Inspection Reports for
Emerald Valley
7601 AMADOR VALLEY BLVD, DUBLIN, CA, 94568
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 5 years)
Deficiencies (over 5 years)
2.4 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
40% better than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
8
6
4
2
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
90% occupied
Based on a February 2026 inspection.
This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Feb 20, 2026
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2025-11-20 regarding staff abuse, medication distribution, and dietary needs at Emerald Valley facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation addressed allegations of physical abuse by staff, failure to distribute medications as prescribed, and failure to meet residents' dietary needs. All allegations were found unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Findings
The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated after interviews with staff, residents, and review of records. No evidence of physical abuse, medication errors, or dietary neglect was observed.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 72
Staff interviewed: 7
Resident files reviewed: 5
Resident interviews: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Janelle Douglas | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Feb 19, 2026
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 2025-08-13 regarding inadequate catheter care, inadequate care and supervision, and verbal abuse of residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations that staff did not meet a resident's catheter needs and did not provide adequate care and supervision. The allegation of verbal abuse was unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
Findings
Two allegations were substantiated: staff did not meet a resident's catheter care needs and did not provide adequate care and supervision. One allegation of verbal abuse was unsubstantiated based on staff interviews, records review, and resident statements.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87623(b)(2)(A): The facility did not ensure trained staff were available to monitor and manage resident R1's catheter as required by the care plan, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87466: The licensee failed to ensure residents were regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning, and appropriate assistance was not provided, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 72
Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 20, 2026
Plan of Correction Due Date: Feb 26, 2026
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Evaluator conducting the complaint investigation |
| Janelle Douglas | Executive Director | Facility representative met during inspection |
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
| Yvonne Flores-Larios | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the investigation |
Inspection Report
Census: 78
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Dec 16, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management inspection to deliver an amended report for a prior complaint.
Complaint Details
The visit was related to complaint #15-AS-20250425125708. The amended report was delivered during this visit.
Findings
No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to the Executive Director.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Janelle Douglas | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection visit. |
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection visit and delivered the amended report. |
| Yvonne Flores-Larios | Licensing Program Manager | Named as Licensing Program Manager on the report. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Nov 12, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations of staff mismanaging resident medication and speaking inappropriately to residents in care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff mismanaging resident medication and inappropriate speech to residents. Interviews and record reviews did not support these allegations.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Medication administration was consistent with prescribed orders, and staff communication with residents was appropriate and respectful.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 72
Sample size: 6
Staff interviews: 6
Resident interviews: 6
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kelly Nguyen | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Janelle Douglas | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Nov 12, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 2023-07-21 regarding medication administration without consent, staff training, infection control, overcharging, activities, food service, facility repair, pests, and secure storage of residents' personal items.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated for all allegations, meaning there was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. All reviewed areas including medication administration, staff training, infection control, billing, activities, food service, facility maintenance, pest control, and secure storage of personal items were found to be in compliance with regulations and facility policies.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 72
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 78
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Oct 30, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by an allegation that staff improperly restrained a resident in care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff improperly restrained a resident. The allegation that a staff member was under the influence while providing care was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff members S4, S5, and S6 restrained a resident for an extended period in the memory care unit, leading to disciplinary action and termination. Another allegation regarding staff under the influence was unsubstantiated.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87468.1(a)(3) requires residents to be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other punitive actions. Staff members S4, S5, and S6 restrained a resident for an extended period, violating this right.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 78
Plan of Correction Due Date: Nov 13, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator | Facility administrator named in the report header |
| Janelle Douglas | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Evaluator who conducted the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 76
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Sep 19, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2025-04-25 regarding staff neglect, refund issues, and medication mismanagement at the facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation addressed three allegations: staff neglect leading to resident injury, failure to refund resident according to the Admission Agreement, and mismanagement of resident medication. All allegations were found unsubstantiated after review of records, interviews, and observations.
Findings
The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence. Staff actions and records reviewed did not support claims of neglect, improper refund, or medication mismanagement.
Report Facts
Refund amount: 10081.67
Payment amount: 16998.38
Facility capacity: 80
Resident census: 76
Resident stay duration: 18
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
| Janelle Douglas | Executive Director | Met with evaluator during inspection |
| Vercina Curley | Interim Executive Director | Met with evaluator during inspection |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 76
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Aug 19, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced Required - 1 Year annual inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.
Findings
No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. The facility was found to have appropriate infection control measures, fire safety equipment, and complete client and staff records.
Report Facts
Fire extinguisher service date: 2025
Fire drill date: 2025
Infection control policy last update: 2024
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator/Director | Named as facility administrator/director |
| Vercina Curley | Interim Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analysts during inspection |
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection |
| Kelly Nguyen | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 80
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 7, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that staff were not meeting the resident's medical needs.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleging that staff were not meeting the resident's medical needs was substantiated. Evidence included email correspondence documenting catheter care concerns, interviews with staff and residents, and review of medical records showing inconsistent catheter care and documentation.
Findings
The allegation that staff failed to meet the resident's medical needs was substantiated based on interviews, record reviews, and documentation. The facility did not ensure trained staff were assigned to monitor and manage a resident's catheter as required by the care plan.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87623(b)(2)(A): The licensee failed to ensure trained staff were assigned and available to monitor and manage R1's catheter as required by the care plan. The catheter bag and tubing were not properly managed by facility staff.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 80
Plan of Correction Due Date: Jul 8, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Yvonne Flores-Larios | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 80
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 7, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2025-04-03 regarding resident hygiene and care concerns at Emerald Valley facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that staff were not ensuring the resident was showered, did not ensure clean clothes, were not meeting hygiene needs, and left a resident in soiled clothing for an extended period. All allegations were found unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Findings
The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated after reviewing care plans, staff interviews, resident interviews, progress notes, schedules, and video evidence. Hygiene tasks and clothing changes were documented as regularly performed, and no consistent failure in meeting hygiene needs was found.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 80
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted complaint investigation and delivered findings |
| Yvonne Flores-Larios | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 79
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Jun 6, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by multiple allegations received on 2024-01-12 regarding resident care issues at Emerald Valley facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations including a resident sustaining a pressure injury, unmet wound care needs, inadequate diapering, improper medication assistance, and failure to respond to the resident's call button. The allegation that staff did not provide activities to residents was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation substantiated multiple allegations including a resident sustaining a pressure injury, unmet wound care needs, inadequate diapering, improper medication assistance, and failure to respond to the resident's call button. One allegation regarding lack of activities was unsubstantiated.
Deficiencies (4)
HSC 1569.269(a)(6): Resident sustained pressure injury while in care and staff did not ensure resident's wound care needs were met.
CCR 87625(b)(3): Staff did not meet resident's diapering needs, leaving resident in wet and soiled conditions.
CCR 87465(c)(2): Staff did not ensure proper medication assistance was provided to resident in care.
CCR 87411(a): Staff did not attend to resident's call button in a timely manner.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 79
Civil penalty: 500
Plan of Correction Due Date: Type A deficiency due date 2025-06-10
Plan of Correction Due Date: Type B deficiencies due date 2025-06-13
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Administrator | Met with during inspection and named in report |
| Kelly Nguyen | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 74
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Apr 23, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that a resident was sexually assaulted by staff.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. The allegation involved a sexual assault by staff on a resident. The Department obtained police reports and interviewed involved parties, confirming the incident and resulting in the arrest of the staff member.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that staff member S4 committed sexual battery on resident R1. The Department reviewed police reports and conducted interviews confirming the incident and subsequent custody of S4.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87468.2(a)(8) requires residents to be free from sexual abuse. The licensee did not comply as staff member S4 committed sexual battery on resident R1 and was taken into custody.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 74
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Kelly Nguyen | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Census: 72
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Aug 2, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced Case Management inspection regarding an incident reported on 06/19/2024 involving an altercation between two residents.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a reported incident involving an altercation between residents R1 and R2. Staff intervened promptly and no further issues were noted.
Findings
Staff intervened immediately to separate the residents involved in the altercation. No deficiencies were issued during the visit.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit. |
| Lori Alexander-Washington | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the unannounced Case Management visit. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Aug 2, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced Case Management inspection regarding an incident reported on 06/17/2024 involving a resident found outside the facility lying face down in a bush.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated based on the incident where resident R1 was found outside the facility unsupervised and the failure to report the incident within 24 hours.
Findings
The facility failed to provide sufficient supervision which posed a potential health and safety risk. Additionally, the facility did not report the incident to the Community Care Licensing Division within 24 hours as required.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87468.2(a)(4) requires care and supervision by qualified staff sufficient to meet individual needs. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision, posing a potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87211(a)(2) requires occurrences threatening resident welfare to be reported within 24 hours. The facility failed to report the incident within the required timeframe.
Report Facts
Census: 72
Total Capacity: 80
Plan of Correction Due Date: Aug 9, 2024
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Met during inspection and named in the report |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 26, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced 1-Year Annual Required inspection conducted to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.
Findings
The facility was toured and various safety and operational aspects were reviewed, including resident apartments, safety equipment, emergency plans, and records. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.
Report Facts
Residents records reviewed: 6
Staff records reviewed: 6
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection |
| Ardalan Gharachorloo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection visit |
| Yvonne Flores-Larios | Supervisor | Supervisor of the licensing evaluation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 54
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jan 16, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a result of a priority 1 complaint to perform a health and safety check at the facility.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a priority 1 complaint. The complaint was substantiated by the finding of hot water temperatures exceeding regulatory limits.
Findings
The facility was toured and found to have adequate food supplies, proper medication storage, and functioning safety equipment. However, a Type A deficiency was cited due to hot water temperatures in five resident rooms exceeding 121 degrees Fahrenheit.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87303(e)(2) Maintenance and Operation. Hot water provided for the use of residents shall be maintained between 105 and 120 degrees F. Five residents’ room temperatures were measured above 121 degrees F.
Report Facts
Residents with hot water temperature above limit: 5
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa K Espinoza | Administrator | Facility Administrator mentioned in the report. |
| Brandie Barrios | Connections For Living Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and participated in exit interview. |
| Kelly Nguyen | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and authored the report. |
| Bennett Fong | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 53
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Dec 5, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced 1-Year Annual Required inspection conducted by the Licensing Program Analyst to evaluate facility compliance.
Findings
The annual inspection was incomplete and will be completed at a later date. No deficiencies were cited during this visit.
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 46
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 31, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 01/30/2023 regarding resident injuries, supervision, access to incident reports, and timely medical attention.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that a resident sustained multiple injuries from a fall, staff did not provide adequate supervision during transport, staff denied an authorized representative access to an incident report, and staff did not seek timely medical attention. All allegations were found unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated after interviews and record reviews. The resident's fall and injuries were not due to neglect or lack of supervision, and staff actions regarding supervision, incident report access, and medical attention were appropriate.
Report Facts
Capacity: 80
Census: 46
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marissa Espinoza | Administrator | Met with during investigation and named in report |
| Kelly Nguyen | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 38
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Apr 19, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was conducted as a result of a priority 2 complaint to perform a health and safety check at the facility.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a priority 2 complaint. No deficiencies were found and no citations were issued.
Findings
The facility was toured including resident bedrooms, bathrooms, common areas, kitchen, and outdoor area. No deficiencies were cited; all safety and health measures such as temperature controls, food supplies, medication security, and safety equipment were found to be adequate.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 80
Resident Census: 38
Facility Temperature: 73
Hot Water Temperature: 119
Refrigerator Temperature: 31
Freezer Temperature: -2
Non-perishable Food Supply: 7
Perishable Food Supply: 2
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Elisa Graber | Director of Sales | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection and signed the report |
| Marissa Espinoza | Executive Director | Facility administrator not available during inspection but was informed of the visit |
Inspection Report
Original Licensing
Census: 37
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 22, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced pre-licensing visit due to a change of ownership at the facility.
Findings
No issues were noted during the inspection. The facility was found ready to be licensed, subject to final approval by the Central Applications Unit.
Inspection Report
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 22, 2022
Visit Reason
The visit was a Case Management - Other type, involving a face-to-face Component III presentation with the Executive Director to discuss regulations and facility management.
Findings
Licensing Program Analysts presented Component III regulations via a PowerPoint and observed that the participant gained knowledge about running and maintaining the facility in accordance with regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Coons | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analysts during Component III presentation. |
Inspection Report
Capacity: 80
Deficiencies: 0
Date: May 17, 2022
Visit Reason
The visit was an office evaluation related to a change of ownership (CHOW) application for the facility.
Findings
The applicant/administrator successfully completed Component II via telephone call, confirming understanding of facility operation, staff qualifications, program policies, and application document requirements. Technical assistance and document review were provided with no deficiencies noted.
Report
January 30, 2026
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



