Inspection Reports for
Discovery Commons Raincross

5232 CENTRAL AVENUE, RIVERSIDE, CA, 92504

Back to Facility Profile

Deficiencies (last 6 years)

Deficiencies (over 6 years) 0.8 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.

80% better than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies per year

4 3 2 1 0
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Occupancy

Latest occupancy rate 57% occupied

Based on a February 2026 inspection.

Occupancy rate over time

40% 60% 80% 100% Jul 2021 Mar 2022 Feb 2024 May 2025 Feb 2026

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 68 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 11, 2026

Visit Reason
The visit was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation regarding an allegation that facility staff were not ensuring a resident receives phone calls.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff were not ensuring a resident received phone calls. The investigation found the allegation to be unfounded as the resident named did not reside at the facility.
Findings
The allegation was found to be unfounded because the named resident did not reside at the facility. The complaint was dismissed after interviews and record reviews confirmed no such resident was present.

Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Census: 68

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Armando PerezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
William LewallenResident Care DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation
Mary McClureAdministratorInterviewed during investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 68 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 11, 2026

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that the licensee was restraining a resident, forcing a resident to remain at the facility against their will, and staff were inappropriately medicating a resident.

Complaint Details
The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded because the resident named in the allegations was not a current resident of the facility. The complaint was dismissed.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations to be unfounded as the named resident did not reside at the facility. Interviews and record reviews confirmed no evidence supporting the complaint, leading to dismissal of the complaint.

Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Census: 68

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
William LewallenResident Care DirectorMet with during the investigation and exit interview
Mary McClureAdministratorInterviewed during the investigation
Armando PerezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 68 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 9, 2026

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required annual inspection conducted by Licensing Program Analysts to assess compliance with licensing requirements for the facility.

Findings
The facility was observed to be clean, in good repair, and compliant with safety and emergency preparedness standards. Client and employee records were reviewed and found to be complete and up to date. Medications were stored securely and dispensed accurately. Fire safety equipment was operational and in compliance.

Report Facts
Client records reviewed: 7 Employee records reviewed: 7 Food supply duration: 7 Food supply duration: 2

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 69 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: May 12, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation regarding an allegation that a resident sustained a suspicious head injury due to neglect.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that Resident #1 sustained a suspicious head injury due to neglect. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on interviews, records, and lack of corroborating evidence.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. The resident had an unwitnessed fall with a laceration treated by staff, and interviews with staff and family did not disclose concerns about neglect.

Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Census: 69

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Beena SinghLicensing EvaluatorConducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Mary McclureFacility Executive DirectorMet with the evaluator during the investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 70 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 1 Date: May 8, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to investigate allegations regarding the resident not being provided a copy of the admissions agreement and improper notice of increased charges.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for failure to provide a copy of the new admissions agreement and failure to provide proper written notice of fee increases. Allegations of charging for services not provided and overcharging were unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the resident and their legal representative did not receive a copy of the new admission agreement and were not properly notified of fee increases. Allegations of overcharging and charging for services not provided were unsubstantiated based on interviews and records review.

Deficiencies (1)
Health and Safety Code 1569.655(a) requires 60 days' prior written notice of fee increases. The facility did not issue proper notice to the resident and their representative of the fee increase, posing a potential health safety or personal rights risk.
Report Facts
Resident charges: 11141.97 Capacity: 120 Census: 70

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Janira ArreolaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation.
Mary McClureExecutive DirectorMet with the Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation.
Judith PierfaxAdministratorFacility administrator mentioned in the report.

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 70 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 12, 2025

Visit Reason
Licensing Program Analyst Armando Perez conducted an unannounced required annual inspection to evaluate compliance with state regulations for the assisted living and memory care facility.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and in good repair with no deficiencies cited. Client and employee records were complete, medication storage and dispensing were accurate, and fire safety measures were in place with a minor technical advisory regarding fire drill record availability.

Report Facts
Food supply: 1 Food supply: 2 Fire extinguisher service date: Oct 4, 2024 Fire drill date: Feb 6, 2025 Client records reviewed: 9 Employee records reviewed: 10

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 73 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Nov 21, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 07/07/2021 regarding inadequate laundry and housekeeping services at the facility.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged staff were not providing adequate laundry services and the facility was not providing adequate housekeeping services. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated after investigation.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations of inadequate laundry and housekeeping services to be unsubstantiated based on observations, interviews, and records review. Laundry services were functional with minor equipment issues addressed, and housekeeping staff were present and performing assigned duties.

Report Facts
Laundry rooms: 3 Washers per laundry room: 2 Dryers per laundry room: 2 Housekeeping staff: 2 Resident rooms cleaned daily: 7 Resident rooms cleaned daily: 9 Laundry loads included in rent: 1 Additional laundry load fee: 20 Laundry frequency for memory care bedding: 2

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Javina GeorgeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and unannounced visit
Mary McClureExecutive DirectorInterviewed during the investigation and received the report
Raul HernandezBuilding Service DirectorInterviewed regarding laundry and housekeeping services

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 89 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 26, 2024

Visit Reason
Licensing Program Analyst Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced annual required visit to evaluate compliance with regulations at the assisted living and memory care facility.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and compliant with safety and health regulations. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Report Facts
Staff files reviewed: 5 Resident files reviewed: 5 Food deliveries per week: 2

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
William LewallenResidential Care DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection.
Sara MartinezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced annual inspection.
Rikesha StampsSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the licensing evaluation.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 82 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Sep 21, 2023

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation regarding allegations that staff did not properly monitor a resident's incontinence needs.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not properly monitor Resident #1's incontinence needs. The allegation was investigated through observations, interviews, and records review and was found to be unfounded.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility reassessed the resident's needs and took appropriate actions including washing the resident's clothes, adjusting shower times, and laying out clothes. The allegation was determined to be unfounded based on observations, interviews, and records review.

Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Census: 82

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Judith PierfaxExecutive DirectorMet during investigation and named in findings
William LewallenResident Care DirectorPresent at care conference regarding resident's needs
Javina GeorgeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 80 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: May 16, 2023

Visit Reason
An unannounced visit was conducted to investigate a complaint alleging a questionable death at the facility.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged a questionable death. The allegation was found to be unfounded as no evidence supported it.
Findings
The investigation found no staff or resident matching the complaint description, no recent deaths in the past week, and the allegation was determined to be unfounded.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Judith PierfaxExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation and provided information regarding the complaint.
Janira ArreolaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced complaint investigation visit.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 62 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 4 Date: Mar 22, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced visit to investigate a complaint (#18-AS-20220317170451) regarding missing updated resident records and changes in the facility's admissions agreement and fee structure.

Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by complaint #18-AS-20220317170451 concerning unavailable updated resident records and lack of required signatures on admissions agreements. The complaint was substantiated with deficiencies cited.
Findings
The facility lacked updated admissions agreements and fee schedules for a resident, did not have required signatures on new agreements, failed to notify the licensing agency of changes in the plan of operation, and was behind on annual licensing fee payments, resulting in multiple deficiencies cited.

Deficiencies (4)
CCR 87506(a): The licensee did not maintain a current, complete resident record for at least one resident, missing the updated Admissions Agreement and rate changes. This is an immediate personal rights violation.
CCR 87507(c): The new Admissions Agreement was not signed or dated by the resident's representative, violating admission agreement requirements and denying the POA opportunity to review or reject charges.
CCR 87208(a)(2): The licensee failed to submit significant changes in the facility's plan of operation, including the revised Admissions Agreement with a different fee structure, to the licensing agency for approval.
CCR 87156(a): The licensee was behind on annual licensing fees and accrued a late fee, failing to comply with fee payment requirements.
Report Facts
Outstanding licensing fees: 2973 Plan of Correction due date: Mar 28, 2022 Plan of Correction due date: Mar 23, 2022 Plan of Correction due date: Mar 31, 2022

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
William LewallenResident Care DirectorMet during inspection and exit interview
Joselynn MunozBusiness ManagerProvided information regarding admissions agreements and records
Crystal ColvinLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and authored the report
Joel EsquivelSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the inspection

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 62 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Mar 21, 2022

Visit Reason
Licensing Program Analyst Stephanie Torres made an unannounced visit to conduct an annual inspection with an emphasis on infection control.

Findings
The facility demonstrated sufficient infection control measures including hand hygiene supplies, cleaning provisions, and proper PPE use. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
William LewallenResident Care DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection.
Stephanie TorresLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 62 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jan 26, 2022

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that staff were not following COVID-19 guidelines, including improper use of PPE and lack of supplies.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged staff were not following COVID-19 guidelines, including PPE use and supply shortages. The allegation was unsubstantiated as there was no preponderance of evidence to prove the violation occurred.
Findings
The investigation found that staff generally followed COVID-19 guidelines with available PPE and hygiene supplies. Some staff were observed not wearing masks properly but corrected this when directed. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence of a violation threatening resident health or safety.

Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 120 Resident Census: 62

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Judith PierfaxExecutive DirectorInterviewed during the complaint investigation
Stephanie TorresLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 78 Capacity: 120 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 20, 2021

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that facility staff failed to provide resident records to an authorized representative and that the facility did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident fall.

Complaint Details
The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded, meaning the allegations were false or without reasonable basis.
Findings
The investigation found both allegations to be unfounded. The requested records were provided after the complaint was filed, and the resident involved in the fall allegation was not a resident of the current facility due to a change of ownership.

Report Facts
Capacity: 120 Census: 78

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Elecia WeathersbyLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Melody BrownLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Judith PierfaxAdministratorFacility administrator interviewed during investigation

Viewing

Loading inspection reports...