Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (72% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 2 - 3 months.
Owned by Dr. Melissa Ake, Fountain View of Monroe is a 119-bed nursing home in Monroe, Michigan, in the Frenchtown Charter Township area, not far from a nearby hospital. The community offers skilled nursing, hospice, palliative, and respite care. It combines long-term nursing care with rehabilitation for residents recovering from an illness, surgery, or hospital stay.
Residents receive an average of about 3 hours and 44 minutes of total nursing care each day from registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants. Nursing staff also provide support 24 hours a day. The facility is close to full occupancy. The average length of stay is about 58 days, which is a mix of short-term rehabilitation and longer-term nursing care. Fountain View of Monroe accepts Medicare and private pay.
Residents have access to on-site dental care, laboratory and radiology services, pharmacy services, podiatry, pain management, and advanced wound care. Hospice and palliative care are also available. The community has shared dining areas, an ice cream parlor, a library, and a salon and barbershop. A resident council meets regularly to provide feedback on community policies and daily life.
The area has a Walk Score of 32 out of 100. A handful of nearby destinations may be within walking distance, but most errands and appointments require a car. Families considering Fountain View of Monroe should ask how rehabilitation and therapy schedules are tailored to each resident’s care needs.
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Total hours from contractors
5,071 contractor hours this quarter
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 65 | 0 | 65 | 17,867 | 92 | 100% | 6.8 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 34 | 0 | 34 | 10,135 | 92 | 100% | 8.7 |
| Registered Nurse | 23 | 0 | 23 | 5,807 | 92 | 100% | 9 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 8 | 0 | 8 | 2,500 | 92 | 100% | 7.1 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1,614 | 72 | 78% | 8.5 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 0 | 4 | 4 | 1,362 | 71 | 77% | 7.4 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 0 | 7 | 7 | 1,127 | 82 | 89% | 6.5 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1,100 | 85 | 92% | 7.2 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 4 | 0 | 4 | 833 | 61 | 66% | 7.6 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 0 | 4 | 4 | 785 | 82 | 89% | 6.4 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 3 | 0 | 3 | 634 | 59 | 64% | 7.9 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 577 | 66 | 72% | 8.5 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 0 | 3 | 3 | 543 | 79 | 86% | 5.4 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 488 | 61 | 66% | 8 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 488 | 61 | 66% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 466 | 55 | 60% | 8.5 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 448 | 56 | 61% | 8 |
| Dental Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 295 | 38 | 41% | 7.5 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 92 | 48 | 52% | 1.9 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 14 | 15% | 2.1 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
28% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
72% of new residents, often for short stays.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Historical financial and operational data for Fountain View of Monroe from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (72% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 2 - 3 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Monroe's city center to Fountain View of Monroe's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 14.96 miles to nearest hospital (Oakwood Southshore Medical Center Pth)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MI Licensing & Regulatory Affairs (LARA), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Michigan average is: 59.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medilodge of Monroe | NH PC RC SNF | Monroe | 103
Facility
103
MI AVG
74
Rank
#111 / 428 |
88.3%
Facility
88.3%
MI AVG
76.7%
Rank
#41 / 105 | +15% | 3.86
Facility
3.86
MI AVG
4.30
Rank
#76 / 129 | -34% | -10% | $0
Facility
$0
MI AVG
$87.6k
Rank
#1 / 129 | 7
Facility
7
MI AVG
33.5
Rank
#6 / 128 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
MI AVG
5.2
Rank
#3 / 128 | 1 | 91 | A+ |
72
Facility
72
MI AVG
40
Rank
#63 / 674 | - | $11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
$13.2M
Rank
#65 / 120 | $5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
$7.7M
Rank
#81 / 120 | 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
59.2%
Rank
#83 / 120 | 235563 | ||||
| Fountain View of Monroe | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Monroe (Frenchtown Charter Township) | 119
Facility
119
MI AVG
74
Rank
#78 / 428 |
93.4%
Facility
93.4%
MI AVG
76.7%
Rank
#24 / 105 | +22% | 3.73
Facility
3.73
MI AVG
4.30
Rank
#97 / 129 | +28% | -13% | $0
Facility
$0
MI AVG
$87.6k
Rank
#1 / 129 | 6
Facility
6
MI AVG
33.5
Rank
#4 / 128 | 2.0
Facility
2.0
MI AVG
5.2
Rank
#5 / 128 | - | 111 | - |
32
Facility
32
MI AVG
40
Rank
#412 / 674 | Dr. Melissa Ake | $16.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
$13.2M
Rank
#32 / 120 | $7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
$7.7M
Rank
#46 / 120 | 47.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
47.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
59.2%
Rank
#110 / 120 | 235225 | ||||
| Monroe Springs Rehab and Nursing Center | NH SNF | Monroe (Frenchtown Charter Township) | 89
Facility
89
MI AVG
74
Rank
#161 / 428 |
92.6%
Facility
92.6%
MI AVG
76.7%
Rank
#31 / 105 | +21% | 3.60
Facility
3.60
MI AVG
4.30
Rank
#105 / 129 | -15% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
MI AVG
$87.6k
Rank
#1 / 129 | 11
Facility
11
MI AVG
33.5
Rank
#15 / 128 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
MI AVG
5.2
Rank
#36 / 128 | - | 82 | - |
32
Facility
32
MI AVG
40
Rank
#412 / 674 | Gail Saba | $9.6M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $5.2M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 53.7%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 235520 | ||||
| Seacrest Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH HOS MC RC SNF | Monroe (Frenchtown Charter Township) | 131
Facility
131
MI AVG
74
Rank
#54 / 428 |
75.9%
Facility
75.9%
MI AVG
76.7%
Rank
#65 / 105 | -1% | 3.81
Facility
3.81
MI AVG
4.30
Rank
#91 / 129 | -49% | -11% | $0
Facility
$0
MI AVG
$87.6k
Rank
#1 / 129 | 17
Facility
17
MI AVG
33.5
Rank
#29 / 128 | 4.3
Facility
4.3
MI AVG
5.2
Rank
#48 / 128 | - | 99 | - |
53
Facility
53
MI AVG
40
Rank
#189 / 674 | Renewal Healthcare LLC | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
$13.2M
Rank
#109 / 120 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
$7.7M
Rank
#104 / 120 | 65.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
65.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MI AVG
59.2%
Rank
#24 / 120 | 235232 |
Fountain View of Monroe is located in Monroe, Michigan.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Michigan.
Fountain View of Monroe is in the Frenchtown Charter Township neighborhood of Monroe.
Fountain View of Monroe has a walk score of 32. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Fountain View of Monroe's occupancy is 90.9%.
No, Fountain View of Monroe has a no-pet policy.
Fountain View of Monroe is registered as a for-profit.
Yes — there are 3 photos of Fountain View of Monroe in the photo gallery on this page.
Fountain View of Monroe is located at 1971 N Monroe St, Monroe, MI 48162.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance