Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
198
108 employees · 90 contractors · 52 on an average day Crystal Ridge Care Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Grass Valley, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Crystal Ridge Care Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Grass Valley, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — 5 points above the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Crystal Ridge Care Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Crystal Ridge Care Center
Crystal Ridge Care Center is a nursing home in Grass Valley, California, offering skilled nursing, memory care, hospice care, palliative care, and respite care. Skilled nursing includes licensed nursing care on site around the clock, with both long-term and short-term care available. Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering, while hospice and palliative care focus on end-of-life support, comfort, and symptom relief. Respite care offers a short stay when a family’s usual caregiver needs to travel or recover, so the range of care can suit someone seeking short-term rehabilitation or respite now and more structured care if needs change.
Opened in 1987, the center has 99 beds, with a 97% occupancy rate meaning nearly all beds were in use at the time measured. Housing includes studios, one-bedroom accommodations, and two-bedroom accommodations. A studio offers one private living space, while a two-bedroom option may suit a couple moving together or someone who wants a companion.
Residents can receive therapy within the community through rehabilitation services and a rehabilitation gym. Courtyards provide outdoor areas, and private bathrooms with showers give residents personal bathing space. Programs cover short-term rehabilitation, pain management, complex wound care, nutrition, sub-acute care, hospice services, palliative care, and behavioral health, addressing rehabilitation, symptom management, wound treatment, nutrition, and behavioral health needs.
The area has a Walk Score of 46 out of 100 and is car-dependent, so most errands require a car or a ride; someone who no longer drives would need access to one for routine errands. Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, allowing families to use public coverage when eligible or pay directly. Total nurse staffing is 3 hours and 51 minutes per resident per day, representing the combined daily nursing time assigned to each resident.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 206th out of 291 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 51m
This nursing home is ranked 206th out of 291 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 51m6 of 6 metrics below California average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
20m
↓ 48% · CA 39mThis facility: 20m per resident per day, 48% below the California average of 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
57m
↓ 22% · CA 1h 13mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 22% below the California average of 1h 13m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 21 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
21 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 121 total: 43 of the facility's own employees and 78 agency contractors.
121 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
2h 33m
↓ 4% · CA 2h 39mThis facility: 2h 33m per resident per day, 4% below the California average of 2h 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 121 total: 43 of the facility's own employees and 78 agency contractors.
121 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
4m
↓ 25% · CA 5mThis facility: 4m per resident per day, 25% below the California average of 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 13m
↓ 21% · CA 4h 5mThis facility: 3h 13m per resident per day, 21% below the California average of 4h 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
13m
↓ 55% · CA 30mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 55% below the California average of 30m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
198
108 employees · 90 contractors · 52 on an average day
198 total staff / 95 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.08 : 1
↑ 19% · CA 1.75This facility: 2.08 staff per resident, 19% above the California average of 1.75 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
198 staff ÷ 95 residents
See full California ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
↑ 5% · CA 7.7 hThis facility: 8.1 h, 5% above the California average of 7.7 h (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
38,174 staff hours this quarter
See full California ranking →81.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
California average: 95.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (78), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Medical Director (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
99
Rank #196 / 344Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 196th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
99
Rank #196 / 344Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 196th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #252 / 343Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 252nd out of 343 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #252 / 343Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 252nd out of 343 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
46
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #19 / 302Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 302 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 302. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #19 / 302Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 302 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 302. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
96.7%
This home is often near full
Based on residents per day and 99 beds.
Higher than the California average: 82.2%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
96
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
113
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
CMS Certification Number555283
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehabilitation
Pain Management
Subacute Care
Complex Wound CareSpecialized treatment for wounds that are deep, slow to heal, infected, or otherwise difficult to manage. Care may include cleaning, dressings, and monitoring for healing.
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Behavioral Health
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
Courtyard
Touring HoursMonday – Friday: 8 am to 4:30 pm
Building TypeSingle-story
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
2 Bed
In-Room Features
Private Bathrooms With Showers
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
87 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
5 points above the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
91 severity-weighted points (45 citations) · 4% lower than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 95)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
31 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 25)
Total health inspections
11
↓ 8% · CA 12This facility: 11, 8% below the California average of 12 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
42
Rank #172 / 294Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 172nd out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the California State average, with a ranking across all 294 CA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 15% · CA 49.7This facility: 42, 15% below the California average of 49.7 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.82
Rank #147 / 294Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the California mean across 294 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 20% · CA 4.77This facility: 3.82, 20% below the California average of 4.77 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
42 of 42 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · CA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 0.3 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · CA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 0.9 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
42
↓ 11% · CA 47.1This facility: 42, 11% below the California average of 47.1 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · CA 1.5This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 1.5 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 16, 2026 · 7 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 11 of 42 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 16, 2026
7 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 03, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 15, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 24, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 26, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 23, 2025
14 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 04, 2024
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 26, 2024
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 01, 2024
1 citation
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 28, 2023
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 07, 2022
9 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 42 citations
Quality of Life & Care
11 deficiencies (26%)
Pharmacy Services
8 deficiencies (19%)
Nutrition & Dietary
7 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (7%)
Nursing & Physician Services
3 deficiencies (7%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (5%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (5%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
27 of 42 citations resulted from standard inspections; 14 of 42 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 42 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
CA avg $57KCalifornia average: $56,949. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
CA avg 1.85California average: 1.85. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CA avg 0.59California average: 0.59. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the California average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 18% · CA 4.2This facility: 5.0, 18% above the CA average of 4.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 13% · CA 3.5This facility: 4.0, 13% above the CA average of 3.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 39% · CA 5.7This facility: 3.5, 39% below the CA average of 5.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 24% · CA 9.5This facility: 7.2, 24% below the CA average of 9.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 5 worse, 2 near CA average
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 1 worse, 3 near CA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3%
↓ 47% · CA 10.2This facility: 5.3, 47% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3%
↓ 47% · CA 10.2This facility: 5.3, 47% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.0%
↓ 33% · CA 8.9This facility: 6.0, 33% below the CA average of 8.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.0%
↓ 33% · CA 8.9This facility: 6.0, 33% below the CA average of 8.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.3%
↑ 6% · CA 9.8This facility: 10.3, 6% above the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.3%
↑ 6% · CA 9.8This facility: 10.3, 6% above the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
↑ 193% · CA 1.2This facility: 3.6, 193% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
↑ 193% · CA 1.2This facility: 3.6, 193% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6%
↓ 61% · CA 1.6This facility: 0.6, 61% below the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6%
↓ 61% · CA 1.6This facility: 0.6, 61% below the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 42% · CA 4.3This facility: 2.5, 42% below the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 42% · CA 4.3This facility: 2.5, 42% below the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
↓ 29% · CA 4.1This facility: 2.9, 29% below the CA average of 4.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
↓ 29% · CA 4.1This facility: 2.9, 29% below the CA average of 4.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18.7%
↑ 147% · CA 7.6This facility: 18.7, 147% above the CA average of 7.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18.7%
↑ 147% · CA 7.6This facility: 18.7, 147% above the CA average of 7.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9%
↑ 5% · CA 12.3This facility: 12.9, 5% above the CA average of 12.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.9%
↑ 5% · CA 12.3This facility: 12.9, 5% above the CA average of 12.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
↑ 1% · CA 98.7This facility: 99.7, 1% above the CA average of 98.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
↑ 1% · CA 98.7This facility: 99.7, 1% above the CA average of 98.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
↑ 1% · CA 97.9This facility: 98.9, 1% above the CA average of 97.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9%
↑ 1% · CA 97.9This facility: 98.9, 1% above the CA average of 97.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.95
↓ 58% · CA 2.25This facility: 0.95, 58% below the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.95
↓ 58% · CA 2.25This facility: 0.95, 58% below the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.83
↑ 15% · CA 1.59This facility: 1.83, 15% above the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.83
↑ 15% · CA 1.59This facility: 1.83, 15% above the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
72.6%
↑ 35% · US 53.7This facility: 72.6, 35% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
72.6%
↑ 35% · US 53.7This facility: 72.6, 35% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.5%
↑ 4% · US 50.6This facility: 52.5, 4% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
52.5%
↑ 4% · US 50.6This facility: 52.5, 4% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 16% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 16% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 16% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 16% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
↓ 65% · CA 1.3This facility: 0.5, 65% below the CA average of 1.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
↓ 65% · CA 1.3This facility: 0.5, 65% below the CA average of 1.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.2%
↑ 2% · CA 94.6This facility: 96.2, 2% above the CA average of 94.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.2%
↑ 2% · CA 94.6This facility: 96.2, 2% above the CA average of 94.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.2%
↑ 4% · CA 93.1This facility: 97.2, 4% above the CA average of 93.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.2%
↑ 4% · CA 93.1This facility: 97.2, 4% above the CA average of 93.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.1%
↑ 4% · CA 23.2This facility: 24.1, 4% above the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
24.1%
↑ 4% · CA 23.2This facility: 24.1, 4% above the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
19.0%
↑ 70% · CA 11.2This facility: 19.0, 70% above the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
19.0%
↑ 70% · CA 11.2This facility: 19.0, 70% above the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Crystal Ridge Care Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 289 California nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
7.5% operating margin
+5.5 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.2M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most California homes
44.8% payroll share of revenue
CA average 61.6%Rank #255 / 289Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 255th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.0M while revenue rose $2.5M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with California homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $16.3M | +$2.5M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $15.3M | Rank in CA Rank #129 / 289Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 129th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 56% of homes | Above CA median Higher net patient revenue than 56% of CA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.1M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $16.0M | Rank in CA Rank #157 / 289Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 157th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 46% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.2M | +$0.9M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $0.5M | Rank in CA Rank #96 / 289Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 96th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 67% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 7.5% | +5.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 3.3% | Rank in CA Rank #102 / 289Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 102nd out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | CA median $0.1M | Rank in CA Rank #276 / 283Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 276th out of 283 nursing homes we track in California for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.2M | +$0.9M | Trend — | CA median $1.1M | Rank in CA Rank #130 / 289Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 130th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most California homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.3M | +$2.0M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $8.8M | Rank in CA Rank #190 / 289Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 190th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below CA median Higher payroll than 34% of CA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 44.8% | +6.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 53.8% | Rank in CA Rank #255 / 289Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 255th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | 16.8 pts under CA average The CA average is 61.6% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the California payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.6M | $8.3M | $9.1M | $8.9M | $10.1M | $13.9M | $13.8M | $16.3M |
| Operating expenses | $9.2M | $9.1M | $9.7M | $9.6M | $10.5M | $14.0M | $13.6M | $15.1M |
| Net patient income | −$0.7M | −$0.8M | −$0.6M | −$0.7M | −$0.4M | −$0.1M | $0.3M | $1.2M |
| Operating margin | −8.0% | −10.0% | −6.3% | −8.4% | −4.0% | −0.8% | 2.0% | 7.5% |
| Net income | −$0.7M | −$0.8M | −$0.6M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $1.2M |
| Payroll costs | $5.4M | $5.3M | $5.3M | $5.2M | $5.1M | $5.4M | $5.3M | $7.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 63.2% | 64.1% | 58.0% | 59.0% | 50.9% | 39.2% | 38.2% | 44.8% |
| Beds | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
| Gross revenue | $9.2M | $8.8M | $9.6M | $8.5M | $9.7M | $12.5M | $17.9M | $23.9M |
| Salaries | $4.4M | $4.4M | $4.3M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.6M | $4.6M | $6.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.1M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $1.1M | $2.9M | $2.5M | $1.4M |
| Other operating costs | $3.8M | $3.8M | $4.4M | $4.4M | $5.3M | $8.5M | $8.3M | $7.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $289 | $301 | $314 | $343 | $408 | $103,397 | $418 | $479 |
| Cost per day | $313 | $331 | $334 | $372 | $424 | $104,169 | $410 | $443 |
| Average length of stay | 119.2 days | 70.3 days | 118.0 days | 140.2 days | 85.8 days | 0.5 days | 129.3 days | 112.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
302 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
160 · 53%
Medicaid
3 · 1%
Private pay & other
139 · 46%
Resident snapshot
95 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
13 · 14%
Medicaid
60 · 63%
Private pay & other
22 · 23%
Leaving
303 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
125 · 41%
Medicaid
7 · 2%
Private pay & other
171 · 56%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Crystal Ridge Care Center
1.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Grass Valley's city center to Crystal Ridge Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Crystal Ridge Care Center
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in California
Crystal Ridge Care Center is located in Grass Valley, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Crystal Ridge Care Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Crystal Ridge Care Center in a walkable area?
Crystal Ridge Care Center has a walk score of 46. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Crystal Ridge Care Center?
Crystal Ridge Care Center's occupancy is 96.7%.
03 Are pets allowed at Crystal Ridge Care Center?
No, Crystal Ridge Care Center has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Crystal Ridge Care Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Crystal Ridge Care Center is registered as a for-profit in CA.
05 What is the overall rating for Crystal Ridge Care Center?
Crystal Ridge Care Center received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does Crystal Ridge Care Center have?
Crystal Ridge Care Center has 99 beds.
07 Are there photos of Crystal Ridge Care Center?
Yes — there are 10 photos of Crystal Ridge Care Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Updated on
