Inspection Reports for
Ivy Park at Walnut Creek

The complaint alleged that facility staff did not meet the care needs of the residents. The investigation found that staff provided appropriate care, including repositioning and incontinence care, and used safe transfer techniques. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, witnesses, and review of relevant documents. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence, and no deficiencies were cited.

The complaint alleged staff did not properly assess Resident R1, did not prevent Resident R1 from wandering from the facility, and did not provide adequate care and supervision to Resident R1. After interviews and review of records, all allegations were found unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that staff properly assessed the resident, prevented the resident from wandering outside the facility without supervision, and provided adequate care and supervision. Therefore, the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint alleged staff did not properly assess Resident R1, did not prevent Resident R1 from wandering from the facility, and did not provide adequate care and supervision to Resident R1. After interviews and review of records, the allegations were found unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that staff properly assessed the resident, prevented the resident from wandering outside the facility unattended, and provided adequate care and supervision. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded based on interviews with witnesses and the Executive Director, as well as record reviews. The allegations were determined to be false or without reasonable basis.

The investigation found that the allegations were not supported by the data collected. Interviews and record reviews showed that the resident was allowed to participate in care decisions, copies of records were provided when requested properly, and personal items were safeguarded. Therefore, the allegations were determined to be unfounded.

The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded. Allegations included staff not allowing resident participation in care decisions, not providing copies of records, and not safeguarding personal items. The data collected did not support any of these allegations.

The investigation found that the allegations were not supported by the data collected and were determined to be unfounded. Interviews and record reviews showed no evidence of the alleged issues.

The facility was inspected inside and outside with no obstructions found. Safety measures such as temperature control, food storage, sharps storage, and fire safety equipment were all in compliance. Records for residents and staff were complete and no citations were issued.

The facility was inspected inside and outside with no obstructions found. Safety measures such as temperature control, lighting, food storage, and fire safety equipment were all in compliance. Records for residents and staff were complete, and no citations were issued.

The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. Allegations included staff not ensuring resident use of medical devices and failure to obtain resident appraisal before admittance. Documentation and interviews did not confirm these allegations.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to confirm the allegations. Interviews and documentation review showed the resident was admitted without a hearing aid and did not require one, and the preadmission appraisal was appropriately completed. Therefore, the allegations were unsubstantiated.

The complaint was unsubstantiated based on interviews with witnesses, the resident, and the Executive Director, as well as review of medical and preadmission documentation.

The investigation found no evidence to confirm the allegations. Interviews and documentation review showed the resident did not require a hearing aid and had a preadmission appraisal indicating lack of capacity for informed medical decisions. Therefore, the allegations were unsubstantiated.

The inspection found that although Resident R1 wore a WanderGuard and staff responded quickly, R1 eloped due to being a very fast walker. No citations were issued during this visit. Plans were made for R1 to move to a memory care unit in a different facility due to the risk of future elopement.

The inspection involved interviews with the Executive Director and Health Service Director regarding the elopement incident. No citations were issued during the visit, and it was noted that R1 will be moving to a memory care unit in a different facility due to the risk of future elopement.

The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure residents had hot water while in care. The complaint was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove them; therefore, the allegations were unsubstantiated. The facility had been informed of the plumbing problem on 4/25/2024, repairs were approved on 4/26/2024, and alternative shower locations were provided to residents during the repair period.

The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure residents had hot water while in care. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation.

The investigation found that although the allegation may have happened or be valid, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove it; therefore, the allegation was unsubstantiated. The facility had addressed the plumbing issue promptly and provided alternative shower locations and compensation to residents during the repair period.

The facility was found to be appropriately furnished, well maintained, and compliant with safety and care standards. The inspection included checks of equipment, food supplies, safety devices, and posted notices. The facility passed the pre-licensing inspection.

The facility was found to be appropriately furnished, well maintained, and compliant with safety and care standards. No deficiencies were noted, and the facility passed the pre-licensing inspection.