Inspection Reports for
Oakmont of Huntington Beach

The complaint included allegations that staff did not obtain permission to enter residents' rooms, did not ensure food quality, restricted residents' visitors, and touched a resident inappropriately during shower assistance. The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate these allegations; therefore, they were deemed unsubstantiated.

The investigation included resident file reviews, facility tours, and interviews. The allegations concerning staff not obtaining permission before entering residents' rooms, food quality issues, visitor restrictions, and inappropriate touching were all found to be unsubstantiated based on evidence and interviews.

The inspection found the facility to be in compliance with no deficiencies noted. The physical plant, infection control practices, medication administration records, emergency preparedness, and personnel files were all reviewed and found satisfactory.

The Licensing Program Analyst toured the facility, reviewed staff files, observed emergency supplies, recorded water temperatures, began resident interviews, and reviewed fire safety documentation. Due to time constraints, a follow-up visit is required to complete the full annual inspection.

The complaint investigation report was amended to change one allegation's finding from Unfounded to Substantiated, with one allegation remaining Unfounded.

The amended report updated one allegation from Unfounded to Substantiated, leaving only one allegation Unfounded. The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed the amendment with the facility Executive Director and conducted an exit interview.

The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that the facility was not providing special diet meals to diabetic residents, inadequate laundry services, failure to maintain infection control practices, improper storage of resident records, and lack of a certified administrator. All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated or unfounded.

All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated or unfounded after investigation. The facility was found to provide appropriate special diet meals, adequate laundry services, maintain infection control practices, and store resident records confidentially. The Executive Director was confirmed to have a valid RCFE Administrator certificate at the time of the visit.

The visit was related to a complaint investigation with Complaint Control #: 22-AS-20201109104853 at a different facility.

The Licensing Program Analyst met with the Executive Director and interviewed Staff #1. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued at the end of the visit.

The complaint alleged the facility failed to provide records to a family attorney. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The investigation found that the facility received a records request with a two-day due date, requested additional time, and sent the records on 6/28/22. The law firm could not confirm receipt due to the case being older. There was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation, so the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged insufficient staffing to meet resident needs. The investigation revealed an incident involving a resident fall and subsequent medical emergency. Staffing levels on the day of the incident and generally were reviewed, including caregiver and med tech counts. Resident interviews and staff reports were conflicting, leading to an unsubstantiated finding.

The investigation included interviews, observations, and documentation review. Conflicting information was found regarding staffing sufficiency, and resident interviews indicated most felt staff were available. The complaint allegation was found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint involved allegations that two caregivers spoke inappropriately to a resident and kissed the resident on the arms and top of the head. The resident has a primary diagnosis of dementia and exhibits confusion and disorientation. The facility reported the incident to Licensing, Ombudsman, PCP, and police. Police took a statement from the resident. The facility is following up with staff re-training.

The investigation included review of the resident's records and interviews with staff and the resident. The facility notified appropriate authorities including police and is conducting re-training of caregivers on personal rights and communication with dementia residents. The resident was observed to be neatly groomed and residing in the memory care unit.

The inspection found the facility to be well-maintained with adequate resident accommodations, safety measures, and infection control practices. No deficiencies were found during the visit.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or be valid, there was no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur.

The investigation found that the resident had multiple falls resulting in injuries, but the facility provided appropriate medical treatment, reported incidents to the family and medical professionals, and implemented increased monitoring and 1:1 care. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint involved allegations that a resident sustained a fracture and injury while in care. The investigation included interviews and medical record reviews. The resident was found on the floor with bruising and injuries, transported to hospital, and underwent surgery. Staff reported regular checks and no prior fall risk designation for the resident. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence of neglect or inadequate supervision.

The investigation found that a resident was discovered on the floor with injuries including a dislocated shoulder and fractured humerus. Despite the injuries, the evidence did not support neglect or lack of care and supervision. The allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The fire was contained by the alarm and sprinkler system with no smoke inhalation or resident property damage observed. The laundry room sustained water damage and is out of service. No deficiencies were noted during the visit per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations.

No deficiencies were found during the inspection. The facility was observed to be fully operational with adequate emergency supplies, safety equipment, and resident accommodations. The facility is ready to be licensed.