Deficiencies (last 5 years)

Deficiencies (over 5 years) 5.6 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.

40% worse than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies per year

16 12 8 4 0
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026

Census

Latest occupancy rate 71% occupied

Based on a February 2026 inspection.

Occupancy over time

120 150 180 210 240 Mar 2022 Jan 2023 Sep 2023 Apr 2024 Sep 2025 Dec 2025 Feb 2026

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 10, 2026

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management inspection conducted in response to incident reports involving inappropriate and sexualized behaviors by Resident 1 towards other residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that Resident 1 engaged in two separate sexual relationships with Residents 2 and 3. Resident 2 denied the incidents, Resident 3 was unresponsive, and staff had been actively managing Resident 1's behaviors. The complaint was not substantiated with deficiencies.
Findings
The investigation found that staff were aware of Resident 1's behaviors and had taken steps including medication adjustments and one-to-one supervision. No deficiencies were observed during the visit, and Resident 1 was subsequently removed from the facility by their responsible party.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 151

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and authored the report
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in the report as Licensing Program Manager

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 4, 2026

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a required 1 year annual inspection to evaluate the facility's compliance with health and safety regulations.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required safety equipment and supplies in place. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and involved in facility tour and evaluation.
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and evaluation of the facility.
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager on the report.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 153 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Dec 2, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was conducted to investigate a complaint alleging that staff posted a resident's picture on social media without consent.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff posted a resident's picture on social media without consent. The investigation included interviews and record reviews and concluded the allegation was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that although a staff member posted an image showing a resident's body with the face covered by an emoji, the resident's identity was not disclosed. Both staff involved had received appropriate training, and the allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 153

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Shasta MccuneAssistant Executive DirectorInterviewed during the investigation and exit interview
Kelli HendrixMemory Care DirectorInterviewed during the investigation and exit interview

Inspection Report

Census: 159 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Nov 25, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management follow-up to an incident report received on October 29, 2025. The Licensing Program Analysts conducted interviews and followed up on the egress system.

Findings
The Licensing Program Analysts conducted interviews and reviewed the egress system as part of the follow-up visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to the facility.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministrator/DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during the visit
Avelina MartinezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the case management visit
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the case management visit
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in the report header

Inspection Report

Follow-Up
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Nov 10, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management follow-up on an incident report received on October 29, 2025, to assess the safety and care related to resident R1 and facility conditions.

Findings
No deficiencies were found during the inspection. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and a building exterior tour, noting a non-operable exterior exit gate and requested several documents related to resident R1's care and facility safety plans.

Report Facts
Census: 151 Total Capacity: 214

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kelli HendrixMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the inspection
Avelina MartinezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection visit
Kathleen GilbeyAdministrator/DirectorFacility Administrator named in the report header

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 149 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Oct 17, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address an allegation that staff forced residents to attend an outing.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff forced residents to attend an outing. Interviews with nine residents and six staff, along with record reviews, found no corroboration of the allegation. The complaint was determined to be unfounded.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with residents and staff, and a review of records related to activities and outings. The complaint was determined to be unfounded as no evidence supported the allegation, and no deficiencies were cited.

Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 9 Staff interviewed: 6 Outings frequency: 1.5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Cynthia TamayoLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorFacility administrator interviewed during investigation
Shantel KoehlerActivities DirectorInterviewed regarding the complaint and activities
Flint MarananAssistant Executive DirectorMentioned as not present during visit; his wife owns the restaurant involved in one outing

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Oct 7, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to an allegation that staff does not give residents access to the common area.

Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. The allegation that staff does not give residents access to the common area was found valid based on the preponderance of the standard.
Findings
The allegation was substantiated based on interviews and observations. A staff member asked a resident and their privately hired companion to move their breathing exercise from the library to the spa room due to a scheduled staff meeting in the library, which posed a potential risk to residents in care.

Deficiencies (1)
Staff asked a resident and their privately hired companion who was in the library to move their breathing exercise to the spa area, posing a potential risk to residents in care.
Report Facts
Deficiency Type: 1 Capacity: 214 Census: 151 Plan of Correction Due Date: Oct 13, 2025

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorNamed in relation to the complaint investigation and findings.
Flint MarananAssistant Executive DirectorNamed in relation to the complaint investigation and findings.
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 152 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Sep 5, 2025

Visit Reason
An unannounced case management visit was conducted to gather additional information and facility documentation related to a SOC 341 report concerning sexually inappropriate behavior by a resident.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved Resident 1 engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior with another resident, as observed by the resident's wife. The facility implemented a safety plan and coordinated with the resident's responsible party. Resident 1 has moved out of the facility.
Findings
The visit found that a safety plan was implemented to address the behavior of the resident involved, who has since moved out of the facility. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 152

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit and reported on safety plan implementation
Kelli HendrixMemory Care DirectorReported on safety plan implementation related to resident behavior
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced case management visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 152 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Sep 5, 2025

Visit Reason
An unannounced case management visit was conducted to gather additional information and facility documentation related to a SOC 341 report about a resident engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior with another resident.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved Resident 1 engaging in sexually inappropriate behavior with another resident, with previous similar incidents reported. The safety plan was implemented and the resident moved out of the facility.
Findings
The facility implemented a safety plan to address the behavior of the resident involved, who has since moved out. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyExecutive DirectorMet with during the visit and reported on safety plan implementation.
Kelli HendrixMemory Care DirectorReported on the safety plan implementation related to Resident 1's behavior.
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced case management visit.
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager on the report.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 150 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Aug 22, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2025-07-28 regarding inadequate incontinent care, uncomfortable meal conditions, and lack of dignity and respect in resident care.

Complaint Details
The complaint allegations were found to be unsubstantiated after investigation. The preponderance of evidence standard was not met to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, family members, and direct observations. No evidence was found to substantiate the allegations. Residents' incontinent care needs were met, mealtimes were comfortable, and residents were treated with dignity and respect. No deficiencies were cited.

Report Facts
Facility census: 150 Facility capacity: 214 Family members interviewed: 6 Staff interviewed: 5 Residents interviewed: 5 Residents observed in dining room: 29

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and authored the report
Kathleen GilbeyExecutive Director/AdministratorFacility administrator met during the investigation
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 150 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Aug 22, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations that staff do not ensure residents' incontinent care needs are met, do not allow residents to eat their meals comfortably, and do not treat residents with dignity and respect regarding their health conditions.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations received on 2025-07-28 regarding incontinent care, meal comfort, and dignity/respect in health conditions. The findings were unsubstantiated based on interviews and observations.
Findings
After interviews with staff, residents, family members, and direct observations, the investigation was unable to corroborate any of the allegations. No deficiencies were cited, and the complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Census: 150 Total Capacity: 214 Number of staff interviewed: 5 Number of family members/friends interviewed: 6 Number of residents interviewed: 5 Number of residents observed in dining room: 29

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyExecutive Director/AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Apr 22, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced annual inspection conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with licensing requirements and ensure the health and safety of residents.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, in good repair, and in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Observations included sufficient food supplies, proper medication storage, and safety measures such as smoke detectors and fire extinguishers. Resident and staff files were complete, and staff background checks were verified.

Report Facts
Facility staff count: 112 Resident files reviewed: 10 Resident medications reviewed: 5 Fire extinguisher last serviced: Apr 16, 2025 Hot water temperature: 109.1 Facility thermostat temperature: 73

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorFacility administrator present during inspection and exit interview
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Shakaricka HughesLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Apr 22, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced annual inspection conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with licensing requirements and ensure the health and safety of residents.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, in good repair, and in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Observations included sufficient lighting, proper furniture in resident rooms, adequate food supplies, and proper medication storage. Some minor issues such as a strong urine odor in one resident's room were addressed during the visit.

Report Facts
Facility staff count: 112 Hot water temperature: 109.1 Fire extinguisher last serviced date: Apr 16, 2025 Resident medication records reviewed: 5 Resident files reviewed: 10

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministrator/DirectorFacility designated administrator present during inspection and exit interview
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Shakaricka HughesLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report as Licensing Program Manager

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 140 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jan 14, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations that staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation and did not ensure a resident had sufficient clothing.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated, meaning there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred regarding bug infestation and insufficient resident clothing.
Findings
The investigation found that the facility responded promptly to bed bug reports by hiring pest control companies and treating affected areas, and provided clothing and hygiene items to residents when necessary. Based on the evidence gathered, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 140

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation
Lisa RiosLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report as Licensing Program Manager

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 140 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jan 14, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to deliver findings related to allegations that staff did not keep the facility free from bug infestation and did not ensure a resident had sufficient clothing.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Despite the allegations, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violations occurred.
Findings
The investigation found that although bed bugs were detected and treated promptly by professional companies, it was unclear if the facility failed to keep the facility free from bug infestation. Regarding clothing, the facility purchased clothing and hygiene items for residents affected by bed bugs, but it was unclear if staff failed to ensure sufficient clothing. The allegations were ultimately found to be unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 140

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during complaint investigation
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Lisa RiosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to a complaint received on 2024-04-25 regarding allegations of inadequate resident care including assistance with showers, blood glucose testing equipment maintenance, and timely medication reordering.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved three allegations: 1) staff not assisting a resident with showers, 2) staff not ensuring the resident's blood glucose testing equipment was working properly, and 3) staff not ensuring residents' medication was reordered timely causing missed medication. The findings were unsubstantiated as evidence did not prove the alleged violations occurred.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Facility records, staff and resident interviews indicated that the resident in question was generally independent in personal care and medication management. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Facility capacity: 214 Census: 135 Complaint control number: 27-AS-20240425082151

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during complaint investigation
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystConducted complaint investigation
Lisa RiosLicensing Program ManagerOversaw complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Follow-Up
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 2 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management follow-up on an incident report received by the department on 2024-06-29 regarding a resident's medication administration and wound care.

Findings
The facility failed to report a resident's unstageable wound within the required 7 days and did not administer prescribed medication to the resident for a total of 12 days, posing potential health, safety, and personal rights risks.

Deficiencies (2)
Failure to report resident's unstageable wound within 7 days of occurrence as required by regulations.
Failure to ensure resident received prescribed medication as ordered by physician from 06/03/2024 to 06/06/2024 and 06/12/2024 to 06/20/2024.
Report Facts
Deficiency due date: Aug 23, 2024 Deficiency due date: Aug 24, 2024 Days medication not given: 12

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with during the inspection visit
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Lisa RiosLicensing Program ManagerSupervisor overseeing the inspection

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to a complaint received on 2024-05-08 alleging that the facility did not prevent a resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility did not prevent a resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents. The investigation found the allegations to be unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with 9 residents and 5 staff members, all of whom denied witnessing or making inappropriate comments. Facility records and house rules were reviewed. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Resident interviews: 9 Staff interviews: 5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during complaint investigation
Arielle PascuaLicensing EvaluatorConducted complaint investigation
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystAssisted in conducting complaint investigation
Lisa RiosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations received on 2024-04-25 regarding staff not assisting residents with showers, malfunctioning blood glucose testing equipment, and untimely medication reordering causing missed medication.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated, meaning there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Findings
The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Facility records, staff and resident interviews indicated unclear or no failure by staff to assist with showers, ensure blood glucose equipment functionality, or timely reorder medication. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 135 Number of allegations: 3 Staff interviewed: 5 Residents interviewed: 9

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during the complaint investigation
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystEvaluator who conducted the complaint investigation
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystEvaluator who conducted the complaint investigation
Lisa RiosSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations that staff did not respond to residents' call pendants in a timely manner and did not ensure residents' oxygen care needs were met in a timely manner.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff did not respond to residents' call pendants in a timely manner, based on interviews with residents and staff, and review of SMART care logs. The allegation regarding oxygen care needs was unsubstantiated after evidence showed proper monitoring and assistance.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that staff did not respond to residents' call pendants in a timely manner, with 7 out of 8 residents' alerts not responded to within 15 minutes, posing a potential health and safety risk. The allegation regarding oxygen care needs was found to be unsubstantiated after interviews and record reviews showed residents' oxygen needs were being met appropriately.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to have a signal system that transmits a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location or produce an auditory signal at the living unit loud enough to summon staff, evidenced by 7 out of 8 resident SMART care logs showing alerts not responded to timely.
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 4 Residents' SMART care logs reviewed: 8 Unresponded alerts: 7 Residents on oxygen interviewed: 6 Facility staff interviewed: 5 Facility capacity: 214 Facility census: 135

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorMet with during investigation and named in findings
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted complaint investigation and authored report
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystAssisted in conducting complaint investigation
Terry ErvinVice President of OperationProvided information on facility response times

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to deliver findings regarding allegations that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, did not assist resident with feeding, and did not meet resident's needs.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, did not assist resident with feeding, and did not meet resident's needs. The investigation included interviews and record reviews. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence. It was noted that resident 1’s glasses were broken and discarded without notification, but reimbursement was provided. Resident 1 was able to feed themselves and had no concerns reported by residents or staff regarding assistance with feeding or meeting needs.

Report Facts
Reimbursement amount: 400 Resident interviews: 9 Staff interviews: 5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorNamed in relation to findings about safeguarding resident’s personal belongings and interviewed during complaint investigation
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Holly WilliamsLicensing Program AnalystAssisted in complaint investigation visit
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystAssisted in complaint investigation visit
Juliann OwensAssistant ExecutiveMet with LPAs during complaint visit
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Follow-Up
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 2 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management follow-up on an incident report received by the department regarding a medication administration issue and delayed incident reporting involving resident 1 (R1).

Complaint Details
The visit was triggered by a complaint incident report received on 06/29/2024 regarding medication errors and delayed incident reporting for resident 1. The complaint was substantiated based on record review and interviews.
Findings
The facility failed to report an unstageable wound incident within the required 7 days and did not administer prescribed medication to resident 1 for a total of 12 days, posing health and safety risks. Deficiencies were cited related to these failures.

Deficiencies (2)
Facility did not report resident's unstageable wound incident within 7 days as required by regulation.
Facility failed to ensure resident received prescribed medication as ordered by physician, missing doses over multiple days.
Report Facts
Days medication not given: 12 Incident report delay: 9 Plan of Correction due date: Aug 23, 2024 Plan of Correction due date: Aug 24, 2024

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during the visit and named in the report.
Arielle PascuaLicensing EvaluatorConducted the inspection and authored the report.
Lisa RiosSupervisorNamed as supervisor overseeing the inspection.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations that staff did not respond to residents' call pendants in a timely manner and did not ensure residents' oxygen care needs were met in a timely manner.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for the allegation that staff did not respond to residents' call pendants in a timely manner. The allegation that staff did not ensure residents' oxygen care needs were met in a timely manner was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that staff did not respond to residents' call pendants in a timely manner, with 7 out of 8 SMART care log alerts not responded to within 15 minutes, posing potential health and safety risks. The allegation regarding oxygen care needs was unsubstantiated as evidence showed residents on oxygen received appropriate monitoring and assistance.

Deficiencies (1)
Based on 7 out of 8 resident SMART care logs, residents' alert calls were not responded to timely, sometimes taking over 15 minutes, posing potential health, safety, or personal rights risks.
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 4 SMART care logs reviewed: 8 SMART care logs with unresponded alerts: 7 Residents on oxygen interviewed: 6 Facility staff interviewed: 5 Facility capacity: 214 Facility census: 135 Plan of Correction due date: Aug 2, 2024

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorMet with during investigation and exit interview
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted complaint investigation and signed report
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystAssisted in conducting complaint investigation
Terry ErvinVice President of OperationProvided information on facility response times
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerOversaw complaint investigation and signed report

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The inspection visit was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation following a complaint received on 2024-04-19 regarding allegations that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, did not assist resident with feeding, and did not meet resident's needs.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings, did not assist resident with feeding, and did not meet resident's needs. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents and review of records. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence. It was noted that resident 1's glasses were broken and discarded by staff without informing the resident or Power of Attorney, but reimbursement was provided. Resident 1 was able to feed independently and did not require assistance as per the individualized service plan and physician's report.

Report Facts
Reimbursement amount: 400 Census: 135 Total capacity: 214

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorNamed in relation to findings about safeguarding resident's personal belongings and interviewed during complaint investigation
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 135 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 23, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to a complaint received on 2024-05-08 alleging that the facility did not prevent a resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that the facility did not prevent a resident from making inappropriate comments to other residents. After investigation, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated as there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violation occurred.
Findings
The investigation included interviews with 9 residents and 5 staff members, all of whom denied witnessing or making inappropriate comments. The facility's staff house rules prohibit disruptive or abusive behavior. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.

Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 9 Staff interviewed: 5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyFacility Designated AdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during the complaint investigation
Arielle PascuaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Lisa RiosLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager on the report

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 138 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Apr 24, 2024

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced annual inspection conducted to evaluate the health and safety compliance of the facility.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, in good repair, and compliant with regulations including fire safety, medication storage, and resident care. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Report Facts
Water temperature: 113.1 Residents pendant check: 5 Resident files reviewed: 6 Staff files reviewed: 5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and authored the report
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorFacility administrator met during inspection
Janae FernandezMarketing DirectorAssisted in inspection of physical plant and resident areas

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 138 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Apr 24, 2024

Visit Reason
An unannounced annual inspection was conducted to evaluate the health and safety conditions of the facility and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, in good repair, and compliant with health and safety regulations. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. All safety equipment, medication storage, and resident care documentation were in order.

Report Facts
Water temperature: 113.1 Fire extinguisher last serviced: Apr 12, 2024 Elevator inspection expiry: Aug 23, 2024 Exhaust hood last service date: Feb 15, 2024 Exhaust hood next service date: Jun 1, 2024 Residents files reviewed: 6 Staff files reviewed: 5 Residents pendant tested: 5

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kathleen GilbeyAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Janae FernandezMarketing DirectorAssisted in physical plant inspection

Inspection Report

Census: 136 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Mar 20, 2024

Visit Reason
An unannounced case management inspection was conducted to address concerns discovered during an unrelated complaint investigation.

Findings
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. The case management inspection was not completed due to time constraints and will be continued at a later date.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 136 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 3 Date: Mar 20, 2024

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations including neglect/lack of supervision resulting in a resident fracture, disrepair of the facility call system, and failure to inform a resident's authorized person of hospitalization.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. Allegations included neglect/lack of supervision causing a resident fracture, failure to notify authorized persons of hospitalization, and malfunctioning call system. The investigation included interviews with multiple staff and corroborating statements from authorized representatives.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations of neglect/lack of supervision, failure to notify authorized representatives, and issues with the call system. Staff interviews confirmed multiple falls of a resident without a fall prevention plan, unreliable alert pendants, and failure to notify emergency contacts of the resident's fall and hospitalization.

Deficiencies (3)
Failure to provide a fall prevention plan resulting in resident injury and hospitalization.
Failure to notify authorized representatives of resident incidents including falls and hospitalization.
Facility call system not operating properly, resulting in staff not being notified of resident alerts.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 136 Deficiencies cited: 3 Plan of Correction Due Date: Mar 21, 2024

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Kathleen GilbyAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation

Inspection Report

Census: 136 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Mar 20, 2024

Visit Reason
An unannounced case management inspection was conducted to address concerns discovered during an unrelated complaint investigation.

Findings
No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. The case management inspection was not completed due to time constraints and will be continued on a later date.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 136 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 3 Date: Mar 20, 2024

Visit Reason
Unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations including neglect/lack of supervision resulting in a resident fracture, disrepair of the facility call system, and failure to notify authorized persons of resident hospitalization.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated based on interviews and evidence showing neglect/lack of supervision causing resident injury, failure to notify authorized representatives of hospitalization, and malfunctioning call system. The investigation was triggered by a complaint received on 2023-09-21.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations of neglect/lack of supervision, failure to notify authorized representatives, and malfunctioning call system. Staff interviews revealed multiple falls of a resident without a fall prevention plan, unreliable alert pendants, and failure to notify authorized persons of the resident's hospitalization. Immediate civil penalties were issued due to resident injury.

Deficiencies (3)
Failure to provide a fall prevention plan for a resident at risk, resulting in falls and a fracture requiring hospitalization.
Failure to notify authorized representatives of incidents including resident's fall and hospitalization.
Facility call system did not operate properly, with staff not always notified of resident alerts.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 136 Deficiencies cited: 3 Plan of Correction Due Date: Mar 21, 2024

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation report
Kathleen GilbyFacility representative met during investigation

Inspection Report

Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Nov 16, 2023

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management inspection conducted in response to concerns brought to the department's attention on 10/30/2023 regarding the facility's failure to provide timely written responses to family council concerns.

Findings
The facility was found deficient for not providing written responses within 14 calendar days to family council concerns submitted on 09/09/2023 and 10/10/2023, with only a verbal response provided on 11/14/2023. Deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to respond in writing within 14 calendar days to family council written concerns or recommendations as required by §1569.158(f).
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 147 Plan of Correction Due Date: Nov 30, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorNamed in relation to failure to provide timely written responses to family council concerns
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and authored the report
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerSupervisor overseeing the inspection
Terry ErvinVice President of OperationsMentioned as recipient of phone calls and emails regarding concerns

Inspection Report

Plan of Correction
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Nov 16, 2023

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) follow-up to verify correction of prior deficiencies and plans of correction due on 11/07/2023 from a complaint investigation conducted on 10/24/2023.

Complaint Details
The visit followed a complaint investigation conducted on 10/24/2023. The POC was due on 11/07/2023. Civil penalties were assessed for failure to correct the cited deficiency by the due date.
Findings
The deficiency cited under Title 22 Regulation 87303(i)(1)(B) was cleared during this visit. Although the facility did not comply by the original POC due date, the administrator provided POC documents during the visit. Civil penalties were assessed for failure to correct by the due date, accruing $100 per day until correction.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to correct deficiency under Title 22 Regulation 87303(i)(1)(B) by the POC due date.
Report Facts
Civil penalty accrual rate: 100

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the POC visit and provided POC documents.
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced Plan of Correction visit.
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in the report as Licensing Program Manager.

Inspection Report

Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Nov 16, 2023

Visit Reason
The visit was conducted in response to concerns brought to the department's attention on 10/30/2023 regarding the facility's failure to provide timely written responses to family council concerns and recommendations.

Findings
The inspection found that the administrator did not ensure written responses to family council concerns were provided within the required 14 calendar days, with delays noted for meetings held on 09/09/2023 and 10/10/2023. A verbal response was provided only on 11/14/2023. Deficiencies were cited under California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to respond in writing to family council concerns or recommendations within 14 calendar days as required by CCR §1569.158(f).
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 147 Plan of Correction Due Date: Nov 30, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorNamed in relation to failure to provide timely written responses to family council concerns
Terry ErvinVice President of OperationsMentioned as recipient of phone calls and emails regarding concerns

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Oct 24, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection visit was conducted as an unannounced complaint investigation regarding allegations that staff do not respond to resident call bells in a timely manner.

Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated based on evidence including interviews with 7 out of 10 residents expressing concerns about delayed staff response to call pendants, and review of 10 residents' Personal Health Button Reports showing 3 residents' calls were not responded to within 15 minutes and 7 residents' calls were never responded to.
Findings
The allegation that staff do not respond to resident call bells in a timely manner was substantiated. Investigation included interviews with residents and review of Personal Health Button Reports, revealing delayed or absent responses to call pendants, posing potential health and safety risks.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to maintain a signal system that transmits a visual and/or auditory signal to summon staff as required by CCR 87303(i)(1)(B).
Report Facts
Residents interviewed: 7 Residents' Personal Health Button Reports reviewed: 10 Residents with calls not responded within 15 minutes: 3 Residents with calls never responded: 7 Facility capacity: 214 Facility census: 147 Plan of Correction due date: Nov 7, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorMet during investigation and provided information on facility response times
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Terry ErvinVP of OperationsAcknowledged facility response time and participated in meeting regarding complaint

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Oct 24, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to an allegation that staff do not respond to resident(s) call bells in a timely manner.

Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. The allegation was that staff do not respond to resident call bells in a timely manner. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, and review of records. It was found that response times exceeded 15 minutes for some residents and some calls were never responded to.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegation that staff did not respond to residents' call bells in a timely manner. Review of Personal Health Button Reports revealed that 3 out of 10 residents' calls were not responded to within 15 minutes, and 7 residents reported that calls were never responded to, posing a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk.

Deficiencies (1)
Failure to have a signal system that transmits a visual and/or auditory signal to a central staffed location or produces an auditory signal at the living unit loud enough to summon staff, as required by CCR 87303(i)(1)(B).
Report Facts
Residents with delayed response: 3 Residents with no response: 7 Facility capacity: 214 Facility census: 147

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst and involved in investigation findings.
Terry ErvinVP of OperationsAcknowledged facility response time and involved in investigation findings.
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation.
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerOversaw the complaint investigation.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Oct 19, 2023

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations that staff were not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements and not adequately keeping records regarding a resident's expenses.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that staff were not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements and not adequately keeping records regarding a resident's expenses. The allegation about financial statements was unsubstantiated, while the record-keeping allegation was substantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegation regarding staff not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence. However, the allegation that staff did not adequately keep records regarding a resident's expenses was substantiated, citing failure to provide a monthly itemized statement of all separate charges incurred by the resident.

Deficiencies (1)
Administrator did not ensure that a resident is receiving a monthly statement itemizing all separate charges incurred by the resident on resident's invoice statement.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 147 Deficiency due date: Oct 27, 2023 Charge amount: 15

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during complaint investigation and provided information about invoice statements
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Oct 19, 2023

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations regarding staff not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements and inadequately keeping records regarding a resident's expenses.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that staff were not providing a resident with a copy of financial statements and were not adequately keeping records regarding a resident's expenses. The allegation regarding financial statements was unsubstantiated, while the allegation regarding record keeping was substantiated.
Findings
The investigation found the allegation that staff did not provide a resident with a copy of financial statements to be unsubstantiated, but substantiated that staff did not adequately keep records regarding a resident's expenses, specifically failing to provide a monthly itemized statement of charges. A deficiency was cited related to this issue with a plan of correction due.

Deficiencies (1)
Administrator did not ensure that a resident is receiving a monthly statement itemizing all separate charges incurred by the resident on resident's invoice statement.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 147 Deficiencies cited: 1 Fine amount: 15 Plan of Correction Due Date: Oct 27, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during complaint investigation and provided information regarding resident invoice statements
Pang LeeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Czarina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerOversaw complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 2 Date: Sep 22, 2023

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations of staff stealing and fraudulently using residents' credit cards and failure to adhere to reporting requirements.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated for allegations of personal rights violations involving theft and fraudulent use of residents' credit cards by staff, and failure to meet mandated reporting requirements. The facility reported four victims and a staff member was arrested. The complaint regarding failure to follow theft/loss policy was found to be unfounded.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations of credit card theft and unauthorized use by a staff member who was arrested and charged with 12 felony counts. The facility self-reported four instances of theft but failed to meet all mandated reporting requirements, specifically the timely submission of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse reports to the local ombudsperson. Another complaint regarding failure to follow theft/loss policy was investigated and found to be unfounded.

Deficiencies (2)
Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities: To be free from neglect, financial exploitation, involuntary seclusion, punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse. This requirement was not met as evidenced by four instances of theft of a resident's credit card and unauthorized use by a staff member who was arrested by local law enforcement.
Administrator - Qualifications and Duties: The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). This requirement was not met as evidenced by the facility not meeting all reporting requirements for mandated reporting of financial abuse as a suspected dependent adult/elder abuse report was not submitted within two working days for one incident.
Report Facts
Number of identified victims: 4 Felony counts charged: 12 Plan of Correction Due Date: Oct 24, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met with evaluator and discussed investigation details

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 2 Date: Sep 22, 2023

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations received on 07/28/2023 regarding staff stealing and fraudulently using residents' credit cards and failure to adhere to reporting requirements.

Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated for allegations of personal rights violations involving theft and fraudulent use of residents' credit cards by a staff member, and failure to adhere to mandated reporting requirements. The staff member was arrested and charged with 12 felony counts. The allegation regarding failure to follow theft/loss policy was unfounded.
Findings
The investigation substantiated the allegations of personal rights violations involving four instances of credit card theft and unauthorized use by a staff member who was arrested. The facility failed to meet all mandated reporting requirements, specifically in submitting a suspected dependent adult/elder abuse report to the local ombudsperson within two working days. Another allegation regarding failure to follow theft/loss policy was found to be unfounded.

Deficiencies (2)
Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities: To be free from neglect, financial exploitation, involuntary seclusion, punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse. This requirement was not met as evidenced by four instances of theft of a resident's credit card and unauthorized use by a staff member who was arrested.
Administrator - Qualifications and Duties: The administrator shall have the qualifications specified in Sections 87405(d)(1) through (7). This requirement was not met as evidenced by the facility did not meet all reporting requirements for mandated reporting of financial abuse as a suspected dependent adult/elder abuse report was not submitted within two working days for one incident.
Report Facts
Identified victims: 4 Felony counts: 12 Deficiencies cited: 2 Plan of Correction due date: Oct 24, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met during investigation and discussed findings

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Sep 5, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to a complaint received on 2023-08-04 alleging that the licensee does not ensure the facility is in good repair.

Complaint Details
The complaint was unsubstantiated as there was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred.
Findings
The investigation found that one of the facility's elevators was out of service from August 1, 2023, and was repaired on August 11, 2023, after a delayed replacement part shipment. The facility implemented meal tray service and transportation assistance during the elevator outage. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove a violation.

Report Facts
Complaint receipt date: Aug 4, 2023 Elevator out of service start date: Aug 1, 2023 Elevator repair date: Aug 11, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Avelina MartinezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met during the investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Sep 5, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to a complaint alleging that the licensee does not ensure the facility is in good repair.

Complaint Details
The complaint was unsubstantiated as the facility addressed the elevator issue in a timely manner and there was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred.
Findings
The investigation found that one of the facility's elevators was out of service from August 1, 2023, and was repaired on August 11, 2023, after a delayed replacement part shipment. The facility implemented meal tray service and transportation assistance during the elevator outage. Due to lack of preponderance of evidence, the allegation was unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Facility capacity: 214 Census: 146 Complaint receipt date: Aug 4, 2023 Elevator out of service date: Aug 1, 2023 Elevator repair date: Aug 11, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Avelina MartinezLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met with Licensing Program Analyst during the visit
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report as Licensing Program Manager

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 25, 2023

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted to investigate allegations including suspicious death and failure to call 911 during a medical emergency at Oakmont of East Sacramento.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations of suspicious death and failure to call 911 during a medical emergency. The allegations were determined unsubstantiated or unfounded based on interviews, record reviews, and evidence. The resident had seizure episodes and expired at the facility. Alpha One was contacted for emergency transport instead of 911, but this was deemed appropriate.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations unsubstantiated or unfounded. The resident had a seizure-like episode and expired at the facility with a do not resuscitate order. Staff contacted Alpha One for medical transport, which is certified to provide emergency services. No deficiencies were cited under California Code Regulation, TITLE 22.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 147

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 147 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 25, 2023

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations including suspicious death and failure to call 911 during a medical emergency at Oakmont of East Sacramento.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved allegations of suspicious death and failure to call 911 during a medical emergency. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated/unfounded based on interviews, record reviews, and evidence gathered during the investigation.
Findings
The investigation found that the allegations could not be substantiated. The resident had a seizure-like episode and expired at the facility with a do not resuscitate order. Staff contacted Alpha One for medical transport, which is certified to provide emergency services, rather than 911. No deficiencies were cited.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 147

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met with the Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager on the report

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: May 10, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted to address allegations that facility staff were not ensuring resident showers, room cleanliness, and proper dietary restrictions, as well as improper billing of a resident.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that facility staff were not ensuring resident showers, room cleanliness, and proper dietary restrictions, and that the facility staff were improperly billing a resident. The allegations regarding personal care and dietary restrictions were unsubstantiated, while the billing allegation was substantiated.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations regarding showers, room cleanliness, and dietary restrictions to be unsubstantiated based on resident statements and documentation. However, the allegation of improper billing related to a pet fee was substantiated, with the facility crediting the resident for the erroneous charge. No deficiencies were noted for the first set of allegations, but one deficiency was cited related to billing procedures.

Deficiencies (1)
Payment provisions, including a comprehensive description of billing and payment procedures, were not met as evidenced by facility disclosure of reimbursement to resident for a pet service fee intended for dog care, not cats, posing a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 146 Deficiencies cited: 1 Plan of Correction Due Date: May 12, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and inspection
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: May 10, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted to investigate allegations that facility staff were not ensuring resident receives showers, not cleaning resident's room, and not providing food following dietary restrictions, as well as a separate allegation regarding improper billing of a resident.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations received on 2023-01-26 regarding failure to provide showers, room cleaning, and dietary compliance. These were unsubstantiated. A separate allegation of improper billing was substantiated, involving a pet fee charged inappropriately to a resident.
Findings
The investigation found the first set of allegations regarding showering assistance, room cleanliness, and dietary restrictions unsubstantiated based on resident statements and records. However, the allegation of improper billing related to a pet fee was substantiated, with the facility crediting the resident for the erroneous charge. No other deficiencies were noted.

Deficiencies (1)
Payment provisions, including a comprehensive description of billing and payment procedures, were not met as evidenced by facility disclosure of reimbursement to resident for pet service fee intended for dog care, not cats, posing potential health, safety, and personal rights risk.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 146 Deficiencies cited: 1 Plan of Correction Due Date: May 12, 2023

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Luis OlivasAdministratorFacility administrator met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 142 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Feb 23, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted as a required 1 year annual inspection to evaluate the facility's compliance with health and safety regulations.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required safety equipment and supplies in place. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Report Facts
Resident files reviewed: 6 Staff files reviewed: 4 Water temperature: 115 Food supplies: 7 Food supplies: 2

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection
Kevin GouldLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 150 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jan 13, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 2023-01-06 regarding resident care issues at Oakmont of East Sacramento.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations including staff not meeting with the responsible party for a reappraisal meeting, staff not showering a resident, and staff not meeting a resident's dietary needs. The first two allegations were found to be unfounded, and the dietary needs allegation was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations that staff did not meet with the responsible party for a reappraisal meeting and that staff did not shower a resident were unfounded. The allegation that staff did not meet a resident's dietary needs was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 150

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation and exit interview
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 150 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jan 13, 2023

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to complaints received on 2023-01-06 regarding staff not meeting with responsible party for reappraisal meeting, not showering a resident, and not meeting a resident's dietary needs.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was based on three allegations: staff did not meet with responsible party for reappraisal meeting, staff do not shower resident, and staff do not meet resident's dietary needs. The first two allegations were found to be unfounded, and the third was unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found the allegations that staff did not meet with the responsible party for a reappraisal meeting and did not shower the resident to be unfounded. The allegation that staff did not meet the resident's dietary needs was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 150

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation and exit interview
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Dec 29, 2022

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation that facility staff did not provide adequate food service for residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged inadequate food service for residents. The investigation found no sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation, resulting in an unsubstantiated finding.
Findings
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the resident received insulin and meals at appropriate times and the facility provided three snacks throughout the day. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 151

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Dec 29, 2022

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to an allegation that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care.

Complaint Details
The complaint allegation was that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Findings
The investigation found that staff were never made aware of the resident having chest pain; chart notes indicated only shoulder pain treated with PRN medication. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation, so it was deemed unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 151

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation and exit interview
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Dec 29, 2022

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to a complaint alleging that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not seek medical attention for a resident in care. The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
Findings
The investigation found that staff were never made aware of the resident having chest pain, only shoulder pain was documented and treated. There was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation, so the complaint was unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 151

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Dec 29, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced visit conducted in response to a complaint alleging that facility staff did not provide adequate food service for residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged inadequate food service for residents. The investigation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.
Findings
The investigation found that Resident 1 received insulin four times daily and ate meals corresponding to those times, with three snacks provided throughout the day. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation, and the complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.

Report Facts
Insulin administration times: 4 Snacks provided: 3

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation and participated in exit interview.
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the unannounced complaint investigation visit.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Dec 9, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 2022-11-07 regarding resident safety, staffing adequacy, hazard accessibility, dietary needs, and staff behavior.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations including failure to prevent elopement of memory care residents, inadequate staffing, accessible hazards, unmet dietary needs, and inappropriate staff speech. The allegation of inappropriate speech by Staff 1 was substantiated; others were unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that most allegations were unsubstantiated, including concerns about elopement prevention, staffing adequacy, hazard accessibility, and dietary needs. However, the allegation that staff spoke inappropriately to residents was substantiated, with corrective actions initiated.

Deficiencies (1)
Licensee did not ensure residents were accorded dignity by Staff 1 (S1), posing a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 151 Deficiencies cited: 1 Plan of Correction Due Date: Dec 16, 2022

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet during inspection and involved in addressing findings
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Staff 1Named in substantiated finding for speaking inappropriately to residents

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 151 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 1 Date: Dec 9, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to multiple allegations received on 2022-11-07 regarding resident safety, staffing adequacy, hazard accessibility, dietary needs, and staff behavior.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations including staff not preventing elopement, inadequate staffing, accessible hazards, unmet dietary needs, and inappropriate staff speech. The allegation of inappropriate speech by Staff 1 was substantiated; others were unsubstantiated.
Findings
The investigation found that most allegations including elopement prevention, staffing adequacy, hazard accessibility, and dietary needs were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence. However, the allegation that staff spoke inappropriately to residents was substantiated, with documented evidence and management taking corrective action.

Deficiencies (1)
Licensee did not ensure residents were accorded dignity by Staff 1 (S1), who spoke inappropriately to residents, posing a potential health and safety risk.
Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 151 Plan of Correction Due Date: Dec 16, 2022

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet during inspection and involved in addressing findings
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystEvaluator who conducted the complaint investigation
Staff 1Named in substantiated finding for speaking inappropriately to residents

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Nov 29, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced complaint investigation visit conducted in response to allegations received on 2022-11-02 regarding a non-functioning call system and staff not following up with a resident's physician after emergency treatment.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was conducted for two allegations: 1) Facility has a non-functioning call system, and 2) Staff did not follow-up with resident’s physician following emergency treatment. Both allegations were found to be unfounded.
Findings
The investigation found that the call system was functioning properly with staff responding timely to calls, and staff were regularly checking on the resident despite the resident's request to reduce checks. The allegations were determined to be unfounded.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 146

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the investigation and participated in exit interview
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation visit
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report as Licensing Program Manager

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 146 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Nov 29, 2022

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted in response to allegations received on 2022-11-02 regarding a non-functioning call system and staff not following up with a resident's physician after emergency treatment.

Complaint Details
The complaint was investigated and found to be unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened, or lacked reasonable basis.
Findings
The investigation found that the call system was functioning properly with timely staff response, and staff were regularly checking on the resident despite the resident's expressed annoyance. The allegations were determined to be unfounded.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 146

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during the complaint investigation
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 140 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 26, 2022

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations that staff allowed residents to perform tasks such as giving medications, opening mail, bathing, catheter changes, and dressing other residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by multiple allegations regarding improper resident care activities being performed by other residents. The findings concluded the allegations were unfounded.
Findings
The investigation found all allegations to be unfounded, determining that the residents were either independent in these activities or the allegations were false and without reasonable basis.

Report Facts
Facility capacity: 214 Census: 140

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report header and signature section

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 140 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 26, 2022

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation visit was conducted in response to allegations that staff allowed residents to perform tasks such as giving medications, opening mail, bathing, catheter care, and dressing other residents.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by multiple allegations regarding improper resident care activities performed by other residents. The findings were determined to be unfounded, meaning the allegations were false or without reasonable basis.
Findings
The investigation found all allegations to be unfounded based on interviews and record reviews, determining that the alleged incidents did not occur and residents were independent in their care.

Report Facts
Capacity: 214 Census: 140

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Christopher Hopkins-ClarkeLicensing EvaluatorConducted the complaint investigation
Luis OlivasExecutive DirectorMet with evaluator during the investigation and exit interview

Inspection Report

Original Licensing
Census: 137 Capacity: 214 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Mar 29, 2022

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced Pre-Licensing inspection due to Change of Ownership.

Findings
The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required safety and health measures in place. No deficiencies were observed during the inspection.

Report Facts
Water temperature: 110 Water temperature: 107 Capacity: 214 Census: 137

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Michael ClymoAssistant Executive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and exit interview
Christopher HopkinsLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection
Czarrina A Camilon-LeeLicensing Program ManagerNamed in report header

Viewing

Loading inspection reports...