Deficiencies (last 6 years)
Deficiencies (over 6 years)
11.5 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
188% worse than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
20
15
10
5
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
75% occupied
Based on a February 2026 inspection.
This facility has shown a decline in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 8
Date: Feb 27, 2026
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced Annual Continuation visit to review staff and resident records and issue citations observed during a prior visit.
Complaint Details
There is an open complaint investigation (#28-AS-20260211084916) related to ceiling damage in rooms 112 and 204 and missing service plans in resident files.
Findings
The facility was found to have several deficiencies including unlocked hazardous items in the Memory Care Unit, missing mattress pads in multiple resident rooms, incomplete staff training and personnel records, lack of proof of recent emergency drills, and residents not receiving prescribed modified diets. Several resident medical assessments were also outdated.
Deficiencies (8)
CCR 87309(a): Tweezers were found in an unlocked refrigerator freezer and nail polish and remover were found in an unlocked arts/crafts cabinet in the Memory Care Unit, posing a safety risk.
CCR 87412(g): Staff files for three employees (S7-S9) were not available for review, posing a potential risk to residents.
CCR 87411(c)(1): Staff (S2, S3, S5) did not have proof of current 1st Aid/CPR training in their files.
HSC 1569.695(c): Facility did not provide proof of an emergency drill conducted within the last quarter.
CCR 87307(a)(3)(C): Multiple resident rooms lacked mattress pads, posing a potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87411(f): Staff (S4 & S6) did not have health screening and TB clearance on file.
CCR 87555(b)(7): Residents R4 and R8 with renal disease were not receiving prescribed renal diets.
CCR 87463(h): Residents R2, R7, R8, R9, and R10 had medical assessments older than 12 months.
Report Facts
Staff count: 42
Resident files reviewed: 12
Residents receiving hospice services: 14
Residents receiving home health services: 15
Resident rooms inspected: 28
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Anahi Reyes | Interim Executive Director | Assisted with the inspection visit and participated in exit interview. |
| Beatriz Romeo-Lui | Administrator/Director | Facility administrator with certificate expiring 02/28/2026. |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw licensing program and signed report. |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and signed the report. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Feb 26, 2026
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required 1-year annual visit to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.
Findings
Deficiencies were observed including missing staff files, incomplete resident service plans, and four residents missing physician ordered medications. A Type A citation was issued for the medication deficiency.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87465(b) Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services: Four residents were missing physician ordered medications, posing an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk.
Report Facts
Residents missing physician ordered medications: 4
Staff files missing: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Anahi Reyes | Interim Executive Director | Met with during inspection and exit interview. |
| Michelle Armendariz | Business Office Manager | Explained purpose of visit. |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Named in report as Licensing Program Manager. |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted inspection and signed report. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 95
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jan 29, 2026
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 2025-09-17 regarding resident care and facility management issues.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to meet residents' incontinence needs, lack of shower assistance, pest issues, failure to safeguard personal belongings, lack of personal care supplies, and absence of a designated substitute manager. Interviews, observations, and documentation did not support these claims.
Findings
The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff were observed and interviewed, and records reviewed, showing that residents' incontinence needs, showering assistance, pest control, safeguarding of personal belongings, provision of personal care supplies, and facility management during administrator absence were adequately addressed.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 95
Resident rooms inspected: 10
Residents interviewed: 15
Staff interviewed: 4
Pest control frequency: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Romeo-Lui | Administrator | Facility administrator interviewed regarding allegations and facility operations |
| Cynthia D Chan | Licensing Program Analyst | Evaluator who conducted the complaint investigation |
| Fernando Fierros | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the licensing evaluation |
| B. Randolph | Staff | Staff member present during exit interview |
Inspection Report
Census: 78
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Sep 11, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced Case Management - Other inspection conducted to amend findings related to complaint control # 28-AS-20240829114254.
Findings
The report documents the completion of the visit with no new deficiencies listed. The visit was conducted to amend previous complaint findings and included an exit interview with the Business Office Manager.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Romeo-Lui | Executive Director | Named as Executive Director during the visit explanation. |
| Alyssa Morales | Business Office Manager | Assisted with the visit and received the exit interview and report copy. |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the unannounced Case Management - Other visit. |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Named as Licensing Program Manager on the report. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 77
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 31, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that staff were not repositioning a resident every 2 hours and that a resident received an unexplained injury.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved two allegations: staff not repositioning a resident every 2 hours and a resident receiving an unexplained injury. The investigation concluded the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Findings
The investigation found that staff generally checked the resident every 2 hours, but sometimes the resident refused repositioning due to pain. A bruise was observed on the resident, but staff interviews indicated it was likely self-inflicted and not caused by staff. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 77
Staff Interviewed: 7
Date Complaint Received: Jan 22, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Named as Licensing Program Manager on report |
| Breanna Randolph | Resident Care Coordinator | Met with during investigation and discussed report |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 76
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 19, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations received on 2025-06-26 regarding staff not properly reporting incidents, not assisting residents with showering, restricting resident access to bedrooms, and not providing activities.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to report incidents to responsible parties, failure to assist residents with showering, denial of resident access to bedrooms, and failure to provide activities. Interviews and observations did not support these allegations.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, a facility tour, and review of documentation. All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence, with staff and most residents denying the claims and observations supporting proper practices.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 76
Staff interviewed: 6
Residents interviewed: 8
Resident refusals of shower: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alberto Lopez | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report |
| Beatriz Romeo-Lui | Administrator | Facility administrator mentioned in report header |
| Maria Nunez | Front Desk | Facility staff member interviewed during investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 73
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 7, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a complaint investigation regarding allegations that staff were not providing adequate food service to residents, including insufficient snacks in the Memory Care Unit.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged inadequate food service, staff retaliation against a resident's authorized representative, failure to obtain admission agreement signatures, unequal treatment of a resident, and failure to follow visitor directives. Only the inadequate food service allegation was substantiated; the others were unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the facility failed to provide adequate snacks between meals in the Memory Care Unit, violating food service requirements. Other allegations related to staff retaliation, admission agreement signatures, equal treatment of residents, and visitor directives were found unsubstantiated.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87555(b)(3) General Food Service Requirements were not met. The Memory Care Unit did not have adequate snacks available between meals, posing potential health, safety, and personal rights risks to residents.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 73
Plan of Correction Due Date: Aug 4, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Romeo Lui | Executive Director | Met with during investigation and exit interview |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted complaint investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 73
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jul 3, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that staff inappropriately removed a resident from palliative care and failed to notify the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) of the incident.
Complaint Details
The complaint involved two allegations: 1) Staff inappropriately removed a resident from palliative care without notifying the POA. 2) Staff did not notify the resident's POA of the termination of palliative care. Both allegations were found unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff were not aware of the termination of palliative care services, and the facility stated it was not responsible for notifying the POA. Interviews with staff and residents did not corroborate the allegations.
Report Facts
Staff interviewed: 6
Residents interviewed: 8
Complaint received date: May 30, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alberto Lopez | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Beatriz Romeo-Lui | Executive Director | Facility administrator present during investigation |
| Brenna Randolph | Resident Care Coordinator | Facility staff present during investigation and exit interview |
| Anahi Reyes | Wellness Director | Interviewed during investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 76
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 3
Date: May 2, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations received on 2025-01-22 regarding staff failure to notify an authorized representative of an incident, failure to reposition a resident every 2 hours, and a resident receiving an unexplained injury.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on evidence that staff failed to notify the authorized representative of a bruise observed on 2025-01-17, did not consistently reposition the resident every 2 hours despite a pressure injury, and the resident sustained an unexplained bruise. Staff interviews, record reviews, and observations supported these findings.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations that staff failed to notify the resident's authorized representative about a bruise, did not consistently reposition the resident every 2 hours as required, and the resident sustained an unexplained bruise. Deficiencies were cited related to personal rights, reporting requirements, and personnel training.
Deficiencies (3)
CCR 87468.2(a)(4) requires care and supervision that meet individual needs. Staff failed to reposition a hospice resident every 2 hours, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87211(a)(1) requires reporting incidents to the licensing agency and responsible party within seven days. Staff did not notify the resident's responsible party of a bruise or submit an incident report, posing a potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87411(d)(3) requires personnel to have training and skill to provide necessary resident care and communication. Staff lacked adequate training in repositioning bedridden residents.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 76
Deficiency Type A: 1
Deficiency Type B: 2
Staff interviewed: 7
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation report |
| Andrea Lopez | Business Office Manager | Facility representative met during investigation and exit interview |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 73
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Apr 24, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was conducted to investigate a complaint alleging that the facility did not accept a resident back after hospitalization.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged the facility did not accept resident back after hospitalization despite hospital psychiatrists deeming the resident stable. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation that the facility refused to accept the resident back after hospitalization. The resident was transferred to a higher level of care due to medical needs, and the facility followed procedures requiring updated physician evaluation before readmission.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 73
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Named in report as Licensing Program Manager |
| Beatriz Lui | Executive Director | Facility representative met during investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Apr 8, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation regarding allegations that staff were prohibiting a resident from having visitors.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that on April 3, 2025, facility staff prohibited a former staff member from visiting resident R1 who was transitioning. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews and record review.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that former staff were prohibited from visiting a resident nearing end of life, which was not explicitly stated in facility policies. This posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to the resident.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87468.1(a)(11) requires residents to have the right to visitors during reasonable hours without prior notice. The facility prohibited visits from former staff to a resident nearing end of life, violating this right.
Report Facts
Census: 72
Total Capacity: 114
Plan of Correction Due Date: Apr 22, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Beatriz Romeo-Lui | Executive Director | Named in allegation and exit interview |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted complaint investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 70
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Mar 14, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations of rough handling of a resident resulting in injury and failure to prevent a resident from falling out of a window.
Complaint Details
The complaint was unsubstantiated. Allegations included rough handling of a resident causing injury and failure to prevent a resident from falling out of a window. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, review of records, and physical inspection. The citation related to rough handling was dismissed.
Findings
The investigation found that while the incident and resulting injuries occurred, there was insufficient evidence to prove the resident required additional supervision. One citation was dismissed, and another deficiency related to personnel requirements was identified with a plan of correction required.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87411(a): Facility personnel were not sufficient in numbers or competent to meet resident needs. On 7/1/2024, a Memory Care Unit resident climbed out of a first-floor window and sustained injuries due to inadequate supervision.
CCR 87468.2(a)(8): A former staff member handled a Memory Care Unit resident roughly, causing bruising instead of using redirection techniques. The staff member was terminated.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 70
Staff interviewed: 7
Residents interviewed: 8
Resident rooms inspected: 17
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and subsequent visits |
| Beatriz Lui | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation |
| Alyssa Morales | Business Office Manager | Participated in exit interview and investigation |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 71
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 5
Date: Mar 11, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 08/29/2024 regarding resident care and facility conditions at La Posada.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated based on evidence gathered from staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and facility inspections. Allegations included rough handling of residents causing injury, failure to prevent falls, medication errors including alteration and non-administration, and improper storage of resident files. Other allegations about facility maintenance and cleanliness were unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation substantiated allegations that staff handled a resident roughly causing injury, failed to prevent a resident from falling out of a window, altered residents' medications, did not administer medications properly, and did not store resident files correctly. Other allegations regarding water damage, room cleanliness, and pest control were found unsubstantiated.
Deficiencies (5)
CCR 87468(a)(8): Former staff handled a Memory Care Unit resident roughly by grabbing their arm causing bruising instead of using redirection techniques, posing a health and safety risk.
CCR 87411(a): Facility personnel were insufficient and not competent to meet resident needs, evidenced by a resident eloping due to staff failing to ensure doors were secured.
CCR 87465(h)(4): Med-tech staff altered resident medications by using house supply and labeling medications improperly, posing immediate health, safety, and personal rights risks.
CCR 87465(c)(2): Med-tech staff logged medication administration in records but did not administer the medications, posing immediate health, safety, and personal rights risks.
CCR 87506(a): A resident's medical file was lost/missing from the medication room, posing potential health, safety, and personal rights risks.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 71
Staff interviewed: 7
Residents interviewed: 8
Resident rooms inspected: 17
Memory Care residents supervised: 22
Residents at fall risk: 6
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Named in relation to staff termination and medication incident investigations |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
| Andrea Lopez | Business Office Manager | Met with during inspection and exit interview |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 70
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 5
Date: Feb 18, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to investigate multiple allegations received on 08/05/2024 regarding resident care and facility safety at La Posada.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations including improper transfer causing injury, delayed medical attention, inadequate toileting care, medication mismanagement, and unsafe environment due to unlocked doors. Allegations of failure to report incidents timely and inadequate food service were unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Findings
The investigation substantiated several allegations including improper resident transfer causing injury, failure to seek timely medical attention, inadequate toileting care, medication mismanagement, and unsafe environment due to unlocked doors. Two allegations regarding incident reporting and food service were unsubstantiated.
Deficiencies (5)
CCR 87464(f)(1): Basic services requirement was not met as resident sustained a hand injury during transfer by one staff instead of two, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87465(a)(1): Facility staff failed to arrange timely medical attention for a resident's hand injury, resulting in delayed hospital transport after more than 3 hours.
CCR 87465(a)(5): Med-tech staff failed to order and obtain timely refill for eye drops and administered bedtime medication early, posing immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87625(b)(3): Resident was not provided incontinence care at least every 2 hours, and bed sheets were found soiled, posing potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87468.1(a)(2): Facility failed to ensure a safe environment as front doors were left unlocked after 7 PM, allowing unauthorized access and posing potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 70
Deficiency Count: 5
Plan of Correction Due Date: 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
| Beatriz Romeo Lui | Executive Director | Facility representative met during the investigation |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator named in report header |
| Katie Manriquez | Administrative Assistant | Received copy of the report during exit interview |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 70
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Feb 18, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was conducted as a Case Management-Deficiencies inspection due to record review findings while investigating a complaint (control #: 28-AS-20240805162120).
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint investigation under control number 28-AS-20240805162120. The deficiency cited relates to failure to timely report a serious injury to the licensing agency.
Findings
A deficiency was cited for failure to submit an incident report within seven days after a resident sustained a serious injury during transfer. The incident report was faxed late, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87211(a)(B) Reporting Requirements. The facility failed to submit a written incident report within seven days after a resident sustained a right hand injury resulting in an open flesh wound of approximately 4 inches during transfer. The report was faxed late on 8/14/24, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Resident injury wound length: 4
Deficiency count: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Evaluator | Conducted the Case Management-Deficiencies visit and cited the deficiency |
| Lisa Hicks | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
| Katie Manriquez | Administrative Assistant | Met with during the inspection and exit interview |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 73
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Jan 9, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted regarding allegations about inadequate furniture, staff threatening not to make a resident's bed, improper disinfecting, and failure to interview prospective resident and authorized representative before signing admissions agreement.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included inadequate furniture in resident's room, staff threatening not to make resident's bed, improper disinfecting during a virus outbreak, and failure to interview resident and authorized representative before signing admission agreement. Evidence did not support these allegations.
Findings
All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated after interviews with residents and staff, review of documentation, and observations. The facility was found to have adequate furniture, proper bed-making practices, appropriate disinfecting protocols following a cleared Norovirus outbreak, and proper admission procedures.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 73
Staff interviewed: 5
Residents interviewed: 6
Date of Norovirus outbreak clearance: Dec 9, 2024
Resident move-in date: Dec 23, 2024
Admission Agreement signed date: Dec 14, 2024
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 5
Date: Nov 15, 2024
Visit Reason
An unannounced Annual Continuation visit was conducted to evaluate compliance with regulatory requirements for the facility serving residents aged 60 and older.
Findings
The inspection found deficiencies related to water temperature exceeding regulatory limits, medication administration errors, and staff training and health screening deficiencies. The facility has plans of correction due for these issues.
Deficiencies (5)
CCR 87303(e)(2): Hot water temperature controls were not maintained within required limits as 12 out of 22 resident rooms and a kitchen sink measured between 120°F and 124.2°F, posing a health risk.
CCR 87465(c)(2): Resident R1's Medication Administration Record listed two medications that were not filled, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87411(f): Staff members S5 and S10 did not have health screenings or TB clearance on file, posing a potential health and safety risk.
HSC 1569.625(b)(2): Six out of eleven staff files lacked required annual training hours, posing a potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87411(c)(1): Nine out of eleven staff files had expired or missing 1st Aid/CPR training, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Residents receiving hospice services: 19
Residents receiving home health services: 6
Staff members: 63
Residents with modified diets: 26
Resident rooms inspected for hot water temperature: 22
Resident rooms with hot water temperature above 120°F: 12
Staff files reviewed: 11
Resident files reviewed: 10
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Executive Director | Administrator named in the inspection and exit interview |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Evaluator | Conducted the inspection and authored the report |
| Lisa Hicks | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Nov 14, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required 1-year annual inspection to evaluate compliance with licensing regulations for the facility serving residents 60 years and older.
Findings
Eleven out of twelve Care Tool Domains were completed during the visit. One domain, "Resident Records/Incident Reports," is pending review, and deficiencies were observed that will be cited during a subsequent Annual Continuation visit.
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 87
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Oct 25, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that staff did not provide a resident’s authorized representative a copy of the admission agreement in a timely manner.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the resident's responsible party never received a copy of the signed Admission Agreement after multiple requests. The allegation was substantiated based on record review and interviews. A civil penalty is being assessed.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility failed to provide the correct admission agreement to the resident's authorized representative until multiple requests were made, with the copy provided being from a former licensee. The allegation was substantiated and a civil penalty is being assessed.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87507(e): The licensee failed to provide a copy of the signed and dated current admission agreement to the resident's authorized representative immediately upon signing. The copy was not provided until multiple requests later, months after the resident's admission.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 87
Deficiency count: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Named in relation to the admission agreement deficiency and exit interview |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Oct 10, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to investigate allegations that facility staff were not making arrangements to meet residents' health needs and were not ensuring residents received annual medical assessments as required.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. Allegations included failure to meet residents' health needs and failure to ensure annual medical assessments. Investigation included interviews and record reviews confirming these issues for resident R1.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the facility failed to follow up on specialist referrals for a resident and did not ensure annual medical assessments were conducted. Staff observed deterioration in a resident's health but did not notify the physician or request medical exams, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87465(a)(1): The licensee failed to arrange or assist in arranging medical care appropriate to residents' conditions and needs, as staff did not follow up on specialist referrals for a resident.
CCR 87466: The licensee did not document or bring changes in a resident's physical health condition to the attention of the resident's physician or responsible person, despite observed deterioration.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 86
Deficiencies cited: 2
Plan of Correction Due Date: 7
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in the investigation and exit interview |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the licensing program and signed the report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 85
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Sep 20, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation regarding allegations that staff were not administering medications as prescribed and that lack of supervision resulted in residents assaulting other residents in care.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for medication administration issues with evidence of multiple residents not receiving medications as prescribed. The allegation of lack of supervision leading to resident assaults was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Findings
The medication administration allegation was substantiated with evidence that med-tech staff did not dispense medications to at least 10 residents as directed by physicians, with some residents going 2-5 days without medications. The allegation of lack of supervision resulting in resident assaults was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87465(c)(2): Med-tech staff did not dispense medications to at least 10 residents as directed by physicians; some residents went 2-5 days without medications, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Residents not receiving medications: 10
Days without medication: 2
Days without medication: 5
Facility capacity: 114
Resident census: 85
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Named in relation to the medication administration and supervision findings. |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation. |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 85
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Sep 6, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was a case management inspection initiated due to observations during a complaint investigation (control #: 28-AS-20240829114254).
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint investigation with control number 28-AS-20240829114254.
Findings
The facility was found deficient for not posting 'No Smoking-Oxygen in Use' signs outside resident room doors where oxygen tanks were present, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87618(b)(3)(B) requires posting 'No Smoking-Oxygen in Use' signs in appropriate areas. The facility failed to post these signs outside rooms 301, 314, and 326 where oxygen tanks were in use.
Report Facts
Census: 85
Total Capacity: 114
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Met with during the inspection and named in the deficiency discussion. |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Evaluator | Conducted the inspection and signed the report. |
| Lisa Hicks | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 83
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 25, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that staff did not ensure the care needs of a resident were being met, specifically regarding missed dialysis appointments due to transportation issues.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure the care needs of resident (R1) were met due to missed dialysis appointments caused by transportation issues. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews, record reviews, and confirmation from medical providers.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that resident (R1) missed multiple dialysis appointments on June 6, 2024, June 18, 2024, June 20, 2024, June 22, 2024, and July 4, 2024, due to transportation failures by Access transportation services and lack of alternate arrangements by the facility. The facility does not provide transportation services as it lacks an assigned driver, which violates the admission agreement requiring transportation to medical appointments.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87464(f)(6): Basic services including arranging transportation to medical appointments were not met. Resident (R1) missed dialysis appointments on June 6 and July 4, 2024, due to failure to ensure transportation via Access transport or facility van.
Report Facts
Missed dialysis appointments: 5
Census: 83
Total capacity: 114
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Met with during the investigation and named in the exit interview. |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report. |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Named in the report as Licensing Program Manager overseeing the investigation. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: May 17, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced Case Management Deficiency visit conducted in conjunction with a complaint investigation regarding failure to submit an Unusual Incident/Injury Report.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found the facility did not submit a required Unusual Incident/Injury Report concerning a resident's fall on 10/14/2022.
Findings
The facility failed to meet reporting requirements by not submitting an Unusual Incident/Injury Report concerning a resident's fall on 10/14/2022, which posed a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to residents in care.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87211 Reporting Requirements were not met as the facility failed to submit an Unusual Incident/Injury Report to the licensing agency within seven days of a serious injury occurring on 10/14/2022.
Report Facts
Census: 86
Total Capacity: 114
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista-Martinez | Executive Director | Named in relation to the deficiency and exit interview |
| Bennette Pena | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and authored the report |
| David Sicairos | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 86
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 2
Date: May 17, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations that a resident sustained a fracture while in care and that staff did not seek medical attention for the resident in a timely manner.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Resident #1 sustained a left hip fracture from a fall due to neglect and lack of supervision. Staff did not seek timely medical attention, delaying treatment for several days. An immediate civil penalty of $500 was issued for neglect/lack of supervision contributing to the delay in medical care.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that Resident #1 sustained a left hip fracture due to a fall under facility care and that the facility neglected to provide timely medical attention, resulting in delayed treatment. The facility was found to have insufficient supervision and care, contributing to the resident's injury and delayed medical response.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87468.2(a)(4) was not met as the licensee failed to provide care, supervision, and services sufficient to meet residents' individual needs, resulting in Resident #1 sustaining a left hip fracture from a fall.
CCR 87468.2(a)(1) was not met as the licensee failed to ensure a reasonable level of personal privacy and timely medical treatment, contributing to a delay in obtaining medical attention for Resident #1.
Report Facts
Civil penalty amount: 500
Capacity: 114
Census: 86
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista-Martinez | Executive Director | Met with during investigation and exit interview. |
| Bennette Pena | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation. |
| David Sicairos | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation. |
| Investigator Santana | Completed investigation of allegations related to Resident #1. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 90
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 3
Date: Apr 25, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to investigate allegations including failure to refill residents' medication timely, medication errors involving giving a resident another resident's medication, and falsification of documents.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Allegations included failure to refill medication timely, medication errors, and falsification of documents. The investigation found sufficient evidence to corroborate all allegations.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staff failed to order insulin medication timely, resulting in a dangerous blood sugar level for a resident. Staff also gave a resident another resident's medications, and falsified incident reports related to these events. The facility failed to follow proper medication administration and incident reporting protocols.
Deficiencies (3)
CCR 87465(c)(2): Med-tech staff failed to order insulin medication for resident R1, resulting in dangerously elevated blood sugar levels on 10/5/23, posing an immediate health and safety hazard.
CCR 87411(d)(4): Med-tech staff lacked knowledge to safely assist with prescribed medications, evidenced by leaving another resident's medications in R1's room and asking R1 to take them on 10/29/23.
CCR 87207: Staff falsified incident reports by omitting facts about the failure to refill insulin medication and incorrectly stating paramedics were called on 10/5/23.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Resident Census: 90
Estimated Days of Completion: 90
Number of staff interviewed: 7
Number of medications dispensed incorrectly: 4
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Met with during investigation and exit interview |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
| S1 | Med-tech staff | Involved in medication refill failure and falsified incident report |
| S2 | Med-tech staff | Dispensed wrong medications to resident R1 |
| Wellness Director | Acknowledged med-tech staff failed to order insulin and was involved in incident report oversight |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 90
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Feb 23, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that staff were not following residents' care plans and were not providing proper meal service to residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff were not following residents' care plans and were not providing proper meal service. The investigation found these allegations substantiated based on interviews and record reviews.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that staffing shortages led to residents not receiving showers as scheduled and delays in feeding assistance. Residents and staff interviews, along with document reviews, confirmed these deficiencies posed potential health and safety risks.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87468.2(a)(4): Residents were not showered at least twice weekly due to staffing shortages between November 2021 and February 2022, posing a potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87464(f)(4): Residents requiring feeding assistance were fed 30 minutes after food was served due to staff shortages between November 2021 and February 2022, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 90
Registry staff used: 15
Residents interviewed: 7
Staff interviewed: 7
Residents requiring feeding assistance: 5
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 90
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Feb 23, 2024
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that the facility was understaffed and unable to meet residents' needs in a timely manner.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged the facility was understaffed, with staff working 12-hour shifts and failing to meet bathing, incontinence care, and feeding needs timely. Interviews with residents and staff confirmed the allegation. The facility had staffing shortages from August 2021 through February 2022, including reliance on registry staff who were sometimes absent or quit quickly. The allegation was substantiated.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation of staffing shortages between August 2021 and February 2022, including use of registry staff and 12-hour shifts, which resulted in insufficient care to residents and posed a potential health and safety risk.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87411(a) Personnel Requirements - General. Facility personnel were insufficient in numbers and competence to meet resident needs between August 2021 and February 2022. This posed a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.
Report Facts
Census: 90
Total Capacity: 114
Residents interviewed: 7
Staff interviewed: 7
Residents on 2-hour checks: 17
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation and authored the report |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
| Janette Hill | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in the investigation and exit interview |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Met with during the inspection visit and discussed the visit purpose |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 91
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 7
Date: Dec 7, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced Annual Continuation inspection using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools to evaluate compliance with regulatory requirements for the facility.
Findings
The inspection found several deficiencies including use of outdated admission agreements, missing mattress pads on beds, staff without current 1st Aid/CPR certificates, a staff member not properly associated with the facility, discarded furniture and safety hazards in the environment, lack of recent emergency drills, and exceeding the approved hospice waiver capacity.
Deficiencies (7)
CCR 87507(e): Residents' admission agreement forms on file and provided are not of the current licensee, posing a potential health, safety or personal rights risk.
CCR 87307(a)(3)(C): Beds in rooms 107, 110, 115, and 218 did not have mattress pads, posing a potential health, safety or personal rights risk.
CCR 87355(e)(3): Staff member (S1) has worked since 2019 but is not associated to the facility, posing an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk.
CCR 87303(a): Discarded mattresses, chairs, and furniture in outdoor parking lot, missing rain gutter pipe, exposed electrical wiring in laundry ceiling, and steel beam sticking out of parking lot floor pose potential health and safety risks.
HSC 1569.618(c)(3): Staff (S2-S6) do not have current 1st Aid/CPR certificates on file or have expired cards, posing a potential health, safety or personal rights risk.
HSC 1569.695(c): The last emergency drill was conducted on 7/6/2023, which is not quarterly as required, posing a potential health, safety or personal rights risk.
CCR 87633(a)(2): There are 23 residents enrolled in hospice services but the facility only has a hospice waiver for 20, posing a potential health, safety or personal rights risk.
Report Facts
Census: 91
Total Capacity: 114
Staff Count: 49
Residents in Hospice Care: 23
Approved Hospice Waiver Capacity: 20
Resident Files Reviewed: 10
Medication Errors Date: Dec 5, 2023
Emergency Drill Last Conducted: Jul 6, 2023
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 91
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Dec 5, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced required 1-year annual inspection using the full Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tools to evaluate facility compliance.
Findings
Two citations were issued: one for unfilled PRN medications for two residents and another for an unlocked drawer containing scissors and sharp office supplies in the Memory Care Unit. An annual continuation visit will be conducted due to time constraints.
Deficiencies (2)
CCR 87465(c)(2) - Two residents had unfilled PRN medications, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
CCR 87705(f)(1) - The Memory Care Unit had an unlocked drawer with scissors and sharp office supplies, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Medication records reviewed: 11
Resident files reviewed: 4
Resident interviews conducted: 1
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 89
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Oct 12, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that facility staff stole a resident's money.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that facility staff stole a resident's money. The allegation was substantiated based on interviews and record reviews. The Activities Director took money from a resident but did not provide the lottery tickets purchased. The staff member was terminated for unrelated reasons. A police report was not filed due to the loss value being under $100.
Findings
The investigation substantiated that the Activities Director (staff S1) took $10 from a resident (R1) to buy lottery tickets but did not provide the tickets. Staff S1 was terminated for unrelated attendance issues. The facility documented the theft but did not file a police report due to the low value of loss.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87468.2(a)(25): Residents in privately operated residential care facilities shall have protection of their property from theft or loss. Staff took $10 from a resident to buy lottery tickets but never gave the tickets, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Census: 89
Total Capacity: 114
Monetary loss: 10
Number of staff interviewed: 6
Number of residents interviewed: 9
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Administrator involved in investigation and exit interview |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Oversaw the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 114
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Aug 31, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations that staff did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents and that the facility was in disrepair.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not provide a comfortable temperature for residents, specifically citing an air conditioning unit not working well in one resident's room, and that the facility was in disrepair due to HVAC system issues. The investigation included interviews with residents and staff, review of HVAC service records, and facility inspection. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that temperature issues in resident rooms were addressed promptly with HVAC repairs and resets, and the facility purchased a new HVAC system for affected areas. Although some temperature discomfort was reported, the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Report Facts
Facility Capacity: 114
Census: 114
Residents interviewed: 10
Staff interviewed: 3
HVAC service visits: 3
Room temperature: 62
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in investigation and interview |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Named as Licensing Program Manager on report |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 89
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Aug 3, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit triggered by allegations received on 07/27/2023 regarding pest infestations and inadequate cleaning of resident rooms.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included a bed bug outbreak and roach infestations in certain rooms, and that some resident rooms were in hoarder conditions. Interviews, observations, and pest control records did not support these claims.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations of pest infestations and inadequate cleaning. Facility staff and residents reported regular pest control treatments and cleaning practices, and no pests or unsanitary conditions were observed during the visit.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 89
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alma Gonzalez | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator interviewed during the investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 89
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Aug 3, 2023
Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to an allegation that the facility was in disrepair, specifically that the air conditioning had not been operating for about two weeks causing discomfort to residents.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility was in disrepair due to non-functioning air conditioning for about two weeks, causing discomfort. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation and observations.
Findings
The investigation found that the air conditioning was working properly at the time of the visit, with comfortable temperatures observed throughout the facility. Interviews with staff and residents confirmed no concerns about temperature, and fans were used in hallways. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 89
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 88
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 6, 2023
Visit Reason
An unannounced Case Management-Deficiencies visit was initiated following a complaint investigation that found Dementia residents had outdated medical assessments.
Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by complaint investigation control # 28-AS-20230630083050 regarding outdated medical assessments for Dementia residents.
Findings
The facility failed to update annual medical assessments for two Dementia residents, with one resident's physician report last updated in 2020 and the other's in 2021, violating Title 22 requirements.
Deficiencies (1)
CCR 87705(c)(5) Care of Persons with Dementia requires annual medical assessments for residents with dementia. The facility did not have current annual assessments for two Dementia residents, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Census: 88
Total Capacity: 114
Deficiency count: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Named in exit interview and responsible party for cited deficiencies |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Evaluator | Conducted the inspection and authored the report |
| Lisa Hicks | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the licensing evaluation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 88
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jul 6, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation of lack of supervision resulting in a resident being struck while in care.
Complaint Details
The allegation was that a resident in the Memory Care Unit physically assaulted another resident. Interviews and record reviews indicated that although the incident may have occurred, there was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation. The allegation was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of a resident being struck due to adequate staffing and cognitive impairments of involved residents. No health or safety concerns were observed during the facility tour.
Deficiencies (1)
R1 and R2's physician reports were not updated. Dementia residents require an annual medical assessment and reappraisal including reassessment of dementia care needs. A citation was issued in the case management report.
Report Facts
Staff interviewed: 4
Residents interviewed: 6
Staff on shift during incident: 3
Times resident R1 hit resident R2: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit. |
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in the investigation and exit interview. |
| Stephanie Varela | Med-Tech | Discussed the purpose of the visit during the investigation. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 85
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Feb 27, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by allegations of staff mismanaging resident medication, staff not treating residents with dignity or respect, and staff not wearing masks in the facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included medication mismanagement, disrespectful staff behavior, and failure to wear masks. Interviews with staff and residents, file reviews, and observations did not corroborate these claims.
Findings
The investigation found no sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff were observed to properly manage medications, treat residents with dignity and respect, and comply with mask-wearing protocols.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 85
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 83
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Feb 9, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation triggered by an allegation that the facility failed to provide resident records in a timely manner.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged the facility failed to provide resident records after a formal records request was made on January 26, 2023. The facility provided the records late on February 2, 2023. The allegation was substantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility did not provide requested resident records within the required two business days, instead providing them five business days later. The allegation was substantiated based on record review and interviews.
Deficiencies (1)
HSC 1569.269(a)(21) Residents have the right to prompt access to review and purchase photocopies of their records. The facility failed to provide requested resident records within two business days, providing them five business days later, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 83
Days late: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Named in relation to the records request and investigation |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 83
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Feb 9, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations regarding unmet resident needs, presence of roaches, facility cleanliness, and nutritional concerns at the facility.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that residents' needs were not being met, the facility was not free of roaches, the facility was unkempt, and residents' nutritional needs were not met. After inspection, interviews, and record review, all allegations were found unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Resident needs were reported as met, no active cockroach infestations were observed, the facility was clean, and residents' nutritional needs were being met.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 83
Resident rooms inspected: 13
Staff interviewed: 7
Residents interviewed: 11
Rooms treated per month: 10
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Facility administrator involved in the investigation and interviews |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Investigator who conducted the complaint visit |
| Lisa Hicks | Licensing Program Manager | Manager overseeing the licensing program |
| Andrea Lopez | Business Office Manager | Participated in exit interview |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 77
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 5
Date: Nov 15, 2022
Visit Reason
Licensing Program Analyst conducted an unannounced required 1-year visit focusing on COVID-19 Infection Control Practices and general compliance with facility regulations.
Findings
The facility was found to have several deficiencies including expired food handling certification for the Dining Services Director, missing mattress pads in multiple rooms, non-functional auditory alarms in the Memory Care unit, missing window screens in the 2nd floor game room, and residents missing medications ordered by their physicians.
Deficiencies (5)
CCR 87555(b)(16) Food service requirements were not met as the Dining Services Director's food handling certificate expired on 3/25/2022.
CCR 87307(a)(3)(C) Majority of rooms in the Memory Care unit lacked mattress pads, including rooms 102, 104, 108, 110, 212, 214, 216, 220, 309, and 311.
CCR 87705(j) Auditory alarms on Memory Care unit exit doors and windows do not have sound to alert staff, posing an immediate risk.
CCR 87303(c) Windows by the 2nd floor game room did not have window screens, posing a potential health and safety risk.
CCR 87465(c)(2) Residents R1-R4 were missing medications ordered by their physicians, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Residents receiving hospice services: 16
Residents receiving home health services: 7
Rooms inspected: 22
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Bautista | Administrator | Named in exit interview and visit meeting |
| Andrea Lopez | Business Office Manager | Named in visit meeting |
| Lisa Hicks | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the inspection |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 72
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Feb 15, 2022
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to examine allegations of roaches in the facility and unclean resident rooms.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated based on the lack of evidence supporting the allegations of roaches and unclean resident rooms.
Findings
The investigation found no evidence of roaches or bugs, as pest control was actively treating the facility and residents reported no sightings. Resident rooms were observed to be clean, with staff and residents confirming regular cleaning despite staffing shortages during COVID-19. Both allegations were unsubstantiated.
Report Facts
Capacity: 114
Census: 72
Bedrooms inspected: 17
Residents interviewed: 12
Staff interviewed: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Janette Hill | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation |
| Diana Bautista Martinez | Business Office Manager | Accompanied Licensing Program Analyst during facility tour |
| Tony Vasallo | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation |
| Wei Siew Ho | Licensing Program Manager | Named in report as Licensing Program Manager |
Inspection Report
Original Licensing
Census: 64
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Nov 23, 2021
Visit Reason
The visit was an announced pre-licensing evaluation for a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly undergoing a Change of Ownership application.
Findings
The facility was found to be generally compliant with operational and safety standards, including fire clearance and physical plant conditions. Several items require correction, including submission of a surety bond, a first aid manual, updated plan of operation, and corrected facility sketch room names.
Deficiencies (4)
A surety bond is not in place as required for cash handling. Proof of correction must be submitted.
The facility does not have a First Aid Manual available. This must be provided.
The plan of operation must be updated to include cash handling and surety bond information.
Facility sketch room names are incorrect and must be corrected.
Report Facts
Fire clearance capacity: 114
Hospice waiver capacity: 20
Memory Care unit capacity: 26
Residents receiving hospice care: 9
Staff and resident files reviewed: 15
Liability insurance coverage: 1000000
Liability insurance aggregate: 3000000
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Janette Hill | Administrator | Met during the pre-licensing evaluation and exit interview |
| Michael Radnia | Licensee | Met during the pre-licensing evaluation |
| Noemi Galarza | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the announced pre-licensing visit and evaluation |
| Lisa Hicks | Supervisor | Supervisor overseeing the licensing evaluation |
Inspection Report
Capacity: 114
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Oct 26, 2021
Visit Reason
The visit was an office evaluation related to a change of ownership application for a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly.
Findings
The applicant and administrator participated in a telephone interview confirming understanding of California Code Title 22 regulations and various operational areas including licensing, admission policies, staffing, emergency preparedness, and complaints reporting. The census was unknown at the time of the visit.
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



