Inspection Reports for
Atria Del Sol

The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. Allegations included inadequate care and supervision, improper resident record maintenance, unmet grooming and hygiene needs, facility odors, and medication dispensing issues. Evidence did not support the allegations.

The investigation included interviews, facility tour, and document review. Staff reported providing care and supervision, grooming, and hygiene services despite resident refusals. No odors were detected, and medication delays were due to insurance and pharmacy protocol changes. The allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.

The incident report indicated a resident fell and was found unresponsive, later pronounced deceased. The facility had no observed health or safety concerns during the visit.

The facility was found to be clean, safe, and sanitary with no health or safety concerns observed. Resident and staff files contained required documentation. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.

The facility was found to be clean, safe, and sanitary with no health or safety concerns observed. Resident and staff files contained required documentation. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.

The complaint alleged inadequate meal service by staff. The investigation found no evidence to corroborate the allegation, resulting in an unsubstantiated finding.

The investigation included observations of meal service and interviews with staff and residents. The Licensing Program Analyst observed that meals were delivered hot and residents reported respectful caregivers and adequate food service. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.

The complaint alleged inadequate meal service by staff. The investigation found no evidence to corroborate the allegation, resulting in an unsubstantiated finding.

The investigation included observations of meal service and interviews with staff and residents. The Licensing Program Analyst observed that meals were served hot and residents reported respectful caregivers and adequate meal service. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with regulations, with clean and sufficient bed linens, sanitary bathrooms, operational safety equipment, proper food storage, compliant medication management, complete staff and resident records, and sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with regulations, with clean and sufficient bed linens, sanitary bathrooms, operational safety equipment, proper food and medication storage, complete staff and resident records, and sufficient staff to meet residents' needs.

The complaint involved multiple allegations including failure to notify authorized representatives of condition changes and new medications, leaving residents in soiled diapers, and overmedication. The investigation found no conclusive evidence to prove or refute these allegations, resulting in an unsubstantiated determination.

The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and a facility tour. The department found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations, concluding the complaint as unsubstantiated due to conflicting information and lack of proof.

The complaint involved four allegations: failure to notify authorized representatives of residents' change in condition and new medication, leaving a resident in soiled diapers for an extended period, and overmedicating a resident. The investigation concluded these allegations were unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and a facility tour. The department was unable to substantiate the allegations due to conflicting information and lack of preponderance of evidence. Staff were found to have followed medication orders and maintained communication with residents' authorized representatives.

The complaint alleged that the facility failed to provide resident's records to an authorized representative. Interviews with the Executive Director and a witness did not corroborate the allegation, and documentation showed the records were requested on November 27, 2023, and received on December 22, 2023, following legal procedures. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

Based on interviews, document reviews, and observations, the Licensing Program Analyst was unable to substantiate the allegation due to lack of preponderance of evidence; the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that the facility failed to provide resident's records to an authorized representative. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated after interviews with the Executive Director and a witness, and review of communication and documents related to the release of records.

The investigation found that the allegation was unsubstantiated as interviews and document reviews showed that resident records were released to authorized representatives following legal department procedures, and there was no preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the allegation.

The complaint was unsubstantiated due to conflicting information and lack of preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The investigation found that on 05/22/2022, a resident was observed outside the facility and was redirected back inside without adverse effects. The resident's family took the resident for a urinalysis and moved them out of the facility. The facility did not conduct a re-assessment as the resident had moved out and was scheduled to see a physician. Conflicting information from witnesses and facility staff led to the allegations being deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated due to conflicting information and lack of preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The investigation found conflicting information regarding the allegations. The resident was observed outside the facility and redirected back without adverse effects. The facility followed corporate policy regarding care companion and urinalysis. Due to conflicting witness statements and lack of corroboration, the allegations were deemed unsubstantiated.

The visit was triggered by an incident report of a resident eloping from the facility. The resident had three documented elopements in the last six months. Physician reports indicated a diagnosis of Dementia. The complaint was followed up with no deficiencies found.

The resident was found outside the facility and redirected back inside. A one-on-one care companion was placed until urinalysis results were received, which were negative. The resident's family declined permanent care companion or memory care placement and moved the resident out. No deficiencies were noted during the visit.

No deficiencies were noted during the visit. The facility had placed a one-on-one care companion with the resident after multiple elopements, and the family was informed of care options before moving the resident out.

The facility was observed to be clean, sanitary, and well-maintained with residents appearing happy and well cared for. Emergency systems and safety equipment were operational, and no citations were issued during the visit.

The facility was observed to be clean, sanitary, and well-maintained with residents appearing happy and well cared for. Emergency systems, medication management, and COVID-19 mitigation plans were reviewed and found operational. No citations were issued during the visit.

The facility appeared clean, sanitary, and well maintained with residents appearing happy and well cared for. No deficiencies were noted during the visit.

The facility appeared clean, sanitary, and well maintained with residents appearing happy and well cared for. No deficiencies were noted during the visit.