Inspection Reports for
Drake House

The facility was found to be clean, in good repair, and compliant with safety and health regulations. No deficiencies were issued during this inspection.

No deficiencies were observed or cited during the visit. The licensing agency will review requested facility files and may follow up with further contact or visits.

The facility was found to be in compliance with all regulations. No deficiencies were cited. The facility was clean, well-maintained, and safety equipment was operational.

No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. The Licensing Program Analyst interviewed the administrator and reviewed records related to the incident.

The complaint alleged staff yelled at a resident and failed to administer medications as prescribed. The investigation did not substantiate these allegations.

The investigation included facility tour, interviews, and record reviews. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated with no immediate health or safety risks identified.

The facility was found to be in compliance with all regulations. No deficiencies were cited. The facility was clean, safe, and properly maintained with appropriate documentation and staff training.

The Licensing Program Analyst observed the facility now has one shower and one tub on the first floor shower room and four shower stalls on the second floor. The final City of Monterey Permit paperwork was received during the visit. No deficiencies were cited.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies observed. Infection control measures such as hand sanitizer availability, symptom screening for visitors, and operational safety equipment were verified.

The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed records including Needs and Appraisal, physician report, training records, and vehicle records during the visit. No deficiencies were cited.

The facility agreed to submit a letter to the Department with projected construction start and completion dates. The facility will remain at the current capacity of 50 to remain in compliance until construction is completed and paperwork is submitted, after which capacity may increase to 55.

The facility is licensed for 55 residents and has 5 showers/tubs, meeting the Title 22 regulation of one tub or shower per ten residents. It was agreed the facility will submit a change of capacity with required forms and a fee to correct this oversight.

The complaint was received on 12/17/2020 alleging the facility is unsanitary. After interviews with 4 staff and 10 residents, review of cleaning records, and multiple facility tours, the allegation was found to be unfounded.

The investigation found the complaint allegation to be unfounded based on interviews with staff and residents, observations during multiple facility tours, and review of cleaning schedules and COVID mitigation plans. The facility was observed to be clean and sanitary with no evidence supporting the complaint.

The complaint investigation was unannounced and conducted by Licensing Program Analyst Marybeth Donovan. The allegations included odor in a resident's room, inappropriate staff treatment, failure to safeguard resident property, and lack of privacy. After interviews with staff and residents, review of cleaning schedules, laundry procedures, and privacy policies, the allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated or unfounded.

The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of records, and observations. The allegations regarding odor and staff treatment were unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence. The allegations about safeguarding resident property and privacy were found to be unfounded, meaning they were false or without reasonable basis. No deficiencies were cited.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated based on interviews with 4 staff and 11 residents, review of food temperature logs, and other records. One resident reported a pink hamburger which was corrected by staff. No further issues were found.

Interviews with staff and residents, as well as review of temperature logs and records, found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the complaint. The allegation was unsubstantiated and no deficiencies were cited.

The complaint alleged that the facility was not providing a comfortable outdoor space for residents. Interviews with 4 staff and 10 residents indicated the outdoor area was cleaned regularly and considered comfortable by most. One resident expressed dislike of smoke from the designated smoking area but would not use it. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, tours of the facility, and record reviews. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence, and no deficiencies were cited.

The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations of medication mismanagement and inappropriate staff communication. After interviews with 4 staff and 12 residents and review of records, the complaint was found to be unfounded.

The investigation found no evidence to support the complaint allegations. Interviews with staff and residents, as well as record reviews, indicated no medication mismanagement or inappropriate staff behavior. The complaint was determined to be unfounded.

The facility was found to be in compliance with infection control regulations, with no citations issued. The evaluator observed proper storage of medications and toxins, adequate PPE supply, and adherence to hygiene and social distancing protocols.