Inspection Reports for
Iron County Care and Share
244 W 900 N, Cedar City, UT, 84721
Back to Facility Profile2 Reports
Inspection Report — Dec 4, 2024
Routine
Date: Dec 4, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an announced routine inspection to assess compliance with licensing rules for the Residential Support program at Iron County Care and Share.
Findings
The inspection found multiple areas of noncompliance including outdated employee roster information, missing documentation of fire drills, incomplete client intake screenings, missing signed client agreements, insufficient staff training records, and other administrative and safety deficiencies.
Deficiencies (7)
R380-600-3(2) The provider did not keep their program's roster and employee information current in the Direct Access Clearance System for 8 employees.
R501-1-8(1) The provider did not conduct and document quarterly fire drills at the facility.
R501-1-12(1)(d) The provider did not complete suicide risk screenings in intake assessments for 3 client files.
R501-1-12(4) The provider did not ensure clients signed and received copies of all required agreements including licensing contact information for 3 client files.
R501-1-13(1)(g) The provider did not complete intake assessments including suicide risk screenings for 3 client files within seven days of admission.
R501-1-16(1) The provider did not ensure 3 employees received required pre-service training on all topics before being left unsupervised and within 30 days of hire.
R501-1-16(2) The provider did not ensure 3 employees received all required annual training topics.
Report Facts
Number of Not Compliant Items: 7
Employees with outdated roster info: 8
Client files missing suicide risk screenings: 3
Client files missing signed agreements: 3
Employee files missing pre-service training documentation: 3
Employee files missing annual training documentation: 3
Inspection Report — Dec 8, 2023
Preinspection
Date: Dec 8, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was a preinspection checklist conducted to review compliance with adult residential support program regulations prior to the official inspection report.
Findings
The facility was found to be compliant with all reviewed licensing, program, staffing, safety, and administrative requirements with no noncompliant items noted during the preinspection.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| James Jetton | Named as individual informed of inspection and observed during inspection. | |
| Nathan Ponis | Licensor conducting the inspection. |
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...
