Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
259
152 employees · 107 contractors · 61 on an average day Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Lynnwood, WA
ALM Inspection Grade
F
ALM's inspection grade is 58 / 100, an F — 26 points below the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 58 / 100, an F — 26 points below the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Lynnwood, WA
ALM Inspection Grade
F
ALM's inspection grade is 58 / 100, an F — 26 points below the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 58 / 100, an F — 26 points below the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation is a nursing home, memory care, and skilled nursing community in Lynnwood, WA. Skilled nursing provides nursing care around the clock, while nursing home services support short term rehabilitation and long term care. Memory care and dementia care provide supervised support for a resident living with dementia. The community may be a good fit for someone who needs rehabilitation or ongoing dementia care in a residential setting.
There are 113 beds, placing the community in the medium sized range. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 2 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands on nursing time assigned to each resident. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families several listed ways to cover care.
Short term rehabilitation includes orthopedic rehabilitation, post surgical care, pulmonary care, bariatric care, and oncology care, so residents recovering from these conditions can receive services through the community’s rehabilitation programs. A rehabilitation gym supports therapy on site. The patio garden and outdoor recreation area give residents designated places to spend time outdoors, while the beauty and barber shop provides grooming services within the community. Transportation services are also available.
A Walk Score of 65 places the area in the somewhat walkable band, meaning some errands can be completed on foot. For a resident who no longer drives, that may allow limited independent access to nearby errands, while other trips may still require transportation.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 2m
This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 2mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +18% above Washington average
4 of 6 metrics below Washington average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 66 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 37 agency contractors.
66 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
50m
↓ 7% · WA 53mThis facility: 50m per resident per day, 7% below the Washington average of 53m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 66 total: 29 of the facility's own employees and 37 agency contractors.
66 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 33 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 19 agency contractors.
33 staff · 8.7-hour shifts
58m
↑ 18% · WA 49mThis facility: 58m per resident per day, 18% above the Washington average of 49m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 33 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 19 agency contractors.
33 staff · 8.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 112 total: 61 of the facility's own employees and 51 agency contractors.
112 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
2h 15m
↓ 16% · WA 2h 41mThis facility: 2h 15m per resident per day, 16% below the Washington average of 2h 41m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 112 total: 61 of the facility's own employees and 51 agency contractors.
112 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 8-hour shifts
3m
↓ 36% · WA 5mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 36% below the Washington average of 5m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 39m
↓ 4% · WA 3h 47mThis facility: 3h 39m per resident per day, 4% below the Washington average of 3h 47m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
43m
↑ 12% · WA 38mThis facility: 43m per resident per day, 12% above the Washington average of 38m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
259
152 employees · 107 contractors · 61 on an average day
259 total staff / 99 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.62 : 1
↑ 45% · WA 1.80This facility: 2.62 staff per resident, 45% above the Washington average of 1.80 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
259 staff ÷ 99 residents
See full Washington ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.3 h
↑ 4% · WA 8 hThis facility: 8.3 h, 4% above the Washington average of 8 h (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
46,336 staff hours this quarter
See full Washington ranking →94% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Washington average: 93.8% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (51), Registered Nurse (37), Licensed Practical Nurse (19)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
113
Rank #20 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
113
Rank #20 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #22 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #22 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
65
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #6 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #6 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
89.9%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 113 beds.
Higher than the Washington average: 77.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
102
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
82
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Orthopedic Rehabilitation
Post-Surgical Care
Pulmonary Care
Oncology Care
Bariatric CareSpecialized care for people with severe obesity, including safe transfers, equipment, mobility support, and management of related health needs.
Transportation
Recreation Area
Patio
Beauty Salon
Library
Pastoral Care
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
58 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
26 points below the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
357 severity-weighted points (123 deficiencies) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 123)
Enforcement
Concern
$190,519 in fines · 4 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
51 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
17
↑ 95% · WA 8.7This facility: 17, 95% above the Washington average of 8.7 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
123
Rank #61 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 148% · WA 49.6This facility: 123, 148% above the Washington average of 49.6 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
7.24
Rank #41 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 17% · WA 6.18This facility: 7.24, 17% above the Washington average of 6.18 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
123 of 123 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 0.3 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
4
↑ 122% · WA 1.8This facility: 4, 122% above the Washington average of 1.8 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
118
↑ 151% · WA 47.1This facility: 118, 151% above the Washington average of 47.1 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 100% · WA 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Washington average of 0.5 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 21, 2026 · 1 citation (Infection Control, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 27 of 123 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 21, 2026
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 30, 2026
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 05, 2026
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 03, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 13, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 03, 2025
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 20, 2025
27 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 24, 2025
3 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 29, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 28, 2025
2 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 07, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 15, 2024
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 123 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 123 citations
Quality of Life & Care
27 deficiencies (22%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
20 deficiencies (16%)
Resident Rights
19 deficiencies (15%)
Pharmacy Services
14 deficiencies (11%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
13 deficiencies (11%)
Nursing & Physician Services
9 deficiencies (7%)
Nutrition & Dietary
7 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
7 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
6 deficiencies (5%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (1%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
92 of 123 citations resulted from standard inspections; 26 of 123 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 123 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
4 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Nov 13, 2025 · $70,083 civil money penalty
Nov 13, 2025 · $70,083 civil money penalty
Jun 24, 2025 · $17,345 civil money penalty
Jun 7, 2024 · $65,636 civil money penalty
Dec 14, 2023 · $37,455 civil money penalty
Total fines
$190,519
↑ 120% · WA $87KThis facility: $190,519, 120% above the Washington average of $86,517. Average among the 121 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #58 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
4
↑ 108% · WA 1.93This facility: 4, 108% above the Washington average of 1.93. Average among the 121 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WA avg 0.26Washington average: 0.26. Average among the 121 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Nov 13, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$70,083
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$70,083
Jun 24, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$17,345
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$17,345
Jun 7, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$65,636
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$65,636
Dec 14, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$37,455
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$37,455Fine amount comparison
This facility
$190,519
Washington average
$86,517
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Washington and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Washington average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 50% · WA 8.5This facility: 4.2, 50% below the WA average of 8.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 38% · WA 18.0This facility: 11.2, 38% below the WA average of 18.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 3 worse, 2 near WA average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 near WA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.7%
↓ 60% · WA 14.2This facility: 5.7, 60% below the WA average of 14.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.7%
↓ 60% · WA 14.2This facility: 5.7, 60% below the WA average of 14.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.6%
↓ 79% · WA 17.2This facility: 3.6, 79% below the WA average of 17.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.6%
↓ 79% · WA 17.2This facility: 3.6, 79% below the WA average of 17.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.3%
↑ 8% · WA 22.5This facility: 24.3, 8% above the WA average of 22.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.3%
↑ 8% · WA 22.5This facility: 24.3, 8% above the WA average of 22.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 76% · WA 1.6This facility: 0.4, 76% below the WA average of 1.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4%
↓ 76% · WA 1.6This facility: 0.4, 76% below the WA average of 1.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
↓ 58% · WA 2.6This facility: 1.1, 58% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
↓ 58% · WA 2.6This facility: 1.1, 58% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
↑ 11% · WA 4.3This facility: 4.8, 11% above the WA average of 4.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
↑ 11% · WA 4.3This facility: 4.8, 11% above the WA average of 4.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1%
↑ 10% · WA 5.5This facility: 6.1, 10% above the WA average of 5.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1%
↑ 10% · WA 5.5This facility: 6.1, 10% above the WA average of 5.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
↓ 85% · WA 17.7This facility: 2.6, 85% below the WA average of 17.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.6%
↓ 85% · WA 17.7This facility: 2.6, 85% below the WA average of 17.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.8%
↓ 9% · WA 15.1This facility: 13.8, 9% below the WA average of 15.1 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.8%
↓ 9% · WA 15.1This facility: 13.8, 9% below the WA average of 15.1 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 4% · WA 96.0This facility: 99.6, 4% above the WA average of 96.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 4% · WA 96.0This facility: 99.6, 4% above the WA average of 96.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
↑ 4% · WA 93.8This facility: 97.6, 4% above the WA average of 93.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
↑ 4% · WA 93.8This facility: 97.6, 4% above the WA average of 93.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
68.2%
↑ 27% · US 53.7This facility: 68.2, 27% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
68.2%
↑ 27% · US 53.7This facility: 68.2, 27% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.2%
↑ 3% · US 50.6This facility: 52.2, 3% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.2%
↑ 3% · US 50.6This facility: 52.2, 3% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.3%
↑ 69% · US 0.8This facility: 1.3, 69% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.3%
↑ 69% · US 0.8This facility: 1.3, 69% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 55% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.6, 55% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 55% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.6, 55% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.7%
↑ 2% · WA 88.3This facility: 89.7, 2% above the WA average of 88.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.7%
↑ 2% · WA 88.3This facility: 89.7, 2% above the WA average of 88.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.6%
↓ 3% · WA 82.0This facility: 79.6, 3% below the WA average of 82.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
79.6%
↓ 3% · WA 82.0This facility: 79.6, 3% below the WA average of 82.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.2%
↓ 24% · WA 19.9This facility: 15.2, 24% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.2%
↓ 24% · WA 19.9This facility: 15.2, 24% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.5%
↓ 66% · WA 13.2This facility: 4.5, 66% below the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.5%
↓ 66% · WA 13.2This facility: 4.5, 66% below the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 60 Washington nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
2.2% operating margin
+31.3 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Washington homes
57.2% payroll share of revenue
WA average 64.4%Rank #36 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.2M while revenue rose $3.8M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Washington homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.0M | +$3.8M | Trend 20162024 | WA median $13.7M | Rank in WA Rank #25 / 60Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 59% of homes | Above WA median Higher net patient revenue than 59% of WA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.6M | +$0.2M | Trend 20162024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | +$3.6M | Trend 20162024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 2.2% | +31.3 pts | Trend 20162024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.3M | +$3.4M | Trend — | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Washington homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.6M | +$2.2M | Trend 20162024 | WA median $8.4M | Rank in WA Rank #30 / 60Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Above WA median Higher payroll than 51% of WA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 57.2% | +0.4 pts | Trend 20162024 | WA median 58.9% | Rank in WA Rank #36 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | 7.2 pts under WA average The WA average is 64.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · WA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Washington payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WA payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $14.0M | $12.3M | $13.4M | $14.1M | $12.7M | $10.8M | $11.1M | $15.0M | |
| Operating expenses | $14.0M | $13.9M | $15.2M | $14.7M | $14.0M | $13.5M | $14.4M | $14.6M | |
| Net patient income | $0.0M | −$1.5M | −$1.8M | −$0.6M | −$1.4M | −$2.7M | −$3.2M | $0.3M | |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | −12.5% | −13.2% | −4.3% | −10.7% | −24.8% | −29.1% | 2.2% | |
| Net income | $0.0M | −$1.5M | −$1.8M | −$0.6M | −$0.7M | −$2.3M | −$3.0M | $0.3M | |
| Payroll costs | $7.0M | $7.2M | $7.9M | $8.4M | $7.6M | $7.2M | $6.3M | $8.6M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 50.1% | 58.1% | 58.6% | 59.8% | 60.2% | 66.9% | 56.8% | 57.2% | |
| Beds | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 113 | |
| Gross revenue | $18.9M | $16.7M | $18.2M | $19.0M | $16.8M | $14.1M | $14.3M | $16.9M | |
| Salaries | $6.0M | $6.2M | $6.8M | $7.1M | $6.5M | $6.1M | $5.1M | $7.4M | |
| Wage-related costs | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.2M | |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | $0.1M | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $1.0M | |
| Other operating costs | $7.0M | $6.7M | $7.3M | $6.3M | $6.4M | $6.3M | $8.1M | $6.1M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $366 | $345 | $353 | $370 | $359 | $365 | $363 | $474 | |
| Cost per day | $365 | $389 | $400 | $386 | $398 | $455 | $469 | $464 | |
| Average length of stay | 50.8 days | 56.6 days | 56.1 days | 52.7 days | 61.2 days | 77.7 days | 78.0 days | 81.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
372 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
76 · 20%
Medicaid
8 · 2%
Private pay & other
288 · 77%
Resident snapshot
99 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
7 · 7%
Medicaid
53 · 54%
Private pay & other
39 · 39%
Leaving
385 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
77 · 20%
Medicaid
97 · 25%
Private pay & other
211 · 55%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Lynnwood's city center to Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 2.94 miles to nearest hospital (Swedish Edmonds Campus)
Calculate Travel Distance to Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Washington
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation is located in Lynnwood, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation in a walkable area?
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation has a walk score of 65. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation?
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation's occupancy is 89.9%.
03 Are pets allowed at Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation?
No, Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit.
05 What is the overall rating for Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation?
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation have?
Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation has 113 beds.
07 Are there photos of Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation?
Yes — there are 5 photos of Alderwood Post Acute & Rehabilitation in the photo gallery on this page.
Updated on
