Inspection Reports for
Oceanside Senior Living

The complaint alleged that the licensee did not maintain the facility at a comfortable temperature. The allegation was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, and review of records. It was found that there was an AC system issue in late July 2025 causing some resident apartment temperatures to reach up to 82 degrees Fahrenheit. Portable AC units were offered but some residents claimed they were not offered cooling devices. The AC system issue was repaired within approximately two weeks. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated based on the evidence.

The complaint alleged that the licensee did not assist Resident 1 with transportation. The allegation was investigated through interviews, records review, and facility tour. It was found that transportation was provided as scheduled, and the resident attended outings except for one occasion due to vehicle capacity and safety concerns. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the facility provided transportation services on scheduled days and residents could sign up for outings. The alleged resident attended all outings except one, and the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The complaint was unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and records review related to the facility's temperature maintenance and AC system functionality.

The investigation found that while there was an issue with the facility's AC system in late July to September 2025, which took approximately two weeks to fix, the allegation was unsubstantiated as temperatures did not rise above 85 degrees and residents were offered portable AC units or fans.

The complaint alleged that the licensee did not assist Resident 1 with transportation. After interviews, records review, and observations, the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to sufficient transportation services and evidence that the resident attended most outings.

The investigation found that the facility provided transportation services regularly and the resident in question attended all outings except one. Due to vehicle repair and capacity issues, the resident was unable to attend one religious service, but overall the allegation was unsubstantiated.

During the visit, residents were observed, facility records reviewed, and the facility toured. Due to time constraints, the annual inspection could not be completed and a return visit is needed. No deficiencies were cited on this date.

No deficiencies were cited during this visit. Due to time constraints, the annual inspection could not be completed and a return visit is needed.

During the visit, residents were observed, facility records reviewed, and the facility toured. Due to time constraints, the annual inspection could not be completed and a return visit is needed. No deficiencies were cited on this date.

No deficiencies were cited during this visit. The annual inspection could not be completed due to time constraints, and a return visit is needed to complete the inspection.

During the visit, residents were observed and facility records reviewed. Due to time constraints, the annual inspection was not completed and a return visit is needed. No deficiencies were cited on the date of the visit.

The complaint alleged that staff did not allow Resident 1 to choose which activity to attend. Interviews and records indicated Resident 1 was forgetful and required reminders but was ultimately allowed to choose activities. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews, records review, and facility tour. Evidence showed that the resident was provided reminders and allowed to choose activities, and the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged the facility did not provide Resident 1 with a refund. The investigation included interviews and record reviews, concluding the allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the facility received two payments for the resident's basic service rate for May 2025 and applied the overpayment to future billing charges rather than issuing a refund check. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated as the resident's agreement allowed applying overpayments to future charges and no regulation required a refund check.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst observed residents and reviewed facility records, requesting a copy of the resident's death certificate for further investigation.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst provided consultation and guidance to the Executive Director.

During the visit, a health and safety check was conducted, residents were observed, and facility records were reviewed. No deficiencies were cited on the date of the visit.

The complaint involved allegations of a questionable death and failure to administer medications as prescribed. The investigation found these allegations unsubstantiated based on interviews, record reviews, and medical professional input.

The investigation included interviews, records review, and a facility tour. The evidence did not substantiate the allegations; the resident's death was due to cerebral atherosclerosis and heart failure, and no narcotic medications were administered by staff. Narcotic counts were consistent with no discrepancies found.

The facility was found to be clean, safe, and in good repair with no pathway obstructions. Resident and staff records were complete and up to date. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. Due to time constraints, the annual inspection could not be completed and a return visit is needed.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with regulations, with operational signal systems, sanitary and equipped resident rooms, proper food storage, and sufficient staffing. Some certificates such as current First Aid and CPR could not be produced at the time of visit.

The complaint alleged that staff did not administer medications as prescribed. The allegation was investigated and deemed unsubstantiated based on interviews and records review.

The investigation included interviews, records review, and facility tour. It was found that the allegation was unsubstantiated as the facility staff followed prescribing orders, made multiple attempts to obtain physician discontinuation orders, and explained residents' rights to refuse medications.

The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. Allegations included neglect causing malnourishment and pressure injuries, failure to assist with incontinence, failure to maintain odor-free environment, failure to clean resident rooms, carpet disrepair, and vermin presence. The investigation included record reviews, interviews, and facility visits, concluding insufficient evidence to support the allegations.

The investigation found that the resident (R1) was under hospice care addressing malnutrition and pressure injuries, with care provided by both hospice and facility staff. Observations and interviews revealed no evidence supporting neglect allegations related to incontinence care, odors, cleanliness, carpet condition, or vermin. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

No deficiencies were cited or observed during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst provided technical assistance and evaluated the facility's COVID-19 Mitigation Plan including disinfection, testing, vaccination, screening protocols, and PPE use.

No deficiencies were observed or cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst toured the facility, interviewed residents and staff, and reviewed facility documents.

The visit was related to an amended complaint investigation report (LIC 9099).

During the visit, the Licensing Program Analyst obtained the signature of the Resident Services Director on the amended complaint investigation report and provided a copy of the report and Licensee's Rights to the facility representative.

No deficiencies were observed during the inspection. The facility was found to be in compliance with infection control practices, including COVID-19 mitigation strategies such as symptom screening, visitor policies, PPE availability, and physical distancing.

During the visit, the Licensing Program Analyst toured the facility and interviewed the Administrator. No deficiencies were issued during this visit.

During the visit, the Licensing Program Analyst reviewed resident records, conducted interviews, and toured the facility. No deficiencies were issued during this visit.