Inspection Reports for
Hope House LLC

The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, including proper maintenance of resident rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, medication storage, fire safety equipment, and infection control practices. No deficiencies or citations were observed during the inspection.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The facility was toured with the administrator and an exit interview was conducted.

A tour of the facility was conducted with the administrator Amber Coxsom, and no deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The facility was found to be in full compliance with no deficiencies observed. All areas including resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, and safety equipment were inspected and met regulatory standards.

The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations. No deficiencies were observed during the inspection. The facility environment, safety equipment, and resident accommodations met required standards.

The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, including proper maintenance of medication records, infection control practices, and safety equipment. No deficiencies or citations were issued during this inspection.

The facility was found to be in compliance with all regulations, including proper maintenance of resident rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, medication storage, fire safety equipment, and infection control practices. No deficiencies were observed during the inspection.

The complaint alleged that the facility forced a resident to choose another hospice agency. Interviews with the resident's son, staff, and review of records showed that the resident's family voluntarily switched hospice providers due to service issues with the original provider. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

Based on interviews with staff, witness, and records reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. The complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated with no evidence found to support the claim.

Allegation: Facility forced resident into choosing another hospice agency. The investigation included interviews with the resident's son, facility staff, and review of records. It was found that the resident's hospice care was switched due to the original hospice not showing up on admission day, but the facility did not force the switch. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

Based on interviews with staff, witness, and records reviewed, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation. The complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated with no evidence found to support the claim.

The complaint alleged inadequate supervision of residents and staff intoxication while caring for residents. The investigation included interviews with the administrator, staff, residents, and witnesses, as well as review of surveillance video. The findings were unsubstantiated.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Interviews and surveillance video showed that residents' needs were met, no staff were intoxicated while working, and no unauthorized persons entered the facility after hours. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged inadequate supervision and staff intoxication. The investigation included interviews with the administrator, staff, residents, and witnesses, as well as review of surveillance video. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Surveillance video and interviews with staff, residents, and witnesses confirmed that residents' needs were met and no staff were intoxicated or failed to provide adequate supervision.

The facility was found to be in good condition with all bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, and safety equipment meeting requirements. No deficiencies or advisory notes were observed during the inspection.

The facility was found to be in good condition with all bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas meeting required standards. Safety features such as smoke detectors, fire extinguishers, sprinklers, and emergency plans were in place and functional. Infection control measures and medication storage protocols were observed and found adequate. No advisory notes were issued.

The applicant/administrator demonstrated understanding of licensing laws, facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness. No clients were present at the time of the visit.

Applicant/administrator demonstrated understanding of licensing laws, facility operation, admission policies, staffing, health conditions, emergency preparedness, complaints reporting, and pre-licensing readiness. Signed documentation and photo ID were obtained.