Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
124
121 employees · 3 contractors · 45 on an average day Maple Springs of Wasilla
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Wasilla, AK
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 1 point above the Alaska average for CMS-certified facilities (87/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 1 point above the Alaska average for CMS-certified facilities (87/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Maple Springs of Wasilla
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Wasilla, AK
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 1 point above the Alaska average for CMS-certified facilities (87/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 88 / 100, a B+ — 1 point above the Alaska average for CMS-certified facilities (87/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Maple Springs of Wasilla accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Maple Springs of Wasilla
Maple Springs of Wasilla provides nursing home, hospice care, respite care, and skilled nursing in Wasilla, AK. Nursing home and skilled nursing services include licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while hospice care supports residents nearing the end of life. Respite care provides a short stay when a resident’s usual caregiver needs time away or recovery.
The community has 67 beds. Total nurse staffing is 5 hours and 26 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families several ways to cover care costs based on eligibility and available resources. Maple Springs of Wasilla may be a good fit for someone who needs skilled nursing, hospice support, or a short-term respite stay within the same care setting.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 26m
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 26mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +350% above Alaska average
4 of 6 metrics below Alaska average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 10-hour shifts
1h 31m
↓ 29% · AK 2h 9mThis facility: 1h 31m per resident per day, 29% below the Alaska average of 2h 9m (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 10-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
1h 2m
↑ 51% · AK 41mThis facility: 1h 2m per resident per day, 51% above the Alaska average of 41m (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 52 total: 51 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
52 staff · 10-hour shifts
2h 53m
↓ 31% · AK 4h 10mThis facility: 2h 53m per resident per day, 31% below the Alaska average of 4h 10m (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 52 total: 51 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
52 staff · 10-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
14m
↑ 350% · AK 3mThis facility: 14m per resident per day, 350% above the Alaska average of 3m (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 42m
↓ 24% · AK 6h 12mThis facility: 4h 42m per resident per day, 24% below the Alaska average of 6h 12m (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
57m
↓ 42% · AK 1h 37mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 42% below the Alaska average of 1h 37m (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
124
121 employees · 3 contractors · 45 on an average day
124 total staff / 67 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.85 : 1
↓ 16% · AK 2.20This facility: 1.85 staff per resident, 16% below the Alaska average of 2.20 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
124 staff ÷ 67 residents
See full Alaska ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9 h
↓ 2% · AK 9.2 hThis facility: 9 h, 2% below the Alaska average of 9.2 h (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
36,882 staff hours this quarter
See full Alaska ranking →98.1% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Alaska average: 87.3% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (1), Feeding Assistant (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
67
Rank #3 / 10Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 10 nursing homes we track in Alaska for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Alaska facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alaska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
67
Rank #3 / 10Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 10 nursing homes we track in Alaska for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Alaska facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Alaska that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
An established community with some operational experience and growing routines. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
7
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
22
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
98.7%
This home is often near full
Based on residents per day and 67 beds.
Higher than the Alaska average: 89.4%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
66
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
80
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
CMS Certification Number025038
Resident Council
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
88 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
1 point above the Alaska average for CMS-certified facilities (87/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
63 severity-weighted points (33 deficiencies) · 25% lower than the typical CMS-certified AK facility (median: 84)
Enforcement
Typical
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified AK facility (median: 0) · $0 in fines
Persistence
Concern
49 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified AK facility (median: 32)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 25% · AK 4This facility: 3, 25% below the Alaska average of 4 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
33
↑ 28% · AK 25.7This facility: 33, 28% above the Alaska average of 25.7 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
11
↑ 83% · AK 6This facility: 11, 83% above the Alaska average of 6 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
33 of 33 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AK 0.2This facility: 0, 100% below the Alaska average of 0.2 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · AK 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Alaska average of 0.9 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
32
↑ 36% · AK 23.5This facility: 32, 36% above the Alaska average of 23.5 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↓ 9% · AK 1.1This facility: 1, 9% below the Alaska average of 1.1 (among Alaska facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 03, 2025 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 8 of 33 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 03, 2025
3 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 21, 2024
13 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 24, 2023
17 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 33 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
8 deficiencies (24%)
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (21%)
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (18%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (15%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (6%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (3%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 33 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Jun 21, 2024 · 25-day payment denial
Jun 21, 2024 · 25-day payment denial
Total fines
$0
AK avg $89KAlaska average: $88,573. Average among the 6 Alaska facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
AK avg 1.83Alaska average: 1.83. Average among the 6 Alaska facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
25 days
↑ 100% · AK 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Alaska average of 0.5. Average among the 6 Alaska facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jun 21, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
25 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
25 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$0
Alaska average
$88,573
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Alaska and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Alaska average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 20% · AK 2.5This facility: 2.0, 20% below the AK average of 2.5 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 33% · AK 3.0This facility: 4.0, 33% above the AK average of 3.0 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 19% · AK 10.0This facility: 11.9, 19% above the AK average of 10.0 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 10% · AK 20.1This facility: 18.1, 10% below the AK average of 20.1 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 4 near AK average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near AK average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.6%
↓ 23% · AK 18.9This facility: 14.6, 23% below the AK average of 18.9 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.6%
↓ 23% · AK 18.9This facility: 14.6, 23% below the AK average of 18.9 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.6%
≈ 0% · AK 18.6This facility: 18.6, level with the AK average of 18.6 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.6%
≈ 0% · AK 18.6This facility: 18.6, level with the AK average of 18.6 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.0%
≈ 0% · AK 21.0This facility: 21.0, level with the AK average of 21.0 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.0%
≈ 0% · AK 21.0This facility: 21.0, level with the AK average of 21.0 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8%
↑ 246% · AK 2.2This facility: 7.8, 246% above the AK average of 2.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8%
↑ 246% · AK 2.2This facility: 7.8, 246% above the AK average of 2.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 51% · AK 3.4This facility: 1.7, 51% below the AK average of 3.4 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 51% · AK 3.4This facility: 1.7, 51% below the AK average of 3.4 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
19.0%
↑ 213% · AK 6.1This facility: 19.0, 213% above the AK average of 6.1 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
19.0%
↑ 213% · AK 6.1This facility: 19.0, 213% above the AK average of 6.1 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
↑ 8% · AK 5.2This facility: 5.7, 8% above the AK average of 5.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
↑ 8% · AK 5.2This facility: 5.7, 8% above the AK average of 5.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.6%
↑ 172% · AK 6.5This facility: 17.6, 172% above the AK average of 6.5 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.6%
↑ 172% · AK 6.5This facility: 17.6, 172% above the AK average of 6.5 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.0%
↓ 47% · AK 18.9This facility: 10.0, 47% below the AK average of 18.9 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.0%
↓ 47% · AK 18.9This facility: 10.0, 47% below the AK average of 18.9 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
↑ 4% · AK 93.9This facility: 97.8, 4% above the AK average of 93.9 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
↑ 4% · AK 93.9This facility: 97.8, 4% above the AK average of 93.9 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · AK 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the AK average of 96.0 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · AK 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the AK average of 96.0 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.94
↓ 19% · AK 1.16This facility: 0.94, 19% below the AK average of 1.16 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.94
↓ 19% · AK 1.16This facility: 0.94, 19% below the AK average of 1.16 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.87
↑ 48% · AK 1.26This facility: 1.87, 48% above the AK average of 1.26 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.87
↑ 48% · AK 1.26This facility: 1.87, 48% above the AK average of 1.26 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
54.6%
↑ 2% · US 53.7This facility: 54.6, 2% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
54.6%
↑ 2% · US 53.7This facility: 54.6, 2% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
70.9%
↑ 40% · US 50.6This facility: 70.9, 40% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
70.9%
↑ 40% · US 50.6This facility: 70.9, 40% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.1%
↑ 45% · US 0.8This facility: 1.1, 45% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.1%
↑ 45% · US 0.8This facility: 1.1, 45% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 38% · AK 0.6This facility: 0.4, 38% below the AK average of 0.6 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 38% · AK 0.6This facility: 0.4, 38% below the AK average of 0.6 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 21% · AK 78.3This facility: 94.6, 21% above the AK average of 78.3 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.6%
↑ 21% · AK 78.3This facility: 94.6, 21% above the AK average of 78.3 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
↑ 17% · AK 82.2This facility: 96.0, 17% above the AK average of 82.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.0%
↑ 17% · AK 82.2This facility: 96.0, 17% above the AK average of 82.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
13.5%
↑ 8% · AK 12.5This facility: 13.5, 8% above the AK average of 12.5 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
13.5%
↑ 8% · AK 12.5This facility: 13.5, 8% above the AK average of 12.5 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.3%
↑ 1% · AK 12.2This facility: 12.3, 1% above the AK average of 12.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.3%
↑ 1% · AK 12.2This facility: 12.3, 1% above the AK average of 12.2 (among AK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Maple Springs of Wasilla’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−23.5% operating margin
+37.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 2 of the last 5 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Alaska homes
62.3% payroll share of revenue
AK average 70.6%
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $3.1M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Alaska homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2020 → 2024Trend | AK median | Compared with AK homesRank in AK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.5M | +$3.1M | Trend 20202024 | AK median $14.2M | Rank in AK Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $16.7M | −$0.1M | Trend 20202024 | AK median $18.4M | Rank in AK Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$3.2M | +$3.2M | Trend 20202024 | AK median −$4.2M | Rank in AK Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −23.5% | +37.2 pts | Trend 20202024 | AK median −29.1% | Rank in AK Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$3.2M | +$3.2M | Trend — | AK median −$4.2M | Rank in AK Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Alaska homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2020 → 2024Trend | AK median | Compared with AK homesRank in AK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $8.4M | +$0.4M | Trend 20202024 | AK median $10.1M | Rank in AK Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 62.3% | −14.7 pts | Trend 20202024 | AK median 70.6% | Rank in AK Not ranked | 8.3 pts under AK average The AK average is 70.6% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2020–2024 2 charts · AK benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Alaska payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AK payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2020–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $15.7M | $16.8M | $17.9M | $10.4M | $13.5M |
| Operating expenses | $13.6M | $15.9M | $15.4M | $16.8M | $16.7M |
| Net patient income | $2.1M | $0.8M | $2.5M | −$6.3M | −$3.2M |
| Operating margin | 13.3% | 5.0% | 13.9% | −60.7% | −23.5% |
| Net income | $2.6M | $2.6M | $2.5M | −$6.3M | −$3.2M |
| Payroll costs | $6.7M | $7.7M | $7.7M | $8.0M | $8.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 42.6% | 45.9% | 43.1% | 77.0% | 62.3% |
| Beds | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 |
| Gross revenue | $18.2M | $19.0M | $19.9M | $16.4M | $17.8M |
| Salaries | $5.8M | $6.5M | $6.3M | $7.0M | $7.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $6.9M | $8.2M | $7.7M | $8.7M | $8.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $759 | $790 | $783 | $662 | $692 |
| Cost per day | $658 | $751 | $674 | $1,064 | $855 |
| Average length of stay | 178.2 days | 110.0 days | 133.8 days | 63.3 days | 79.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 2 earlier years
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
265 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
121 · 46%
Medicaid
92 · 35%
Private pay & other
52 · 20%
Resident snapshot
67 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
31 · 46%
Medicaid
33 · 49%
Private pay & other
3 · 4%
Leaving
245 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
156 · 64%
Medicaid
57 · 23%
Private pay & other
32 · 13%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Maple Springs of Wasilla
2.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Wasilla's city center to Maple Springs of Wasilla's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Maple Springs of Wasilla
Add your location
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Alaska
Maple Springs of Wasilla is in Wasilla, Alaska. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
General Relief Assisted Living Home Program
Alaska General Relief Assisted Living Home (GRALH)
Eligibility
- General
- Alaska adults who need assisted-living protective support, are at risk of abuse, neglect or exploitation, and meet financial and functional criteria.
- AK specifics
- Apply for other assistance, including Medicaid and Adult Public Assistance. A priority waitlist applies. Use is limited to homes with a GR Provider Agreement; confirm participation directly.
What it provides
- Temporary state-funded help with eligible assisted-living care costs. Participants contribute income after the personal-needs allowance; this is not a cash grant or nursing-care benefit.
Alaska Community Living Program
Alaska Community Living (ACL)
Eligibility
- General
- Assisted-living support for Alaska adults assessed by DOH who are leaving API, AMHR, Corrections, or another individually approved setting and receive community behavioral-health services.
- AK specifics
- Severe persistent mental illness or Alzheimer’s/related dementia must substantially impair functioning. Alternative funding must be exhausted and protective-care criteria met. The home needs an approved ACL agreement.
What it provides
- Cost-sharing for care in an assisted-living home with an approved ACL agreement. The resident contributes income; support does not include continuous nursing or medical care.
Alaskans Living Independently Waiver
Alaska Medicaid ALI Waiver
- Income limit
- 2026 · The published nursing-home/HCB-waiver income standard is $2,982/month for an individual; DPA applies category, trust and spousal rules.
Eligibility
- General
- Adults age 21+ who meet Alaska Medicaid eligibility and nursing-facility level-of-care criteria.
- AK specifics
- The ALI waiver renewal is effective July 1 2026; functional assessment and an approved support plan are required.
What it provides
- Care coordination and authorized home/community support including respite; chore services; residential support and environmental modifications when approved.
Senior In-Home (SIH) Services
AK SIH
Eligibility
- General
- Low-income adults age 60+ with functional impairments; qualifying younger adults with Alzheimer disease or related disorders may also be served.
- AK specifics
- Services are provided through state-funded grantees according to assessed needs and available resources.
What it provides
- Case management; chore assistance; respite; personal care and extended support as authorized by the local program.
Senior Benefits Program
Alaska Senior Benefits
- Income limit
- Gross annual income tiers are linked to 75%, 100% and 175% of Alaska federal poverty guidelines.
- Asset limit
- No asset test.
Eligibility
- General
- Alaska residents age 65+ who meet citizenship or qualified-alien and other program requirements; some institutional residents are excluded.
- AK specifics
- Payment amounts depend on income tier and available state funding.
What it provides
- Monthly cash assistance to eligible older residents; payment amount depends on income and funding.
Senior Access Program (SAP)
AK SAP
- Income limit
- 2026 · Generally at or below 100% of area median income adjusted for household size; alternative categorical qualification may apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Qualifying senior household including a member age 55+ needing an accessibility modification; eligible owners and renters may be served.
- AK specifics
- Assistance is administered through funded local grantees. Rental modifications require property-owner cooperation.
What it provides
- Accessibility modifications; homeowner assistance caps are $15,000 in Anchorage / Fairbanks North Star / Kenai Peninsula and $30,000 elsewhere.
Alaska Heating Assistance Program (HAP)
AK HAP
- Income limit
- 2026 · For 2026–2027, LIHEAP serves income up to 150% of Alaska poverty guidelines and AAHP extends assistance above 150% through 225%; one-person maximum listed is $3,739/month.
Eligibility
- General
- Alaska households responsible for at least $200 per year in out-of-pocket heating costs and meeting program rules.
- AK specifics
- One regular benefit per heating season is paid to the vendor; normal application deadline is April 30 and crisis deadline June 30.
What it provides
- Heating-cost assistance determined by household circumstances and program calculations; no fixed $500–$1,000 award guarantee.
Adult Public Assistance
Alaska Adult Public Assistance (APA)
- Income limit
- Countable income must meet the current Adult Public Assistance standard. DPA determines the amount using the applicant’s circumstances.
- Asset limit
- Countable resources may not exceed $2,000 for an individual or $3,000 for a couple; exclusions apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Cash support for Alaska residents age 65+ or eligible adults with blindness or disability, with qualifying citizenship/immigration status.
- AK specifics
- Applicants must pursue other benefits for which they qualify. This is living-expense cash assistance, not confirmation that a particular care provider’s charges will be paid.
What it provides
- Monthly cash assistance for basic living costs such as housing; food and personal needs. The award is individually calculated and does not guarantee payment of an assisted-living bill.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Maple Springs of Wasilla
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Maple Springs of Wasilla in a walkable area?
Maple Springs of Wasilla has a walk score of 22. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Maple Springs of Wasilla?
Maple Springs of Wasilla's occupancy is 98.7%.
03 How long has Maple Springs of Wasilla been in business?
Maple Springs of Wasilla has been operating for approximately 7 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
04 Are pets allowed at Maple Springs of Wasilla?
No, Maple Springs of Wasilla has a no-pet policy.
05 Does Maple Springs of Wasilla operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Maple Springs of Wasilla is registered as a for-profit in AK.
06 What is the overall rating for Maple Springs of Wasilla?
Maple Springs of Wasilla received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Maple Springs of Wasilla have?
Maple Springs of Wasilla has 67 beds.
Updated on
