Inspection Reports for
Atria Grass Valley

The inspection found the facility to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The facility was observed to be properly maintained, with safe food storage, medication security, and operational safety equipment.

The complaint investigation addressed four allegations: questionable death, resident sustained multiple fractures due to lack of care, staff touched resident inappropriately, and insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. All allegations were found unsubstantiated.

All four allegations investigated were found to be unsubstantiated after interviews, facility tour, and documentation review. There was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The complaint investigation addressed four allegations: questionable death, resident sustained multiple fractures due to lack of care, staff touched resident inappropriately, and insufficient staffing to meet resident needs. All allegations were found unsubstantiated.

All four allegations investigated were found to be unsubstantiated after interviews, facility tour, and documentation review. There was no preponderance of evidence to prove any violations occurred.

The facility was found compliant with all reviewed areas including resident and staff files, fire drills, emergency preparedness, and safety equipment. No health or safety violations were observed and no deficiencies were cited.

The facility was found compliant with all reviewed areas including resident and staff files, fire drills, emergency preparedness, and safety equipment. No health or safety violations or deficiencies were observed or cited during the inspection.

The complaint alleged that the facility kitchen was unsanitary. The investigation was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Melissa Parks. After interviews, observations, and review of cleaning schedules and certifications, the allegation was found to be unfounded.

The investigation found the dining room and kitchen to be clean, well-organized, and following current regulations. Interviews and review of cleaning schedules and staff certifications supported that cleaning duties were performed and the facility was not unsanitary. The allegation was found to be unfounded.

The complaint alleged that the facility kitchen was unsanitary. After investigation, the allegation was found to be unfounded based on evidence including observations, interviews, and an internal audit showing 100% compliance.

The investigation found the dining room and kitchen to be clean, well-organized, and following current regulations. Interviews and review of cleaning schedules and staff certifications showed compliance, and the allegation was found to be unfounded.

The facility was found to be compliant with all reviewed requirements including resident and staff files, fire drills, elopement drills, and environmental safety. No health or safety violations or deficiencies were observed or cited during the inspection.

The facility was found to be compliant with all regulatory requirements, including resident and staff file documentation, fire drills, and elopement drills. No health or safety violations were observed during the tour of the facility.

The complaint alleged staff mishandled a resident's medication. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and healthcare providers, and review of medication records and police reports. The allegation was found unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the resident managed their own medication and that the missing medication was later found. There was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, and the complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint was unsubstantiated, meaning there was not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged medication mishandling occurred.

The investigation found that the resident managed their own medication and that a missing medication was later found in a full bottle. The resident experienced increased neuropathy pain, sleepiness, and confusion. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with no deficiencies cited. No immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed during the tour of the facility.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with no deficiencies cited. The infection control domain was completed jointly with the administrator, and no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed during the tour.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations observed. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations observed. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.

The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded, meaning the allegation was false, could not have happened, or was without reasonable basis.

Based on interviews and documentation review, the allegation was found to be unfounded as the preponderance of evidence standards was not met.

The complaint alleged that the facility was not refunding community fees per agreement. The investigation concluded the allegation was unfounded.

Based on interviews and documentation review, the allegation was found to be unfounded as the preponderance of evidence standards were not met. The complaint was determined to be false or without reasonable basis.