Inspection Reports for
La Estancia Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
15810 S 42nd St, Phoenix, AZ 85048, United States, AZ, 85048
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 5 years)
Deficiencies (over 5 years)
9.2 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory findings recorded during state inspections.
149% worse than Arizona average
Arizona average: 3.7 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
24
18
12
6
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
46% occupied
Based on a August 2023 inspection.
This facility has shown a decline in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Aug 8, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint regarding the facility's failure to send required notices of transfer or discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for several residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that the facility did not send discharge notices to the Ombudsman for seven months, including for residents discharged against medical advice. The Ombudsman confirmed not receiving notices except for December and November 2024. Multiple staff interviews revealed case manager turnover and lack of notification, posing risks of unsafe discharges and lack of resident advocacy.
Findings
The facility failed to send discharge or transfer notices to the Ombudsman for 3 sampled residents, potentially preventing residents from accessing advocacy services. Interviews and record reviews confirmed multiple case manager turnovers and lapses in sending required notifications over several months.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 of 3 sampled residents.
Report Facts
Number of residents sampled: 3
Number of residents cited: 3
Total discharges: 245
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #59 | Case Manager | Interviewed regarding discharge notice process and admitted recent sending of notices after months of no notification |
| Staff #152 | Social Service Director | Interviewed about responsibilities including sending discharge notices to Ombudsman and risks of not sending |
| Staff #109 | Unit Manager/Infection Preventionist | Covered case management temporarily and admitted failure to send discharge notices |
| Staff #66 | Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed about discharge notification process and case manager turnover |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 3
Date: Mar 5, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to implement abuse policies and timely report and investigate a major injury sustained by a resident (#5).
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on the failure to implement abuse policies, failure to report a major injury to the State Agency, and failure to investigate the injury thoroughly. The resident (#5) sustained a left periprosthetic femur fracture and a right hip fracture after a fall. Staff interviews revealed the injury was unwitnessed and not reported to the state. The facility's investigation was limited to speaking with the nurse who found the resident. The resident was on palliative care and had been denied therapy at multiple facilities.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure implementation of abuse policies related to a major injury sustained by resident #5, failed to report the injury to the State Agency, and did not thoroughly investigate the incident. The resident sustained fractures after a fall, and staff concluded the fall was unwitnessed and did not report it as required.
Deficiencies (3)
Failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Failed to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Failed to respond appropriately to all alleged violations by not thoroughly investigating a major injury sustained by a resident.
Report Facts
Residents Affected: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #20 | Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding the fall and injury of resident #5 and the facility's investigation and reporting practices. |
| Staff #50 | Assistant Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding resident #5's discharge, therapy denial, and care status. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 6
Date: Feb 29, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate multiple complaints including failure to notify resident representatives of condition changes, failure to protect residents from abuse, failure to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and misappropriation of narcotics, inadequate provision of activities of daily living care, failure to provide appropriate pressure ulcer care, and failure to implement infection prevention and control practices.
Complaint Details
The investigation was complaint-driven, triggered by allegations of failure to notify representatives, abuse incidents, failure to investigate abuse and narcotic misappropriation, inadequate ADL care, pressure ulcer care deficiencies, and infection control lapses. Substantiation status is not explicitly stated.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to notify resident representatives of significant condition changes, failure to protect residents from physical and verbal abuse by other residents, failure to thoroughly investigate abuse and narcotic misappropriation allegations, inadequate assistance with activities of daily living for some residents, failure to provide ordered wound care treatments, and failure to implement proper infection control precautions for a resident with C-diff infection.
Deficiencies (6)
Failed to ensure resident representatives were notified of significant changes in condition for one resident (#120).
Failed to protect residents (#128, #161, #15, #14) from abuse by other residents (#15, #11, #17).
Failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for residents (#174, #125) and misappropriation of narcotics for residents (#134, #135, #136).
Failed to adequately provide activities of daily living care for residents (#127 and #137).
Failed to provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing for resident (#171).
Failed to implement infection prevention and control practices related to C-diff precautions for resident (#123).
Report Facts
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 4
Residents affected: 2
Residents affected: 3
Residents affected: 2
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 1
BIMS score: 4
BIMS score: 15
BIMS score: 14
BIMS score: 9
Braden scale score: 12
Dates of wound care orders: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #5 | Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) | Interviewed regarding notification of change in resident condition |
| Staff #69 | Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed regarding notification policies, abuse reporting, wound care, and missing investigation reports |
| Staff #106 | Administrator | Interviewed regarding abuse investigations and missing documentation |
| Staff #12 | Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) | Witnessed resident #15 pulling feeding tube and yelling |
| Staff #29 | Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) | Witnessed resident #15 pulling feeding tube and yelling |
| Staff #46 | Wound Care Nurse | Interviewed regarding wound care procedures and responsibilities |
Inspection Report
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Aug 3, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess the facility's compliance with regulatory requirements regarding addressing residents' needs and preferences, specifically focusing on the case of resident #72 and his wheelchair.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure that resident #72's needs and preferences regarding his wheelchair were adequately addressed. The resident arrived without his electric wheelchair, experienced delays in receiving it, and refused to eat until it was delivered and repaired. The facility provided a regular wheelchair but lacked documentation on the receipt and handling of the electric wheelchair. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent knowledge and documentation about the wheelchair issue.
Deficiencies (1)
Failed to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of resident #72 regarding his wheelchair.
Report Facts
Residents sampled: 18
Residents affected: 1
Dates referenced: 2023
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #204 | Social Worker | Contacted previous facility regarding resident #72's belongings |
| Staff #38 | Social Services Specialist | Spoke to resident #72 about his wheelchair and contacted previous facility |
| Staff #202 | Interim Social Services Director | Reviewed resident #72's files and discussed delays in obtaining wheelchair |
| Staff #21 | Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) | Discussed inventory process and wheelchair provision for resident #72 |
| Staff #79 | Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) | Provided information about resident #72's wheelchair status and eating behavior |
| Staff #34 | Director of Nursing (DON) | Discussed resident #72's wheelchair issue and facility responsibilities |
Inspection Report
Routine
Census: 89
Deficiencies: 14
Date: Aug 3, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a routine regulatory survey to assess compliance with healthcare facility standards, including resident care, medication administration, infection control, and facility safety.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to reasonably accommodate resident needs (wheelchair issue), medication administration errors, inadequate ADL care, insufficient activity offerings, inconsistent wound care, hydration monitoring deficiencies, pharmaceutical service lapses, medication labeling issues, expired glucometer controls, unsafe food storage and sanitation, and infection prevention and control program deficiencies.
Deficiencies (14)
Failure to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of resident #72 regarding his wheelchair.
Failure to ensure medications were administered as ordered, including incorrect nasal spray dosing and oral administration of medication ordered via g-tube.
Medications left unattended on the floor and at bedside, risking missed doses or overdose.
Failure to provide consistent ADL care to resident #40, including assistance to get out of bed.
Failure to consistently offer individualized activities to resident #40.
Inconsistent wound care treatments and documentation for resident #82 with multiple pressure ulcers.
Failure to ensure adequate hydration care and documentation for resident #62, with many undocumented fluid intakes and lack of routine offering of fluids.
Failure to ensure accurate reconciliation and accounting for controlled substances, including missing two-nurse signatures on narcotic verification sheets.
Failure to ensure medications were properly labeled and expired multi-use insulin vials were discarded.
Expired glucometer control solutions were available for use, risking inaccurate blood glucose readings.
Unsafe and unsanitary kitchen conditions including dusty ventilation exhausts and improperly stored and unlabeled food items in nourishment refrigerators.
Failure to maintain infection prevention and control during wound treatment for resident #82, including improper glove use and contamination of bandage scissors.
Infection Preventionist had not completed required specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control until the day of the survey.
Failure to appropriately monitor and re-evaluate PRN psychotropic medication use for resident #20, with continued use beyond recommended 14 days without proper review.
Report Facts
Facility census: 89
Sample size: 18
Days without two-nurse narcotic reconciliation: 2
Days with no wound treatment documentation: 5
Days with no documented fluid intake: 37
Days with no documented fluid intake: 47
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Social Services Specialist | Staff #38 involved in wheelchair issue for resident #72 | |
| Interim Social Services Director | Staff #202 interviewed regarding wheelchair and activity issues | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | Staff #21 interviewed regarding inventory and wheelchair issues | |
| Certified Nursing Assistant | Staff #79 interviewed regarding wheelchair and medication issues | |
| Director of Nursing | Staff #34 interviewed regarding multiple findings including medication, wheelchair, hydration, and infection control | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | Staff #29 observed and interviewed regarding medication administration errors | |
| Registered Nurse | Staff #81 observed and interviewed regarding medication storage and narcotic reconciliation | |
| Activity Director | Staff #50 interviewed regarding activity participation documentation | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | Staff #3 observed providing wound care and interviewed regarding infection control practices | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse Charge Nurse | Staff #61 interviewed regarding medication labeling and glucometer control issues | |
| Infection Preventionist | Staff #35 interviewed regarding infection prevention training | |
| Food Service Director | Staff #205 interviewed regarding kitchen sanitation and food storage |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Aug 3, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint regarding the facility's failure to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of resident #72, specifically related to the delay in obtaining and providing his electric wheelchair.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found that resident #72 did not have his electric wheelchair upon admission, leading to delays in obtaining it. The resident refused to eat until the wheelchair was delivered and repaired. The facility was aware but documentation and follow-up were inadequate. Staff interviews indicated delays and lack of clear communication regarding the wheelchair status.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure that resident #72's needs and preferences were addressed concerning his wheelchair. The resident arrived without his electric wheelchair, experienced delays in receiving it, and subsequently refused to eat until the wheelchair was delivered and repaired. The facility provided a regular wheelchair temporarily but lacked documentation on the receipt of the electric wheelchair. Staff interviews revealed inconsistent knowledge and documentation about the wheelchair issue.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of resident #72 regarding his electric wheelchair.
Report Facts
Residents sampled: 18
Residents affected: 1
Date survey completed: Aug 3, 2023
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #204 | Social Worker | Contacted previous facility regarding resident's belongings and wheelchair |
| Staff #38 | Social Services Specialist | Spoke to resident #72 about wheelchair and contacted previous facility |
| Staff #202 | Interim Social Services Director | Reviewed resident files and discussed wheelchair issue and delays |
| Staff #21 | Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) | Provided information about inventory process and wheelchair provision |
| Staff #79 | Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) | Reported resident #72 did not have electric wheelchair on arrival and received it later |
| Staff #34 | Director of Nursing (DON) | Discussed resident's wheelchair delay, repair, and facility responsibilities |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 5, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to concerns regarding the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and safety measures for a resident (#2) assessed as an elopement risk, following multiple elopement incidents.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on resident #2's multiple elopements and the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring. The resident was found outside the facility multiple times, with the wander guard failing to alarm. The investigation included staff interviews and review of clinical records, revealing lack of physician order for the wander guard and incomplete documentation.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for resident #2, who was an elopement risk and eloped multiple times. The wander guard device did not alarm during elopements, and there was no physician order for the wander guard, resulting in lack of proper documentation and monitoring. Despite interventions, increased supervision was not evidenced in the clinical record.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to provide adequate supervision and safety measures for a resident assessed as an elopement risk, resulting in multiple elopements without proper monitoring.
Report Facts
Wander guard testing dates: 7
Staff involved in resident return: 4
Monitoring duration: 72
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed regarding wander guard testing, documentation, and expectations for resident safety |
| Unit Manager | Unit Manager | Interviewed about wander guard checking and clinical record review for resident #2 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) | Interviewed about wander guard checks, elopement drills, and resident #2's behavior |
| Certified Nurse Assistant | Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) | Interviewed about wander guard testing responsibilities and resident #2's condition after elopement |
Inspection Report
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 5, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with safety protocols related to resident elopement risk, specifically focusing on a resident (#2) assessed as an elopement risk who had multiple elopement incidents.
Findings
The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for a resident at risk of elopement, including lack of physician order for wander guard use, incomplete documentation of wander guard checks, and insufficient increased supervision despite multiple elopements. Testing of wander guards was limited to only two doors, and the resident's wander guard did not alarm during elopement incidents.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to provide adequate supervision and monitoring for a resident assessed as an elopement risk, resulting in multiple elopements without increased supervision.
Report Facts
Wander guard testing dates: 7
Staff involved in resident return: 4
Monitoring frequency: 72
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Interviewed regarding wander guard testing, documentation, and elopement risk protocols |
| Unit Manager | Unit Manager | Interviewed about wander guard checking and clinical record review |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | Licensed Practical Nurse (staff #8) | Interviewed about wander guard checks and elopement drills |
| Certified Nurse Assistant | Certified Nurse Assistant (staff #67) | Interviewed about wander guard testing responsibility and resident condition after elopement |
Inspection Report
Routine
Census: 102
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jun 15, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess whether the facility maintained adequate nursing staff levels to meet the needs of residents, based on staffing documentation, facility assessment, and staff interviews.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure adequate staffing was maintained, with documented instances of registered nurse (RN), licensed practical nurse (LPN), and certified nursing assistant (CNA) staffing below required levels on multiple dates in December 2022 and February 2023. Interviews confirmed occasional understaffing, which could impact resident care and quality of life.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Report Facts
Average daily census: 100
Average daily census: 101
Average daily census: 102
Dates RN staffing below 0.24 PPD: 10
Dates LPN staffing below 0.95 PPD: 5
Dates CNA staffing below 1.80 PPD: 12
Dates RN staffing below 0.24 PPD: 8
Dates CNA staffing below 1.80 PPD: 8
Overtime shifts worked by CNA: 4
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #78 | Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) | Provided information about staffing levels and overtime work during phone interview on June 15, 2023 |
| Staff #88 | Staffing Coordinator/Unit Manager | Provided staffing details and policies during phone interview on June 15, 2023 |
| Staff #82 | Director of Nursing (DON) | Provided statements about staffing criteria and consequences of inadequate staffing during interview on June 15, 2023 |
Inspection Report
Census: 102
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jun 15, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess whether the facility maintained adequate nursing staff levels to meet the needs of residents as required by the facility assessment and staffing policies.
Findings
The facility failed to maintain adequate staffing levels for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nursing assistants on multiple dates in December 2022 and February 2023, which could result in necessary services not being provided to residents. Interviews with staff confirmed staffing shortages on some shifts.
Deficiencies (1)
Failed to provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Report Facts
Average daily census: 100
Average daily census: 101
Average daily census: 102
RN staffing below required hours: 10
LPN staffing below required hours: 5
CNA staffing below required hours: 12
RN staffing below required hours: 8
CNA staffing below required hours: 8
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CNA (staff #78) | Provided interview about staffing shortages and working overtime | |
| Staffing coordinator/unit manager (staff #88) | Provided interview about staffing patterns and requirements | |
| Director of Nursing (DON/staff #82) | Provided interview about staffing levels and consequences of inadequate staffing |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Mar 21, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse involving resident #30 to the State Agency within the required timeframe.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved an allegation of sexual abuse made by resident #30 on February 22, 2023. The facility was aware of the allegation on that date but did not report it to the State Agency until March 3, 2023, approximately 8 days later. The allegation was substantiated as the facility acknowledged the late reporting.
Findings
The facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency within the mandated timeframe, resulting in a delay of approximately 8 days. The investigation included review of records, staff interviews, and facility policies, confirming the late reporting and potential risk to resident safety.
Deficiencies (1)
Failure to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Report Facts
Days late reporting abuse allegation: 8
Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score: 8
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Social Services (SS) | Staff #20 involved in documenting the allegation and reporting process | |
| Nurse Practitioner (NP) | Staff #25 involved in gathering information about the allegation | |
| Director of Nursing (DON) | Staff #15 referenced in the reporting process | |
| Executive Director (ED) | Staff #10 interviewed regarding the late reporting |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 11
Date: Jun 10, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was a routine survey to assess compliance with regulatory requirements including resident care, safety, and facility operations.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to fully inform residents about psychotropic medications, inadequate housekeeping services, delayed abuse reporting, inaccurate resident assessments, failure to coordinate PASRR screenings, inadequate assistance with activities of daily living, insufficient wound care and skin assessments, failure to provide appropriate range of motion care, failure to conduct bladder training for a resident with an indwelling catheter, and insufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs.
Deficiencies (11)
Failure to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications prior to administration.
Failure to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe and clean environment for residents.
Failure to timely report allegations of abuse and report investigation results to the State Agency.
Failure to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents.
Failure to coordinate PASRR screenings and referrals for residents with serious mental illness.
Failure to provide adequate assistance with activities of daily living including bathing and hygiene.
Failure to provide appropriate wound care and skin assessments, resulting in delayed treatment and healing.
Failure to provide appropriate care to maintain or improve range of motion and use of orthotic devices.
Failure to conduct bladder training and discontinue Foley catheter as ordered.
Failure to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs.
Failure to maintain accurate resident medical records regarding advance directives.
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 11
Facility licensed capacity: 192
Average daily census: 80
Staffing PPD RN: 0.24
Staffing PPD LPN: 0.95
Staffing PPD CNA: 1.8
Staffing PPD CNA May 9, 2022: 2.17
Staffing PPD Nursing May 9, 2022: 1.43
Staffing PPD CNA May 11, 2022: 2.42
Staffing PPD Nursing May 11, 2022: 1.51
Staffing PPD CNA May 21, 2022: 1.6
Staffing PPD Nursing May 21, 2022: 1.75
Staffing PPD CNA May 27, 2022: 1.77
Staffing PPD Nursing May 27, 2022: 1.58
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Staff #86 | Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding psychotropic medication informed consent, abuse reporting, wound care, bladder training, and advance directives |
| Staff #19 | Assistant Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding psychotropic medication informed consent, abuse reporting, wound care, range of motion care, bladder training, and staffing |
| Staff #81 | Administrator/Executive Director | Interviewed regarding abuse reporting, PASRR screening, bladder training, and staffing |
| Staff #83 | Occupational Therapist | Interviewed regarding range of motion care and orthotic use |
| Staff #58 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Interviewed regarding bathing care and staffing |
| Staff #47 | Unit Manager | Interviewed regarding wound care and skin assessments |
| Staff #3 | Staffing Coordinator | Interviewed regarding staffing schedules and challenges |
| Staff #66 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Interviewed regarding orthotic use and skin checks |
| Staff #32 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed regarding skin checks and wound care |
| Staff #9 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Interviewed regarding abuse investigation and bathing care |
| Staff #10 | MDS Nurse | Interviewed regarding MDS assessment accuracy |
| Staff #45 | Social Worker | Interviewed regarding PASRR screening |
Inspection Report
Routine
Census: 108
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Feb 27, 2020
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident assessments, wound care, safety, and food handling at the nursing home.
Findings
The facility was found deficient in ensuring accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, timely wound treatment per physician orders, safe smoking assessments and supervision, proper wheelchair positioning, and safe food handling practices including avoiding bare hand contact and maintaining clean kitchen air vents and ceiling tiles.
Deficiencies (4)
Failed to ensure that a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the discharge status for one resident (#107).
Failed to ensure wound treatments were completed per physician's order for one resident (#406), resulting in delayed wound healing.
Failed to ensure timely and accurate assessment for safe smoking for one resident (#99) and failed to provide adequate and safe positioning while propelling a wheelchair for one resident (#101).
Failed to ensure bare hand contact was not used when handling ready-to-eat food and failed to ensure ceiling air vents and tiles above the food trayline were clean.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 2
Residents affected: 108
Sample size: 23
Sample size: 5
Number of meal trays observed: 5
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MDS Coordinator (staff #170) | Interviewed regarding MDS assessment accuracy for resident #107 | |
| Director of Nursing (DON/staff #33) | Interviewed regarding expectations for MDS accuracy, wound care, smoking assessments, and wheelchair safety | |
| Admission nurse (staff #175) | Interviewed regarding wound treatment orders and admission audits for resident #406 | |
| Corporate nurse (staff #174) | Interviewed regarding wound treatment order entry and wheelchair policy | |
| Staff member (staff #25) | Observed assisting resident #99 with smoking and retrieving dropped cigarettes | |
| Activities staff member (staff #138) | Interviewed regarding supervision of smoking residents and wheelchair assistance | |
| Cook (staff #62) | Observed using bare hand contact when handling ready-to-eat food | |
| Dietary manager (staff #136) | Interviewed regarding food handling practices and kitchen cleanliness |
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



