | Interviewed regarding the complaint and investigation |
| Bill Ferguson | Business Director | Met during the inspection visit |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 84
Capacity: 126
Citations: 1
Date: Sep 20, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that staff do not answer resident’s call button in a timely manner.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on interviews, record review, and observation. The allegation involved delayed response times to a non-ambulatory resident's call pendant, with waits up to 30-45 minutes reported and observed response times of 10-29 minutes during the investigation.
Findings
The allegation that staff do not answer resident’s call pendant in a timely manner was substantiated. Records showed multiple call pendant presses with response times between 10-29 minutes, exceeding the facility's goal of 3-5 minutes. A deficiency was cited for failure to ensure timely response to call buttons, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Citations (1)
Failure to ensure resident’s call buttons were responded to timely, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Census: 84
Total Capacity: 126
Call pendant occurrences: 8
Call response time (minutes): 10
Call response time (minutes): 29
Plan of Correction Due Date: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit and authored the report |
| Rick Olds | Administrator | Facility administrator met during the investigation and provided statements regarding call pendant response |
| Mark Cortes | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint visit |
| Kelly Burley | Supervisor | Supervisor named in the report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 77
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Jun 2, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations that staff spoke inappropriately towards residents and did not treat residents with dignity.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that staff spoke rudely and inappropriately to residents, with a specific staff member (S1) accused of using a yelling tone. The investigation included interviews with residents and staff, and the allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.
Findings
After interviewing residents, staff, and administrators, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated. Multiple residents reported no inappropriate staff behavior, and the administrator had conducted in-service training to remind staff of residents' rights and expectations.
Report Facts
Capacity: 126
Census: 77
Number of residents interviewed: 11
Number of staff interviewed: 5
Estimated days of completion: 90
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Rick Olds | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst and provided information during investigation |
| Karolyn Sorenson | Administrator | Named as facility administrator in report header |
Inspection Report
Original Licensing
Census: 66
Capacity: 126
Citations: 0
Date: Nov 15, 2022
Visit Reason
An announced Change of Ownership Prelicensing Inspection was conducted to license the facility as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE).
Findings
The facility was found to be in good repair, clean, and compliant with licensing requirements per Title 22 California Code of Regulations. Fire safety and personal accommodations were inspected with no deficiencies noted.
Report Facts
Fire extinguishers: 40
Hospice waiver residents: 10
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rick Olds | Administrator | Met with during inspection and mentioned in narrative |
| Kristin Kontilis | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection |
| Karolyn Sorenson | Administrator | Named as facility administrator |
| Kelly Burley | Licensing Program Manager | Named in report header and footer |
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



