Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
44
43 employees · 1 contractor · 16 on an average day Maplewood Park Place
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Bethesda, MD
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Maplewood Park Place
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Bethesda, MD
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Maplewood Park Place accepts Medicare and private pay.
Maplewood Park Place offers nursing home care, skilled nursing, assisted living, independent living, memory care, and respite care in Bethesda, MD. Nursing home and skilled nursing care provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Assisted living helps with daily tasks such as bathing, dressing, and medication while a resident keeps their own apartment.
Memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Independent living offers private living with community services and no daily care. Respite care provides short stays when a family’s usual caregiver needs to travel or recover, and the combination of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time without leaving the community.
With 29 beds, Maplewood Park Place is a smaller community where staff and residents can get to know one another. One bedroom and two bedroom residences are available, including a two bedroom option for a couple moving together or someone who wants a companion. The listed starting price is $318 to $407 per day for a private room, giving families a daily amount to budget rather than a monthly starting figure.
Payment options are Medicare and private pay. Medicare covers short term skilled care after a hospital stay, while private pay means the resident or family pays directly. The home may be a good fit for someone who needs anything from independent living to nursing care, including a resident whose needs may increase over time or a family needing a short respite stay.
In the Pooks Hill neighborhood, the Walk Score is 38, an officially car dependent setting where most errands require a car or a ride. Complimentary transportation takes residents to shopping centers and doctors’ offices, so those trips do not require arranging a separate ride.
Residents can use the fitness center, heated indoor pool, whirlpool, and library. Entertainment, arts, nature excursions, and wellness opportunities offer additional ways to spend time on site or take part in organized activities. Pets are allowed, so a resident may keep a pet in the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2025 (April 1 – June 30, 2025).
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
44
43 employees · 1 contractor · 16 on an average day
44 total staff / 15 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.93 : 1
↑ 66% · MD 1.77This facility: 2.93 staff per resident, 66% above the Maryland average of 1.77 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
44 staff ÷ 15 residents
See full Maryland ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.7 h
↓ 4% · MD 8 hThis facility: 7.7 h, 4% below the Maryland average of 8 h (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
11,165 staff hours this quarter
See full Maryland ranking →99.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Maryland average: 87.8% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
29
Rank #120 / 139Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Maryland for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Maryland facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
29
Rank #120 / 139Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Maryland for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Maryland facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #17 / 41Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Maryland for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Maryland facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #17 / 41Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Maryland for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Maryland facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
30
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #101 / 160Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 101st out of 160 nursing homes we track in Maryland for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Maryland facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #101 / 160Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 101st out of 160 nursing homes we track in Maryland for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Maryland facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
38
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #84 / 90Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 90 nursing homes we track in Maryland for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Maryland average, with its Statewide rank out of 90. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #84 / 90Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 90 nursing homes we track in Maryland for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Maryland average, with its Statewide rank out of 90. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
48.7%
This home usually has availability
Lower than the Maryland average: 83.2%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
63
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$318 - $407/Day
CountyMontgomery
CMS Certification Number215287
Resident Council
Family Council
Doctor on Staff
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Hospice partners Hospice providers this community works with, as listed in the Maryland Health Care Commission's consumer guide. Hospice brings end-of-life and comfort care to residents where they live.
- Holy Cross Home Care & Hospice
- Jewish Social Service Agency Hospice
- Montgomery Hospice & Prince George's Hospice
Mild Alzheimer's LevelAccepts residents with mild (early-stage) Alzheimer's or dementia, who are mostly independent but need reminders and some supervision. Maryland's Health Care Commission asks each assisted living community which stages of Alzheimer's or dementia it accepts and publishes the answer; other states do not report this.
Moderate Alzheimer's LevelAccepts residents with moderate (middle-stage) Alzheimer's or dementia, who need regular help with daily activities and closer supervision. Maryland's Health Care Commission asks each assisted living community which stages of Alzheimer's or dementia it accepts and publishes the answer; other states do not report this.
Severe Alzheimer's LevelAccepts residents with severe (late-stage) Alzheimer's or dementia, who need extensive help with most daily activities. Maryland's Health Care Commission asks each assisted living community which stages of Alzheimer's or dementia it accepts and publishes the answer; other states do not report this.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Full-Time Lifeguard
Housekeeping
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Minimum Age60 Years Old
Swimming Pool
Fitness Center
Library
Game Room
Whirlpool
Activities
Tai Chi
Zumba
Yoga Classes
Exercise Classes
Water Aerobics
Book Club
Billiards
Outings To Local Pool Halls
Personal Training
Touring HoursMonday through Friday 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; After hours by request; Weekends by appointment.
Building TypeMid-rise
Room Types
1 Bed
2 Bed
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
2
↓ 55% · MD 4.4This facility: 2, 55% below the Maryland average of 4.4 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
5
Rank #1 / 120Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 120 nursing homes we track in Maryland for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Maryland State average, with a ranking across all 120 MD facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 90% · MD 52This facility: 5, 90% below the Maryland average of 52 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.5
Rank #1 / 120Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 120 nursing homes we track in Maryland for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Maryland mean across 120 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 79% · MD 11.76This facility: 2.5, 79% below the Maryland average of 11.76 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
5 of 5 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MD 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Maryland average of 0.4 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 100% · MD 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Maryland average of 0.5 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
4
↓ 92% · MD 49.8This facility: 4, 92% below the Maryland average of 49.8 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MD 1.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Maryland average of 1.3 (among Maryland facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 10, 2025 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 2 of 5 citations · 3 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 10, 2025
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 02, 2019
2 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 5 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (40%)
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (40%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (20%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 5 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsDemographics Source: Maryland Health Care Commission consumer guide, as reported by the facility. Maryland is the only state that publishes resident demographics for each community. Data retrieved May 2026.
Resident demographic information for this facility.
Gender
- Female 82.4%
- Male 17.7%
Age Distribution
- 95+ 70.6%
- 85-94 23.5%
- 75-84 5.9%
Ethnicity
- White 100%
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
MD avg $53KMaryland average: $53,427. Average among the 87 Maryland facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MD avg 1.56Maryland average: 1.56. Average among the 87 Maryland facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MD avg 0.1Maryland average: 0.1. Average among the 87 Maryland facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Maryland average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 8% · MD 3.7This facility: 4.0, 8% above the MD average of 3.7 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 37% · MD 3.7This facility: 5.0, 37% above the MD average of 3.7 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.9
Score · lower is better
↓ 19% · MD 11.0This facility: 8.9, 19% below the MD average of 11.0 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 4% · MD 22.4This facility: 23.4, 4% above the MD average of 22.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 7 better, 2 worse, 1 near MD average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.0%
↑ 23% · MD 20.4This facility: 25.0, 23% above the MD average of 20.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
25.0%
↑ 23% · MD 20.4This facility: 25.0, 23% above the MD average of 20.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
↓ 11% · MD 22.2This facility: 19.7, 11% below the MD average of 22.2 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
↓ 11% · MD 22.2This facility: 19.7, 11% below the MD average of 22.2 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5%
↑ 2% · MD 25.0This facility: 25.5, 2% above the MD average of 25.0 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.5%
↑ 2% · MD 25.0This facility: 25.5, 2% above the MD average of 25.0 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 1.5 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 1.5 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 2.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 2.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 2.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 2.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 5.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 5.9 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 5.9This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 5.9 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 5.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 5.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · MD 5.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MD average of 5.4 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8%
↓ 70% · MD 22.8This facility: 6.8, 70% below the MD average of 22.8 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8%
↓ 70% · MD 22.8This facility: 6.8, 70% below the MD average of 22.8 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
44.4%
↑ 222% · MD 13.8This facility: 44.4, 222% above the MD average of 13.8 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
44.4%
↑ 222% · MD 13.8This facility: 44.4, 222% above the MD average of 13.8 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · MD 92.6This facility: 100.0, 8% above the MD average of 92.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 8% · MD 92.6This facility: 100.0, 8% above the MD average of 92.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
42.9%
↓ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 42.9, 20% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
42.9%
↓ 20% · US 53.7This facility: 42.9, 20% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.0%
↑ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 65.0, 28% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
65.0%
↑ 28% · US 50.6This facility: 65.0, 28% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4%
↑ 122% · MD 1.1This facility: 2.4, 122% above the MD average of 1.1 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.4%
↑ 122% · MD 1.1This facility: 2.4, 122% above the MD average of 1.1 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 25% · MD 79.1This facility: 99.3, 25% above the MD average of 79.1 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.3%
↑ 25% · MD 79.1This facility: 99.3, 25% above the MD average of 79.1 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 24% · MD 80.6This facility: 100.0, 24% above the MD average of 80.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 24% · MD 80.6This facility: 100.0, 24% above the MD average of 80.6 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.7%
↑ 59% · MD 21.2This facility: 33.7, 59% above the MD average of 21.2 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
33.7%
↑ 59% · MD 21.2This facility: 33.7, 59% above the MD average of 21.2 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.4%
↓ 66% · MD 9.9This facility: 3.4, 66% below the MD average of 9.9 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.4%
↓ 66% · MD 9.9This facility: 3.4, 66% below the MD average of 9.9 (among MD facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Maplewood Park Place’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 116 Maryland nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−6.8% operating margin
+3.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($3.2M) turns it into a net profit to $1.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Maryland homes
46.3% payroll share of revenue
MD average 47.0%Rank #38 / 116Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Maryland for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Maryland average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.0M while revenue rose $1.3M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Maryland homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MD median | Compared with MD homesRank in MD | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $19.8M | +$1.3M | Trend 20172024 | MD median $17.7M | Rank in MD Rank #46 / 116Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Maryland for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Maryland average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Above MD median Higher net patient revenue than 61% of MD homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $21.1M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | MD median — | Rank in MD Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.4M | +$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | MD median — | Rank in MD Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −6.8% | +3.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | MD median — | Rank in MD Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $3.2M | — | Trend — | MD median — | Rank in MD Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.9M | +$1.1M | Trend — | MD median — | Rank in MD Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Maryland homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MD median | Compared with MD homesRank in MD | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $9.2M | +$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | MD median $6.3M | Rank in MD Rank #32 / 116Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 116 nursing homes we track in Maryland for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Maryland average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 73% of homes | Above MD median Higher payroll than 73% of MD homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 46.3% | −2.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | MD median 40.5% | Rank in MD Rank #38 / 116Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 116 nursing homes we track in Maryland for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Maryland average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Maryland that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 68% of homes | Near MD average The MD average is 47.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MD benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Maryland payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MD payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $15.8M | $17.0M | $17.4M | $16.9M | $16.3M | $17.1M | $18.5M | $19.8M |
| Operating expenses | $18.1M | $17.9M | $18.9M | $17.8M | $18.9M | $20.2M | $20.3M | $21.1M |
| Net patient income | −$2.3M | −$0.9M | −$1.5M | −$0.8M | −$2.7M | −$3.1M | −$1.8M | −$1.4M |
| Operating margin | −14.3% | −5.1% | −8.4% | −5.0% | −16.5% | −18.2% | −9.8% | −6.8% |
| Net income | −$0.3M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $0.7M | −$0.3M | −$1.1M | $0.8M | $1.9M |
| Payroll costs | $7.0M | $7.1M | $7.5M | $7.8M | $8.0M | $8.4M | $9.1M | $9.2M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 44.0% | 41.7% | 43.1% | 46.3% | 49.2% | 48.9% | 49.2% | 46.3% |
| Beds | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 | 259 |
| Gross revenue | $17.2M | $19.0M | $19.5M | $18.3M | $17.4M | $17.7M | $18.8M | $19.9M |
| Salaries | $6.1M | $6.2M | $6.6M | $6.8M | $6.8M | $7.2M | $7.9M | $7.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $11.1M | $10.8M | $11.4M | $9.9M | $10.9M | $11.9M | $11.2M | $12.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $164 | $171 | $175 | $176 | $182 | $188 | $203 | $218 |
| Cost per day | $187 | $180 | $189 | $185 | $212 | $223 | $223 | $233 |
| Average length of stay | 65.2 days | 72.6 days | 80.7 days | 87.5 days | 93.3 days | 106.1 days | 77.0 days | 63.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
83 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
48 · 58%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
35 · 42%
Resident snapshot
15 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
2 · 13%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
13 · 87%
Leaving
85 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
40 · 47%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
45 · 53%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Maplewood Park Place
Places of interest near Maplewood Park Place
2.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bethesda's city center to Maplewood Park Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.18 miles to nearest hospital (Suburban Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Maplewood Park Place
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Bethesda
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MD Dept. of Health (OHCQ), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Maryland average is: 47.0% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maplewood Park Place | NH AL IL MC SNF | Bethesda (Pooks Hill) | 29
Facility
29
MD AVG
104
Rank
#120 / 139 |
48.7%
Facility
48.7%
MD AVG
83.2%
Rank
#84 / 90 | -41% | - | - | +32% | - | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 120 | 5
Facility
5
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#1 / 120 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#1 / 120 | 1 | 15 | - |
38
Facility
38
MD AVG
45
Rank
#101 / 160 | Sunrise Senior Living Services Inc | $19.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$19.5M
Rank
#46 / 116 | $9.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#32 / 116 | 46.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
47%
Rank
#38 / 116 | 215287 | |||
| Sterling Care Bethesda | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Bethesda | 200
Facility
200
MD AVG
104
Rank
#7 / 139 |
88.9%
Facility
88.9%
MD AVG
83.2%
Rank
#38 / 90 | +7% | 3.07
Facility
3.07
MD AVG
3.92
Rank
#99 / 118 | -27% | -22% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 120 | 38
Facility
38
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#43 / 120 | 7.6
Facility
7.6
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#25 / 120 | - | 178 | - |
45
Facility
45
MD AVG
45
Rank
#79 / 160 | Bbf Holdings LLC | $24.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$24.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$19.5M
Rank
#22 / 116 | $9.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#30 / 116 | 38.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
38.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
47%
Rank
#68 / 116 | 215187 | ||||
| Carriage Hill of Bethesda | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Bethesda (Maplewood) | 108
Facility
108
MD AVG
104
Rank
#69 / 139 |
95.8%
Facility
95.8%
MD AVG
83.2%
Rank
#9 / 90 | +15% | 3.56
Facility
3.56
MD AVG
3.92
Rank
#46 / 118 | -37% | -9% | $0
Facility
$0
MD AVG
$53.4k
Rank
#1 / 120 | 43
Facility
43
MD AVG
52.0
Rank
#59 / 120 | 14.3
Facility
14.3
MD AVG
11.8
Rank
#88 / 120 | - | 104 | - |
54
Facility
54
MD AVG
45
Rank
#61 / 160 | Derek Vucich | $16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$19.5M
Rank
#66 / 116 | $8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
$8.2M
Rank
#37 / 116 | 50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
50.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MD AVG
47%
Rank
#27 / 116 | 215234 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MD nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Maryland
Maplewood Park Place is located in Bethesda, Maryland.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Maryland.
More homes from the same operator
Operated by
Sunrise
Frequently Asked Questions about Maplewood Park Place
What neighborhood is Maplewood Park Place in?
Maplewood Park Place is in the Pooks Hill neighborhood of Bethesda.
Is Maplewood Park Place in a walkable area?
Maplewood Park Place has a walk score of 38. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Maplewood Park Place?
Maplewood Park Place's occupancy is 48.7%.
How long has Maplewood Park Place been in business?
Maplewood Park Place has been operating for approximately 30 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Maplewood Park Place?
Yes, Maplewood Park Place allows residents to bring their pets.
What is the best email address for Maplewood Park Place?
The team at Maplewood Park Place can be reached at info@maplewoodparkplace.com.
Does Maplewood Park Place operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Maplewood Park Place is registered as a for-profit in MD.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
