Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
New residents most often arrive under Medicaid (43% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 11 - 12 months.
Located in Wabash, Indiana, about one mile from Parkview Wabash Hospital, Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre provides skilled nursing, rehabilitation, memory care, respite, hospice, and long-term care services. The 75-bed community is operated by Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County and is led by Administrator Michael Wolfe, Director of Nursing Rebecca Hatfield, and Medical Director James McCann. Medicare, Medicaid, and private-pay options are accepted.
Care is delivered by licensed nurses and trained healthcare aides working under physician oversight. Services are designed to support both recovery and long-term well-being, with physical, occupational, and speech therapy available alongside social services and activity programs that promote physical and cognitive engagement. Residents receive an average of 3 hours and 33 minutes of nursing care each day, including approximately 42 minutes from registered nurses.
The community currently has an occupancy rate of about 52%, with 39 residents living in the 75 available beds. An average stay of 167 days reflects a combination of short-term rehabilitation admissions and longer-term nursing and memory care needs. The surrounding neighborhood has a Walk Score of 35, allowing limited access to nearby destinations on foot while most travel remains vehicle-dependent.
Inspections conducted by the Indiana Department of Health’s Division of Long Term Care have identified issues related to safety equipment, infection-control procedures, and aspects of resident dignity and grooming. Corrective measures were implemented in response to these findings.
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre is legally operated by Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County, and administered by Michael Wolfe.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Indiana, the Department of Health, Division of Long Term Care is the primary regulatory body that performs onsite inspections and quality of care reviews for all licensed facilities.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 29 | 36 | This facility has 19% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Indiana nursing home (29 vs. IN avg 36).↓ 19% better Rank #191 / 318 Total deficiencies — State benchmarked This home is ranked 191st out of 318 homes we track in Indiana for deficiencies. Shows this facility's deficiencies compared to the Indiana average among 318 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total visits
| 5 | 19 | This facility has had 74% fewer total visits than the Indiana average (5 vs. IN avg 19). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 74% fewer |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
| 7 | 7 | This facility has inspections with deficiencies in line with the Indiana average (7 vs. IN avg 7).— At avg |
|
Inspections
| 5 | 13 | This facility has had 62% fewer inspections than the Indiana average (5 vs. IN avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 62% fewer |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
| 1 | 5 | This facility has 80% fewer total complaints than a typical Indiana nursing home (1 vs. IN avg 5).↓ 80% better Rank #1 / 290 Total complaints — State benchmarked This home is ranked 1st out of 290 homes we track in Indiana for total complaints. Shows this facility's total complaints compared to the Indiana average among 290 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Complaints per year
| 0.3 | 1.3 | This facility has 77% fewer complaints per year than a typical Indiana nursing home (0.3 vs. IN avg 1.3).↓ 77% better |
|
Complaint visits
| 5 | 8 | This facility has had 38% fewer complaint visits than the Indiana average (5 vs. IN avg 8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 38% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Indiana average 6
Last Health inspection on Mar 2025
Indiana average 25
Indiana average 4.12
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 7 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Indiana average: 0.2
Indiana average: 0.6
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Total hours from contractors
51 contractor hours this quarter
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 22 | 0 | 22 | 6,719 | 92 | 100% | 6.9 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2,285 | 92 | 100% | 9.7 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,208 | 80 | 87% | 8.7 |
| Registered Nurse | 4 | 0 | 4 | 923 | 79 | 86% | 8.7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 4 | 0 | 4 | 723 | 76 | 83% | 5.6 |
| Medication Aide/Technician | 1 | 0 | 1 | 547 | 64 | 70% | 8.6 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 460 | 58 | 63% | 7.9 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 456 | 57 | 62% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 1 | 0 | 1 | 374 | 63 | 68% | 5.9 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 2 | 0 | 2 | 330 | 64 | 70% | 5.1 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 1 | 0 | 1 | 124 | 14 | 15% | 8.8 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 92 | 15 | 16% | 6.1 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 13 | 14% | 2.3 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 4 | 4% | 6.2 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 21 | 18 | 20% | 1.2 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 6 | 6 | 21 | 29 | 32% | 0.7 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 4% | 4.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2% | 2.4 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
21% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
37% of new residents, often for short stays.
43% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Historical financial and operational data for Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
New residents most often arrive under Medicaid (43% of admissions), and a typical Medicaid stay runs around 11 - 12 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Wabash's city center to Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.14 miles to nearest hospital (Parkview Wabash Hospital)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the IN Dept. of Health (IDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the state average. See the benchmark below for the typical score in this state; higher is better.
This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Indiana average is: 51.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Meadows Health and Rehabilitation | NH MC SNF | La Fontaine | 115
Facility
115
IN AVG
116
Rank
#187 / 431 |
76.5%
Facility
76.5%
IN AVG
66.9
Rank
#130 / 410 | +14% | 4.12
Facility
4.12
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#42 / 275 | -37% | +20% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 93
Facility
93
IN AVG
83
Rank
#63 / 393 | 5
Facility
5
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#11 / 278 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#6 / 278 | 1 | 88 | - |
8
Facility
8
IN AVG
40
Rank
#484 / 551 | Riverview Hospital | $10.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$10.5M
Rank
#109 / 268 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$5.2M
Rank
#113 / 268 | 48.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
48.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
51.1%
Rank
#146 / 268 | 155551 | ||||
| Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre | NH HOS MC RC SNF | Wabash | 75
Facility
75
IN AVG
116
Rank
#336 / 431 |
52.0%
Facility
52.0%
IN AVG
66.9
Rank
#321 / 410 | -22% | 3.48
Facility
3.48
IN AVG
3.44
Rank
#105 / 275 | -36% | +1% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$31.4k
Rank
#1 / 278 | 88
Facility
88
IN AVG
83
Rank
#118 / 393 | 7
Facility
7
IN AVG
25.0
Rank
#22 / 278 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
IN AVG
4.1
Rank
#119 / 278 | - | 39 | A+ |
35
Facility
35
IN AVG
40
Rank
#298 / 551 | Rebecca Hatfield | $4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$10.5M
Rank
#249 / 268 | $3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
$5.2M
Rank
#211 / 268 | 68.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
68.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
IN AVG
51.1%
Rank
#16 / 268 | 155162 |
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre is located in Wabash, Indiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Indiana.
Rebecca Hatfield is the Director of Nursing at Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre.
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre is legally operated by Health And Hospital Corporation Of Marion County, and administered by Michael Wolfe.
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre has a walk score of 35. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
According to IN state health department records, Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre's license number is 24-000081-1.
According to IN state health department records, Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre's license expires on November 30, 2026.
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre's occupancy is 52%.
Autumn Ridge Rehabilitation Centre has been operating for approximately 27 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance