Inspection Reports for
Belmont Village Senior Living Westwood

No deficiencies were observed during the visit, and no citations were issued. The facility was found to be in compliance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8).

No deficiencies were observed during the visit; therefore, no citations were issued.

No deficiencies were observed during the visit, and no citations were issued. The individual named in the Decision and Order was not found to be associated with the facility.

The allegation was that staff mishandle the residents' medications. Interviews with 11 staff members and 10 residents found 11 staff denied mishandling and 9 residents denied it, with 1 resident affirming. Based on the evidence, the allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation included record reviews, interviews with staff and residents, and a facility tour. No sufficient evidence was found to substantiate the allegation of medication mishandling, and no deficiencies were cited.

The complaint alleged that staff mishandle the residents' medications. The investigation included review of medication administration records, interviews with 11 staff and 10 residents, and a tour of the medication room. Of those interviewed, 11 staff denied mishandling and 9 of 10 residents denied mishandling. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.

Based on records review, interviews with staff and residents, and observations, the Licensing Program Analyst did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegation of medication mishandling. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated and no deficiencies were cited.

The complaint included allegations that facility staff did not provide adequate food service, did not ensure safe food handling, discouraged residents from reporting, yelled at residents, and did not keep the facility clean. After interviews with residents, staff, witnesses, and review of documents and observations, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.

The investigation found that the facility provides adequate and well-balanced meals, staff are certified in safe food handling, residents and witnesses reported no discouragement from reporting or yelling by staff, and the facility is kept clean according to schedules and observations. Therefore, all allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint included allegations that facility staff did not provide adequate food service, did not ensure safe food handling, discouraged residents from reporting, yelled at residents, and did not keep the facility clean. After investigation including interviews and document reviews, all allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the facility provides adequate and well-balanced meals with proper food handling certifications and training. Interviews with residents, staff, and witnesses confirmed no discouragement from reporting, no yelling by staff, and that the facility is kept clean. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated based on the evidence gathered.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff not providing timely medication assistance, failure to keep resident rooms clean, and providing poor quality food with small portions. After interviews, observations, and record reviews, the department found no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations.

The investigation found no sufficient evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Interviews with staff and residents, observations, and record reviews indicated that medication was administered timely, rooms and facility were kept clean, and food quality and portions were adequate.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included untimely medication assistance, unclean resident rooms, and poor quality food. Interviews with staff and residents, medication administration record reviews, and facility inspections did not find sufficient evidence to support the allegations.

The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, record reviews, and facility inspections. No sufficient evidence was found to substantiate any of the allegations; all were determined to be unsubstantiated.

No deficiencies were observed during the visit. The facility's surveillance system was confirmed to have no audio capabilities, and the facility was found to be in compliance with admission regulations.

No deficiencies were observed during the visit, and no citations were issued. The facility promptly assisted the residents involved in the incident and followed up with the primary care physician and families. The Executive Director stated this was the first time the resident exhibited aggressive behavior.

No deficiencies were observed during the visit. The facility was found to be in compliance with the Health and Safety Code regarding surveillance cameras and admission of new residents, and no citations were issued.

No deficiencies were observed during the visit, and no citations were issued. The Executive Director stated this was the first time the resident exhibited aggressive behavior, and a new physician's report will be completed.

The Licensing Program Analysts conducted a health and safety check, reviewed staff and resident rosters, observed video footage of the intruder, and reviewed staff in-service training. No deficiencies were observed and no citations were issued.

The Licensing Program Analysts conducted a health and safety check, reviewed staff and resident rosters, observed video recordings of the intruder event, and reviewed staff in-service training. No deficiencies or citations were observed or issued at this time.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished with no observed deficiencies. All safety equipment was operable, infection control practices were followed, and medication administration records showed no discrepancies.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished with no observed deficiencies. All safety equipment was operable, infection control practices were followed, and resident and staff files were maintained in order. No citations were issued.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to assist residents with wearing clean clothing, incontinence care, showering, dietary needs, and hearing aid use. Interviews and record reviews showed residents were either independent or received appropriate assistance, and refusals were documented and communicated to family and physicians.

The investigation included interviews with the administrator, staff, residents, and review of records. The evidence did not substantiate the allegations; residents and staff confirmed that assistance was provided as needed, and residents were generally independent or received appropriate support. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged failures by facility staff to assist residents with wearing clean clothing, incontinence care, showering, dietary needs, and hearing aid use. After investigation, these allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The investigation included interviews with the administrator, staff, residents, and review of records. The evidence did not substantiate the allegations; residents generally manage their own care or receive appropriate assistance, and the facility has procedures in place to support resident needs.

The Licensing Program Analyst conducted a facility tour observing infection control practices, physical plant conditions, and resident accommodations. The facility was found to have appropriate infection control measures, adequate resident room furnishings, and safe common areas. The visit was not completed due to time constraints and will be resumed.

The inspection included a risk assessment, verification of infection control practices, review of facility physical plant and medication, and observation of resident living areas. The facility was found to have appropriate infection control measures, adequate resident accommodations, and no immediate hazards noted. The visit was not completed due to time constraints and will be resumed.

The complaint alleged that life-threatening heavy or sharp objects on surfaces were not anchored, specifically bookcases and accent tables with ceramic pots and sharp-edge decorative materials. The Bureau of Fire Prevention inspected and recommended anchoring bookshelves to prevent falling hazards. The Executive Director confirmed a request was made to anchor all bookshelves. No health or safety violations were found, and the allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation found no sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the facility physical plant is unsafe. The Bureau of Fire Prevention did not find any fire safety violations, and the facility was found to be in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that life-threatening heavy or sharp objects on surfaces were not anchored, posing a safety risk. The Bureau of Fire Prevention inspected and recommended anchoring bookshelves to prevent falling items. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.

The investigation found no sufficient evidence to support the allegation. The facility was cleared of COVID-19 infection, and the Bureau of Fire Prevention did not find any fire or safety code violations. The Executive Director stated that management would anchor all bookshelves to the wall as a precaution.

The facility was found to have 9 active Covid-19 cases with an approved mitigation plan. Infection control practices, physical plant conditions, safety measures, and sanitation were observed and found compliant. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies cited. Infection control practices, physical plant conditions, safety measures, and regulatory requirements were all observed to be satisfactory.

The allegation was that staff stole a resident's ring. The investigation revealed no reports of stolen property to facility staff, and interviews with five staff members and five residents found no evidence of theft. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegation of staff stealing resident's belongings. Interviews with staff and residents, review of records, and observations supported an unsubstantiated finding.

Allegation: Facility changed resident's medication without consent. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation.

The investigation found that the facility administered medication (Xanax) to Resident #1 based on a physician's order, but the resident's responsible person was not fully informed about the medication change. After review of evidence and interviews, the allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The allegation was that staff stole a resident's ring. The investigation revealed no reports of stolen property to the facility, and the allegation was based on hearsay. Interviews with five staff members and five residents found no reports or evidence of stolen property. The facility has a posted 'Theft and Loss' Program. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found no substantiated evidence that staff stole resident belongings. Interviews with staff and residents, review of records, and observations did not support the allegation, which was therefore found to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that the facility changed a resident's medication without consent. The investigation was unsubstantiated as evidence did not prove the alleged violation occurred.

The investigation found that the facility administered medication (Xanax) prescribed by a neurologist to Resident #1 without the responsible person's prior knowledge, but based on physician's orders on file. After review of evidence and interviews, the allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint investigation addressed three allegations: 1) Facility not following quarantine/isolation guidelines; 2) Staff not trained to care for residents with COVID-19; 3) Administrator not demonstrating good character. All allegations were found unsubstantiated after interviews and record reviews.

The investigation found that all allegations were unsubstantiated based on interviews with staff and residents, review of training and PPE protocols, and observation of infection control measures. Staff and residents denied the allegations, and the facility demonstrated appropriate COVID-19 precautions and training.

The complaint investigation was initiated based on allegations that the facility was not following quarantine/isolation guidelines, staff were not trained to care for residents with COVID-19, and the administrator was not demonstrating good character. The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated after interviews and record reviews.

The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of training and PPE protocols, and observation of infection control measures. All allegations were denied by staff and residents, and no preponderance of evidence was found to substantiate the complaints. The report concluded the allegations were unsubstantiated.

The facility was found to be clear of Covid-19 infection with an approved mitigation plan. Infection control practices were observed to be adequate, PPE supplies were available, and the physical plant was in good condition. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The facility was found to be clear of Covid-19 infection with approved mitigation plans in place. Infection control practices, physical plant, medication storage, and safety equipment were all observed to be in compliance. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.