Inspection Reports for
Ararat Gardens

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to seek timely medical attention, neglect causing pressure injury, inadequate nutrition, and uncomfortable living accommodations. None of these were verified by the investigation.

The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, and review of medical and facility records. All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and record reviews, with no evidence supporting the claims of neglect or inadequate care.

The complaint involved two allegations: 1) Resident receiving additional incidental medical care unrelated to their health condition, and 2) Facility staff bullying a resident. Both allegations were investigated through interviews, record reviews, and observations and were deemed unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, and the executive director, as well as a review of records and observation. Both allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence and lack of supporting information from interviews and records. No health or safety issues were noted during the visit.

The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that Resident #1 was given medical care unrelated to their condition and that staff bullied the resident. Interviews with residents and staff, as well as record reviews, did not support these claims. The complaint was deemed unsubstantiated.

After interviews, observations, and record reviews, both allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence. No health and safety issues were noted during the visit.

The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews with staff and residents, inspected the facility, and found no foul odors or unsanitary conditions as alleged.

The investigation found no evidence of foul odors or unsanitary conditions during the physical plant tour, interviews with staff and residents, and inspection of the resident's bathroom. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to insufficient information to verify the claim.

The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. The allegation involved a strong odor in a resident's bathroom, but no evidence was found to support the claim.

The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, a physical plant tour, and inspection of the alleged area. No foul odors or unsanitary conditions were observed or reported by others. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The complaint involved two allegations: 1) staff did not respond to the call signal system in a timely manner, and 2) staff handled a resident in a rough manner. Both allegations were investigated through interviews with staff and residents, record reviews, and observation. Both allegations were deemed unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that staff responded to the resident's emergency call within a reasonable time frame, and the allegation of rough handling was unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and record reviews. No health and safety issues were noted at the time of the visit.

The complaint involved two allegations: 1) staff did not respond to call signal system in a timely manner, and 2) staff handled a resident in a rough manner. After investigation including interviews, record reviews, and observation, both allegations were found unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that staff responded to the resident's emergency call within a reasonable time frame, and interviews with staff and residents confirmed timely assistance. There was no sufficient evidence to verify the allegation that staff handled the resident roughly. Both allegations were deemed unsubstantiated.

The facility was found to be generally well-maintained with no health or safety hazards noted. The physical plant, medication storage, fire safety equipment, and resident rooms were all in compliance. The facility was currently housing 72 residents with a licensed capacity of 175.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and compliant with safety and health standards. No health and safety hazards were noted, medication was securely stored, and fire safety equipment was up to date.

During the tour, the Licensing Program Analyst observed that bedrooms were clean and residents were happy with their new rooms. Plan of correction letters were issued during this visit.

During the tour, the Licensing Program Analyst confirmed residents needing room changes from ambulatory to non-ambulatory and observed clean bedrooms with residents satisfied with their new rooms. Plan of correction letters were issued during this visit.

The facility is not in compliance with Title 22 regulations regarding approved fire clearance, as non-ambulatory and bedridden residents are residing on the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floors without appropriate fire clearance. The Glendale Fire Department denied the request to increase non-ambulatory and bedridden counts on upper floors, requiring these residents to remain on the 1st floor or have direct outside access. The facility plans to relocate affected residents accordingly. No other immediate health and safety issues were observed.

The facility was found to be operating within capacity limits with no health and safety issues noted. Fire clearance, carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were all compliant and operable. Resident rooms were properly furnished, medicines securely stored, and environmental safety measures such as grab bars and nonskid mats were in place.

The facility has implemented a new program and relocated residents requiring minimal care from the 3rd floor to the 2nd floor. The Executive Director was advised to ensure residents' personal rights are respected regarding relocations and to submit an addendum to the program plan reflecting these changes.

The facility was found to be operating within capacity limits with no health and safety issues noted. Fire clearance, carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were compliant and operable. Resident rooms were properly furnished, medicines securely stored, and safety features such as grab bars and nonskid mats were in place. Food storage and diet quality met requirements.

The facility has begun implementing the 'Assisted Living +' program, relocating residents requiring minimal care from the Independent Living 3rd floor to the 2nd floor. Concerns were raised about resident personal rights regarding relocations and the need to submit program changes as an addendum to the facility plan.

The complaint alleged that the provider refused to honor existing Continuing Care Contracts. The investigation concluded the allegation was unfounded.

The investigation found that the provider, Ararat, is fully aware of and obligated to honor existing continuing care contracts following the sale of the facility. There was no evidence of failure to fulfill these obligations, and the allegation was found to be unfounded.

The complaint alleged that the provider refused to honor existing Continuing Care Contracts. The investigation concluded the allegation was unfounded, meaning it was false or without reasonable basis.

The investigation found that the provider is fully aware of and obligated to honor existing continuing care contracts following the sale of the facility. There was no evidence of failure to fulfill these obligations, and the allegation was found to be unfounded.

The complaint involved allegations that Staff 1 was rough while changing Resident 1 and threw the resident's soiled underwear at them. The administrator self-reported the incident to CDPH, Ombudsman, and Law Enforcement. The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded.

The investigation found no injuries or witnesses, and the incident occurred in the Skilled Nursing portion of the campus overseen by CDPH. Based on the information obtained, the allegations were deemed unfounded, meaning they were false, could not have happened, or lacked reasonable basis.

The complaint involved allegations of staff mishandling a resident and throwing a soiled undergarment at the resident's face. The allegations were investigated and found to be unfounded.

The investigation found no injuries or witnesses, and the incident occurred in the Skilled Nursing portion of the campus overseen by CDPH. Based on the information obtained, the allegations were deemed unfounded, meaning they were false, could not have happened, or lacked reasonable basis.

During the pre-licensing inspection, no deficiencies or non-compliance issues were observed. The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and no follow-up inspection is required.

During the pre-licensing inspection, no deficiencies or non-compliance issues were observed. The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with applicable laws and regulations, with no items requiring follow-up inspection.

The applicant and administrator demonstrated understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness during the COMP II telephone interview.

The applicant and administrator demonstrated understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness during the COMP II telephone interview.